On 15:29 Thu 10 Jul , Felix Miata wrote:
I saw what he wrote before I wrote. I don't understand his response either.
What is matter of comps?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CompsXml#Fonts
It originaly should mean
Nicolas brought up the point recently in a font package review that we
should standardize the naming of our fonts packages to improve
consistency. The proposal is to name all source packages in the form
*-fonts.
If we agree on this then I think the Fonts Packaging guidelines should
be
Le Jeu 10 juillet 2008 10:06, Jens Petersen a écrit :
Hi,
Nicolas brought up the point recently in a font package review that we
should standardize the naming of our fonts packages to improve
consistency. The proposal is to name all source packages in the form
*-fonts.
Actually I didn't
On 2008/07/10 14:05 (GMT+0200) Nicolas Mailhot apparently typed:
If I had to propose a convention today that would be
foundry-name-fonts (single package)
foundry-name-fonts-sub (subpackage)
Great way to annoy people who use GUI package managers. They generally when
attempting to search for
Le Jeu 10 juillet 2008 16:46, Felix Miata a écrit :
On 2008/07/10 14:05 (GMT+0200) Nicolas Mailhot apparently typed:
If I had to propose a convention today that would be
foundry-name-fonts (single package)
foundry-name-fonts-sub (subpackage)
Great way to annoy people who use GUI package
On 10:46 Thu 10 Jul , Felix Miata wrote:
Great way to annoy people who use GUI package managers. They generally when
attempting to search for possible fonts to install will get at least 20 times
as many packages not actually containing fonts as packages actually
containing fonts.
One
Le jeudi 10 juillet 2008 à 17:31 +0200, Michal Nowak a écrit :
Or issue:
yum groupinfo Fonts
Just a matter of comps if the category includes non-font stuff.
Unless I've made a mistake somewhere, our guidelines make very clear
both that fonts packages must be declared in comps and how to
On 14:15 Thu 10 Jul , Felix Miata wrote:
As to the current state of the GUI package manager in F9, I have no idea what
it looks like or can do, because starting KDE4 from KDM kills video or puts
display to sleep in both KDE and all ttys ever since last updates on my Intel
845G.
