On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 12:07:50 -0400
Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to use the FAS instance on publictest10, and it's
acting very strangely. Basically, after a restart, it goes like this:
o FAS works fine, both from the web UI and using the API for a few
Ok, I've got a git puppet mechanism up and working. Its in a very
simplistic form right now but works pretty well. I'll be sending a follow
up email with directions and will be updating all relevant documentation.
-Mike
___
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 14:24 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Ok, I've got a git puppet mechanism up and working. Its in a very
simplistic form right now but works pretty well. I'll be sending a follow
up email with directions and will be updating all relevant documentation.
-Mike
What
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I've got a git puppet mechanism up and working. Its in a very
simplistic form right now but works pretty well. I'll be sending a follow
up email with directions and will be updating all relevant documentation.
nice
Ricky set up a FAS instance on pt9 that seems to work fine so far, so
I'm done whining. :-)
Thanks!
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 05:46:07PM -0400, Robin Norwood wrote:
Ricky set up a FAS instance on pt9 that seems to work fine so far, so
I'm done whining. :-)
Hmmm, so what is the difference between the pt10 and pt9 deployments?
We've been testing the bleeding-edge python-fedora package on pt10, so
On 2008-07-08 08:48:57 PM, Luke Macken wrote:
Hmmm, so what is the difference between the pt10 and pt9 deployments?
We've been testing the bleeding-edge python-fedora package on pt10, so
if that is causing the issues we definitely need to track it down asap.
I manually updated python-fedora on
