I'd like to add the 'compress' term to logrotate for http logs on the app
servers. App2 is low on disk space right now and it would free up some
space.
-Mike
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 06:20:06PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
John Poelstra wrote:
Fedora 10 Beta Release Planning Meeting
2008-09-17
== Invitees ==
Jonathan Roberts -- Marketing
Karsten Wade -- Docs
Jesse Keating -- Rel Eng (present)
Paul Frields -- FPL (present)
Spot
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Mike McGrath wrote:
I'd like to add the 'compress' term to logrotate for http logs on the app
servers. App2 is low on disk space right now and it would free up some
space.
Two other things, I'd like to blow away a directory on app2:
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 18:20 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Wouldn't it be useful to invite more than person as part of the
different groups? Currently it seems a number of people have not
attended which leaves that group voice unheard.
These are supposed to be
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:36:56AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
I'd like to add the 'compress' term to logrotate for http logs on the app
servers. App2 is low on disk space right now and it would free up some
space.
+1
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 10:43 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Mike McGrath wrote:
I'd like to add the 'compress' term to logrotate for http logs on the app
servers. App2 is low on disk space right now and it would free up some
space.
+1 to compress (though it concerns
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 10:43 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Mike McGrath wrote:
I'd like to add the 'compress' term to logrotate for http logs on the app
servers. App2 is low on disk space right now and it would free up some
On 2008-09-19 10:43:04 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
I'd like to add the 'compress' term to logrotate for http logs on the app
servers. App2 is low on disk space right now and it would free up some
space.
+1
Two other things, I'd like to blow away a directory on app2:
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 09:07:16PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Wouldn't it be useful to invite more than person as part of the
different groups? Currently it seems a number of people have not
attended which leaves that group voice unheard.
I'm pretty sure the meeting was
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 12:53 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
I was wrong in thinking it was public. It was a phone call, not an IRC
meeting.
Just for more fun and confusion, a meeting doesn't have to be on IRC for
it to be public.
While this meeting wasn't announced on one of the major lists (for
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:13:32PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 09:07:16PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Wouldn't it be useful to invite more than person as part of the
different groups? Currently it seems a number of people have
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 12:15:46AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I have. My point still stands. If a new Fedora meeting is being held, it
should not planned and organized as a secret. It should be announced
So those Red Hat budget meetings that control the financial fate
Some of you have seen the disk alerts on app2, Looking more closely it
seems the host was not built with enough disk space (like was app1). So
after the freeze is over I'll rebuild it.
It does raise a point about storage for transifex though. Basically each
host running transifex (or damned
13 matches
Mail list logo
