On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:43:47PM -0600, Ian Weller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:22:03PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 17:13 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Hi Infrastructure team,
Not sure if this inquiry belongs here or on websites, but I'll start
here.
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 14:56 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
seth vidal wrote:
imo -1. Part of the benefit of the process being manual is that a little
sanity checking is applied.
Can that be automated?
Can't we automate manual checking? Do you understand that the word
'manual' is opposite
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 08:09 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Does the Fedora Hosted FAQ or instruction sheet have a link to the
location on the wiki describing how people can get by with fpeeps.o
until their Hosted project appears?
All the info about the things you can do on fedorapeople is
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 19:07 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Oh, come on. No need to play super smart. Isn't it obvious? I meant, can
the sanity checking be automated?
Part of the sanity checking is looking at what's requested itself.
If by 'it' you mean have a giant pile of unmaintained pkgs
seth vidal wrote:
Part of the sanity checking is looking at what's requested itself.
What do you look for?
And do you think the quality of the projects at fedorahosted is going
to get better or get worse if we make it happen automatically?
I think it will decline.
Perhaps it will but
We've got a cron job that creates the fedorahosted webpage. It produces
(on occasion) this output:
== START ==
.. done.
.. done.
== END OUTPUT =
I've been poking at it for a bit and I just don't know what is causing
that, so to the list I came.
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
We've got a cron job that creates the fedorahosted webpage. It produces
(on occasion) this output:
== START ==
.. done.
.. done.
== END OUTPUT =
I've been poking at it for a bit and I just don't know
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:23:00AM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 08:09 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Does the Fedora Hosted FAQ or instruction sheet have a link to the
location on the wiki describing how people can get by with fpeeps.o
until their Hosted project appears?
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Rahul Sundaram
sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
seth vidal wrote:
Part of the sanity checking is looking at what's requested itself.
What do you look for?
Things that would probably be looked for:
Easy to automatically sanity check
Fedora Sucks project
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 08:09 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Does the Fedora Hosted FAQ or instruction sheet have a link to the
location on the wiki describing how people can get by with fpeeps.o
until their Hosted project appears?
Are we then going to require new hostees to have access to
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Fedora Unity and Cooperation KDE- Gnome might raise some eyebrows but
would not be easy to auto-sanity-check.
/me raises one or two eyebrows...
I see we're being used as an example but I'm not sure I understand what
you're saying ;-)
Kind regards,
Jeroen van
On 2009-01-27 09:01:55 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
.. done.
.. done.
This is just a random guess, but the text reminds me of:
receiving file list ... done
from rsync. I wonder what could cause this to be printed if it were
rsync...
Thanks,
Ricky
pgpCrLFCKuIUu.pgp
Description: PGP
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 12:30 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 08:09 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Does the Fedora Hosted FAQ or instruction sheet have a link to the
location on the wiki describing how people can get by with fpeeps.o
until their Hosted project
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
seth vidal wrote:
imo -1. Part of the benefit of the process being manual is that a little
sanity checking is applied.
Can that be automated?
Making it instantaneous and automatic just makes it prone to abuse.
http://repo.or.cz/ seems to do it well. So do other
Hi,
2009/1/27 Ricky Zhou ri...@fedoraproject.org:
On 2009-01-27 09:01:55 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
.. done.
.. done.
This is just a random guess, but the text reminds me of:
receiving file list ... done
from rsync. I wonder what could cause this to be printed if it were
rsync...
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 02:19:05PM -0500, mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes, rsync always do that:
building file list ... done
...
receiving file list ... done
This makes me wonder if rsync is sending part of that message to stderr.
I tried to reproduce it but have been unable to. It just
If memory serves me, cron jobs do not get their own tty.
tty based file handels can get flaky in cron jobs.
I have run across situations in Solaris and AIX,
where the the last filehandle accessed --redirected to /dev/null or not-- by
a cron script is the one that gets the output.
I am not sure why
I can confirm that google-code is automated. I have one project hosted
there.
do you think a happy medium would work?
set it up for instant access to owner but review by Fedora
Infrastructure is required
before read only and/or read write repositories are opened?
Mike.
2009/1/27 Toshio
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Mike wrote:
I can confirm that google-code is automated. I have one project hosted there.
do you think a happy medium would work?
set it up for instant access to owner but review by Fedora Infrastructure
is required
before read only and/or read write repositories are
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 15:29 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Mike wrote:
I can confirm that google-code is automated. I have one project hosted
there.
do you think a happy medium would work?
set it up for instant access to owner but review by Fedora
Infrastructure
20 matches
Mail list logo