Re: /releases/10/Everything: several packages changed

2009-01-31 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 20:10 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: a current rsync shows that thousands of files have been changed in the last week. This is not expected as /releases/ is considered to only change for the release day and then never again. The files have a date of Jan 23rd. Although I

Re: /releases/10/Everything: several packages changed

2009-01-31 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 12:14 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: Hrm, there was no action on my part to touch everything, so I'll have to do some investigation into what's going on. Looking on the server, all the files in releases/10/Everything/i386/os/Packages/ have varying timestamps, but I do

Re: /releases/10/Everything: several packages changed

2009-01-31 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 12:21 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: I misread/misunderstood what --size-only option would do, in relation to --link-dest Actually it may have nothing to do with --size-only, that may have just been my clue that something was wrong. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a

Re: /releases/10/Everything: several packages changed

2009-01-31 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 12:21 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: This was certainly unexpected, and repairing this is going to be... interesting. Through some fun work with /sbin/hardlink I got a lot of the packages fixed up. There are some more that aren't quite right, due to the development tree

CSI (Security Policy) Help

2009-01-31 Thread Frank Chiulli
So I've implemented the CSI (Security Policy) as previously posted by Mike (http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/csi/security-policy/en-US/html-singel/) Now I'm seeing the following messages in /var/log/messages: Jan 31 19:09:21 localhost kernel: FW-REJECT IN=eth0 OUT=

Re: CSI (Security Policy) Help

2009-01-31 Thread Mike McGrath
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Frank Chiulli wrote: So I've implemented the CSI (Security Policy) as previously posted by Mike (http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/csi/security-policy/en-US/html-singel/) Now I'm seeing the following messages in /var/log/messages: Jan 31 19:09:21 localhost kernel:

Re: CSI (Security Policy) Help

2009-01-31 Thread seth vidal
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 21:30 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Frank Chiulli wrote: So I've implemented the CSI (Security Policy) as previously posted by Mike (http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/csi/security-policy/en-US/html-singel/) Now I'm seeing the following

Re: CSI (Security Policy) Help

2009-01-31 Thread Frank Chiulli
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:59 PM, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 21:30 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Frank Chiulli wrote: So I've implemented the CSI (Security Policy) as previously posted by Mike

Change request

2009-01-31 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen
Hey, I'd like the following patch to be applied. It fixes the redirects for RPM-GPG-KEY files for secondary arches not to be redirected to /pub/fedora-secondary/, so that Jigdo's can find the files. Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -kanarip commit b240e804a23e4171d21de19f0de0ec4b34586654