On 07/15/2009 05:00 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-07-15 01:41:52 AM, Davi Vercillo C. Garcia wrote:
I would like to help Fedora community grow and keep moving... (Johnny
Walker ? =P)
As you've seen already, we mostly hang out in #fedora-admin. We also
have weekly meetings on Thursdays at
Hi Toshio,
Individual app authors also hang out on IRC. So if you introduce
yourself, we can point you at individual apps that need work as well!
Yesterday I was there, talking with ricky about what I can do to help
fedora-infraestructure's team. I was working with ticket system,
looking for
20:00 mmcgrath #startmeeting
20:00 zodbot Meeting started Thu Jul 16 20:00:11 2009 UTC. The chair is
mmcgrath. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
20:00 zodbot Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
20:00 ricky (switch it)
20:00 mmcgrath
This is a new upstream snapshot that fixes some of the ongoing issues
we've had with the git plugin. Some were already patched from a
different upstream, but I've had to throw those changes out in favor of
the actual upstream changes. I tested it a bit on hosted2 and couldn't
find any problems,
Alright! So the last two weeks there wasn't much comment on:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1524
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Licensing
but I think people were either sleeping or didn't entirely understand
what the AGPL's requirements mean for us as
On 07/16/2009 04:10 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 15:57 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
* admin.stg.fedoraproject.org is accessible by the general public but it
isn't meant for the general public's use -- it's for developers to
collaborate on what will be on the production
ricky and I were considering adding patch to global.pp and dennis
brought up that it might be a command used to do malicious stuff. So
what do you guys think?
Pros:
patch makes some things much easier to do. Want to cherrypick a change
as a hotfix? Many times patch is needed to apply the diff.
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 19:59 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
What's the consensus here?
If we install patch, will git come next, since people will want to git
am stuff? Not that I'm against having patch, it would make things
easier.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
ricky and I were considering adding patch to global.pp and dennis
brought up that it might be a command used to do malicious stuff. So
what do you guys think?
Pros:
patch makes some things much easier to do. Want to cherrypick a change
as a
On 07/16/2009 08:50 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 19:59 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
What's the consensus here?
If we install patch, will git come next, since people will want to git
am stuff? Not that I'm against having patch, it would make things
easier.
Well I won't
On 07/16/2009 08:59 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
+0 no opinion if it would be of some use. I've generally scp'd files
where needed and copied from there. Same number of commands and files
copied as if you were to patch
scp blah.py app1: ; ssh app1 ; sudo cp blah.py /usr/blah
scp blah.patch
11 matches
Mail list logo
