On 01/06/2010 05:35 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
So F13 is underway, we should get our list of F13 goals together. So what
would you like to see (and will be working on) for F13?
For example, I know Jon and Dennis are working on the mail man migration.
The major features include:
1)
On 01/06/2010 05:48 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 01/06/2010 05:35 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
So F13 is underway, we should get our list of F13 goals together. So what
would you like to see (and will be working on) for F13?
For example, I know Jon
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 11:09:56 -0600 (CST), Mike McGrath
mmcgr...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
I'm interested in working on it with you -from the composing side as
well. I'm assuming I'm gonna need to read up a lot, is there a Fedora
reference page somewhere
On 01/07/2010 12:34 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
And it was fairly easy ;-) For those interested:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553055
$ curl -I http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/gpxe.spec
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:33:18 GMT
, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen
kana...@kanarip.comwrote:
On 12/14/2009 10:46 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 12/14/2009 09:36 PM, Frederic Hornain wrote:
Dear *,
Would someone be interested to make a talk on Fedora Community
infrastructure at FOSDEM'10 - Belgium
On 12/14/2009 10:27 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
So I woke up today and we're still having dns issues on at least one of my
hosts.
Could everyone that has access please do a dig fedoraproject.org on all
their hosts and tell me if any of them cannot resolve?
I'm fine from 7 different locations in
On 12/14/2009 09:36 PM, Frederic Hornain wrote:
Dear *,
Would someone be interested to make a talk on Fedora Community
infrastructure at FOSDEM'10 - Belgium -?
* FedoraCommunity, opensourced LaunchPad, Bugzilla extensions, etc...
BTW, as the rule have changed at FOSDEM, you will do your
On 12/14/2009 10:46 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 12/14/2009 09:36 PM, Frederic Hornain wrote:
Dear *,
Would someone be interested to make a talk on Fedora Community
infrastructure at FOSDEM'10 - Belgium -?
* FedoraCommunity, opensourced LaunchPad, Bugzilla extensions, etc...
BTW
On 11/24/2009 05:25 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 10:33 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
(I really don't want to maintain the mingw32-sha256sum package for
Fedora, as it's just a quick and dirty hack to built a small subset of
of coreutils for Windows.)
Thoughts?
Well, if you
On 11/23/2009 06:12 AM, Jon Stanley wrote:
In an effort to work on the cvs side of
https://fedorahosted.org/packagedb/ticket/165 I'd like to have an
offsite copy of cvs1:/cvs/pkgs to test on. Being that this is in
violation of our security policy
On 11/23/2009 05:18 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 11/23/2009 06:12 AM, Jon Stanley wrote:
In an effort to work on the cvs side of
https://fedorahosted.org/packagedb/ticket/165 I'd like to have an
offsite copy of cvs1:/cvs/pkgs to test on. Being that this is in
violation of our security
On 11/23/2009 06:27 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 11/23/2009 05:18 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Just curious, what part of the policy does a local copy from a public
rsync location conflict with?
Having pressed Ctrl+Enter before I was done
On 10/25/2009 11:51 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
With all my babbling I forgot to mention we do already run python daemons
in Fedora Infrastructure. Func is one, TurboGears (though it's wrapped in
mod_wsgi) and one that we wrote ourselves[1] is our mirrorlist server.
It's the backend that powers:
On 10/26/2009 12:37 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 10/25/2009 11:51 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
With all my babbling I forgot to mention we do already run python daemons
in Fedora Infrastructure. Func is one, TurboGears (though it's wrapped in
mod_wsgi
On 05/26/2009 05:44 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 15:50:49 Seth Vidal wrote:
I was changing some settings with my mobile phone company and in order to
change my password they made me use what looks a lot like 2 factor auth:
something I know: my current password
something I have:
that have been removed from the mirror because for example they've
expired and have been superseeded by another update to said package).
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
jigdofy_everything.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
___
Fedora
seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 15:49 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Well, a URL that was:
/git/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=252c7c1bf9779dbdba94abe47350c866ba8ca421
is now (in the test instance):
/cgit/initscripts.git/commit/?id=252c7c1bf9779dbdba94abe47350c866ba8ca421
We may
for appointments I found it to be useless.
Nonetheless, it could be worthwhile for allocating Test days and
Events -and things of the sort.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list
Clint Savage wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, guys. Uh, quick intro for those who see the redhat.com and wonder
who I am - I'm Adam Williamson. I'm new in the Fedora QA department here
at RH, my job is to drive
from my side.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Hey,
I'd like the following patch to be applied. It fixes the redirects for
RPM-GPG-KEY files for secondary arches not to be redirected to
/pub/fedora-secondary/, so that Jigdo's can find the files.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
commit b240e804a23e4171d21de19f0de0ec4b34586654
Teb (Zikula NL) wrote:
Hi all,
I have just subscribed to both the fedora-infrastructure-list and the
fedora-docs-list to keep you (and myself) updated about the
documentation project.
Hello Arjen,
good to hear we have another Dutchman on board ;-) Welkom!
Kind regards,
Jeroen van
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Fedora Unity and Cooperation KDE- Gnome might raise some eyebrows but
would not be easy to auto-sanity-check.
/me raises one or two eyebrows...
I see we're being used as an example but I'm not sure I understand what
you're saying ;-)
Kind regards,
Jeroen van
to exist.
If you are going to change anything, maybe consider using [files] vs.
/path/to/files/ since that name for the mount appears to be most
commonly used.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora
Mike McGrath wrote:
I'd like to implement the following global fix (its generating cron spam)
in /etc/logrotate.d/func_rotate I'd like to change line 8 from
/etc/init.d/funcd condrestart
to
/etc/init.d/funcd condrestart /dev/null
Can I get 2 +1's?
Sounds reasonable to me, +1.
-Jeroen
Jon Stanley wrote:
I'll throw a -1 in here (not that my vote matters for anything :) ).
Not because of any risk in the change, but rather it violates the
concept of a change freeze. It doesn't affect service, so if I went to
our change management meeting at work with something like this during
a
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Nigel Jones wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 01:59 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Nigel Jones wrote:
IIRC the GPL at least requires that the code be kept for 3 years (hence
why we can't clean the look-a-side cache from memory).
AFAIK that only goes to /distribution
Mike McGrath wrote:
Getting back to this. What should we do with code to which no one claims
ownership or the owner cannot be found?
Has something like an AWOL procedure been considered?
-Jeroen
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Nigel Jones wrote:
IIRC the GPL at least requires that the code be kept for 3 years (hence
why we can't clean the look-a-side cache from memory).
AFAIK that only goes to /distribution/ under GPLv2 section 3b, not the
upstream SCM, but then again I'm not sure and it may be worthwhile
looking
Mike McGrath wrote:
For how long? Here's the concern. At some point between now and the end
of time decisions are going to have to be made about these projects. I'm
trying to have us learn a lesson from the elvis move as well trying to
make sure other's lack of planning doesn't become
points
to os/ where it would need os.oldkey/ to get the packages it can check
gpg keys on.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 02:32 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
I'm not sure how that solves the net install use case, especially if
mirrormanager is going to redirect to os.newkey/, as signatures used on
os.newkey/ packages will not meet what the installer expects
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:54:40PM +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
W/o knowing all details, why not move os to os.oldkey and use os as
the new key's content? If the key is considered compromised what
mirror admin would like to keep the old signed packages
and corresponding consequential response paradigm to the ones that know
best what happened and are actually in a position to decide whether or
not to revoke keys and nuke content or to make it an easy transition now
just to be safe rather then sorry.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
?
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
the entire release tree is a PITA (jigdo,
iso, torrent, foo) even though updates would not be included other then
maybe the updated fedora-release package (with the new rpm-gpg-keys and
new repo configuration files)?
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 01:51 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
If 9/ is excluded, wouldn't that mean 9/$releasever/*/os.newkey is also
excluded? If it's not, then I guess there's no point in the new
directory being created either.
Yes, if 9 is excluded (or included
/ content into the modules for as far as these are related
to the modules (e.g. templates, new files, but not simple files).
- Changes go into the development branch first, then are pulled into /
pushed to production.
Any other thoughts?
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
Mike McGrath wrote:
Should the first serial number for a day be 00 or 01? EX:
2008081001 or 2008081000
Common practice is 01, along with (usually) appending your (account)
name to the '; serial (mmcgrath)' in case you want other people with the
same amount of control over the zone to be
regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
become a regular thing to do on all repos?
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Mike McGrath wrote:
Trying to prevent stuff like this:
XXX pts/7XXX 06Jul08 10:11 0.06s 0.10s sshd: XXX [priv]
^^^ holy moly :)
holy alright
-Jeroen
___
interprets email addresses (AFAIK without a some hackery
postfix can't treat @lists.domain differently from @domain).
Has anyone checked the masquerade domains and masquerade domains
except settings or their postfix equivalents?
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
ships (in files and manifests).
I'd like to work on the puppet configuration for Fedora Project as well
(but you know that), as soon as I get back from my holiday.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
For your consideration.
FWIW, I have the same; while showing someone how easy it was to
register, I created kanarip2, not realizing that there was no delete
or expire account button anywhere.
It would be nice to have some procedure to go about deleting these
all this... I like awstats and all but I was wondering
what other _OSS_ solutions people are using where they are? Just seems
like awstats has... kind of been the same for years...
I've been using webalizer for as long as I can remember... Impressive
huh? ;-)
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
?
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
=1)
Does that sound like a good idea?
Just my brain dump ;p
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Maybe because Fedora is also a moving target.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
Itamar - IspBrasil wrote:
why these machines can't run fedora 8 ?
fedora 8 have new xen version, and new xen kernels.
Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Mike McGrath wrote:
FYI all we're
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:41:24 +0100
Jeroen van Meeuwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We on the other hand have hundreds -if not thousands- of users
download the CD version of Fedora 7 and Fedora 8 while supposedly
they are in possession of the DVD images already.
What makes
Michael DeHaan wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
and we were going to
judge jigdo a success if a certain % (compared to bittorrent) use
jigdo. What % would that be?
Jigdo would in this case be particularly useful to those with a
local mirror as they have 99
to know Jigdo that way will be
using it again for our respins, and if possible, again for other spins
(non-Everything?), and again, and again.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list
Till Maas wrote:
On Do Dezember 6 2007, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
The current updates system is getting better each release, but I think
we should adjust our policies to also have an “updates-archive�
repository. This repository will include all signed updates that had
once lived in the
been
reported by 'blarney' to have the same error.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:12:24 +0100
Jeroen van Meeuwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy had been
reported by 'blarney' to have the same error.
Which I fixed at the same time, as you would know if you actually
checked
I had to move
around directories because some mirror I was syncing from did not use
the exact same full tree the master mirror was; if it is still current,
could that be flagged and filtered on-request by mirror-manager?
Thanks,
Matt
Thank you!
--
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
at 20:00 UTC unless people
can't make that time.
Aug 27th at 20:00 UTC works well for me as well.
+1
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
- -kanarip
- --
http://www.kanarip.com/
RHCE, LPIC-2, MCP, CCNA
C6B0 7FB4 43E6 CDDA D258 F70B 28DE 9FDA 9342 BF08
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
in this aspect was the right way to go.
AFAIK, no. Who's the Jidgo integration project lead?
-Mike
There's a bugzilla ticket assigned to Jesse:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245601
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
Dimitris Glezos wrote:
O/H Karsten Wade έγραψε:
On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 00:55 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
This is my worry too. It's almost enough to make me not want to do it
for non Fedora projects but thats just bad. I'm hoping someone here has
a good, clever way
) would
make just as much sense to me as allowing empty passwords to use these
keys, but at least you prevent the webinterface from ever reaching those
keys or files.
I bet there's some thoughts on this ;-)
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
Jeff Sheltren wrote:
On Jul 3, 2007, at 6:33 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
If you start with having tickets assigned to certain milestones, and
then add a milestone to move some tickets to, or remove a milestone
(long story short: IMACD milestones), there's no easy way of moving
tickets
we didn't
And indeed it does show up 404's from where I'm sitting, too.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
to match the
packaging guidelines and pass review, right?
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
domain.
eGroupware and joomla have not been packaged for Fedora, have they?
Just my € 0,02
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman
for Fedora. What components make up our complete account system, I don't
know.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
be blocked now.
So let me get this straight. We (kinda upstream) should have users log
bugs in bugzilla, although we are using the hosted.fp.org ticketing
system for the work we do? How do we get bugzilla tickets into Trac?
Manually?
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
, and prevent sending the message
more then once.
And yes, modifying the Reply-to: header is a mailman option, and applies
to every message sent to the m-l.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
- -kanarip
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 01:58:48PM -0400, Wilmer Jaramillo M. wrote:
Hi, I
68 matches
Mail list logo
