On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:55:35AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 10:02 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
on the
netapp.
Er, this is on nfs1 right, not the netapp?
My
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:55:35AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 10:02 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
on the
netapp.
Er, this is on nfs1 right, not the netapp?
My mistake, correct. All this is on nfs1 which has directly
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, Mike McGrath wrote:
Lets pool some knowledge together because at this point, I'm missing
something.
I've been doing all measurements with sar as bonnie, etc, causes builds to
timeout.
Problem: We're seeing slower then normal disk IO. At least I think we
are. This is
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
The big changers? 1) Better use of the share in our scripts. 2) A larger
readahead value (blockdev)
I forgot one more big change, kojipkgs (the web server our builders use to
get the packages off the nfs share) now has a squid server on it. Instead
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 10:02 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
on the
netapp.
Er, this is on nfs1 right, not the netapp?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 10:02 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
on the
netapp.
Er, this is on nfs1 right, not the netapp?
My mistake, correct. All this is on nfs1 which has directly attached
storage.
-Mike
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 03:02:55AM +, Kostas Georgiou wrote:
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 06:32:38PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
What ext3 journaling options are enabled (e.g. what does 'mount' say)?
If it's data=ordered (the default), that's OK. If
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 02:42:27PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
Lets pool some knowledge together because at this point, I'm missing
something.
I've been doing all measurements with sar as bonnie, etc, causes builds to
timeout.
Problem: We're seeing slower then normal disk IO. At least I
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 06:32:38PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
What ext3 journaling options are enabled (e.g. what does 'mount' say)?
If it's data=ordered (the default), that's OK. If it's data=journal,
then all the data gets written twice (first to the journal, then the
journal to the disk),
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 03:02:55AM +, Kostas Georgiou wrote:
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 06:32:38PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
What ext3 journaling options are enabled (e.g. what does 'mount' say)?
If it's data=ordered (the default), that's OK. If it's data=journal,
then all the data gets
Hello again,
this line looks suspicious to me:
# nameactive_objs num_objs objsize objperslab
pagesperslab : tunables limit batchcount sharedfactor :
slabdata active_slabs num_slabs sharedavail
ext3_inode_cache 98472 15026076051 : tunables 54 27
8 : slabdata 30052
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:38:43 +0100, Sascha wrote:
The Filesystem is btw. marked as needs_recovery.
Which can be harmless, because it is a feature flag that is also
set if dumpe2fs is run on a mounted fs. It means that there are blocks
that still need to be committed, which is pretty normal for a
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 11:57 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Sascha Thomas Spreitzer wrote:
Hello again,
this line looks suspicious to me:
# nameactive_objs num_objs objsize objperslab
pagesperslab : tunables limit batchcount sharedfactor :
slabdata
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, James Antill wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 11:57 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Sascha Thomas Spreitzer wrote:
Hello again,
this line looks suspicious to me:
# nameactive_objs num_objs objsize objperslab
pagesperslab : tunables
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Sascha Thomas Spreitzer wrote:
Hello again,
this line looks suspicious to me:
# nameactive_objs num_objs objsize objperslab
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Sascha Thomas Spreitzer wrote:
Hello again,
this line looks suspicious
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 01:28:43PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, James Antill wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 11:57 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Sascha Thomas Spreitzer wrote:
Hello again,
this line looks suspicious to me:
# name
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 13:28 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
There are other directories at /mnt/koji/static-repos/. A directory like
static-repos contains almost exclusively hardlinks to those packages.
Since many of those hardlink oriented directories can be recreated, we
don't bother backing
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 01:17:38AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, James Antill wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 14:42 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
Lets pool some knowledge together because at this point, I'm missing
something.
I've been doing all measurements with sar
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, Kostas Georgiou wrote:
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 01:17:38AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, James Antill wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 14:42 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
Lets pool some knowledge together because at this point, I'm missing
something.
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, James Antill wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 14:42 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
Lets pool some knowledge together because at this point, I'm missing
something.
I've been doing all measurements with
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, Sascha Thomas Spreitzer wrote:
Hello Mike,
maybe the RAID mirror failed and is auto healing in background. Is
there a way to determine the RAID state?
It dawns on me I never answered these questions. The raid array is fine,
its got 14 drives in a raid5 configuration and
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Kostas Georgiou
k.georg...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
Can you run blktrace+seekwatcher (both in EPEL) to get an idea on
what is going on? An iostat -x -k /dev/sde 1 output will also be
helpfull.
Here's a slabinfo that someone else requested and the iostat. I don't
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, Kostas Georgiou wrote:
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 01:17:38AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, James Antill wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 14:42 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
Lets pool some knowledge together because at this point, I'm missing
something.
Lets pool some knowledge together because at this point, I'm missing
something.
I've been doing all measurements with sar as bonnie, etc, causes builds to
timeout.
Problem: We're seeing slower then normal disk IO. At least I think we
are. This is a PERC5/E and MD1000 array.
When I try to do a
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Lets pool some knowledge together because at this point, I'm missing
something.
I've been doing all measurements with sar as bonnie, etc, causes builds to
timeout.
Problem: We're seeing slower then normal disk IO. At
On 2008-12-31 10:49:56 PM, Xavier Lamien wrote:
Could you perform an hdparm -tT on that disk ?
/dev/sde:
Timing cached reads: 2668 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1336.06 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 1024 MB in 3.01 seconds = 340.69 MB/sec
Also, output an strace against your cat dd commands.
Mike McGrath wrote:
Lets pool some knowledge together because at this point, I'm missing
something.
I've been doing all measurements with sar as bonnie, etc, causes builds to
timeout.
Problem: We're seeing slower then normal disk IO. At least I think we
are. This is a PERC5/E and MD1000
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2008-12-31 10:49:56 PM, Xavier Lamien wrote:
Could you perform an hdparm -tT on that disk ?
/dev/sde:
Timing cached reads: 2668 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1336.06 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 1024 MB in 3.01 seconds = 340.69 MB/sec
Also,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Lets pool some knowledge together because at this point, I'm missing
something.
I've been doing all measurements with sar as bonnie, etc, causes builds to
timeout.
Problem: We're seeing slower then normal disk IO. At
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, Corey Chandler wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
Lets pool some knowledge together because at this point, I'm missing
something.
I've been doing all measurements with sar as bonnie, etc, causes builds to
timeout.
Problem: We're seeing slower then normal disk IO. At
If its related to the FS driver ( inode table or algorithms ) the
program slabtop might give an indication of the kernel processes
eating system performance.
Slabtop is in the ps-tools suite, should be on any major linux distribution.
2009/1/1 Greg Swift gregsw...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, Sascha Thomas Spreitzer wrote:
If its related to the FS driver ( inode table or algorithms ) the
program slabtop might give an indication of the kernel processes
eating system performance.
Slabtop is in the ps-tools suite, should be on any major linux distribution.
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, Greg Swift wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 17:35, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, Corey Chandler wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
Lets pool some knowledge together because at this point, I'm missing
something.
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, Mike McGrath wrote:
Lets pool some knowledge together because at this point, I'm missing
something.
I've been doing all measurements with sar as bonnie, etc, causes builds to
timeout.
Problem: We're seeing slower then normal disk IO. At least I think we
are. This is
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 14:42 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
Lets pool some knowledge together because at this point, I'm missing
something.
I've been doing all measurements with sar as bonnie, etc, causes builds to
timeout.
Problem: We're seeing slower then normal disk IO. At least I think we
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, James Antill wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 14:42 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
Lets pool some knowledge together because at this point, I'm missing
something.
I've been doing all measurements with sar as bonnie, etc, causes builds to
timeout.
Problem: We're seeing
37 matches
Mail list logo
