Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 06:20:06PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
John Poelstra wrote:
Fedora 10 Beta Release Planning Meeting
2008-09-17
== Invitees ==
Jonathan Roberts -- Marketing
Karsten Wade -- Docs
Jesse Keating -- Rel Eng (present)
Paul Frields -- FPL (present)
Spot
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 18:20 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Wouldn't it be useful to invite more than person as part of the
different groups? Currently it seems a number of people have not
attended which leaves that group voice unheard.
These are supposed to be
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 09:07:16PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Wouldn't it be useful to invite more than person as part of the
different groups? Currently it seems a number of people have not
attended which leaves that group voice unheard.
I'm pretty sure the meeting was
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 12:53 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
I was wrong in thinking it was public. It was a phone call, not an IRC
meeting.
Just for more fun and confusion, a meeting doesn't have to be on IRC for
it to be public.
While this meeting wasn't announced on one of the major lists (for
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:13:32PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 09:07:16PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Wouldn't it be useful to invite more than person as part of the
different groups? Currently it seems a number of people have
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 12:15:46AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I have. My point still stands. If a new Fedora meeting is being held, it
should not planned and organized as a secret. It should be announced
So those Red Hat budget meetings that control the financial fate
John Poelstra wrote:
Fedora 10 Beta Release Planning Meeting
2008-09-17
== Invitees ==
Jonathan Roberts -- Marketing
Karsten Wade -- Docs
Jesse Keating -- Rel Eng (present)
Paul Frields -- FPL (present)
Spot Callaway -- FEM (present)
John Poelstra -- Organizer (present)
Mike McGrath
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 18:20 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Wouldn't it be useful to invite more than person as part of the
different groups? Currently it seems a number of people have not
attended which leaves that group voice unheard.
These are supposed to be representatives from the
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 18:20 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Wouldn't it be useful to invite more than person as part of the
different groups? Currently it seems a number of people have not
attended which leaves that group voice unheard.
These are supposed to be representatives from the various
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 18:20 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Wouldn't it be useful to invite more than person as part of the
different groups? Currently it seems a number of people have not
attended which leaves that group voice unheard.
These are
10 matches
Mail list logo
