Hi all,
AFAIK ubuntu includes a patch to allow dynamic loading of alternate AML code
dumps, to work around bios ACPI bugs. I know BIOS's and the kernel ACPI code
are getting betterm but for some laptops this is needed, any chance this could
be included into the Fedora kernel?
Also any
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:37:13PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:29:21 -0400, Prarit Bhargava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+++ kernel-2.6.spec 2007-03-29 06:04:16.0 -0400
@@ -1219,7 +1219,7 @@
# unpack sparse.
if [ !
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:41:45PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
I was thinking about adding something like this to the .spec file
at the beginning:
%define allowup 1
%define allowsmp 1
%define allowpae 1
%define allowxen 1
%define allowdoc 1
%define allowdump 1
%define
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Eric Paris wrote:
Right before FC6 we turned off CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM since there
was a lot of development still going on in that areas especially
concerning secid reconciliation between that and secmark. The
reconciliation work was killed upstream and XFRM
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 13:46 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:37:13PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:29:21 -0400, Prarit Bhargava [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
+++ kernel-2.6.spec 2007-03-29
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:06:58PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:41:45PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
I was thinking about adding something like this to the .spec file
at the beginning:
%define allowup 1
%define allowsmp 1
Dave Jones schrieb:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 07:53:00PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi all,
AFAIK ubuntu includes a patch to allow dynamic loading of alternate AML code
dumps, to work around bios ACPI bugs. I know BIOS's and the kernel ACPI code
are getting betterm but for some
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:52:02 -0400, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zaitcev had something that tracked the Fedora tree, but I never
found time to look at what he did.
You mean this?
http://git.fedoraproject.org/?p=kernel/zaitcev/linux-2.6-volk.git;a=summary
I still have it, but the
Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:06:58PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:41:45PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
I was thinking about adding something like this to the .spec file
at the beginning:
%define allowup 1
Jarod Wilson wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:06:58PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:41:45PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
I was thinking about adding something like this to the .spec file
at the beginning:
Apparently the qlogic drivers don't have any firmware included in FC7,
so nobody can actually use a qlogic adapter. Should we be patching the
kernel like in FC6 or do we need a separate package? Or maybe the
firmware goes in the kernel package?
Peter says the support for Anaconda / mkinitrd to
Clinton Lee Taylor wrote:
Greetings ...
I for one would like to vote for rpms of vanilla kernel build!
I have an Adaptec ASR-3410S, which is an i2o device, but since
2.6.18-1.2869.fc6, I can't use it and the i2o maintaner suggests I try a
vanilla kernel build to see if it's an FC kernel
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:24:44PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
I'd love to have a tool which would slurp bugdata out of our bz and
allow me to edit it if necessary, and then push a submit upstream button.
dkl is long on notice of how snazzy this would be, for sourceware bugzilla,
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Jarod Wilson wrote:
The minimalist approach that comes to mind is to make all the %define
build* bits all set to 1/enabled by default, and only flip them to
disabled where appropriate, so they'd be equivalent to your allow* idea,
in that if you disable them at the top of
14 matches
Mail list logo
