Re: 2.6.24

2008-02-10 Thread drago01
Jarod Wilson wrote: On Saturday 26 January 2008 05:19:14 am Roland McGrath wrote: Is F-[78] going to stay on 2.6.23 for a while, or switch to 2.6.24 fairly soon? Chuck was talking about branching in cvs to start doing 2.6.24 builds for at least F8 as soon as possible for people to

Linux Kernel Multiple Prior to 2.6.24.1 Multiple Memory Access Vulnerabilities

2008-02-10 Thread Pavel Šefránek
Hi! Description: The Linux kernel is prone to multiple memory access vulnerabilities, including: - A vulnerability that allows unauthorized users to read arbitrary memory locations. - A vulnerability that allows unauthorized users

Re: Fedora kernel build failure: *** ERROR: same build ID in nonidentical files!

2008-02-10 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 20:14:39 -0600 Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe the compiler is adding some new section type that eu-elfcmp doesn't know it should be ignoring? (If either cmp or eu-elfcmp say the files are identical the script treats them as such. And stripped and unstripped

execshield inspection needed

2008-02-10 Thread Kyle McMartin
x86-merge has kind of thrown a spanner in the execshield patchset. I've merged it up so it looks like it works, but I'd like to get some input from others to make sure I didn't brown-paper-bag it. The randomization bits seem to have been merged upstream, but I deferred to the execshield