Re: crash with iwl3945/iwlagn; fix is in 2.6.28, can it be provided to 2.6.27?

2009-01-28 Thread Bill Nottingham
Pete Zaitcev (zait...@redhat.com) said: Intel has produced a patch, and John Linville has applied this to the 2.6.28 kernel (available from koji), but it now sounds like 2.6.28 might not make it out soon, or ever. Can this fix be applied to the 2.6.27 branch? Maybe the -stable team will

Re: crash with iwl3945/iwlagn; fix is in 2.6.28, can it be provided to 2.6.27?

2009-01-28 Thread John W. Linville
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:20:03AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: Pete Zaitcev (zait...@redhat.com) said: Intel has produced a patch, and John Linville has applied this to the 2.6.28 kernel (available from koji), but it now sounds like 2.6.28 might not make it out soon, or ever. Can

Re: Package: kernel-2.6.29-0.59.rc2.git3.fc11 Tag: dist-f11 Status: failed Built by: markmc

2009-01-28 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 09:31:47AM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hey, I enabled CONFIG_PCI_STUB (#482792), but the build failed on ppc: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c: In function 'nouveau_load': drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c:487: error: implicit declaration of function

Re: crash with iwl3945/iwlagn; fix is in 2.6.28, can it be provided to 2.6.27?

2009-01-28 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:30:27AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote: On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:20:03AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: Pete Zaitcev (zait...@redhat.com) said: Intel has produced a patch, and John Linville has applied this to the 2.6.28 kernel (available from koji), but

Re: crash with iwl3945/iwlagn; fix is in 2.6.28, can it be provided to 2.6.27?

2009-01-28 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:53:12PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote: I started this last night, so I could submit it to stable... Forgot to mention this here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1089515 ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list

Re: crash with iwl3945/iwlagn; fix is in 2.6.28, can it be provided to 2.6.27?

2009-01-28 Thread Tom Davidson
Alas, Kyle's patched kernel does not fix the problem--I continue to get oopses and hard panics. Also, the problem is fixed by an unpatched build of 2.6.28 (2.6.28-3.fc10.i686). A closer read of the comments at the original bug reveals that no one was actually testing just the patch. So while this