On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 11:23 +0100, drago01 wrote:
Yeah, you need a new enough hal aparently, which I guess f8 didn't have.
F9 should be safe to be using just the sysfs stuff.
I have not tested rawhide on a laptop yet, but it seems that rawhide
still uses hal-0.5.10 (which is also the
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 14:08 -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
Can you show me more of the log?
The log is more sgrubb.
I think selinux-policy is busted at the moment. depmod and mkinitrd are
having trouble in enforcing...
rpm -e kernel-2.6.24-133-blah-blah
setenforce 0
yum update kernel
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 14:09 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 14:08 -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
Can you show me more of the log?
The log is more sgrubb.
Eh.. From.. the log is from sgrubb. That's what I meant.
David
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 19:09 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:02:23AM +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
Hi,
I just finished removing the sysprof-kmod package from CVS as mandated
by the new guidelines for F9 and above.
I am now seeking some help to understand what
Dave,
Please take a look at
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2c7afd125cc482dbdf6b0a169c42337e7e76cda5
Can we include this simple patch in Fedora 7 and Rawhide please? Without
this, events arrive in the wrong order meaning that udev and hal may get
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 14:59 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 09:24:09AM -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2c7afd125cc482dbdf6b0a169c42337e7e76cda5
Can we include this simple patch in Fedora 7
