On 8/4/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 10:34:12AM +0200, dragoran wrote:
While debugging some qemu problems I wanted to try change the value in
/proc/sys/dev/rtc/max-user-freq
like suggested from qemu but there is no rtc dir in /proc/sys/dev/
a cat
On 8/4/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 08:02:02PM +0200, dragoran wrote:
On 8/4/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 10:34:12AM +0200, dragoran wrote:
While debugging some qemu problems I wanted to try change the value
On 6/16/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 03:13:56PM +0100, Chris Brown wrote:
I've started playing around with virtualization at work and the first
thing
I'd like to query is kqemu's lack of inclusion in the Fedora kernel. It
was
GPL'd in February and
On 8/2/07, Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 08/02/2007 02:20 PM, dragoran wrote:
well but kqemu seems not to break that often I just recompile it after
each
kernel release and it just works.
the code might be big but it does not depend on (fast) changing
interfaces.
Maybe I
Hans de Goede wrote:
I must say I like this approach, it avoids the whole problem of having
to rebuild kmods all the time and of wether to delay kernel security
updates until all kmods are fixetd etc. I do think however that this
might cause some pain for Dave Jones, whose job already is hard.
On 7/10/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
* nouveau needs rebasing. Ajax?
Not sure where to pull that from right now.
(add url to scripts/pull-upstreams.sh)
I might be wrong but from xorg git?
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/nouveau/xf86-video-nouveau
* No idea just how
On 7/3/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 09:36:45AM +0200, dragoran wrote:
Can we now reenable them by default in rawhide (they should be better in
.22) and see if they cause problems?
They are.
ok, needs to set up a new rawhide box soon ;)
Dave
I have read a thread on lkml about stripped and not stripped modules...
so I checked if they are in fedora (2.6.21-1.3194.fc7) and it seems that
they aren't.
so I tested how much it would gain (size) so I picked some random module
(sata_nv.ko) copied it to my home folder and did the test:
Dave Jones wrote:
On the subject of backporting, due to us only having 5 months
for F8, and a lot of that time being 'conference season', I expect
upstream to slow down a little, so we're probably looking at
2.6.23 for F8. I'm guessing .24 will begin way too late in our cycle,
so we'll have
Dave Jones wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 06:36:32PM +0200, dragoran wrote:
2.6.21.1 is out ... so whats the plan now? Relase a FC6
update(updates-testing) or stick with 2.6.20.x until 2.6.22 is
out/2.6.21 get some more testing?
We could do a rebase to .21 this week, and push that out
10 matches
Mail list logo
