On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:51:02AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Also, anyone have thoughts on re-versioning, at least in the vanilla
case, so as to more accurately describe what's being built? For example,
the above is 2.6.22-rc4-git6, so I'm a fan of the package that gets
churned out being
Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:51:02AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Also, anyone have thoughts on re-versioning, at least in the vanilla
case, so as to more accurately describe what's being built? For example,
the above is 2.6.22-rc4-git6, so I'm a fan of the package that
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 11:57 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:51:02AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Also, anyone have thoughts on re-versioning, at least in the vanilla
case, so as to more accurately describe what's being built? For example,
the above is 2.6.22-rc4-git6,
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:00:59AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 11:57 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:51:02AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Also, anyone have thoughts on re-versioning, at least in the vanilla
case, so as to more accurately
On 02/07/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's another reason I'd like to get this done for F8.
I'd still really like us to ship 2.6.23 for f8, but with the shorter
devel schedule, it's unclear if it's going to land upstream in time.
We've shipped -rc's as GA kernels before, but I
On 02.07.2007 18:27, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:00:59AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 11:57 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:51:02AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Also, anyone have thoughts on re-versioning, at least in the
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 07:27:17PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
I'd still really like us to ship 2.6.23 for f8, but with the shorter
devel schedule, it's unclear if it's going to land upstream in time.
We've shipped -rc's as GA kernels before, but I always felt 'dirty' for
doing
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 05:50:13PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
On 02/07/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's another reason I'd like to get this done for F8.
I'd still really like us to ship 2.6.23 for f8, but with the shorter
devel schedule, it's unclear if it's going
Roland McGrath wrote:
So I finally got around to poking at these bits again myself (in
relation to bug 240878), but ran into an issue with a vanilla/nopatches
build:
$ rpmbuild -bb --with baseonly --define 'nopatches 1' kernel-2.6.spec
RPM build errors:
File not found:
Here I am again with those hacks to do alternate builds from the kernel
spec file. Can I commit at least the spec parts to rawhide now?
The diff is only this:
--- kernel-2.6.spec 08 Jun 2007 12:55:12 -0700 1.3213
+++ kernel-2.6.spec 08 Jun 2007 12:55:05 -0700
@@ -63,7
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:59:26PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
Here I am again with those hacks to do alternate builds from the kernel
spec file. Can I commit at least the spec parts to rawhide now?
The diff is only this:
# This patch adds a make nonint_oldconfig which is
11 matches
Mail list logo
