Re: A really "big" kernel (in a dead weight)

2009-01-08 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 11:20:20PM -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > I tried to install kernel-2.6.29-0.12.rc0.git7.fc11.x86_64. Its rpm > package is quite reasonable 24M in size. Only rpm started to complain > about insufficient space on /. A check with 'rpm -qip ...' revealed > that the package

Re: Enabling drivers in staging tree in rawhide

2009-01-08 Thread John W. Linville
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 10:35:42AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:17:30AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > Related: I raised the staging problem already in > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477927 > > as rawhide contained the at76 driver as separate pat

Re: Enabling drivers in staging tree in rawhide

2009-01-08 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:35 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:17:30AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > Related: I raised the staging problem already in > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477927 > > as rawhide contained the at76 driver as separate patch > >

Re: Enabling drivers in staging tree in rawhide

2009-01-08 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:31 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:17:30AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > IOW: Either enable or disable them. I'm unsure myself what to do but I > > tend to say that disabling the whole staging drivers might be the best > > for Fedora (Greg

Re: Enabling drivers in staging tree in rawhide

2009-01-08 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:17:30AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Related: I raised the staging problem already in > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477927 > as rawhide contained the at76 driver as separate patch > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/rpms/kernel/devel/linux-2.6-

Re: Enabling drivers in staging tree in rawhide

2009-01-08 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:17:30AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > IOW: Either enable or disable them. I'm unsure myself what to do but I > tend to say that disabling the whole staging drivers might be the best > for Fedora (Greg calls himself as "maintainer of crap" for a good > reason). >

Re: /proc/sys/fs/epoll/max_user_instances=128 considered harmful

2009-01-08 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 05:01:22PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:18:12PM +, Joe Orton wrote: > > The F10 kernel has /proc/sys/fs/epoll/max_user_instances set to 128 by > > default. Apache httpd uses one epoll fd ("instance") per child process, > > so this sets a ha