On 08/09/2007 01:59 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
You should define define an all_alpha spec macro for alpha alphaev56.
Well. I just use it the way it was in the existing spec to not blow it
up too much.
However, if I would do so, it would be better to
%define all_alpha alpha alphaev5 alphaev56
On 09/08/07, Gilboa Davara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 13:22 -0500, Guy Streeter wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 14:17 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
The pcspkr driver doesn't load automatically any more with kernel
2.6.22.
Should we build it in, or maybe add it to the
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 14:57 +0100, Chris Brown wrote:
On 09/08/07, Gilboa Davara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 13:22 -0500, Guy Streeter wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 14:17 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
The pcspkr driver doesn't load automatically any more with kernel
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 03:36:54PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 08/08/2007 10:50 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:41:57PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 08/08/2007 01:28 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
We are still hitting problems with MSI (and probably mmconfig)
I put in the macroified kernel.spec last night. It also has some new magic
changes to play well with the new find-debuginfo.sh. It hasn't built yet
since I threw in some other broken changes at the same time, which are
probably fixed by now for the next build Dave does.
I made the bits that
I propose we change the release format for snapshot kernels.
Now we get e.g.:
kernel-2.6.23-0.89.rc2.git2.fc8
and I suggest instead:
kernel-2.6.23-0.rc2.git2.89.fc8
That is, put the spec file version number last, not first. This way, when
we forget to reset fedora_cvs_origin after a rebase,
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 13:59 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
I propose we change the release format for snapshot kernels.
Now we get e.g.:
kernel-2.6.23-0.89.rc2.git2.fc8
and I suggest instead:
kernel-2.6.23-0.rc2.git2.89.fc8
That is, put the spec file version number last, not first.
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:59:49PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
I propose we change the release format for snapshot kernels.
Now we get e.g.:
kernel-2.6.23-0.89.rc2.git2.fc8
and I suggest instead:
kernel-2.6.23-0.rc2.git2.89.fc8
That is, put the spec file version number
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 13:59 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
I propose we change the release format for snapshot kernels.
Now we get e.g.:
kernel-2.6.23-0.89.rc2.git2.fc8
and I suggest instead:
kernel-2.6.23-0.rc2.git2.89.fc8
That is, put the spec file version number last,
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:59:49PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
I propose we change the release format for snapshot kernels.
Now we get e.g.:
kernel-2.6.23-0.89.rc2.git2.fc8
and I suggest instead:
kernel-2.6.23-0.rc2.git2.89.fc8
That is, put the spec file version
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 02:24:44PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:59:49PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
I propose we change the release format for snapshot kernels.
Now we get e.g.:
kernel-2.6.23-0.89.rc2.git2.fc8
and I suggest instead:
11 matches
Mail list logo
