Re: de-modularising for the win!

2008-09-19 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Bill Nottingham wrote: - killing the initrd for that general 90% case can be a big win You aren't going to kill the initrd for a default fedora install due to root-on-lvm. cheers, Gerd ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list

Re: de-modularising for the win!

2008-09-19 Thread John W. Linville
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:13:55PM -0700, Bill Nottingham wrote: See various and sundry plumber's conf discussions. Comments? (The netfilter stuff needs further investigation.) @@ -1284,7 +1284,7 @@ CONFIG_WLAN_80211=y # CONFIG_PCMCIA_RAYCS is not set -CONFIG_MAC80211=m

Re: de-modularising for the win!

2008-09-19 Thread Chris Snook
Gerd Hoffmann wrote: Bill Nottingham wrote: - killing the initrd for that general 90% case can be a big win You aren't going to kill the initrd for a default fedora install due to root-on-lvm. For the people who care the most about this, putting / on a partition is a very low hurdle

Re: de-modularising for the win!

2008-09-19 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:02:54 +0200 Gerd Hoffmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bill Nottingham wrote: - killing the initrd for that general 90% case can be a big win You aren't going to kill the initrd for a default fedora install due to root-on-lvm. why do we have root-on-lvm by default on

Re: de-modularising for the win!

2008-09-19 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:02:47AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: -CONFIG_IEEE80211=m +CONFIG_IEEE80211=y CONFIG_IEEE80211_DEBUG=y CONFIG_IEEE80211_CRYPT_WEP=m CONFIG_IEEE80211_CRYPT_CCMP=m Do we have a way to _not_ do this on secondary architectures? the per-arch config fragments