reasonably well to replace it and 3) you can likely just boot the
current smp-enabled kernel with maxcpus=1 added to the command line
to get up behavior if you absolutely must run the cisco vpn client in
a single-processor environment.
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
without problems
MK
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
probably lies your answer to why
things are behaving differently).
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
issues with the code, so it has yet to be merged into
Linus' kernel, thus the reason its not in the Fedora kernel.
CC'ing Aris, who might have a better idea on upstream progress of that code...
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
___
Fedora-kernel-list
squashfs v3, even for the 2.6.29.x builds. Will just let it
trickle in via upstream for the devel branch.
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel
works best.
It'll get picked up via an upstream rebase long before then. I saw it
last night in rc7-git2, and that or later is bound to be pulled into
rawhide long before April (its likely to get in today).
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
___
Fedora
upstream into the kernel-firmware package?
No clue... Would have to talk to some alsa folks.
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
it
corresponds to upstream.
Yeah, I'd be happy with pkgname-tree id-description.patch, omitting the
tree id portion if there isn't one, or some variant thereof. Being able to do
an 'ls kernel*.patch' is definitely useful.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Friday 10 October 2008 20:37:24 Dave Jones wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 05:55:50PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Friday 10 October 2008 17:27:00 Chris Snook wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
For a while, diffs in the Fedora kernel have followed the form
linux-2.6-*.patch
without
this set. Even if we just turn it on for ia64 that works for me (but I
imagine some new big x86_64 systems may run into it once they grow this
large).
Just committed the change to flip those on for ia64-only.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED
changelog entries. Its
reasonably trivial to implement, though my current hack-around for 'make clog'
complains about me redefining the clog target. Is shaving 800+ lines out of
the spec file (only to put them in another file) worth the hassle though?
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED
John W. Linville wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 07:43:49PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could also, if so desired, install the split-out changelog as a %doc
file, the thought being that not everyone knows to look at 'rpm -q
one-off builds?
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
governor over the ugliness we do in the
cpuspeed init script would be nice. Even nicer would be if we could outright
get rid of the initscript (not sure what people who need the cpuspeed daemon
are to do in that case though).
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED
that actually does get a noarch build pass done on it for
kernel-docs. No reason kernel-firmware couldn't be spit out from the same
build run, so far as I know.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list
package. I think I might lean toward making that directory owned by
filesystem, so you have singular ownership and both udev and kernel-firmware
can use it without either one explicitly requiring the other.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora
David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 08:39 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Not quite sure. udev owns it right now. Could have multiple ownership so as to
not Requires: udev. Could possibly be something that should move to the
filesystem package. I think I might lean toward making
for any device that doesn't get brought up until we've
already spun up the kernel and initrd -- i.e., system boots off internal disk,
later during boot, brings up external storage on fibre channel adapter, which
loads its firmware from /lib/firmware.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Jarod Wilson wrote:
We were trying to do this with RHEL (jcm was working on this). One
of the
issues I brought up (which no one had a solution for) was the case
for a
bad firmware for storage devices. Currently they are built into the
kernel. So if you stumble upon bad firmware, you just
Don Zickus wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 11:08:57AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Don Zickus wrote:
I suspect that (for now) we should make the kernel binary packages
depend on kernel-firmware?
Should the package own the /lib/firmware/ directory?
Ideally we'll want kernel-firmware
/BuildingUpstreamKernel
and this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/CustomKernel
should help.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
On Saturday 03 May 2008 12:37:22 am Koji Build System wrote:
Package: kernel-2.6.25.1-1.fc10
Tag: dist-f10
Status: failed
Built by: jwilson
ID: 47960
Started: Sat, 03 May 2008 03:42:41 UTC
Finished: Sat, 03 May 2008 04:20:53 UTC
Changelog:
* Fri May 02 2008 Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED
...
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
?
Done.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
on fixing that now.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
differences are \. instead of . for matching
literal . in two places.
Ah, that's even better. Forgot this is essentially regex passed down to
find-debuginfo.sh... I'll drop the ? and add the \'s.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-kernel
for DevelDir, and makes use of %{KVERREL}-%{Flavour} right
now, which as discussed on irc, looks more correct to both of us. :)
i.e., this changes uname -r for kernel-PAE from 2.6.25-1.fc9.i686PAE to
2.6.25-1.fc9.i686-PAE, and all paths laid down are changed accordingly.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 02:02:04 am Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 24.03.2008 20:53, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Monday 24 March 2008 03:32:37 pm Dave Jones wrote:
I took a stab at bz 197065 and arrived at the patch below.
Would appreciate some eyeballs before I commit from people
familiar
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 12:54:07 pm Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 12:49:28 pm Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 08:58:00 am Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 25.03.2008 13:47, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 02:02:04 am Thorsten Leemhuis wrote
*}.
%{_arch} || exit $?\ %{nil}
I suspect this will make new-kernel-package very unhappy, since I think its
expecting to be fed what
essentially amounts to $(uname -r).
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora
not there
after some discussion on irc (and on this list).
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
a
useless module loaded, we do some clean-up in this case.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
at HP. :)
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
On Wednesday 20 February 2008 10:36:12 am davide rossetti wrote:
On Feb 20, 2008 4:11 PM, Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 20 February 2008 09:56:53 am davide rossetti wrote:
As soon as I unwrapped my brand new Core 2 Quad, I discovered that
acpi-cpufreq seems not able
On Monday 11 February 2008 02:01:01 pm Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:54:25PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Monday 11 February 2008 12:53:40 pm Kyle McMartin wrote:
git trees:
firewire - commented out, pending didn't apply
Yeah, the pending bits depend on some bits
the rebase.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 02:55:08 pm Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 02:17:17 pm Roland McGrath wrote:
Roland, I don't suppose any of the recent changes I seem to recall
hearing you were going to make to debuginfo might have anything to do
with this...
Seems
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 03:47:26 pm Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 02:55:08 pm Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 02:17:17 pm Roland McGrath wrote:
Roland, I don't suppose any of the recent changes I seem to recall
hearing you were going to make
to an
immediate upgrade from 2.6.23, but I'd assume if testing goes well with
2.6.24, we'll move to it fairly soon.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
or the other :\
First glance says oh hell yeah, check it in.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
buffers is also present but unfixed in the
packet-per-buffer code.
I can probably get a similar fix added on top of the packet-per-buffer code
today, if it is indeed still needed.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Jarod Wilson wrote:
David Moore wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 10:44 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
No, according to what several people saw with VT630x in OHCI 1.0 mode,
there is still the bug that the DMA program stops after receiving one or
a few frames. This is 100% reproducible
kernel, but assign it to me and cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[*]
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/ieee1394/linux1394-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=e9f5ca46377ac60a6b7d52c6c19a1661c87c6e20
- --
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU
Thomas J. Baker wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 16:47 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Thomas J. Baker wrote:
I've got a Precision 490 that hangs at reboot unless I use reboot=bios
on the kernel command line. A bug filed against the kernel should
include what other information?
I might suggest
a Precision 490 here that reboots just peachy.
Dell actually has bios updates that can be done from Linux on these boxes.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel
.
Just take a look at the source to any of the umpteen modules in the
kernel... May also want to visit http://kernelnewbies.org/.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
).
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
, and go from there.
On 11/12/07, *Jarod Wilson* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feng Xian wrote:
Thanks for all your help. I ran into another problem.
My 16-core machine has a scsi/sata disk. I have enabled all important
features related with scsi
. (But on Fedora 8 it will.)
I vaguely recall seeing a bug about this one, and I thought the solution
was to set _ALIGH and _START to the same value, but these are only vague
recollections...
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-kernel-list
, stripping didn't happen. The above
seems like a sane remedy to me.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
to get it to work as it now
requires Ctrl+Alt+Fn+F1.
Just as an fyi, this is also the case on my 2+ year old PowerBook G4.
And I'm pretty sure it was also the case on the iBook I had prior to
that, which I got roughly 5 years ago.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description
to lower the feature's
overhead and make its API match 2.6.23's.
Saw that one too. Turning it on just in F8 sounds sane to me.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing
Jarod Wilson wrote:
Eric Sandeen wrote:
Jarod Wilson wrote:
Hey all,
So... As I've mentioned on various forums here and there in the
recent past, I'd really like to see fedora carry the lirc drivers
(http://www.lirc.org/) in-kernel, and help push them into the
upstream kernel. I finally
Eric Sandeen wrote:
Jarod Wilson wrote:
Hey all,
So... As I've mentioned on various forums here and there in the recent
past, I'd really like to see fedora carry the lirc drivers
(http://www.lirc.org/) in-kernel, and help push them into the upstream
kernel. I finally got around to doing
there are no pci device id overlap w/the older driver, it
shouldn't break anything already working, so it really can't cause any
regressions. I'd say do it.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 04:34:43PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Damn, it'd be nice if koji could spread kernel variant builds of the
same arch across multiple builders...
That's not difficult to do - just have exactly one kernel built in the
specfile and pass the flavour
Jarod Wilson wrote:
Just realized it looks like you also snuck in a kernel-PAE-debug build=
variant... ;) Damn, it'd be nice if koji could spread kernel variant
builds of the same arch across multiple builders...
=20
I didn't add it, it was already there. I just made it uniform
, but just what does kqemu give
you that KVM doesn't?
Acceleration of non-hardware-virt guests.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 20:43 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 16:23 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 16:02 -0400, Sam Folk-Williams wrote:
I noticed this in the kernel-2.6.22.1-33.fc7.src.rpm spec
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:49 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 07/11/2007 01:37 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
The attached patch switches the kernel rpm over from including the
current static kernel-*.config files to instead including the config-*
files
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 07/11/2007 12:35 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Cpuspeed afaics needs an adjustment if cpuidle stays:
$ LC_ALL=C sudo /etc/init.d/cpuspeed restart
Disabling ondemand cpu frequency scaling: /etc/init.d/cpuspeed: line
212: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuidle/cpufreq
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 07/11/2007 12:48 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
I submitted a push request for the FC6 update I did w/the other pre-F7
update system, but haven't got any notice about it being pushed just
yet. I'll ping someone in rel-eng.
Can't wait for FC-6 to die now, so we don't have two
,
since cvs blows.
(For the record, I've also done a number of successful builds w/this
patch now.)
Comments appreciated!
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: Makefile.config
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/kernel/devel
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 07/11/2007 01:37 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
The attached patch switches the kernel rpm over from including the
current static kernel-*.config files to instead including the config-*
files that are actually in cvs.
It means we don't leave kernel-*.config droppings all over
Jarod Wilson wrote:
Roland McGrath wrote:
What's Patch5?
D'oh. Meant to nuke that. Inserted for testing purposes -- 'spectool
kernel-2.6.spec -p 5 -d somemacro value' to verify expected N-V-R's
being set properly. Disregard the -v2 patch, use this guy instead. :)
(or just drop the Patch5
. Otherwise, the changes look fine
to me.
The other crazy idea I had was to call 2.6.22-rc7
2.6.22-0.rc7.git0.1.fc8. Making fedora_build auto-increment is probably
cleaner, though it'd be nice to also have it reset on a kernel major
version rebase (either manually or automagically).
--
Jarod Wilson
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:01:16PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
snip
The other crazy idea I had was to call 2.6.22-rc7
2.6.22-0.rc7.git0.1.fc8. Making fedora_build auto-increment is probabl=
y
cleaner, though it'd be nice to also have it reset on a kernel major
version rebase (either manually
Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:51:02AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Also, anyone have thoughts on re-versioning, at least in the vanilla
case, so as to more accurately describe what's being built? For example,
the above is 2.6.22-rc4-git6, so I'm a fan of the package
the current path. Everything between
hey, that looks good! and what in the blue hell are you thinking?
welcomed. :) (Even better if you have suggestions for improvement).
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: kernel-2.6.spec
===
RCS
necessary. The new stuff should interoperate with your bits as
well for other-tree-git-based rpms too though.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel
Roland McGrath wrote:
What about before the first -rcN tag?
I presume you're referring to the likes of say kernel 2.6.21-gitX, which
was post-2.6.21, but pre-2.6.22-rc1? Crap. Hadn't thought about that
case. Okay, will have to do some further twiddling to cover that case...
--
Jarod Wilson
order. Ughlay, but still much closer than we've
been, and outside of that window, it should be spot-on to see what
exactly we're packaging.
Oh, and this version does result in a fully-completed rpm build (also
has the kernel-vanilla fix).
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: kernel-2.6.spec
spec).
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: kernel-2.6.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/kernel/devel/kernel-2.6.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3245
diff -u -p -r1.3245 kernel-2.6.spec
--- kernel-2.6.spec 2 Jul 2007 17:07:41 -
change.
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
David Woodhouse wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 21:20 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Hrm, not sure why that doesn't pass the option through, but I hadn't
even thought to look at the Makefile to see how these flags would work
at that level. Out of curiosity, does the following work?:
$ make
Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:06:58PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:41:45PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
I was thinking about adding something like this to the .spec file
at the beginning:
%define allowup 1
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Jarod Wilson wrote:
The minimalist approach that comes to mind is to make all the %define
build* bits all set to 1/enabled by default, and only flip them to
disabled where appropriate, so they'd be equivalent to your allow* idea,
in that if you disable them at the top
77 matches
Mail list logo
