So we're moving to 2.6.32 across F-11 & F-12, as such
I've tagged the old kernels on those branches.
F-11 2.6.30 is on branch private-fedora-11-2_6_30
F-12 2.6.31 is on branch private-fedora-12-2_6_31
The devel/ sources from 2.6.32 are on
private-rawhide-2_6_32.
Kyle.
__
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 09:31:52PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> I've noticed the dot in front of the symbol, is kernel using still the for
> years deprecated oldish ppc64 ABI instead of the new one (i.e. uses
> -mcall-aixdesc instead of not using this option at all)? Maybe it is broken
> only in
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 09:04:33PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:44:42PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > - fix ppc/ppc64 -mmultiple and out of line gpr/fpr saving bugs
> > (#519409, PR target/40677, PR target/41175)
> >
> > My guess is this
- fix ppc/ppc64 -mmultiple and out of line gpr/fpr saving bugs
(#519409, PR target/40677, PR target/41175)
My guess is this has broken the kernel build on powerpc64:
init/built-in.o: In function `arch_disable_smp_support':
/builddir/build/BUILD/kernel-2.6.31/linux-2.6.31.ppc64/init/main.c:139:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 03:32:43PM -0700, Markus Kesaromous wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:23:46 -0600
> > From: zait...@redhat.com
> > To: remotes...@live.com
> > CC: fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: Radeon driver broken in 2.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:33:08AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 10:53 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Because ... why would you want to use this? Ever?
>
> <@mezcalero> people who enable that module in the kernel deserve to
> suffer
>
> Kill it kill it kill it.
>
Just fo
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 01:31:47PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > Due to backport of patch
> >
> > linux-2.6-iwl3945-report-killswitch-changes-even-if-the-interface-is-down.patch
> >
> > we have bunch of iwl3945 bugs (race c
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:41:11PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> I would like to apply the following patch to the rawhide
> kernel that will make exports for NFS v4 mount work just
> list exports for v3 and v2 mounts.
>
> In a nutshell, for NFS v4 mounts to work like v3/2 mounts
> the '/ *(ro,fsid
Last night, I committed the rebase of devel/ to 2.6.31-git, which will
likely, for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is because F-12
is a short cycle, be what F-12 eventually releases with.
The following tags now exist:
F-11, private-fedora-11-2_6_29 which contains a snapshot of the
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 12:57:06PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jun 2009, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 09:28:25AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 16:13 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
I blame yaboot...
>>>
>>> Fixed in yaboot-1.3.14-13 (than
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 04:55:33PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch needs to replace the current 2 btrfs patches that are being
> carried for F11. All of the scary things in this patch are currently
> in F11 in the form of the two patches we are already carrying, this
> patch jus
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:27:38AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > You should always specify an arch.
>
> make prep uses noarch and generally works fine. You can just ignore the
> strange assembler messages in the 'make configs' phase and the .config
> files come out fine, in my experience.
>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 06:18:07PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> if ! egrep "^Patch[0-9]+: $patch\$" %{_specdir}/%{name}.spec ; then
> if [ "${patch:0:10}" != "patch-2.6." ] ; then
> echo "ERROR: Patch $patch not listed as a source patch in specfile"
> exit 1
> fi
> fi 2>
Just a quick note, we've early branched for F-11... The 2.6.29
based tree for F-11 is located in the F-11/ subdirectory... Make sure
you cvs up the common/ dir as well.
devel/ has been updated for -git7 and will continue to move towards
2.6.30.
regards, Kyle
_
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 04:11:37PM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:
> I didn't want to do it directly in private-fedora-9-2_6_27-branch with
> my first shot. I hope that's OK with? This way it's in CVS and I can
> build from it for testing. Now that I've seen it builds fine, I can go
> on and approa
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:33:25AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >+#if __OS_HAS_AGP
>
> Not that this is your fault, but shouldn't this be something
> like __ARCH_HAS_AGP?
>
Keep in mind the DRM for better or for worse supposedly supports more
OSes than just Linux.
I suspect the 'ideal' fix for up
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:13:03PM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:37:27PM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:
>> > * Update Makefile.config to generate *alpha.config and
>> *alpha-smp.config
>
> I haven't attached this part, since it's quite clear how it will l
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:51:14AM +, Fedora PackageDB wrote:
> oliver has requested the commit acl on kernel (Fedora devel)
>
Uh, who are you again?
regards, Kyle
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redha
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:30:56AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Kyle McMartin (k...@infradead.org) said:
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:53:57AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > The compose process (for rawhide/updates) only pulls the latest build
> > > for each
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:53:57AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> The compose process (for rawhide/updates) only pulls the latest build
> for each source package; ergo, this won't work as far as havong
> -docs always available to install.
>
Well, that's broken. But honestly I suspect nobody actu
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 02:07:27AM +, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> Modified Files:
> kernel.spec
> Log Message:
> go away docs. we hates you.
>
And here's a patch to turn them back on once per -rc. I think. My shell
isn't what it used to be.
The idea is we don&#
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:41:55PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hey,
> Michael Young has been building some test kernels using Jeremy
> Fitzhardinge's dom0 patch set.
>
> I suggested that he use a private branch in CVS and scratch builds in
> Koji to make the task a bit easier. I've
ep warning.
Should this go upstream as well?
Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
index cc0adb4..9303063 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
@@ -1108,8 +1108,8 @@ int i915_driver_l
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 03:11:37PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Thorsten Leemhuis (fed...@leemhuis.info) said:
> >> I don't see how this is a problem.
> >
> > Getting rid of the suffix -PAE afaics would solve exactly the problem
> > that now is "just exposed to more people" (or might make solvi
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 08:47:41PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Getting rid of the suffix -PAE afaics would solve exactly the problem
> that now is "just exposed to more people" (or might make solving it a
> lot easier afaics). And it would make documentation a whole lot easier,
> making Fedor
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 01:11:40PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> PAE also gets you NX support, so it's not just a >4G thing.
> (Which means you won't need to run the nasty execshield segment
> limit hacks -- One more nail in execshields coffin)
>
On Prescott+ at least... but conveniently that was a
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 12:42:24PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Given the other information coming through (about dynamic kernel PAE
> > enable), should we really being doing this right now?
>
> it's vaporware.
>
> > Why not wait for the dynamic PAE stuff to settle upstream and then make
>
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 05:36:31AM +, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Fold sata_sil build fix into compile-fixes.patch
>
Patch can be dropped, alternate fix is in -rc3-git.
regards, Kyle
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
http
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:53:12PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> I started this last night, so I could submit it to stable...
>
Forgot to mention this here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1089515
___
Fedora-kernel-list m
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:30:27AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:20:03AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Pete Zaitcev (zait...@redhat.com) said:
> > > > Intel has produced a patch, and John Linville has applied this to the
> > > > 2.6.28
> > > > kernel (available f
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 09:31:47AM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I enabled CONFIG_PCI_STUB (#482792), but the build failed on ppc:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c: In function 'nouveau_load':
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c:487: error: implicit declaration of
> fu
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:06:41AM +0530, Kedar Sovani wrote:
>
I applied it, but there wasn't enough in config-arm to make it build.
Rather than just ignore it, I filled in some of the blanks that seemed
relevant.
I have no idea what your specific machtype is, but I assumed the
versatile thingy
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 02:20:56PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Wow, thanks !
>
> (I wonder CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_CONT may be stale config name..)
>
Entirely possible... sadly we don't prune the config as often as we
should so stale config options linger for a while. :)
cheers, Kyle
_
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 02:07:45PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi!
> I thought there was a request to make memroy resource controller
> (CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR) availele in Fedora10 age.
> (But not configured.)
>
> I'd like to request memory cgroup configured in Fedora 11.
> (I
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:42:02AM +0530, Kedar Sovani wrote:
> Since kernels for different ARM CPUs differ wildly, and since
> embedded folks tend to provide their own kernels, this patch makes
> the Fedora kernel package only build kernel-headers when built for
> ARM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lennert
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 09:15:24AM +, Christopher Brown wrote:
> The fall-out from this going onto the livecd makes me shudder.
>
Jesse explained this to me,
To clarify: the anaconda installer is i586, and all 3 kernel flavours
are shipped on the disc. I would imagine the livecd is i586 and
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:28:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Users won't be running yum. They're running that applet thing.
>
Which just shells out to yum... ;-)
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:06:17AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Eric Paris wrote:
>> I've got a P3 (Coppermine) with 256M memory running F10. My significant
>> other took it with her to Antarctica (Well F9 has been to Antarctica but
>> it'll be F10 in Antarctica next month). You can only run one ap
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:36:08PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> Absolutely, I've got a Thinkpad T42 here that does just fine on fedora 10.
> Unless of course, I try to load a PAE enabled kernel on it.
>
> I've not looked into it at all, but this thread got me thinking, is there any
> particular rea
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:24:14AM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> BTW, does anyone know if the Geode in OLPC XO has PAE?
>
The PAE bit in %cr4 is listed as reserved in the geode databook
the olpc site links to, so my guess is no. :\
regards, Kyle
___
Fe
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:23:26AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) said:
> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 03:49:20PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > This probably comes up once in a while, thought I'd raise it again.
> > >
> > > I'd like to suggest switching the default
I dislike looking at those
C=`wc -l ..`
if [ -gt ... ]
things in the spec-file...
How about something like this?
? prep2.log
Index: kernel.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/kernel/devel/kernel.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1218
diff
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 02:47:18PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Kyle McMartin (k...@infradead.org) wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 01:39:13PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> > > Upstream was still broken as recently as Friday for bad BIOSes (x200s in
> > > this c
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 01:39:13PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:55:27PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > > Here's some proposed config changes.
> > >
> > > Jumping on the wagon ;)
> > >
> > >
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:21:52PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:55:27PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > > Here's some proposed config changes.
> > >
> > > Jumping on the wagon ;)
> > >
> > > Can we enable CONFI
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 11:20:20PM -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> I tried to install kernel-2.6.29-0.12.rc0.git7.fc11.x86_64. Its rpm
> package is quite reasonable 24M in size. Only rpm started to complain
> about insufficient space on /. A check with 'rpm -qip ...' revealed
> that the package
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:17:30AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> IOW: Either enable or disable them. I'm unsure myself what to do but I
> tend to say that disabling the whole staging drivers might be the best
> for Fedora (Greg calls himself as "maintainer of crap" for a good
> reason).
>
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 04:58:43PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> interdiff choked, so I moved your diff over the current one
> and cvs diff'd, which coped a little better, but it still isn't
> too easy to see the delta. It's times like this I wish we
> did have a git tree.
>
> The only bits that jum
execshield rebased against 2.6.28, merged by git and then fixed up
by hand.
build tested against x86-64 and pae/non-pae i386.
i'm uploading a scratch srpm but it will take a damned long time to
upload so i'll include the build id in a reply.
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h b/arch/x86/in
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 02:50:39PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Is everyone getting a "Kernel failure" message
> with the latest kernel, 2.6.27.4-79.fc10.i686 ?
> I haven't noticed any adverse effect from it.
> (I did send the back-trace as requested.)
>
> I notice that following the backtrace i
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:33:47PM +0100, Joshua C. wrote:
> Can the following commit be merged in the release kernel for fedora 10:
>
> commit 20edd74fcf9ad02c19efba0c13670a7b6b045099
> Author: Zhao Yakui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri Oct 17 02:02:44 2008 -0400
>
>ACPI: Ignore AE_NOT_FOU
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:57:27AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> While I'm certainly not advocating for building them normally,
> it would be handy to actually be able to build a debug kernel
> for ppc64 from time to time. I had to make the following
> changes for this to work (outside of adding ppc6
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:03:39AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 06:33:49AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Anyone planning to respin the F-9 kernel with a .27 base? Webcams! :)
>
> I'd recommend waiting until at least the first batch of -stable patches
> is released.
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 09:02:08AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>
> Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:56:04PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> >> A while back, I believe back during the last FUDCon in Raleigh I talked
> >> with kylem and da
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:56:04PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> A while back, I believe back during the last FUDCon in Raleigh I talked with
> kylem and davej about turning off the "inline-functions-called-once" which
> inlines functions that are only called once. Turning off this optimization
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 01:06:57PM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 25K 2008-09-23 21:38 dm-mirror.ko
> -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 25K 2008-09-23 21:38 dm-snapshot.ko
> -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 7.0K 2008-09-23 21:38 dm-zero.ko
>
> 57kB or so max. But at the same time, these are loade
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 11:25:49AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> See various and sundry plumber's conf discussions.
>>
>> Comments? (The netfilter stuff needs further investigation.)
>
> Also, please add these, since they're nearly always loaded (patch is on
> top of yours):
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 03:18:37PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 19:51:30 -0400
> Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > I've got to agree, for ALSA who provide a turnkey package that lets people
> > > test the la
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 06:34:18PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:10:35 +0200
> Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The alsa-project is a good example. Say you purchase a new motherboard
> > and it has a brand new audio codec that is not yet supported by the
>
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 01:34:33AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> for certain types of choices the answer is going to be "oh now you need
> to compile your own kernel"; there's just too many config options for
> that not to be the case.
> Of course for the normal, common scenarios that's not the
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 06:53:55AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Subject: Re: de-modularising for the win!
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 05:21:45PM +0200, Chris Lalancette wrote:
>
Looks fine... Appliedinated.
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 11:13:40AM +, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Author: airlied
>
> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/kernel/devel
> In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22014
>
> Modified Files:
> drm-nouveau.patch
> Log Message:
> * Tue Sep 02 2008 Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 05:05:33PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> John W. Linville wrote:
>>
>> I still think that for continuity's sake f8 and f9 should continue
>> to get wireless fixes from 2.6.27. Those should only be specific
>> bug fixes (although I suppose there is still time for a new driver
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 04:19:07PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> That's what it does. It includes all firmware, even for drivers that don't get
> built. Look in firmware/Makefile and you'll see it builds lists
> named fw-shipped-y, fw-shipped-m and fw-shipped- then just merges them to
> create fw-sh
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 04:16:39PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 12:37:32PM -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> > Dear fellow testers,
> >
> > New kernel oops again and no X when starting it
> >
> > kernel-2.6.27-0.215.rc1.git4.fc10.i686
&
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 12:37:32PM -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> Dear fellow testers,
>
> New kernel oops again and no X when starting it
>
> kernel-2.6.27-0.215.rc1.git4.fc10.i686
>
> Here's oops
>
> http://www.kerneloops.org/submitresult.php?number=48331
>
nasty... did this just start r
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:01:17AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 August 2008 09:24:10 Steve Dickson wrote:
> > Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > > Steve Dickson wrote:
> > >> Now that devel kernels rpms require the kernel-firmware rpm, it makes
> > >> sense to me that one should be able to build
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 05:48:04AM +, Dave Jones wrote:
> +cp -a acpi config keys linux math-emu media mtd net pcmcia rdma rxrpc
> scsi sound video drm asm-generic
> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/modules/$KernelVer/build/include
> +if [ -f asm ]; then
> + cp -a `readlink asm`
> $RPM_BUILD
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:31:33PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:26:10PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>
> > We could put it in fedora but it's not upstream and nobody can say when or
> if
> > it will go in.
>
> After the long drawn out pain that utrace has been, I'm somew
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:31:04AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I added these to config-generic to keep building with -git11.
> I have no idea if these are the right settings.
>
> +# CONFIG_MFD_TC6393XB is not set
> +# CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_SOFTLOCKUP_PANIC is not set
> +CONFIG_DMADEVICES=y
> +CONFIG
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 01:16:08PM -0400, Doug Chapman wrote:
> Roland,
>
> The latest incarnation of the utrace patch breaks the kernel build on
> ia64:
>
> arch/ia64/kernel/process.c: In function 'do_notify_resume_user':
> arch/ia64/kernel/process.c:189: error: implicit declaration of function
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 06:19:40PM +, Kristian H?gsberg wrote:
> Log Message:
> * Fri May 23 2008 Kristian Høgsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> - Drop linux-2.6-debug-no-quiet.patch. As discussed with Jeremy and
> Dave, it's time to drop this patch. Verbose output can still be
> enabled by spe
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:43:15PM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> This mail contains a patch which merges the IMAC mode code into the efifb
> driver and removes the imacfb driver entirely. There are also a couple of
> minor bug fixes. Any comments before I start bothering the upstream
> maintainers
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 03:38:38PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 15:32 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > I took a stab at bz 197065 and arrived at the patch below.
> > Would appreciate some eyeballs before I commit from people
> > familiar with the macro goo in the specfile. (Hi Rol
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 03:32:37PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> I took a stab at bz 197065 and arrived at the patch below.
> Would appreciate some eyeballs before I commit from people
> familiar with the macro goo in the specfile. (Hi Roland!)
>
This looks sane, from my quick once over and fairly n
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 05:56:01PM +, Dave Jones wrote:
> Log Message:
> I think 76fc60a2e3c6aa6e98cd3a5cb81a1855c637b274 obsoletes this.
>
It does indeed, sorry, I meant to remove this after I saw it go in.
cheers, Kyle
___
Fedora-kernel-list mai
lguest uses asm-offsets to generate ... offsets, obviously, for use
in the lguest switcher code. When the hypervisor code is built as a
module though, the asm offsets it needs won't be generated since
CONFIG_LGUEST will be undefined.
Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 06:43:16PM +0200, Eugene Goubine wrote:
> Kyle, thanks for reffering,but it seems like GPL is not the case.
> I want to write a module to track netdevices present.
> Sort of a protocol sitting there. It is GPL'ed, but register_pm_notifier
> usage ( as you can see in sources)
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:41:15PM +0200, Eugene Goubine wrote:
> Hello , dear list users.
> >From my module I am trying to register for the system suspend using the *
> register_pm_notifier(nb)*
> which is expanded to *blocking_notifier_chain_register(&pm_chain_head, nb).*
> **
> I have a linker w
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 11:48:20AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > For Fedora 9 maybe it should be the sysfs interface if it works.
> > i don't really see a harm in having both.
>
> I imagine that eventually someone upstream will make the decision a no-brainer
> by removing the proc stuff. Not
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 09:08:02PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 02/16/2008 06:53 AM, drago01 wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I tested the kernel-2.6.24.2-3.fc8 (downloaded the x86_64 build
> > directly) on my laptop.
> > Hal detects two batteries because it looks in sysfs and in procfs for
> > the battery in
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 02:39:09PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I needed the following patch to be able to build the fedora rpms
> > on i386. This is likely a case of the new code doing the right thing,
> > but me not being able to figure out the debug stuff in the spec file
> > at the time tho
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:50:00PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > M linux-2.6-i386-vdso-install-unstripped-copies-on-disk.patch
> >
> > needs a bit of inspection, looks right (and builds ok)
>
> This one should be upstream now. If anything is still missing, I should be
> able to get it in for
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:54:25PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Monday 11 February 2008 12:53:40 pm Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > git trees:
> > firewire - commented out, pending didn't apply
>
> Yeah, the pending bits depend on some bits that are in linux1394-git that
git trees:
firewire - commented out, pending didn't apply
ext4 - commented out, seems upstream
wireless - mostly upstream, pending didn't apply
M linux-2.6-acpi-eeepc-hotkey.patch
fixed rejects
M linux-2.6-e1000-corrupt-eeprom-checksum.patch
somewhat upstream... i merged
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:43:32PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> x86-merge has kind of thrown a spanner in the execshield patchset. I've
> merged it up so it looks like it works, but I'd like to get some input
> from others to make sure I didn't brown-paper-bag it.
>
&g
x86-merge has kind of thrown a spanner in the execshield patchset. I've
merged it up so it looks like it works, but I'd like to get some input
from others to make sure I didn't brown-paper-bag it.
The randomization bits seem to have been merged upstream, but I deferred
to the execshield implementa
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:47:55PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Why are we building kernels with this broken compiler?
> >
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8501
> >
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=388196&name=build.log
>
> Why are we building these broken
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 06:49:51PM -0500, Matt Anderson wrote:
> I noticed that config-x86 and config-x86_64 both have tpm_infineon=m but
> config-ia64 does not. I enabled that on my system and rebuild the kernel
> rpm and everything just worked. Could tpm_infineon be built as a module by
> de
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 05:19:36PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I may have hashed this out with davej only in private before, so perhaps
> you aren't aware of the normal plan for utrace updates. You disabled
> utrace when you should have just run ./scripts/pull-upstreams.sh to get the
> current
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:31:30AM -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
> I actually talked to the sysctl.conf owner first who said "if it is a
> good default for everyone turn it on in the kernel"
>
Ah, I meant in a regular init script and using /etc/sysconfig/security
or something.
> which i tended to agr
Hi Eric,
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:58:38AM -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
> Would anyone have a problem carrying this patch in fedora? This would
> be a forever fedora'ism.
>
Wouldn't it be better to just use sysctl in an init script to turn it on
during boot (or, optionally, not.) as opposed to car
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 03:09:08PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> Isn't that needed though to access higher config space on PCIE ?
> Or do we not have any drivers that use that yet, making it a nonissue?
>
Yeah, you need it to access Extended config space on PCI-Express, but the
only people who need
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:15:28PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Jay Cliburn wrote:
> > Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> >> It seems like more and more problems with PCI MSI are turning up
> >> in the 2.6.20 kernel. Discussion upstream concluded that maybe
> >> it should have been off by default in 2.6.20, so
95 matches
Mail list logo
