On Dec 2, 2007 8:10 AM, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is I really hate adding patches that provide new user interfaces.
I understand this concern
It's easy enough to add it, but it'll be a 'fedora-ism' that doesn't work
in any other distro, or with an upstream kernel.
I
Gianluca Sforna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What if the sysprof author offered
a. to maintain the patch in the SRPM (e.g. make sure it works)
This looks like an easy target; I can witness the module sources
always worked since the package entered in the repo (around FC5 IIRC).
The few
On Dec 2, 2007 10:33 PM, David Zeuthen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if the sysprof author offered
a. to maintain the patch in the SRPM (e.g. make sure it works)
This looks like an easy target; I can witness the module sources
always worked since the package entered in the repo (around FC5
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:02:23AM +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
Hi,
I just finished removing the sysprof-kmod package from CVS as mandated
by the new guidelines for F9 and above.
I am now seeking some help to understand what is needed to have again
the kernel module required for
On Dec 2, 2007 1:09 AM, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:02:23AM +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
Hi,
I just finished removing the sysprof-kmod package from CVS as mandated
by the new guidelines for F9 and above.
I am now seeking some help to understand
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 19:09 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:02:23AM +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
Hi,
I just finished removing the sysprof-kmod package from CVS as mandated
by the new guidelines for F9 and above.
I am now seeking some help to understand what
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 02:04:01AM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
Upstream sources are at:
http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/sysprof/
The upstream kernel is likely to eventually get support for
perfmon2 integrated, but this could really use more work.
It's been in -mm for a
