Re: Rebuild exisitng errata for x86_64?

2006-03-04 Thread Marc Deslauriers
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 01:58 -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote: In any case, I think we should _at least_ release all FC3 packages for x86_64. In other words, we shouldn't release new FC3 x86_64 without releasing also the older FC3 x86_64, for consistency. So far, all FC3 updates have had x86_64

Re: Rebuild exisitng errata for x86_64?

2006-03-03 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Jesse Keating wrote: So with the new build software that we're having good success with we can produce x86_64 packages (and with future hardware donations ppc packages too). We've been spinning all FC3 updates with x86_64 packages, but the question remains, do we want to rebuild all previously

Re: Rebuild exisitng errata for x86_64?

2006-03-03 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Jesse Keating wrote: On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:06 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: So perhaps an obvious question is could Red Hat internal build systems used by Fedora Core or the ones used for Fedora Extras be spared a few cycles for Fedora legacy on x86_64/PPC or do you want to keep the

Re: Rebuild exisitng errata for x86_64?

2006-03-03 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:26 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Thats strange. How does RHL content affect the ability of Fedora Legacy to use Fedora Extras buildsystems?. I didnt see any public discussion happening on this and we definitely need the details spelled out more precisely. Again, I'm

Re: Rebuild exisitng errata for x86_64?

2006-03-03 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Jesse Keating wrote: On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:26 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Thats strange. How does RHL content affect the ability of Fedora Legacy to use Fedora Extras buildsystems?. I didnt see any public discussion happening on this and we definitely need the details spelled out more

Re: Rebuild exisitng errata for x86_64?

2006-03-03 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: The way I see it, Fedora Extras and Core already have access to PPC systems and Legacy is meanwhile waiting for hardware donations. If we share the infrastructure and we are well integrated, that shouldnt be happening. This is not

RE: Rebuild exisitng errata for x86_64?

2006-03-03 Thread Donald Maner
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jesse Keating Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 10:21 PM To: fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com Subject: Rebuild exisitng errata for x86_64? So I guess the bottom line question is, is there a significant

Re: Rebuild exisitng errata for x86_64?

2006-03-03 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Jesse Keating wrote: On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: The way I see it, Fedora Extras and Core already have access to PPC systems and Legacy is meanwhile waiting for hardware donations. If we share the infrastructure and we are well integrated, that shouldnt be

Re: Rebuild exisitng errata for x86_64?

2006-03-03 Thread Eric Rostetter
Quoting Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED]: packages, but the question remains, do we want to rebuild all previously released errata for x86_64, for releases that have x86_64 (FC1,2,3). Yes, if possible, but this is something to be done in the background, at lower priority, as time permits. In