At the Fedora Legacy website, I see the following statement in the
Fedora Core 3 paragraph.
Fedora Core 3 on the x86_64 architecture is not available at this
point. Users and interested community members can participate in the
discussions on Fedora Legacy List
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Temple wrote:
But looking at the download site, it /looks/ as though the x86_64 rpms
are there.
(Not so for core 2).
Does the site need this updated?
Matt,
Good point; but, they may be holding off updating this fact until we see
the
James Kosin wrote:
Matt Temple wrote:
But looking at the download site, it /looks/ as though the x86_64 rpms
are there.
(Not so for core 2).
Does the site need this updated?
Matt,
Good point; but, they may be holding off updating this fact until we see
the workload involved with this. Since
http://www.squirrelmail.org/download.php
Just thought I'd let you all know if you don't already. I run Core 1 and
I've been having a problem with squirrelmail chopping the last attachment
when doing multiple attachments after one of the recent php updates.
Anyhow, I have verified the latest
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 08:51:05PM -0500, Paul wrote:
Anyhow, I have verified the latest squirrelmail 1.4.5-1 fixes this bug.
The latest one is squirrelmail-1.4.6-1. Well, for FC4 but it will
recompile anyway and it is fixing security issues. Is the above a typo?
Michal
--
So with the new build software that we're having good success with we
can produce x86_64 packages (and with future hardware donations ppc
packages too). We've been spinning all FC3 updates with x86_64
packages, but the question remains, do we want to rebuild all previously
released errata for
Jesse Keating wrote:
So with the new build software that we're having good success with we
can produce x86_64 packages (and with future hardware donations ppc
packages too). We've been spinning all FC3 updates with x86_64
packages, but the question remains, do we want to rebuild all previously
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:06 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
So perhaps an obvious question is could Red Hat internal build systems
used by Fedora Core or the ones used for Fedora Extras be spared a few
cycles for Fedora legacy on x86_64/PPC or do you want to keep the
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:26 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Thats strange. How does RHL content affect the ability of Fedora Legacy
to use Fedora Extras buildsystems?. I didnt see any public discussion
happening on this and we definitely need the details spelled out more
precisely.
Again, I'm
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:26 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Thats strange. How does RHL content affect the ability of Fedora Legacy
to use Fedora Extras buildsystems?. I didnt see any public discussion
happening on this and we definitely need the details spelled out more
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
The way I see it, Fedora Extras and Core already have access to PPC
systems and Legacy is meanwhile waiting for hardware donations. If we
share the infrastructure and we are well integrated, that shouldnt be
happening. This is not
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jesse Keating
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 10:21 PM
To: fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
Subject: Rebuild exisitng errata for x86_64?
So I guess the bottom line question is, is there a
significant
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
The way I see it, Fedora Extras and Core already have access to PPC
systems and Legacy is meanwhile waiting for hardware donations. If we
share the infrastructure and we are well integrated, that shouldnt be
On Friday 03 March 2006 20:51, Paul wrote:
On Fri, March 3, 2006 9:21 pm, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 08:51:05PM -0500, Paul wrote:
Anyhow, I have verified the latest squirrelmail 1.4.5-1 fixes
this bug.
The latest one is squirrelmail-1.4.6-1. Well, for FC4 but it
Hello Everybody,
If it is any help, I've been rebuilding all fedora legacy patches for
FC2 in a production environment since Fedora Legacy took over
maintenance of FC2. All legacy source RPMS have built without issues
and the updates have been running flawlessly. If there is some way I
can help
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 09:51:25PM -0500, Paul wrote:
On Fri, March 3, 2006 9:21 pm, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 08:51:05PM -0500, Paul wrote:
Anyhow, I have verified the latest squirrelmail 1.4.5-1 fixes this bug.
The latest one is squirrelmail-1.4.6-1. Well, for
Quoting Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
packages, but the question remains, do we want to rebuild all previously
released errata for x86_64, for releases that have x86_64 (FC1,2,3).
Yes, if possible, but this is something to be done in the background,
at lower priority, as time permits.
In
17 matches
Mail list logo
