Re: Fedora products, to upgrade rather than backport?

2006-05-17 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 11:01 -0500, Eric Rostetter wrote: > > As can be seen in the sendmail upgrade, lots of other things (alternatives, > pam, etc) can come into play that are not immediately obvious. > Right, thinks like sendmail are hard. Things like gaim, or evince, or other top level appli

Re: Fedora products, to upgrade rather than backport?

2006-05-17 Thread Eric Rostetter
Quoting James Kosin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: not to start any kind of flame war, but just for accuracy's sake, the recent sendmail release *was* tested before public release - i Yes, but IMHO not enough, but that is totally another matter. that may say that our required testing is insufficient;

Re: Fedora products, to upgrade rather than backport?

2006-05-17 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tom Yates wrote: > On Mon, 15 May 2006, James Kosin wrote: > >> I agree with Jesse here; but, I would like to add that the >> packages should be tested on the released platform by someone and >> not just released in this case. SendMail was a recent bl