- Original Message -
From: Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: [fab] looking at our surrent state a bit
== MISC ==
* I got the impression (and LWN readers, too [hello corbert! ]) that
Fedora Legacy is
On Monday 06 November 2006 06:21, Rex Dieter wrote:
David Eisenstein wrote:
Fedora Board, please take heed. Although providing a stable, long-term
operating system/environment is *not* one of Fedora Project's stated
goals, the practical lifetime of a Fedora release of 1 year (without
On Monday 06 November 2006 09:59, Dave Stevens wrote:
a confession of inadequacy is more of a preliminary than an answer
Confession how? How would it be any different from the Fedora Legacy project
itself from making some sort of 'confession' ? The unfortunate problem is
ours to solve.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Stevens wrote:
a confession of inadequacy is more of a preliminary than an answer
Dave
Sorry, to butt in
Maybe, what we need to do is have a re-organization of the idea of
FedoraLegacy instead of trying to overtax anyone. Or chase
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:04:06PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
Additionally, the project simply needs at least one person who manages the
project as a full-time job.
And by needs, I mean: I'm very skeptical that it can be viable without
this. While the project was in its most functional stage,
with thanks to Ali Lomonaco and Michal Jaegermann for proposing packages!
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-211760
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211760
2006-11-06
