Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The issue is also not the infrstructure IMO, it's simply lack of human
resources and either someone needs to assign them to it if that entity
(Red Hat/board/whatever) considers that a worthy goal, or the
resources need to come from
Quoting David Eisenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What do you suggest as an alternative for IRC for folks who are not able or
interested in using it?
I work in several opensource projects that have IRC channels, and I've never
used IRC for any of them, and no one has ever complained about that fact
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 08:21:26AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
David Eisenstein wrote:
Fedora Board, please take heed. Although providing a stable, long-term
operating system/environment is *not* one of Fedora Project's stated
goals, the practical lifetime of a Fedora release of 1 year
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 08:21:26AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
OK, I'll bite. What do you want exactly from the Board?
Wave our magic Fedora wand to produce more (active) community contributors?
OK, lemme see, now where did I leave that darn thing...
I see 2 things that could help:
* use
Axel Thimm wrote:
I don't know if the board has power over suggesting to Fedora's
sponsor, Red Hat, to resuffle its engineering resources, but if so,
then it's a simple equation: If FL is indeed going to get more
resources to prolong a Fedora release's lifespan then these resources
need to be
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 11:46:37PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Unifying and opening up more of the infrastructure and other ideas like
that only doing critical security fixes are things to look at.
But FL's charter is already to only cater about security fixes, or do
you imply to categorize
Quoting Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The issue is also not the infrstructure IMO, it's simply lack of human
resources and either someone needs to assign them to it if that entity
(Red Hat/board/whatever) considers that a worthy goal, or the
resources need to come from more voluntary people,
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 04:54:34PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 16:47, Axel Thimm wrote:
The issue is also not the infrstructure IMO, it's simply lack of human
resources
Well, if the barrier to contribute was lower, getting more people would be
easier. If it
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 11:46:37PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Unifying and opening up more of the infrastructure and other ideas like
that only doing critical security fixes are things to look at.
But FL's charter is already to only cater about security fixes, or do
you
Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The issue is also not the infrstructure IMO, it's simply lack of human
resources and either someone needs to assign them to it if that entity
(Red Hat/board/whatever) considers that a worthy goal, or the
resources need to come from
- Original Message -
From: Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: [fab] looking at our surrent state a bit
== MISC ==
* I got the impression (and LWN readers, too [hello corbert! ]) that
Fedora Legacy is
On Monday 06 November 2006 06:21, Rex Dieter wrote:
David Eisenstein wrote:
Fedora Board, please take heed. Although providing a stable, long-term
operating system/environment is *not* one of Fedora Project's stated
goals, the practical lifetime of a Fedora release of 1 year (without
On Monday 06 November 2006 09:59, Dave Stevens wrote:
a confession of inadequacy is more of a preliminary than an answer
Confession how? How would it be any different from the Fedora Legacy project
itself from making some sort of 'confession' ? The unfortunate problem is
ours to solve.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Stevens wrote:
a confession of inadequacy is more of a preliminary than an answer
Dave
Sorry, to butt in
Maybe, what we need to do is have a re-organization of the idea of
FedoraLegacy instead of trying to overtax anyone. Or chase
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:04:06PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
Additionally, the project simply needs at least one person who manages the
project as a full-time job.
And by needs, I mean: I'm very skeptical that it can be viable without
this. While the project was in its most functional stage,
15 matches
Mail list logo
