[FC1] ClamAV 0.86.2 Unsupported Update

2005-07-26 Thread James Kosin
/mirror/fedora-core/beta/i386 Package area http://support.intcomgrp.com/mirror/fedora-core/beta/src Package source area GCC Update - -- Not as close as I'd like it to be. I got past one problem and another problem has shown up. Now in building c++flint James Kosin

Re: Move to Fedoraproject.org wiki

2005-07-28 Thread James Kosin
a member; what can I do to help with things? Or what do I need to do? My account is JamesKosin ... Thanks, James Kosin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC6R

Re: Move to Fedoraproject.org wiki

2005-07-29 Thread James Kosin
ideally take another path. I'd like to help; but, have only limited free time on my busy schedule. I'm trying to get a GCC update setup and working. only problem is now I think there are package problems... Compiling completes correctly now. James Kosin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

Re: Building Fedora Legacy 2.4.20-43.7 for RH7.3 from sources.

2005-08-04 Thread James Kosin
kernel you can boot from and try carefully. Good Luck, James Kosin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC8jLkkNLDmnu1kSkRApnoAJ0SCEWiLl2cuHt3IUfHMLPGd1mtcACePq60 upRSVzrrZhWUKEzhW+sjWnQ= =zFkJ

Updates for FC1

2005-08-05 Thread James Kosin
believe where kept from the old gcc version. One patch was already applied and one did not agree with the new changes. I fixed my problems building the package. The last thing was documentation being replaced. Thanks, James Kosin REMEBER, my updates are NOT SUPPORTED BY REDHAT or FEDORA CORE. If you

Re: [FC1] Unofficial Updates to ZLIB

2005-08-08 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Klinke wrote: | On Monday 08 August 2005 09:21, James Kosin wrote: | | JAMES' Unofficial Unsupported by RedHat, Redhat Fedora Core, and | Redhat Fedora Legacy Groups! ~Any support for my packages, | will only come from me

[FC1] UNSUPPORTED UPDATES by James

2005-08-12 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Again, - - JAMES' Unofficial Unsupported by RedHat, Redhat Fedora Core, and Redhat Fedora Legacy Groups! ~Any support for my packages, will only

Re: [FC1] James' Updates

2005-09-09 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Gilbert Sebenste wrote: | On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, HaJo Schatz wrote: | | James, I truly appreciate your efforts to get latest versions of | critical packages out. | | However, | [...] | | SpamAssassin 3.0.4 | -- | | [...] | | I'd

[FC1: ClamAV] James' Update Advisory

2005-09-16 Thread James Kosin
! == Thanks James Kosin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDKxWIkNLDmnu1kSkRA66bAJ9tpyEz3Zb5lHqk+fQYGlavHFUA/gCaA79z xIwabr8Y/r9X8kEiLw0hNfM= =8hMt -END PGP

Re: [FC1: SpamAssassin] James' Update Advisory

2005-09-19 Thread James Kosin
.src.rpm New BINARY RPM - -- http://support.intcomgrp.com/mirror/fedora-core/beta/i386/spamassassin-3.1.0-1.fc1.i386.rpm I caught this on Friday; but, couldn't get a patch done quick enough to get it out then. Sorry again, James Kosin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

Re: [FC1: SpamAssassin] James' Update Advisory

2005-09-20 Thread James Kosin
/fedora-core/beta/i386/perl-Net-DNS-0.45-3.fc1.i386.rpm Sorry again, James Kosin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDMBzTkNLDmnu1kSkRAzkxAJ9UPwzc/kh1JE7GdgkfgJCCNpDxTwCeIQ92

Re: Web-Page for James' Updates.

2005-10-04 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 David Eisenstein wrote: |On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, James Kosin wrote: | |This may be easier than writing a long detailed email all the time. |Everyone can get / see updates via my newly created web-page at |~http://support.intcomgrp.com/~jkosin

Package Submission?

2005-10-18 Thread James Kosin
to binutils http://beta.support.intcomgrp.com/mirror/fedora-core/beta/src/binutils-2.16.1-1.fc1.src.rpm I'm also willing to make changes / patches to the versions I have if there are any problems. Thanks, James Kosin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG

Re: Package Submission?

2005-10-18 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 James Kosin wrote: Ok, I would like to know how to submit a package for FC1 to be updated... Of course, not through the normal means of patching the existing version; but, a new build. In particualar, the gcc package I've built for 3.3.6

Re: Package Submission?

2005-10-18 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Rex Dieter wrote: James Kosin wrote: I would like to know how to submit a package for FC1 to be updated... Of course, not through the normal means of patching the existing version; but, a new build. In particualar, the gcc package I've

Re: Build team?

2005-10-19 Thread James Kosin
adding people, but I see that it just isn't going to happen. David, I had tagged you as one I was going to invite. I will be making private invitations to join the build team over the next week or so. I'm willing to help with building as well. Let me know. James Kosin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

Another security problem..

2005-10-20 Thread James Kosin
if they do have a PHP document configuring some of these administrative tasks open on the internet. Thanks, James Kosin - - -- - - -- James Kosin International Communications Group, Inc. 230 Pickett's Line Newport News, VA 23603-1366 - - - United States of America - Phone: 1(757)947-1030 ext

Re: Another security problem..

2005-10-20 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Jim Popovitch wrote: Another? Heck, that's old stuff from quite some time (Internet time) ago. If I had a nickel for every invalid file access attempt. ;-) -Jim P. James Kosin wrote: --snip-- I'm not all that worried about invalid

Re: FC1 yum update Problems

2005-11-08 Thread James Kosin
system... Then import the fedora-legacy keys. Or maybe someone could resign all the packages with the fedora-legacy key. James Kosin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDcLBIkNLDmnu1kSkRAwDcAJoC86

PHP Attacks....

2005-11-09 Thread James Kosin
by updating PHP also for FC1, if someone doesn't get going on this for FC1 FC2 builds... which seem to be susceptible to this attach. http://support.intcomgrp.com/~jkosin James Kosin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http

Re: PHP Attacks....

2005-11-09 Thread James Kosin
to be fixed if we are vulnerable. James Kosin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDcmfnkNLDmnu1kSkRA39pAKCABlO6P3J7EVRAG6oefeclrPDEEwCeI2w0 U65qbkAwaJhCVlc+nNLt3ao= =11iK -END PGP SIGNATURE

Re: PHP Attacks....

2005-11-09 Thread James Kosin
packages don't have. Ok, FC1 already has the patch for CAN-2005-1921 All be need to do is add the patch for RHSA-2005:748-05 I'll have to compare the patches to be sure. James Kosin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http

Re: PHP Attacks....

2005-11-09 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Michal Jaegermann wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:19:35PM -0500, James Kosin wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:22:28AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: Does look like we need to patch this. RHEL issued an update, Do you mean that one from

Re: PHP Attacks....

2005-11-09 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Michal Jaegermann wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:19:35PM -0500, James Kosin wrote: SNIP We could base our build for FC1 from the patches in FC3... If and only if, we are allowed to update some packages inside to newer versions. FC3

[Fwd: FYI: branch-1-5: fix local denial of service in relink]

2005-12-20 Thread James Kosin
workgroup to domain and I lost my gpg signatures. Will have to make new later. Thanks, James Kosin Original Message From - Mon Dec 19 08:38:06 2005 X-Account-Key: account2 X-UIDL: AAwxUJBAAAQHAoeNlePNMK01LNu50oh5 X-Mozilla-Status: 1003 X-Mozilla-Status2: Received: from smtp3

Re: slapper worm

2006-01-23 Thread James Kosin
.legacy openssl-0.9.7a-33.13.legacy Are there any updates FL can do to any of the packages to fix/block slapper from an FC1 machine? Michael. Michael, Try my version of httpd here: http://support.intcomgrp.com/~jkosin It has been effective against the worm so far. James Kosin

Re: slapper worm

2006-01-23 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Keating wrote: James, what is in your package that we haven't included in our Apache? I was under the assumption that we had fixed all the CVEs related to the slapper worm and that our users were safe. If this isn't the case, we have a

Re: slapper worm

2006-01-24 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Keating wrote: On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 17:11 -0500, James Kosin wrote: My version takes care of the mod_ssl issue he already disabled. FC1 doesn't have a fix or if so it hasn't gone through QA yet. Do you have a CVE for the ssl issue? I'd

Re: slapper worm

2006-01-24 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike McCarty wrote: --snip-- $ ps -A | grep pache $ ps -A | grep ssl doesn't show anything, so Apache isn't running, and I guess SSL isn't either. Mike Mike, ps -A | grep httpd /* Apache is only the name of the server

James' Unofficial Updates

2006-01-30 Thread James Kosin
for FC1. I could also always start with the kernel, if that is OK. I've gotten very good with my own package and it seems to be simpler than say perl or many of the more complex builds. Thanks, James Kosin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG

Re: no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

2006-02-14 Thread James Kosin
, James Kosin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD8hQokNLDmnu1kSkRAu1nAJwJq9OK49o7lHySze7/YdD946z/vQCfaGg8 zAIWK7orCaOp/IYyu63R0Jg= =b0lD -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Scanned by ClamAV - http

Re: no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

2006-02-14 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legacy/QATesting. OK, It is a little buried in the clutter. I've seen this page many times, but never really dig-ed into it. I'm printing this stuff out for further review. Thanks, James

Re: no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

2006-02-14 Thread James Kosin
description. Even something like follow these steps or procedures James Kosin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD8i+7kNLDmnu1kSkRAu6zAJ4874rS9Xfly2zdxapfWJecy7ObuQCffu8j 7Kz9ON76BJye21LktA4fJtk= =qJij

Re: Documentation question at fedoralegacy.org

2006-03-03 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Temple wrote: But looking at the download site, it /looks/ as though the x86_64 rpms are there. (Not so for core 2). Does the site need this updated? Matt, Good point; but, they may be holding off updating this fact until we see the

Re: Documentation question at fedoralegacy.org

2006-03-03 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Temple wrote: I'm not sure I understand. The x86_64 rpms are already in the download area for core 3. They're really there. Matt Matt, I'm not saying they are not there.

Re: 1-2-3 out, time for FC2?

2006-03-22 Thread James Kosin
go on and on about this point. Just my 2-cents, James Kosin -- Scanned by ClamAV - http://www.clamav.net -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

Re: New sendmail and missing /usr/lib/sendmail

2006-03-27 Thread James Kosin
Jesse Keating wrote: On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 16:17 -0600, Mike Klinke wrote: There is instead an entry in /usr/lib; sendmail.sendmail which is linked to /usr/sbin/sendmail. Also the man pages no longer work if you type; man sendmail You have to use man sendmail.sendmail. This

Re: New sendmail and missing /usr/lib/sendmail

2006-03-27 Thread James Kosin
Jesse Keating wrote: On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 13:43 -0500, James Kosin wrote: Sounds like something didn't get built correctly. Was this a new release of sendmail or a patch? I believe my packages needed (or at least I let them build a -cf package) at one point. My version has been working

Re: Fedora products, to upgrade rather than backport?

2006-05-16 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Keating wrote: So in the RHL space, the choice was clear. Backport whenever possible. However the Fedora landscape is different. Upstream Core does not do backporting, they more often than not version upgrade to resolve security issues.

Re: Fedora products, to upgrade rather than backport?

2006-05-17 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tom Yates wrote: On Mon, 15 May 2006, James Kosin wrote: I agree with Jesse here; but, I would like to add that the packages should be tested on the released platform by someone and not just released in this case. SendMail was a recent blunder

Re: Friday Flames - What to do with RHL7.3/9 and FC1/2

2006-06-12 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok, Normally, I'm very patient. But, this just rubs me the wrong way. Have we lost sight of our purpose? This is Fedora Legacy, which supports older unsupported versions past their 6-month window with Fedora group. I think the support if too

Re: Meeting results

2006-07-07 Thread James Kosin
fight the powers that be and I have advanced notice, which gives me time to prepare. - -James Kosin Long time FC1 user, and proud supporter of RedHat / Fedora. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Re: sendmail DOS (CVE-2006-1173)

2006-07-19 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adam Gibson wrote: Anyone know if this is being worked on? http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-1173 -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

Re: FC1 and FC2 end of life

2006-07-31 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bo Lynch wrote: Just read about the end of life of FC1 and FC2 on the fedoralegacy page. I understand that there will be no more bug fixes for these OS's, but does that mean that there will bo no more security fixes as well? Yes, it means NO MORE

Re: Legacy FC-4 branch created -one more time

2006-08-11 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Aaron Konstam wrote: On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 16:55 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote: At the risk of showing my ignorance let me ask. The information was received that FC4 is moving to legacy control. Is there a legacy repo that FC4 people can use with

Re: Yum config for Fedora Core 4

2006-08-14 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Keating wrote: On Monday 14 August 2006 16:06, Eric Rostetter wrote: This page needs to be updated to reflect FC1 and FC2 being retired... Whoops! Thanks for catching that. (I added the FC4 too) Jesse, I believe RH9 was retired many

Re: Fedora Core 4 Legacy security updates?

2006-10-11 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Thome wrote: David, Sounds like a good thing entering it into Bugzilla, however, if there is not a priority within Red Hat to fix it, the bug will sit there and rot... Might be a good time to split the bugzilla between active devlopment and

Re: lwn article on the death of Fedora Legacy

2006-10-20 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Miller wrote: Legacy is all about security-updates!!! ONLY!!! The policy is update with PATCHES if at all possible. From RH even better; otherwise fall back to other sources for patches such as the development groups, etc. Only if

Re: You Need Fedora Legacy!! Re: [fab] looking at our surrent state a bit

2006-11-06 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dave Stevens wrote: a confession of inadequacy is more of a preliminary than an answer Dave Sorry, to butt in Maybe, what we need to do is have a re-organization of the idea of FedoraLegacy instead of trying to overtax anyone. Or chase

Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy

2006-11-15 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Keating wrote: See my blog regarding the future of Legacy as a project. Please remember these are just proposals and not final solutions. A wiki page will follow soon. http://jkeating.livejournal.com/#entry_34659 I hope this doesn't

Re: Option --force for cp

2008-06-10 Thread James Kosin
Luc MAIGNAN wrote: Hi, I definitively can't force cp to override existing files without asking confirmation. According to documentation , I try : cp -r --force src/file1 ./ but always a confirmation is asked... What's wrong ? 'cp -r --reply=yes src/file1 ./' This will work... Check

Re: Option --force for cp

2008-06-10 Thread James Kosin
wwp wrote: Hello James, On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:43:48 -0400 James Kosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Luc MAIGNAN wrote: Hi, I definitively can't force cp to override existing files without asking confirmation. According to documentation , I try : cp -r --force src/file1

Re: Memory, swap, and limits

2008-06-18 Thread James Kosin
Beartooth Sciurivore wrote: Every new computer I've yet had has begun slowing down soon after I get it -- probably because I keep several browsers open, with from several to many tabs each. I've learned long since to make sure each machine has all the memory it can handle from the git-go,

Re: Memory, swap, and limits

2008-06-18 Thread James Kosin
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: James Kosin wrote: Having TOO much swap space can be a detriment and not an asset. Usually, the rule of thumb I go by is allocate about 2x the amount of physical memory installed on the system; for machines with 1M. This number will need to approach more or less

Re: Memory, swap, and limits

2008-06-19 Thread James Kosin
Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:56:25 -0400, James Kosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Having TOO much swap space can be a detriment and not an asset. Usually, the rule of thumb I go by is allocate about 2x the amount of physical memory installed on the system

DNS Attacks

2008-07-25 Thread James Kosin
Everyone, The DNS attacks are starting!!! Below is a snippet of a logwatch from last night. Be sure all DNS servers are updated if at all possible. The spooks are out in full on this security vulnerability in force. THIS IS YOUR LAST WARNING...!!! Patch or Upgrade NOW! James Kosin A long

Re: DNS Attacks

2008-07-25 Thread James Kosin
Jim van Wel wrote: Zhe zombies are coming But we are all aware of this fact after release of the patch ;) Greetings, Jim. I know; but there is always somebody who always says, It won't happen to me. And sadly they usually never learn their lesson even if repeated multiple times. I

Re: DNS Attacks

2008-07-25 Thread James Kosin
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: James Kosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: client 143.215.143.11 query (cache) 'com/ANY/IN' denied: 30 Time(s) client 143.215.143.11 query (cache) 'gmail.com/ANY/IN' denied: 32 Time(s) client 143.215.143.11 query (cache) 'hotmail.com/ANY/IN' denied: 31 Thanks

Re: DNS Attacks

2008-07-25 Thread James Kosin
or update. b) If the DNS is corrupted you can't rely on the DNS resolver to be pointing to the correct IP.!! You could be digging on the phishing site and they would be reporting false and bad information to you so they can scam you of your passwords and/or money. James Kosin

Re: How to patch Fedora Core 2 Bind RPM?

2008-08-12 Thread James Kosin
John Smith wrote: I have a Fedora Core 2 box that is running BIND 9.2.3-13 and I want to update to the latest patch due to the DNS issue. How can I upgrade my RPM install? Is there an RPM that is independent of the Fedora OS? Or is it possible to compile and use the patch installed from

Re: fc9 install

2008-08-12 Thread James Kosin
Paul Newell wrote: From reading the fc docs, it appears that this is the mailing list to send questions about installation of fedora core (in the case, FC9). Before I send email, I want to make sure I have the right mailing list and, if not, would please ask for advice about which mailing

Re: Backup Server RAID Suggestions - Resend

2008-09-08 Thread James Kosin
much in advance! Mike Good Luck Mike, James Kosin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate

Re: ftp passive connection timing out

2008-09-11 Thread James Kosin
rfjones wrote: I update my server to f9; client is f8 my ftp no longer works; I get following error trying to put get or ls: 227 Entering Passive Mode (192,168,253,12,152,205). ftp: connect: Connection timed out an f9 client can connect without errors I have not changed the f8 ftp client

Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 55, Issue 100

2008-09-12 Thread James Kosin
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 22:57 +0930, Tim wrote: On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 07:59 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: stop copying the whole digest in your posts If it's technical possible for *this* list server to automatically reject quoted digest replies, I'd like to see

Re: FireFox 3 EULA

2008-09-16 Thread James Kosin
Everyone, Maybe as a compromise, Mozilla (Firefox) could tie the pop-up to the first use of the security feature and not to the start of the application. This way distributions that didn't want the pop-up could disable the features in the default configuration before firefox starts. And when the

Re: Fedora-10 problems

2008-10-03 Thread James Kosin
Timothy Murphy wrote: I tried installing F-10 from the hard disk on my Thinkpad T43 but came up against two major impediments: 1. The cursor is not visible. Occasionally something lights up, to show where the cursor is (eg when specifying one's location), but on other occasions it does

Re: Fedora-10 problems

2008-10-03 Thread James Kosin
Timothy Murphy wrote: James Kosin wrote: I tried installing F-10 from the hard disk on my Thinkpad T43 but came up against two major impediments: 1. The cursor is not visible. Occasionally something lights up, to show where the cursor is (eg when specifying one's location), but on other

Package Rebuilding

2008-10-07 Thread James Kosin
, or uninstalling all the dependent packages then rebuilding. Am I making sense... James Kosin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Package Rebuilding

2008-10-08 Thread James Kosin
Todd Zullinger wrote: James Kosin wrote: When you build a new package (say for postgresql) and you are leaping version number, say from 7.x to 8.x, How do you go about updating the other dependencies (other packages that require a library in 7.x) that doesn't exist in the new package

Re: 16GB USB Drive Not Accessible

2008-10-27 Thread James Kosin
Christopher A. Williams wrote: I recently bought a snazzy new 16GB USB pen drive from the local store - it was only $29! I have several drives that are 8GB and smaller from the same store that are the same brand. Imagine my surprise when: * The 16GB drive is not accessible on either F9 or

Re: script help

2008-12-01 Thread James Kosin
adrian kok wrote: Hi I have script to remove files but it can't work in directory ls *log | sort -r | sed -e 1,1d | xargs rm -f those folders are: Nov28-log Nov29-log Nov30-log Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com You have to change the

Re: Freeze SO Linux, it's possible?

2008-12-10 Thread James Kosin
Carlos Carrero Gutierrez wrote: Hi, i would like to freeze my linux in order to freeze the OS, then, when I reboot the computer all changes that i made in the computer dissapears and it returns to the previous OS freezed. In windows there is something similar, called Deep Freeze (it's

Re: service network restart won't run via su

2008-12-15 Thread James Kosin
Wade Hampton wrote: I upgraded a laptop from F8 to F9 and now have an issue If I log in as a normal use, open an xterm, then type su, I used to be able to run /sbin/service network restart Now it fails: # /sbin/service network restart env: /etc/init.d/network: Permission denied

Re: Fresh install of Fedora 10 on an IBM 9123-710 having problems with X11

2008-12-18 Thread James Kosin
Morris.Marshael wrote: This box does not have a video card and its monitor is a dump terminal connected through a hmc. Can I configure X11 server to run so that my PC can access with exceed? I have already run the yum update since the install to get the latest and greatest. Thanks

Re: rpmbuild question - follow on to gcc issues

2009-02-10 Thread James Kosin
homb...@tips-q.com wrote: What is the Fedora way of dealing with this situation? Once you modify a package your warranty is null and void ;-) Actually, there is NO WARRANTY of any sort. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list

Re: Chown ???

2009-04-09 Thread James Kosin
Rick Stevens wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 11:19 -0400, Jim wrote: Rick Stevens wrote: Jim wrote: Rick Stevens wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 15:27 +, g wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: ttys 'b-'. you did not answer which model and

Re: Chown ???

2009-04-09 Thread James Kosin
Jim wrote: Rick Stevens wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 11:19 -0400, Jim wrote: Rick Stevens wrote: Jim wrote: Rick Stevens wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 15:27 +, g wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: ttys 'b-'. you did not answer

Re: Chown ???

2009-04-09 Thread James Kosin
psmith wrote: James Kosin wrote: Rick Stevens wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 11:19 -0400, Jim wrote: Rick Stevens wrote: Jim wrote: Rick Stevens wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, 2009-04-08

Re: Chown ???

2009-04-10 Thread James Kosin
Tim wrote: On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 21:55 +0100, psmith wrote: the first ever program being 10 print phil is cool 20 goto 10 run Blasphemer! Stone him, stone him, he used a GOTO! That word is forbidden and must never be uttered... ;-) Actually, GOTO was very heavily in BASIC

Re: Goto [Was Re: Chown ???]

2009-04-10 Thread James Kosin
Dave Ihnat wrote: On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:07:00AM -0400, James Kosin wrote: Actually, GOTO was very heavily in BASIC programming language. There was no idea of statement blocks back then. It may be the only language at the time where it isn't considered taboo. That's been a bone

Re: Question about update of clamav

2009-04-13 Thread James Kosin
Steven W. Orr wrote: When I tried to update clamav using yum, it told me that I'm up to date. I've got 0.94.2 and .95 is out. Should I expect this to be available soon or how would this work? Questions: a) What version of fedora? 8, 9, 10? b) 0.95 made significant changes to milter. This

Re: Question about update of clamav

2009-04-14 Thread James Kosin
Steven W. Orr wrote: On Monday, Apr 13th 2009 at 15:34 -, quoth James Kosin: =Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:34:01 =From: James Kosin jko...@beta.intcomgrp.com =Reply-To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. =fedora-list@redhat.com =To: Community

Re: Question about update of clamav

2009-04-15 Thread James Kosin
Kevin Kofler wrote: James Kosin wrote: b) 0.95 made significant changes to milter. This may be the cause for the delay. And there is no real threat for using 0.94.2 other than not being the latest release. Judging from previous history, the clamav maintainer is extremely cautious about

Re: nVidia vs. ATI graphics card for fedora

2009-04-28 Thread James Kosin
Globe Trotter wrote: Hi, I am ordering a souped-up workstation and I was wondering which graphics card is preferable for running fedora: a 256 MB PCIe x16 nVidia NVS 290, Dual Monitor capable or a ATI Fire GL V3600 256MB, Dual Monitor DVI Capable ATI3600

Re: OT: Can Reformatting A Hard Drive To ext3 Destroy All the Data On It?

2009-06-10 Thread James Kosin
Tim wrote: Tim: But do you know what the drive does when you use that function? ;-\ Bruno Wolff III: Reading the drive back in should give you a good idea. If that isn't enough of a check for you then you should just be destroying the drive. While that would tell you that *you*

Re: OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread James Kosin
Alan Evans wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: All PIIIs are single cores, AFAIK. Of course I knew that. In my mind, dual and dual core are the same thing and don't necessarily mean that the cores are on the same die. Kind of like when I say a Sun E1 is