On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 23:14 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 20:41 -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Problem is the symbol does not really attract anyone. We have
seen the reactions on fedoraforum.org. I even show it to
my family and friend, overall they didn't like it.
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 20:41 -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Problem is the symbol does not really attract anyone. We have
seen the reactions on fedoraforum.org. I even show it to
my family and friend, overall they didn't like it.
I've been catching up on the discussions from last week on this
Hello, I read about the new logo on Fedora People. Might as well throw in
my opinion :)
It's too clever.
The first time I saw the proposed logo I thought to myself Why on earth
is there a Möbius strip in the logo?.
I don't want to have to understand a logo.
What about a logo that can be good
nodata wrote:
Hello, I read about the new logo on Fedora People. Might as well throw in
my opinion :)
It's too clever.
The first time I saw the proposed logo I thought to myself Why on earth
is there a Möbius strip in the logo?.
I don't want to have to understand a logo.
Logos
nodata wrote:
Mod01, mod02, mod03 are all improvements because they try to hide the
difficult-to-explain part of the logo.
I disagree: why have a logo in the first place if you try to hide it?
The logo should stand on its own and be recognizable even without the
'fedora' word - this is what
nodata wrote:
Hello, I read about the new logo on Fedora People. Might as well throw in
my opinion :)
It's too clever.
The first time I saw the proposed logo I thought to myself Why on earth
is there a Möbius strip in the logo?.
I don't want to have to understand a logo.
Logos dont
Hi
But not understanding a logo is distracting and annoying. Is that good?
Is it really?. Examples have been given before. What your understanding
of the Nike logo?. Is that somehow immediately visible to anyone who
sees it?.
Fedora represents many things to many different people. Its my
Hi
But not understanding a logo is distracting and annoying. Is that good?
Is it really?. Examples have been given before. What your understanding
of the Nike logo?. Is that somehow immediately visible to anyone who
sees it?.
Fedora represents many things to many different people. Its my
Hi
I look at the Nike logo and see a tick. That's all the thought I gave to it.
I looked at the proposed Fedora logo, and saw a Möbius strip, with white
and light blue, then wondered why it had two colours, then saw the f,
then wondered why the rest of the strip was light blue, then wondered
Hi
I look at the Nike logo and see a tick. That's all the thought I gave to
it.
I looked at the proposed Fedora logo, and saw a Möbius strip, with white
and light blue, then wondered why it had two colours, then saw the f,
then wondered why the rest of the strip was light blue, then wondered
Hi
Err- thanks for that, but the point of my e-mail wasn't to get it
explained,
It wasnt a explanation of the logo but the colors associated with the
project.
it was to show the questions others might ask themselves when
seeing the logo.
A loop with an f in it?
If thats the impression
On 11/8/05, nodata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But not understanding a logo is distracting and annoying. Is that good?
I'm not distracted... nor am I annoyed... perhaps the fault lies
inward and not with the logo.
If you choose to go back and read up on the initial discussion when
this draft was
I made a quick sckethy modification of the draft
with a stylist f and a subtle infinity symbol.
http://finalzone.webmasterswebworkshop.com/Fedora/fedora_logo_draft_scketchy.png
I didn't intend to make if perfect but that is a suggested idea.
Luya
--
This level of discussion is not moving things foward. If you have
different modifications to present.. do like dfong did..create a set
of modifications to the draft and present them.
Jef, it's not my intention to derail the process, so please don't
misread me. I respect the work that you
Tejas Dinkar wrote:
Hmmm,
for many people, including myself, feather == Apache, even if the
color of the feather is different, as may be the angle.
Tejas
I havent heard much about the different
how about instead we just keep dragging this process out..with more
and more ideas... every month..a new logo idea.
Are there some links to the other logo ideas? I've seen Diane's and the
donkey (I think that was gdk's child), and the capstrat one. That makes
three.
--
Joshua Wulf wrote:
how about instead we just keep dragging this process out..with more
and more ideas... every month..a new logo idea.
Are there some links to the other logo ideas? I've seen Diane's and
the donkey (I think that was gdk's child), and the capstrat one. That
makes three.
Joshua Wulf wrote:
how about instead we just keep dragging this process out..with more
and more ideas... every month..a new logo idea.
Are there some links to the other logo ideas? I've seen Diane's and the
donkey (I think that was gdk's child), and the capstrat one. That makes
three.
On 11/7/05, Joshua Wulf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how about instead we just keep dragging this process out..with more
and more ideas... every month..a new logo idea.
Are there some links to the other logo ideas? I've seen Diane's and the
donkey (I think that was gdk's child), and the
Thanks for the links Rahul and Jeff.
--josh
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On 11/7/05, Joshua Wulf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how about instead we just keep dragging this process out..with more
and more ideas... every month..a new logo idea.
Are there some links to the other logo ideas? I've
F is freedom is a cool idea. Here are my thoughts about the current
proposal:
It's too clever.
Infinite freedom is a clever concept, which requires some explanation.
(Why doesn't it let me play my mp3s and DVDs - where's the freedom to
do what I want?)
The idea of combining the f for
Nicu Buculei wrote:
Joshua Wulf wrote:
how about instead we just keep dragging this process out..with more
and more ideas... every month..a new logo idea.
Are there some links to the other logo ideas? I've seen Diane's and
the donkey (I think that was gdk's child), and the capstrat one.
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
If you are serious about this idea, what we need are 3
drafts for 3 different designs which all attempt to express the same
idea.
Heh. Let's do it.
Let's get some variations on the theme.
--josh
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
My main concern with the present design is the confusion caused in the
cortex by the superimposition of the f and the infinity sign. Having the
two elements there in that way causes neither of them to be striking and
the brain to prevaricate between the two. It makes the effect weak.
The
Hi
Here is a set of modifications of the first proposal and a new one by
Diana Fong
http://www.isity.net/appeal/
Courtesy: http://fedoraproject.org/people
regards
Rahul
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 06:44 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Here is a set of modifications of the first proposal and a new one by
Diana Fong
http://www.isity.net/appeal/
I like some of the alterations. The Feather though, Feather Linux uses
almost that exact same feather as the
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 07:25 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Never heard of Feather Linux before but if you are talking about this
one http://featherlinux.berlios.de/ , they dont seem to be using a
feather but a variation of tux.
Look to the right of Tux (:
--
Jesse Keating RHCE
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 07:25 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Never heard of Feather Linux before but if you are talking about this
one http://featherlinux.berlios.de/ , they dont seem to be using a
feather but a variation of tux.
Look to the right of Tux (:
On 11/6/05, Rahul Sundaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats barely visible. While we have to avoid confusion with other
projects, we cant choose to use any elements at all if we are going to
nit pick at this level.
how about instead we just keep dragging this process out..with more
and more
29 matches
Mail list logo
