-Original Message-
From: fedora-marketing-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-
marketing-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Susan Lauber
Sent: 14 May 2009 23:21
To: For discussions about marketing and expanding the Fedora user base
Subject: Re: ETA on the CMS? (Was: Podcast feed
I brought this up briefly in IRC this morning and didn't want to
forget about it.
We really need a central podcasting feed from somewhere. There is a
CMS coming soon, and that would be ideal. Would it be possible for
the Fedora Planet to simply carry these things in a way that didn't
duplicate
Paul W. Frields wrote:
I brought this up briefly in IRC this morning and didn't want to
forget about it.
We really need a central podcasting feed from somewhere. There is a
CMS coming soon, and that would be ideal. Would it be possible for
the Fedora Planet to simply carry these things in a
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 05:17:29PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
CMS coming soon
Speaking of which, what's the ETA on this?
--
Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org
GnuPG fingerprint: E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226 B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36
pgpEy6mv6CGcH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 05:17:29PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
CMS coming soon
Speaking of which, what's the ETA on this?
Def. post-F-11
I honestly haven't had the time I wish I could dedicate to getting all
of the modules
Where is the documentation on whats going on with this, if any? What
did we decide to use?
Jack
David Nalley wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 05:17:29PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
CMS coming soon
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 05:24:27PM -0400, Jack Aboutboul wrote:
Paul W. Frields wrote:
I brought this up briefly in IRC this morning and didn't want to
forget about it.
We really need a central podcasting feed from somewhere. There is a
CMS coming soon, and that would be ideal. Would it be
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
I just meant that since people sometimes repost content -- which is a
good and fine thing -- we don't want subscribers to end up having
double, treble, or more multiple downloads of the same things simply
because they
