[Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-03-24 08:41:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request

[Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 21:47:51 EDT --- I'm not worried about

[Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 --- Comment #3 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-03-19 03:45:18 EDT --- Hello, What happened with this packet? I

[Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 --- Comment #5 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-03-19 06:38:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) This package is

[Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 --- Comment #5 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-03-19 06:38:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) This package is

[Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 --- Comment #5 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-03-19 06:38:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) This package is

[Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-03-19 05:59:31 EDT --- This package is still waiting

[Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-03-19 09:43:38 EDT --- Nicolas, I'll finish this review shortly, and

[Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-03-19 10:47:44 EDT --- Looks good still, is there documentation that

[Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-16 10:40:29 EDT --- Hello, and sorry for the late

[Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: