[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-21 16:33:05 EDT --- sbackup-0.10.5-5.fc9 has

[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-21 16:38:02 EDT --- sbackup-0.10.5-5.fc10 has

[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-19 10:03:20 EDT --- sbackup-0.10.5-5.fc9 has

[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-19 10:02:08 EDT --- sbackup-0.10.5-5.fc10 has

[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

2009-01-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

2009-01-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

2009-01-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #8 from Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-16 18:41:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) - Please

[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

2009-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-01-11 18:56:22 EDT --- - Timestamp of Source0 is

[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

2009-01-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-05 11:46:18 EDT --- Issues: - Timestamp of Source0

[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

2009-01-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-01-03 20:15:28 EDT --- REVIEW FOR

[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

2009-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

2008-11-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-27 08:13:50 EDT --- Spec URL:

[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

2008-11-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-27 11:47:45 EDT --- Koji:

[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

2008-11-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-26 18:15:34 EDT --- i have a little problem with consolehelper and

[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

2008-11-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #1 from Simon Wesp [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-01 09:39:14 EDT --- Spec URL: