[Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library

2009-03-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 --- Comment #15 from Roman Rakus rra...@redhat.com 2009-03-11 10:37:43 EDT --- Service group will be able to write into

[Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library

2009-03-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 Roman Rakus rra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library

2009-03-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library

2009-03-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 --- Comment #13 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com 2009-03-06 03:22:09 EDT --- Good point - I mentioned that off bugzilla

[Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-05 15:32:26 EDT --- I don't see the Requires(pre): shadow-utils.

[Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library

2009-03-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library

2009-03-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 Roman Rakus rra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library

2009-03-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 --- Comment #10 from Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com 2009-03-04 10:33:26 EDT --- Shoudln't this be using a defined

[Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library

2009-03-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 --- Comment #11 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com 2009-03-04 10:43:08 EDT --- If defined system gid, then some of the

[Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library

2009-03-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 --- Comment #3 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com 2009-03-03 10:24:06 EDT --- Additionally groupdel in postun would mean

[Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library

2009-03-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 --- Comment #4 from Roman Rakus rra...@redhat.com 2009-03-03 11:16:35 EDT ---

[Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library

2009-03-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 --- Comment #5 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com 2009-03-03 11:33:36 EDT --- I recommend to also add - otherwise pre

[Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library

2009-03-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 --- Comment #6 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com 2009-03-03 11:34:46 EDT --- Sorry, I meant: %post getent group service

[Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library

2009-03-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 --- Comment #7 from Roman Rakus rra...@redhat.com 2009-03-03 12:15:30 EDT --- updated -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library

2009-02-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 --- Comment #1 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com 2009-02-25 10:11:19 EDT --- First check: I'm a bit worried about the

[Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library

2009-02-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 --- Comment #2 from Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com 2009-02-25 17:28:47 EDT --- Also, what's the separate user used for

[Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added