[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker

2009-03-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 Pavel Shevchuk stl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker

2009-03-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker

2009-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker

2009-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 --- Comment #12 from Pavel Shevchuk stl...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 17:29:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request

[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker

2009-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 Pavel Shevchuk stl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker

2009-03-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 --- Comment #10 from Pavel Shevchuk stl...@gmail.com 2009-03-22 19:54:31 EDT --- * Mon Mar 23 2009 Pavel Stalwart Shevchuk

[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker

2009-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 --- Comment #9 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2009-03-16 04:22:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=335317) --

[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker

2009-03-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Shevchuk stl...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 13:57:10 EDT --- * Sun Mar 15 2009 Pavel Stalwart Shevchuk

[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker

2009-03-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker

2009-03-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 --- Comment #6 from Pavel Shevchuk stl...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 17:13:52 EDT --- This is NOT a gui application, it's

[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker

2009-03-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 --- Comment #7 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 17:41:36 EDT --- And there are standard way for window

[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker

2009-03-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 --- Comment #8 from Pavel Shevchuk stl...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 19:13:36 EDT --- Light WMs like openbox and dwm (slock was

[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker

2009-03-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker

2009-03-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 --- Comment #2 from Pavel Shevchuk stl...@gmail.com 2009-03-08 12:08:45 EDT --- Now it does. * Sun Mar 08 2009 Pavel

[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker

2009-03-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 --- Comment #3 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2009-03-08 12:21:01 EDT --- Generated debuginfo is empty. It happens