[Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA

2009-04-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA

2009-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA

2009-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA

2009-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA

2009-04-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA

2009-04-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-04-21 22:52:28 EDT --- Yes, you're right. updated. Spec URL: