Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System
2009-05-25 17:23:11 EDT ---
gmixer-1.3-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System
2009-05-25 17:12:29 EDT ---
gmixer-1.3-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 sta
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System
2009-05-25 17:10:46 EDT ---
gmixer-1.3-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System
2009-05-22 04:29:20 EDT ---
gmixer-1.3-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System
2009-05-22 04:27:22 EDT ---
gmixer-1.3-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update fo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System
2009-05-22 04:28:25 EDT ---
gmixer-1.3-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update fo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #13 from leigh scott 2009-05-21
12:09:39 EDT ---
Hi Igjurisk,
Thank you for reviewing gmixer for me.
Leigh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
Igor Jurišković changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #12 from Igor Jurišković 2009-05-21
11:56:16 EDT ---
# MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #11 from leigh scott 2009-05-21
10:12:31 EDT ---
The gmixer-1.3-4 srpm builds at Koji on all targets on all ac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #10 from leigh scott 2009-05-21
09:12:31 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Two more things:
>
>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #9 from Igor Jurišković 2009-05-21
08:49:09 EDT ---
Two more things:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
Igor Jurišković changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #6 from leigh scott 2009-05-21
05:55:28 EDT ---
Spec: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/3/gm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #4 from leigh scott 2009-05-20
20:20:14 EDT ---
OK, I found this new gmixer sourcecode at launchpad, it isn't
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #5 from leigh scott 2009-05-20
20:22:20 EDT ---
I will correct the licence next build, it should be GPLv3+
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #3 from Igor Jurišković 2009-05-20
18:39:41 EDT ---
There is nothing in wiki related to no icons in desktop fi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #2 from leigh scott 2009-05-20
18:23:55 EDT ---
Ok, I will create a desktop file, is it ok to add a generic mi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #1 from Igor Jurišković 2009-05-20
18:10:22 EDT ---
I'll take this one.
# MUST: rpmlint must be run on every
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
Igor Jurišković changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
26 matches
Mail list logo
