Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System
2009-06-15 22:46:05 EDT ---
cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System
2009-06-15 22:02:53 EDT ---
cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #23 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-03
13:44:08 EDT ---
Please push the packages to stable and close this bug.
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System
2009-05-18 22:03:39 EDT ---
cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System
2009-05-18 01:18:40 EDT ---
cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-2.fc10 has been submitted as a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System
2009-05-18 01:09:23 EDT ---
cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-2.fc11 has been submitted as a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
Jochen Schmitt changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
Milos Jakubicek changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #14 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-17
14:10:14 EDT ---
The blocker is the issue reported on comment #12
--
Conf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-17 12:42:10 EDT ---
Hey Jochen: What blockers for approval remain? Let me know and
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #12 from Matthew Miller 2009-05-14 11:06:19
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Crash is properly not the righ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #11 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-14
11:03:41 EDT ---
Crash is properly not the right word, but I have got an er
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
Martin Vidner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 17:02:12 EDT ---
>Bad:
>- Application crashed when they is started without argum
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #8 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-13
14:19:02 EDT ---
Bood:
+ License tag has proper value GPLv2+ and Public Doma
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
Bastien Nocera changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-12
15:39:44 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Odd. I was told by the gdm maint
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-12 15:19:24 EDT ---
Odd. I was told by the gdm maintainer that they were not config
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-12
14:57:25 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The build step is a single sed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-12 14:48:11 EDT ---
Thats for the review!
>Bad:
>- Please replace:
>
>
>%build
>ma
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
Jochen Schmitt changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-12 13:30:05 EDT ---
Scratch build at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?t
28 matches
Mail list logo
