Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System
2009-11-27 16:50:14 EDT ---
qbrew-0.4.1-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
Chris St. Pierre changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System
2009-10-29 11:06:21 EDT ---
qbrew-0.4.1-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update f
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
Chris St. Pierre changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
Jon Stanley changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
--- Comment #14 from Chris St. Pierre 2009-10-07
11:13:47 EDT ---
Fixed and fixed. New spec file is up, and new SRPM is a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
--- Comment #13 from Jon Stanley 2009-10-06 21:16:12
EDT ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
--- Comment #12 from Chris St. Pierre 2009-10-06
16:32:58 EDT ---
Following a conversation with Kevin Fenzi, I've made a f
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
--- Comment #11 from Chris St. Pierre 2009-09-28
11:35:31 EDT ---
A little bit of googling has shown me the way to Qt tran
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
--- Comment #10 from Chris St. Pierre 2009-09-23
09:29:13 EDT ---
Forgot to mention: new SRPM URL is
http://www.nebrwesley
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
--- Comment #9 from Chris St. Pierre 2009-09-23
09:23:46 EDT ---
I've updated the specfile and RPM a) with a reconstructed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
--- Comment #8 from Jon Stanley 2009-09-22 22:30:05 EDT
---
Some other random tidbits:
The upstream tarball includes a st
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
--- Comment #7 from Jon Stanley 2009-09-22 21:29:26 EDT
---
One thing that I immediately see is that there's no history in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
Jon Stanley changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
--- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-18
10:13:05 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Your rpmlint gave loads more e
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
--- Comment #4 from Chris St. Pierre 2009-09-18
09:58:28 EDT ---
Specfile and SRPM updated.
Your rpmlint gave loads more
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
--- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-18
08:51:09 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> - in %Source0, give the full U
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
--- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-18
08:31:02 EDT ---
I'm not a sponsor but nonetheless some quick comments:
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
Chris St. Pierre changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
22 matches
Mail list logo
