Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #22 from srinivas 2009-10-09
06:00:36 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> New Package CVS Request
> ==
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
srinivas changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
Praveen K Paladugu changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #19 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-10-07
15:49:31 EDT ---
Everything looks good. Please go ahead and request CVS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #18 from srinivas 2009-10-06
07:46:06 EDT ---
Fixed all the rpmlint errors/warnings.
Here's the current rpmlin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #17 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-10-05
11:49:33 EDT ---
Review:
#user1 rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/libnetdevname-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #16 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-10-05
10:05:28 EDT ---
Is there a reason to explicitly mention
Provides: %{r
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #15 from narendr...@dell.com 2009-09-29 07:25:06 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> That still requires the cal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #14 from Shyam kumar Iyer 2009-09-25
14:41:22 EDT ---
>That still requires the caller allocate the string; hav
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #13 from Bill Nottingham 2009-09-25 12:53:03
EDT ---
That still requires the caller allocate the string; havin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
Praveen K Paladugu changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
narendr...@dell.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #11 from narendr...@dell.com 2009-09-25 12:45:09 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=362690)
--> (https://bugzill
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #10 from Sandeep K. Shandilya
2009-09-23 14:16:55 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> So if I understand what's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #9 from Sandeep K. Shandilya
2009-09-23 14:14:43 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I'm not really a fan of th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #8 from Andy Gospodarek 2009-09-18 17:05:30
EDT ---
Once I look at the code I'll be able to comment (and maybe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #7 from narendr...@dell.com 2009-09-18 17:01:30 EDT ---
http://linux.dell.com/git/?p=development/libnetdevna
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #6 from narendr...@dell.com 2009-09-18 16:28:28 EDT ---
http://linux.dell.com/git/?p=development/libnetdevna
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #5 from Andy Gospodarek 2009-09-18 16:10:09
EDT ---
So if I understand what's being done by this code (the git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
Andy Gospodarek changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #4 from Bill Nottingham 2009-09-18 14:39:13
EDT ---
This is not a package review. This is more of a code revie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #3 from Bill Nottingham 2009-09-18 12:50:43
EDT ---
Doesn't this require not-yet-upstream kernel code?
--
Co
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #2 from srinivas 2009-09-18 03:09:45
EDT ---
Took care of all the errors and warnings.
Here's the rpmlint outp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147
--- Comment #1 from srinivas 2009-09-18 02:31:25
EDT ---
Initial rpmlint output:
rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/libnetdevname.spe
26 matches
Mail list logo
