[Bug 173388] Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 02:23 EST --- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 02:31 EST --- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226232] Merge Review: passwd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: passwd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226232 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234858] Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person Alias: perl-User-Identity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234858 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 02:35 EST --- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225293] Merge Review: authconfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: authconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225293 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226224] Merge Review: pam_ccreds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pam_ccreds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226224 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187621] Review Request: blam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 02:42 EST --- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200249] Review Request: cvs2svn
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cvs2svn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200249 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 02:48 EST --- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226130] Merge Review: man-pages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226130 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226118] Merge Review: mailx
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mailx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226118 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 02:55 EST --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234436] Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234436
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 03:11 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Created an attachment (id=151678)
--
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151678action=view)
[edit]
mock build log of glchess-1.0.4-1 on FC-devel i386
Well, for 1.0.4-1:
* BuildRequires
- mockbuild failed. At least desktop-file-utils is missing
for BuildRequires.
Fixed
* Executable permissions/shebang
# make rpmlint happy
chmod +x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/scene/opengl/png.py \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/gtkui/__init__.py
- IMO the resolution should be opposite.
Fixed for one of the 2 files, the other can be executed stand alone
* GConf files
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/glchess.schemas
- Well, while I cannot find any wiki packages, however I am
sure that GConf schemas files under /etc/gconf/schemas is
generally _not_ regarded as config file and should not
marked as %config (even if rpmlint complains about it).
Fixed
* Some python related dependency
- Well, would you check the following import sentence?
* import Image (from opengl/texture.py: Perhaps python-imaging
It seems that Packages link from http://glchess.sourceforge.net/
requires it)
python-imaging is not required, it will fallback to an alternative png loading
routine if python-imageging is not installed, and all the included textures are
png, so that will work fine:
try:
self.__loadPIL(fileName)
except ImportError:
self.__loadPNG(fileName)
New version here:
Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/glchess.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/glchess-1.0.4-2.fc7.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226320] Merge Review: psacct
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: psacct https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226320 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 03:52 EST --- (In reply to comment #18) Tim, you may be right that JDT is required. What was the error you were getting without it? I dont get any visible errors, it is just not working, there is no PyDev entry in Windows - Preferences. In The About - Plugin details i only see 2 org.python.pydev plugins (ast online help) the other org.python.pydev is missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235471] Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 04:10 EST --- Spec URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/perl-PDF-API2.spec SRPM URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/perl-PDF-API2-0.59.002-2.src.rpm * Fri Apr 06 2007 Bernard Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.59.002-2 - moving resource to docs was a mistake, fix it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226113] Merge Review: lynx
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lynx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226113 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 04:38 EST --- Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 04:44 EST --- Can you please do an initial review pending updating of tarball because this is currently blocking the build of bug #234573. Upstream is taking a while to do the update, but we *do* know that it is under the Artistic license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|234573 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|233848 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||234573 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||233848 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 04:48 EST --- Thanks for the review! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233139] Review Request: SDLmm - C++ interface for the popular SDL library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDLmm - C++ interface for the popular SDL library Alias: SDLmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233139 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234835] Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 04:52 EST --- Jochen, Will you also review FlightGear itself? Also you still haven't answered my question yet, can (and will) you sponsor Fabrice, or shall I? Fabrice do you want to import these 2 now, or do you want to wait till FlightGear itself is also reviewed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 05:02 EST --- Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/sessionsaver/dialogs.py, line 35, in on_session_added self.row_inserted(self.on_get_path(piter), piter) TypeError: iter should be a GtkTreeIter ** (gedit:12835): CRITICAL **: gedit_commands_load_uris: assertion `(uris != NULL) (uris-data != NULL)' failed Manage saved sessions... still opens very damaged windows here, and hence I still think the plugin ought to be excluded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted
at avr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 05:02 EST ---
(In reply to comment #18)
In my specs I do all these steps this way:
%prep
%setup -q -c -T -n %{name}-%{version}
%setup -q -D -T -n %{name}-%{version} -a0
Erm why not just:
%prep
%setup -q -c
That has exactly the same effect.
Finally: As you already know, I dislike a toolchains using an architecture
(avr)
as their target
I know, but as long as almost the whole world does it like this I'm not planning
on changing this.
All other Must's and Should's fixed, new version here:
Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-binutils.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-binutils-2.17-2.fc7.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 05:23 EST --- (In reply to comment #19) (In reply to comment #18) Finally: As you already know, I dislike a toolchains using an architecture (avr) as their target I know, but as long as almost the whole world does it like this I'm not planning on changing this. Even though I in principle agree with Ralf, I think it is to much trouble to try to convince the rest of the world. As everybody else uses only avr as target, I think it justifies the exception. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 05:46 EST --- Patrice, could you please look at the last version zlib-1.2.3-10.fc7 and approved this review request or if you see any reason why you don't want to aproved it here. But at first I want to reply to your comments: * adding autotools is the most clear solution and there is no problem with it * zutil.h is removed * timestamps are kept * the description is easy to get/find/grab it is not a part of zlib package and upstream don't want to add it so I think it is not necessary to add it too Thanks for your comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 07:47 EST --- Created an attachment (id=151869) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151869action=view) spec file that incorporates all my comments I removed the autotools patch in this spec. I think that such change is for upstream, not in a fedora package. Moreover this is not similar with upstream since the tests are removed. I cleaned the build such that the package is built in the build section and also used more rpm macros. and I added the manual, in my opinion this is a must - don't use the autotools, instead revert to the previous build procedure - ship the manual to have a description of the API - build the libraries in the %%build section rpmlint output is explained in comments in the spec E: zlib configure-without-libdir-spec W: zlib make-check-outside-check-section make check E: zlib configure-without-libdir-spec W: zlib make-check-outside-check-section make check Feel free to modify it again (for example if you like the build but not the manual). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 07:55 EST --- Created an attachment (id=151870) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151870action=view) keep header and man page timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225861] Merge Review: grub
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: grub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225861 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 07:59 EST --- Just noticed: $ LC_ALL=C rpm -qf /boot/grub/* file /boot/grub/device.map is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/fat_stage1_5 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/ffs_stage1_5 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/grub.conf is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/iso9660_stage1_5 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/jfs_stage1_5 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/menu.lst is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/minix_stage1_5 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/reiserfs_stage1_5 is not owned by any package fedora-logos-6.0.97-2.fc7 file /boot/grub/stage1 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/stage2 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/ufs2_stage1_5 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/vstafs_stage1_5 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/xfs_stage1_5 is not owned by any package I'd say all those unowned files should be ghost-owned by grub. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235501] New: Review Request: jsdoc - Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235501
Summary: Review Request: jsdoc - Produces javadoc-style
documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/jsdoc.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/jsdoc-1.10.2-1.src.rpm
Description:
A script that produces javadoc-style documentation from
well-formed JavaScript sourcefiles. At the moment, this means it
supports sourcefiles where all functions are mapped to a class
using prototype-based inheritance. Anonymous function
definitions (e.g. Circle.prototype.getRadius = function(){ ...} )
are supported.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 08:12 EST --- * Fri Apr 06 2007 Alex Lancaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.01-2 - Updated license. - Add BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-SVG-Graph.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-SVG-Graph-0.01-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234835] Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 08:16 EST --- Hans, Yes, I can import fgfs-base and fgfs-Atlas now, and build them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 194279] Review Request: kdeartwork: Extra KDE artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork: Extra KDE artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194279 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 08:36 EST --- marked approved, per comment #24. please update in cvs (I don't have access yet, poo), and then you can close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227241] Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227241 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 08:37 EST --- Chitlesh, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225960] Merge Review: kdbg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kdbg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225960 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200236] Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200236 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Keywords|Reopened| Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 194374] Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194374 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 194278] Review Request: kdeadmin: Administrative tools for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeadmin: Administrative tools for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194278 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Keywords|Reopened| Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 08:39 EST --- closing per comment #7 (no need to wait for merge) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225961] Merge Review: kdebase
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kdebase https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225961 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 194280] Review Request: kdebindings: KDE/DCOP bindings to non-C++ languages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebindings: KDE/DCOP bindings to non-C++ languages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194280 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 08:40 EST --- than, can you update cvs? then you can close this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 194373] Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194373 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 194374] Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194374 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis|| Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 08:42 EST --- approved per comment #19, closing-rawhide per comment #21 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195485] Review Request: kdegraphics: K Desktop Environment - Graphics Applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegraphics: K Desktop Environment - Graphics Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195485 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 08:42 EST --- than, please update cvs, and then you can close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200236] Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200236 Bug 200236 depends on bug 194374, which changed state. Bug 194374 Summary: Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194374 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225963] Merge Review: kdelibs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kdelibs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225963 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Keywords|Reopened| Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225964] Merge Review: kdemultimedia
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kdemultimedia https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225964 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195486] Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195486 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 08:43 EST --- than, please update cvs, then you can close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225965] Merge Review: kdepim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kdepim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225965 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235501] Review Request: jsdoc - Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jsdoc - Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235501 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 08:51 EST --- Currently there is a known problem with this package -- missing license. I am trying to get upstream to make some changes in that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234721] Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234721 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 09:43 EST --- I think that the spec I proposed in Comment #10 is right, but if you really want to use the autotools and think my proposal is not right, I could also accept an autotool based package -- although I think it is not right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234721] Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234721 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 10:48 EST --- Well, You should add flags INSTALL=install -p to your make install to keep timestamp on files, such as doc files, *.png files (which is included including in this package). -- .desktop file -- ** category: Application and X-fedora is deprecated and SHOULD be remove. can be fix by adding -remove-category= option ** .desktop file : no correct permission - 0664 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ll rpmbuild/SOURCES/sakura.desktop -rw-rw-r-- 1 SmootherFrOg lxtnow 271 Apr 6 09:47 rpmbuild/SOURCES/sakura.desktop can be fix by adding -mode 0644 option from desktop-file-install. ** scriptlets: %post update-desktop-database /dev/null ||: %postun update-desktop-database /dev/null ||: The use of above is only require when the desktop entry have a mime type key. and isn't the case. This scriptlet can be remove. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235376] Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235376 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 11:32 EST --- Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-ipdiscover.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-ipdiscover-1.01-2.fc7.src.rpm * Fri Apr 06 2007 Remi Collet [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.01-2 - change source URL - add ocsinventory-ipdiscover.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234436] Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234436 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 11:33 EST --- Okay. - This package (glchess) is APPROVED by me. - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 11:37 EST --- I haven't had a chance to look at your updated spec Jules, but my experience with other packages is that using a generic spec file from the tarball usually doesn't work in the long run. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 11:40 EST --- Well, this is svn version, right? I suppose svn version does not have configure, etc... So please * write in the spec file how you created this tarball as a comment like # The svn version tarball is created by the following command # $ svn . # $ tar . so that I can reproduce the tarball which you used. * write from autoreconf, in %prep stage and add appropriate BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 11:46 EST --- Well, I still think that * having config.h installed in -devel package * #ifdef judgment for HAVE_NUMPY HAVE_NUMARRAY etc... being included in header files are wrong as said in comment 40. IMO you should remove unnecessary header files and remove confusing ifdef judgment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 11:50 EST --- Well, then should I wait until you upload a new spec/srpm, Brian? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226406] Merge Review: selinux-policy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: selinux-policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226406 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 12:04 EST --- selinux-policy-targeted outputs a bunch of stuff to the console during an upgrade, this is an example output: /sbin/restorecon reset /etc/cron.daily/000-delay.cron context system_u:object_r:etc_t:s0-system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 If this is important it should be sent to syslog with the logger command, otherwise it should be surpressed. I don't know if there is a guideline to prevent spurious output to the console during upgrades, but there should be. There is nothing more annoying than a package outputting a ton of stuff to your console. One really bad side effect is that you can no longer scroll back to see which config files were backed up, and you have to run updatedb just to find the .rpmnew/.rpmsave files again because some package spewed out a bunch of text preventing you from just simply scrolling up to find out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 12:09 EST --- (In reply to comment #78) Well, then should I wait until you upload a new spec/srpm, Brian? Probably. after a quick look at Jules spec there's a few things that should probably be changed (Unnecessary requires, use %doc, etc). Of course, I've got to get some new web-space to upload to, since I shutdown my webserver over the holidays. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234721] Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234721
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 12:19 EST ---
Some notes:
* Timestamps
- Well, while the method 'INSTALL=%{__install} -p' normally
works for makefile.in generated by GNU autotools,
for the types of makefiles which were created by developer
by his own way (like this package), it is very rare that
this method still works (and actually for this package
it does not work).
For the latter case, the packager has to check what are actually
done on install stage and fix some files appropriately.
Normally the package has to change the command like cp or
install appropriately (see the lines 119-148 of mobs.mk).
* Cflags
- And for makefiles generated by GNU autotools, fedora specific
compilation flags are normally passed correctly by %configure
macro (please check what %configure actually does),
however, again for the types of makefiles created by the developer's
own way, passing cflags has to be done with a special care
Actually
--
%build
./0 --prefix=/usr
make %{?_smp_mflags}
--
does not use fedora specific compilation flags (%optflags or
$RPM_BUILD_FLAGS). You have to use this flags _somehow_
* Desktop file
- Be careful on the each item on desktop file (e.g. is the
path for icon used correct? in the first place, does the
path have to be specified by full path?)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 12:28 EST --- Done! SRPM: http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-7.20070406svn.leof6.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/pcmanx-gtk2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234721] Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234721 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 12:28 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) $RPM_BUILD_FLAGS). $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, sorry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! Alias: nemiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 12:56 EST --- ping. I am going to approve this as soon as you can provide some info about my remarks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! Alias: nemiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 13:24 EST --- Pong :) Hi, Gianluca and Thanks for the review! (In reply to comment #33) Just a couple questions: is the touch trick for forcing the icon cache update the usual/preferred/best way to do that? It is, according to the Packaging/ScriptletSnippets page on the wiki. are you going to remove COPYING from the -devel subpackage as suggested in comment #2? No. I'm of the opinon that such license texts should be included in development subpackages to make the license explicitly clear (and not have to backreference that of the original SRPM's main package). I know of no guideline for or against thish, though; and it seems more sensible to me tokeep it in there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 13:34 EST --- Created an attachment (id=151889) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151889action=view) Updated spec file Here's an updated spec file. No major change, though I did remove the license that was in the header, since it's not really necessary IMO. Jules, if you have a problem with that please tell me, and I can put it back in. Once I score some webspace, I'll post the srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #151889|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 13:37 EST --- (From update of attachment 151889) Argh! wrong spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 13:40 EST --- Created an attachment (id=151890) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151890action=view) Update spec file. Here's an updated spec file. No major change, though I did remove the license that was in the header, since it's not really necessary IMO. Jules, if you have a problem with that please tell me, and I can put it back in. Once I score some webspace, I'll post the srpm. Note: This is targeted for the devel branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 13:51 EST ---
Well, actually on rawhide automake is 1.10 and
some other fixes are needed for rawhide.
For me, the following works
%prep
%setup -q -n %{name}
for f in `ls -d %{_datadir}/automake-1.* | sort -g -k 2 -t .` ; do
automakever=`echo $f | sed -e 's|%{_datadir}/automake-||'`
done
eval %{__sed} -i.orig -e \'s\|-1\\\.9\|-$automakever\|\' autogen.sh
%{__sed} -i -e 's|set -x|set -e -x|' autogen.sh
touch config.rpath
./autogen.sh
#autoreconf -fi
Please check if the above also works for you.
And.. I have not checked other things yet...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 174289] LibHdate is a small C, C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: LibHdate is a small C,C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174289 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 14:06 EST --- Well, again ping? Normally, when no response is received from packager for one month, the bug is closed as WONTFIX or so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 14:07 EST --- Again what is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232815] Review Request: libnetfilter_queue - Netfilter queue userspace library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_queue - Netfilter queue userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232815 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235456] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235456 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 14:27 EST --- Hi, if this is your first package you should block FE-NEEDSPONSER as shown to be important and hilighted here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-a7a95bc9083826b65ccdd4d0f201ea6e59426590 I can sponser you, but I prefer to sponser people who can log onto the #fedora-devel channel on IRC for easier communication. A good way to start is to review some packages, for example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235526] New: Review Request: python-xattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235526 Summary: Review Request: python-xattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/python-xattr/python-xattr.spec SRPM URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/python-xattr/python-xattr-0.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: Python extension module wrapper for libattr. It allows to query, list, add and remove extended attributes from files and directories. It's a recommended runtime dependency for rdiff-backup (already in Fedora Extras). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235527] New: Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235527 Summary: Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/python-libacl/python-libacl.spec SRPM URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/python-libacl/python-libacl-0.2.1-2.src.rpm Description: Python extension module for POSIX ACLs. It allows to query, list, add and remove ACLs from files and directories. It's a recommended runtime dependency for rdiff-backup (already in Fedora Extras). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235370] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235370 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 14:32 EST --- I can sponser you, however I prefer users who can log into #fedora-devel on IRC for easier communication. You can start by reviewing some packages, for example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232165 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235527] Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235527 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||163776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 14:37 EST --- Added FE-NEW dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235526] Review Request: python-xattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235526 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||163776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 14:36 EST --- Added FE-NEW dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232816] Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232816 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 14:50 EST --- Jochen, can you say something here so I'd push this further? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234436] Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234436 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 15:01 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: glchess Short Description: 3d Chess game using OpenGL Owners:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: empty Notice this package is intended for FC-6 only in devel this has been integrated into gnome-games, still I would like to release this for FC-6 as there have been several specific packaging requests for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 15:33 EST --- Spec URL: http://manta.univ.gda.pl/~mgarski/fe/jomolhari-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://manta.univ.gda.pl/~mgarski/fe/jomolhari-fonts-0.003-3.src.rpm - Update to 0.003c - Change license from GPL to OFL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235456] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235456 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 15:47 EST --- (In reply to comment #19) I dont get any visible errors, it is just not working, there is no PyDev entry in Windows - Preferences. In The About - Plugin details i only see 2 org.python.pydev plugins (ast online help) the other org.python.pydev is missing. Thanks, I'll include a requires for JDT in the next revision. (In reply to comment #16) - plugins/org.python.pydev.jython_1.3.1/Lib. Where does the content of this directory come from? Is it necessary?If so, can we symlink it? - plugins/org.python.pydev_1.3.1/PySrc. What is the content of this directory? If we want to ship it or if it's necessary, I think it should either have a clear source and license trail or be a separate package. This is some auxiliary scripts that are used for running tests I believe. Some of the files here come from outside python packages, see full reply bellow. - plugins/org.python.pydev.jython_1.3.1/jysrc.Same questions as above. This is pydev's files, and they are jython scripts used to control pydev. - plugins/org.python.pydev.debug_1.3.1/pysrc. Same. These seem to be pydev's own scripts. Here's Fabio's reply about the origin of these files: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=cfb578b20704060345n677f8a26u5e87bbc3a4a20c8%40mail.gmail.com What do you think is the appropriate thing to do with these? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235527] Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for
python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235527
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 16:09 EST ---
A path to the source package should be:
http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pylibacl-%{version}.tar.bz2
I don't want to bump release number only because of that, so I will fix it
together with other changes suggested in a review.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||0.3.8-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 16:49 EST --- I finally managed to catch upstream's attention. :) The license is in svn now and a new release should be coming soonish, with the license and some of the optimizations me and others have been working on... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235417] Review Request: zzuf - Transparent application input fuzzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zzuf - Transparent application input fuzzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235417 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235417] Review Request: zzuf - Transparent application input fuzzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: zzuf - Transparent application input fuzzer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235417
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 17:22 EST ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Rpmlint output:
Agreed, rpmlint is wrong.
W: zzuf invalid-license WTFPL
W: zzuf invalid-license WTFPL
W: zzuf-debuginfo invalid-license WTFPL
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is written in American English.
[x] Spec file for the package is legible.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package: 1970dcf4f77251bea843b0f6ae19231c
MD5SUM upstream package: 1970dcf4f77251bea843b0f6ae19231c
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: FC-6/i386
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR:
Arches excluded:
Why:
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are
listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
Not required since this is a LD_PRELOAD package
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: FC-6/i386
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on: FC-6/i386
[x] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[x] Latest version is packaged.
=== Issues ===
1.
=== Final Notes ===
1.
*** APPROVED ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Alias: gmediaserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 17:29 EST --- (In reply to comment #15) In the absence of option 3 (static UID/GID), I think option 2 (not removing the user/group) is much better. It may be messy in terms of leaving accounts on systems but IMHO this is not as messy as leaving unowned files on those systems (which would happen if the user/group were deleted). There is actually a pseudo-static UID/GID mechanism available in Fedora (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserCreation) but use of it is contentious I agree with Paul here. This is messy, but ATM there is not a good way to handle this except with fedora-usermgmt as noted above. However, I would not recommend fedora-usermgmt (although I use it on my packages) until the controversy regarding it's use is ironed out. So for now, let's go with the persistent user/group. (In reply to comment #14) Well...IMO there are some ways resolve this problem: 1. Do not change it, the owner of /srv/gmediaserver will be changing all time when the package user will be having other uid/gid and the files are often 644, so the program can read it. I think it is safe, because if the directory will not be deleted unless it is empty. But there will be potentially unowned files depending on how the media server is used. You're lucky in the regard that the media server doesn't actually have to manage the files, only read them - otherwise it would be more sticky. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232548] Review Request: gnome-yum - Graphical program for easier use the YUM install program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - Graphical program for easier use the YUM install program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232548 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 17:41 EST --- Looks like you are sponsored now, so I'll provide a review. Let's get this fixed first: checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for GNOME... no + make make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! Alias: nemiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 17:57 EST --- (In reply to comment #35) (In reply to comment #33) Just a couple questions: is the touch trick for forcing the icon cache update the usual/preferred/best way to do that? It is, according to the Packaging/ScriptletSnippets page on the wiki. Ok. seems I missed it until now... are you going to remove COPYING from the -devel subpackage as suggested in comment #2? No. I'm of the opinon that such license texts should be included in development subpackages to make the license explicitly clear (and not have to backreference that of the original SRPM's main package). I know of no guideline for or against thish, though; and it seems more sensible to me tokeep it in there. I have no strong opinion against this either (though I did not notice other packages doing the same). In the lack of an official guideline about this and given there was more than enough time for further comments the package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233802] Review Request: python-xlib - Fully functional X client library for Python programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlib - Fully functional X client library for Python programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233802 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 18:11 EST --- Updated for the summary text change suggestion http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/python-xlib/python-xlib-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/python-xlib/python-xlib.spec So uhm, Rex, anytime you want to start that official review that would be great. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235417] Review Request: zzuf - Transparent application input fuzzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zzuf - Transparent application input fuzzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235417 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 18:11 EST --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: zzuf Short Description: Transparent application input fuzzer Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 18:59 EST --- * Fri Apr 06 2007 Alex Lancaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.01-3 - Added e-mail confirmation for license in package. Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-SVG-Graph.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-SVG-Graph-0.01-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235376] Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235376 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 19:05 EST --- GOOD - rpmlint checks do not return anything - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL ) OK, matches source; upstream did not include the full license, but the only existing doc (a README) mentions that the license is GPL and points to the URL - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream, sha1sum 06acb6c071040d2ae6d3c26109e526afba660835 OCSNG_LINUX_AGENT_1.01.tar.gz - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all files and directories that it creates; does not take ownership of foreign files and directories - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - not a GUI, so no need for .desktop file - no static content. no libtool / pkgconfig files SHOULD - compiles and builds in mock/devel/x86_64 - there are no translations available, but %description is also in French - no scriptlets - the program does start and seems to run without problems. I cannot do full tests because I do not have the other needed programs (the agents). If someone else could test this, please give us a hand. Unless someone steps in pointing to problems that I have not spotted, Wednesday I will approve this package (I think it's a good idea to wait till after Easter). Meanwhile, Remi, please think of a method to preserve the timestamp of the README file. Using perl to remove the CR/LF line endings affects it. Maybe using touch -r before and after modifying the file ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top
command
Alias: ntop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |medium
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 21:33 EST ---
(In reply to comment #97)
* when I do
export CFLAGS=%{optflags} -DDEBUG
just before %configure in %build, there is a compile error
in util.c, so I cannot test a build with -DDEBUG.
This is now fixed in the upstream, and I've included the -DDEBUG in the src.rpm
for now until we get this worked out.
* the libraries aren't linked against any libraries,
so there are a lot of undefined non weak symbols with
rpmlint run on the installed rpm. I'll attach a patch.
After applying the patch I get
W: ntop unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libntop-3.3.so
...
I checked some of those symbols, they were in admin.c,
or main.c and admin.c and main.c are only in ntop. This
should really be reported upstream, this is weird
Upstream claims to have fixed this.
My rpmlint does now show any problems, but it never did on the other builds
either. Can you check and see if this clears it up for you?
* Fri Apr 06 2007 Bernard Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 3.3-0.12.20070407cvs
- update to 20070407cvs
- compile with -DDEBUG for now to check for problems
- rework ntop-am.patch with recent changes
- patch to remove gdVersionGuessValue from plugin
- repatch with shrext patch
Spec URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/ntop.spec
SRPM URL:
http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/ntop-3.3-0.12.20070407cvs.fc6.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! Alias: nemiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 22:35 EST --- Great; thanks for your review comments! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: nemiver Short Description: A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-6 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233602] Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233602 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 22:48 EST --- Spec URL: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/pykdeextensions.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted
at avr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 23:37 EST ---
(In reply to comment #19)
(In reply to comment #18)
In my specs I do all these steps this way:
%prep
%setup -q -c -T -n %{name}-%{version}
%setup -q -D -T -n %{name}-%{version} -a0
Erm why not just:
%prep
%setup -q -c
That has exactly the same effect.
Yes, but only if a package has exactly one source-tarball.
When a package has several source-tarballs (like my gcc-specs), my construct is
more flexible (I generate the specs)
Finally: As you already know, I dislike a toolchains using an architecture
(avr)
as their target
I know, but as long as almost the whole world does it like this I'm
not planning on changing this.
Well, ... who is this whole world you are referring to?
Any GNU toolchain developer will tell you that using an architecture as target
is not a clever decision.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
