[Bug 428894] Review Request: rudesocket - Library (C++ API) for creating client sockets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rudesocket - Library (C++ API) for creating client sockets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428894 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 03:00 EST --- Is this built for F-7 and F-8? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431414] Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431414
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 03:06 EST ---
As this package uses ocaml, I think good to follow same what ocaml used in SPEC
=
ExclusiveArch: alpha armv4l %{ix86} ia64 x86_64 ppc sparc
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 03:34 EST --- hey it worked now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 03:29 EST --- hmm, weird, it works for me, I tested again this morning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 04:23 EST --- Greg, Thanks for the patch. I managed to get it build across all the architectures with this patch applied. Unfortunate that other arch's besides x86 wont get voice support though. Revised spec and SRPM: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gyachi.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gyachi-1.1.0-6.fc8.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=396129 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 04:22 EST --- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/jabbin/jabbin.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/jabbin/jabbin-2.0-3.beta2a.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 04:46 EST --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpmlint sawfish-1.3.2-1.fc8.src.rpm W: sawfish summary-ended-with-dot An extensible window manager for the X Window System. W: sawfish invalid-license GPLv2 W: sawfish strange-permission sawfish.spec 0444 E: sawfish no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 04:43 EST --- Please check directory ownership issue. For example, %_datadir/%name is not owned by any package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 04:52 EST --- The Changelog says * Thu Jan 31 2008 Rahul Sundaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] -1.3.2-1 and the package is submitted by Ritesh Khadgaray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) any specific reason for that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video)
capture devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 05:08 EST ---
I've no 64 bit system around, so I unluckily didn't find that. /usr/lib seems
somehow to be hardcoded and not /usr/lib(64) depending on the arch. Do you
think,
it fits to do a mv /usr/lib %{_libdir}, if we're on x86_64 etc. during build or
should I better really fix the code, inclulde as patch and send upstream?
Shoulds are luckily no must, so I don't care about 1) - sorry
2) is accepted, will be corrected for the next build of course
3) seems just useless for non-packagers when reading the file
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 05:09 EST --- Thx Parag. I'll fix the last problem before importing. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Net-eBay Short Description: Perl Interface to XML based eBay API Owners: xavierb Branches: F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 05:01 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 175674e914326a6af84564acfb57286b Net-eBay-0.46.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test output is t/00-load.# Testing Net::eBay 0.46, Perl 5.008008, /usr/bin/perl ok t/pod-coverageok t/pod.ok All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=22, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.64 cusr + 0.05 csys = 0.69 CPU) + Package perl-Net-eBay-0.46-1.fc9 - Provides: perl(Net::eBay) = 0.46 Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(Carp) perl(Cwd) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(DateTime::Precise) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(HTML::FormatText) perl(HTML::PrettyPrinter) perl(HTML::TreeBuilder) perl(HTTP::Date) perl(HTTP::Request::Common) perl(HTTP::Status) perl(LWP::UserAgent) perl(Net::eBay) perl(Text::Format) perl(XML::Dumper) perl(XML::Simple) perl(strict) perl(utf8) perl(vars) perl(warnings) SHOULD: Remove OPTIMIZE=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS from make coammand APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 05:42 EST --- Also, Good to preserve timestamps by replacing make install command as given below == make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL=install -p == -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video)
capture devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 05:49 EST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
I've no 64 bit system around, so I unluckily didn't find that. /usr/lib seems
somehow to be hardcoded and not /usr/lib(64) depending on the arch. Do you
think,
it fits to do a mv /usr/lib %{_libdir}, if we're on x86_64 etc. during build
or
should I better really fix the code, inclulde as patch and send upstream?
You better fix this in code and include patch in SRPM and send same to upstream
also.
Shoulds are luckily no must, so I don't care about 1) - sorry
ok.
2) is accepted, will be corrected for the next build of course
hope to see that in next SRPM update.
3) seems just useless for non-packagers when reading the file
ohh. I thought it covers also Runtime issues which are useful to end user
and also from configure output it said
*** Please read the file README.troubleshooting ***
*** if you have any trouble using this software. ***
NOTE:-It said using this software not compiling/packaging this software.
Anyway Ok if you will not include as its not a blocker :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice
support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 05:35 EST ---
will review this.
I suggest replacing %files section of gyachi to
=
%files -f %{name}.lang
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc ABOUT-NLS ChangeLog doc/KNOWN_PROBLEMS-gyvoice.txt doc/KNOWN_PROBLEMS.txt
doc/txt/COPYING doc/html/gyachi-help.html
%{_bindir}/%{name}*
%{_datadir}/applications/*%{name}.desktop
%{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png
%{_datadir}/%{name}
%dir %{_libdir}/%{name}
%{_libdir}/%{name}/%{name}-*
%dir %{_libdir}/%{name}/plugins
===
And remove
ExcludeArch line from SPEC.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431414] Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431414 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 06:13 EST --- Agreed. All of the above addressed, see original URLs. NVR not incremented. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 06:09 EST --- Revised spec and SRPM http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gyachi.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gyachi-1.1.0-7.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431534] New: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534 Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/gfeed/gfeed.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/gfeed/gfeed-2.5.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: gfeed is an RSS feed reader for Linux and Gtk+ 2.0. It is designed to be a simple yet highly customizable reader, not an aggregator, which means it is designed for easy integration into a desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238817] Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238817 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 06:56 EST --- My pointless comment was about the existence of the metapackage (as you seem to agree), and not anything against qtcurve itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431175] Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 06:49 EST --- Imported and built. Thanks again for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431534] Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 06:32 EST ---
URL:http://sourceforge.net/projects/%{name} is better
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431534] Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 06:38 EST --- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/gfeed/gfeed.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/gfeed/gfeed-2.5.0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 06:48 EST --- Imported and built. Thanks again for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238817] Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238817
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
Version|devel |rawhide
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 06:46 EST ---
:-) I was about to construct package for QtCurve-0.55, and submit them to
Fedora.
Kelly, can you update to QtCurve-0.55 in bug #238816 and bug #238815, and also
provide the KDE4 style? I am using this style in both Gtk2/KDE3/Qt4 apps, and
my desktop now looks better.
In my opinion, the current meta-package should not exist. Anyway, should it
exist, then the requirements should be:
kde-style-qtcurve = %{version}, gtk-qtcurve-engine = %{version}
(In reply to comment #1)
imo, this is is kinda pointless, but who am I to judge? :)
Rex, you are the maintainer of gtk-qt-engine. I do not understand your point,
here. In my opinion, using QtCurve for both KDE3, KDE4 and Gtk is a better
option than gtk-qt-engine, because it offers a quite-uniform look for all the
desktop, even for KDE3/KDE4. Until all KDE3 applications are ported to KDE4, I
will prefere to use QtCurve instead of a mix of Oxygen (for KDE4) and any
other style for Gtk2/KDE3/Qt3.
And, IMO, Oxygen is ugly.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 07:31 EST --- As I said in comment 16: - This jabbin doesn't build on g++43 (i.e. rawhide) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=396315 I tried to fix this, however apparently it requires not a few fixes. I hope I have some time to try on this weekend, however I suggest that you ping to upstream. - Builds on dist-f8-updates-candidate, however Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored correctly. More patches or some sed trick or so is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 07:26 EST --- (In reply to comment #27) http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gridengine-6.1u3-4.fc8.src.rpm http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gridengine.spec Returns 404 (not found)... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431414] Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431414 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 07:06 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) Agreed. All of the above addressed, see original URLs. NVR not incremented. which you should have done actually. That will help to differentiate between exiting SRPM I have downloaded and new one to review it without confusion. Also, Changelog will suggest how review got progressed with written changes in changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431534] Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431414] Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431414 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 07:20 EST --- Fixed: Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/planets/planets.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/planets/planets-0.1.13-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431534] Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 07:41 EST --- Is icon working for you? I installed rpm and when tried to run gfeed I got options help only. will review this by tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245919] Review Request: openvpn-auth-ldap - OpenVPN plugin for LDAP authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvpn-auth-ldap - OpenVPN plugin for LDAP authentication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245919 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 07:42 EST --- Oops, I didn't realize that this review was so old, that the initial packages were still in the old location I used to use :-) Updated packages (2.0.3-3) are here : http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/openvpn-auth-ldap/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 08:17 EST --- Well, I want to know how Jindrich thinks about your idea. (In reply to comment #12) all snip Your idea seems good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238817] Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238817 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||lesup.org --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 08:49 EST --- Sorry Rex for the misunderstanding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431534] Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 09:00 EST --- Yes icon is working. If you wrote example: gfeed -f http://linux.pl/rss.php;, new windows will open and icon will show. Thanks in advance for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 430360] Review Request: ggz-gtk-client - Gtk+ client libraries for GGZ gaming zone
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ggz-gtk-client - Gtk+ client libraries for GGZ gaming zone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430360 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 09:31 EST --- Brian, feel free to add yourself as comaintainer in any capacity you wish for dep's libggz-devel, ggz-client-libs (and I'll add myself here as mostly an observer, if you don't mind). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 296161] Review Request: ical - An X Window System-based calendar program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ical - An X Window System-based calendar program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296161 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||201449 nThis|| Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 09:34 EST --- Once CLOSING. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 398601] Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398601 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 09:32 EST --- Would someone update this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 251710] Review Request: potrace - Transforming bitmaps into vector graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: potrace - Transforming bitmaps into vector graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251710 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 09:31 EST --- CC-ing new Balint e-mail. Balint, would you update this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225250] Merge Review: antlr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: antlr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225250] Merge Review: antlr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: antlr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 11:29 EST --- rpmlint on SRPM: antlr.src:375: W: macro-in-%changelog _bindir Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly rewriting history on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. Fix. antlr.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 76) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. Fix. antlr.src: W: non-standard-group Development/Code Generators The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: Amusements/Games, Amusements/Graphics, Applications/Archiving, Applications/Communications, Applications/Databases, Applications/Editors, Applications/Emulators, Applications/Engineering, Applications/File, Applications/Internet, Applications/Multimedia, Applications/Productivity, Applications/Publishing, Applications/System, Applications/Text, Development/Debug, Development/Debuggers, Development/Languages, Development/Libraries, Development/System, Development/Tools, Documentation, System Environment/Base, System Environment/Daemons, System Environment/Kernel, System Environment/Libraries, System Environment/Shells, User Interface/Desktops, User Interface/X, User Interface/X Hardware Support. I'd use Development/Tools. rpmlint on rpms: antlr.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/antlr/ANTLRUtil.hpp A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. etc. . .. Ok, due to the nature of the package. antlr.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.7.7-1jpp.6 0:2.7.7-1jpp.6.fc8 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. Fix. antlr-javadoc.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm antlr-javadoc.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun rm It looks like these are necessary, so OK. Need to include something about how the RHCLEAN tarball can be produced from the upstream tarball. Mock build error: /usr/bin/make -C lib/cpp/antlr all make[3]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/antlr' make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/antlr' /usr/bin/make -C lib/cpp/src all make[3]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src' *** compiling /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/../../../lib/cpp/src/ANTLRUtil.cpp *** compiling /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/../../../lib/cpp/src/ASTFactory.cpp *** compiling /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/../../../lib/cpp/src/ASTNULLType.cpp *** compiling /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/../../../lib/cpp/src/ASTRefCount.cpp *** compiling /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/../../../lib/cpp/src/BaseAST.cpp *** compiling /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/../../../lib/cpp/src/BitSet.cpp *** compiling /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/../../../lib/cpp/src/CharBuffer.cpp *** compiling /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/../../../lib/cpp/src/CharScanner.cpp In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/../../../lib/cpp/src/CharScanner.cpp:10: /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/scripts/../lib/cpp/antlr/CharScanner.hpp: In member function 'bool antlr::CharScannerLiteralsLess::operator /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/scripts/../lib/cpp/antlr/CharScanner.hpp:565: error: 'strcasecmp' was not declared in this scope E R R O R
[Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 11:45 EST --- At least gnash depends on agg. I can take care of this package, as a gnash dependency. Would you accept me as a co-maintainer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225676] Merge Review: dbus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225676 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge reviews to be completed for F9 Alias: F9MergeReviewTarget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 225676, which changed state. Bug 225676 Summary: Merge Review: dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225676 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226669] Merge Review: zip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226669 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|MODIFIED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 11:55 EST --- The bug should certainly be assigned to Ruben. But the comments should also be addressed, in my opinion the package is not really ready for inclusion without those comments addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225676] Merge Review: dbus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225676 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 11:55 EST --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 11:56 EST --- Sure, you can even be the sole maintainer if you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 12:01 EST --- Yikes, so I need to retract the 'ACCEPT'/APPROVED part since I am not a sponser (per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-a601c13b0950a89568deafa65f505b4b58ee869b: First reviews for new packagers must be done by registered sponsors. Informal reviews can be done by anyone interested.). Next stage is actually for a sponsor to do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225252] Merge Review: apmd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225252 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 12:03 EST --- rpmlint on srpm: apmd.src:17: W: prereq-use chkconfig The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires is enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post), Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq. Fix. apmd.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Advanced Power Management (APM) BIOS utilities for laptops. Summary ends with a dot. Fix. apmd.src: W: invalid-license GPL The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: Adobe, AFL, AGPLv1, AGPLv3, AMPAS BSD, ARL, ASL 1.0, ASL 1.0+, ASL 1.1, ASL 1.1+, ASL 2.0, ASL 2.0+, APSL 2.0, APSL 2.0+, Artistic 2.0, Artistic clarified, BitTorrent, Boost, BSD, BSD with advertising, CeCILL, CDDL, CPL, Condor, Copyright only, Cryptix, Crystal Stacker, EPL, eCos, EFL 2.0, EFL 2.0+, EU Datagrid, FTL, Giftware, Glide, gnuplot, GPL+, GPL+ or Artistic, GPLv2+ or Artistic, GPLv2, GPLv2 with exceptions, GPLv2+, GPLv2+ with exceptions, GPLv3, GPLv3 with exceptions, GPLv3+, GPLv3+ with exceptions, IBM, IJG, ImageMagick, iMatix, Imlib2, Intel ACPI, Interbase, ISC, Jabber, JasPer, LGPLv2, LGPLv2 with exceptions, LGPLv2+, LGPLv3, LGPLv3+, libtiff, LPL, LPPL, mecab-ipadic, MIT, MPLv1.0, MPLv1.0+, MPLv1.1, MPLv1.1+, NCSA, NGPL, NOSL, Netscape, Nokia, OpenLDAP, OpenPBS, OReilly, OSL 1.0, OSL 1.0+, OSL 1.1, OSL 1.1+, OSL 2.0, OSL 2.0+, OSL 3.0, OSL 3.0+, OpenSSL, Phorum, PHP, Public Domain, Python, QPL, RPSL, Ruby, Sleepycat, SISSL, SLIB, SPL, TCL, UCD, Vim, VNLSL, VSL, W3C, WTFPL, wxWindows, xinetd, Zend, ZPLv1.0, ZPLv1.0+, ZPLv2.0, ZPLv2.0+, ZPLv2.1, ZPLv2.1+, zlib, CDL, FBSDDL, GFDL, IEEE, OFSFDL, Open Publication, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, DSL, Free Art, Arphic, Baekmuk, Bitstream Vera, mplus, OFL, STIX, Utopia, XANO, Redistributable, no modification permitted, Freely redistributable without restriction. Fix, should be GPLv2+ apmd.src: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. Fix. apmd.src: W: strange-permission apmscript 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. apmd.src: W: strange-permission apmd.init 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. apmd.src: W: strange-permission laptopmode 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. Ok. apmd.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/apmd Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig. apmd.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/sysconfig/apm-scripts/laptopmode Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig. apmd.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/sysconfig/apm-scripts/apmscript Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig. These are fine for this package. apmd.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/apmd A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here apmd.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sysconfig/apm-scripts/apmscript A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here apmd.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sysconfig/apm-scripts/laptopmode A
[Bug 226147] Merge Review: mktemp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mktemp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226147 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 12:44 EST --- than, in that case, could you complete the package EOL process for mktemp as described in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife so we can close this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||com) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 12:33 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 12:33 EST --- (In reply to comment #28) Returns 404 (not found)... Sorry, should work now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427010] Review Request: abcmusiex - Training music score (pentagram) reading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abcmusiex - Training music score (pentagram) reading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427010 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||dep.org.bo) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 12:35 EST --- What is the status of this review request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428793] Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429451] Review Request: magicmaze - Board game featuring a maze which the players change each turn
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: magicmaze - Board game featuring a maze which the players change each turn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429451 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: maze - Board|Review Request: magicmaze - |game featuring a maze which |Board game featuring a maze |the players change each turn|which the players change ||each turn Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 14:20 EST --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: magicmaze Short Description: Board game featuring a maze which the players change each turn Owners:jwrdegoede Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429199] Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429199 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225289] Merge Review: at-spi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: at-spi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225289 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 14:21 EST --- Only one rpmlint message: at-spi-python.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. I'd split out something into this if possible, but it doesn't look like it. No blockers at all. An exemplary package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 14:28 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429451] Review Request: magicmaze - Board game featuring a maze which the players change each turn
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: magicmaze - Board game featuring a maze which the players change each turn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429451 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 14:28 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429451] Review Request: maze - Board game featuring a maze which the players change each turn
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maze - Board game featuring a maze which the players change each turn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429451 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 14:17 EST --- I finally got around to packaging up a new version released by upstream, which includes a zlib license.txt now: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/magicmaze.spec http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/magicmaze-1.0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |com)| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 14:17 EST --- sorry, i working on a project for my factory :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 415791] Review Request: netbsd-iscsi - User-space implementation of iSCSI target from NetBSD project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netbsd-iscsi - User-space implementation of iSCSI target from NetBSD project Alias: netbsd-iscsi-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=415791 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226353] Merge Review: quota
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: quota https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226353 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 14:28 EST --- No response that I've seen from the Packaging Committee. Anyone else hear anythin g off-list? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429199] Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429199 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 14:32 EST --- Not much has changed since previous review, so I'll be brief: clean, simple. source matches upstream, 673d21db31eeaedf9b63cd09f6b247a8 polyester-1.0.3.tar.bz2 scratch build was already pruned, so did a local build, which is rpmlint-clean. All I see: 1. SHOULD: I'd much prefer avoiding the use of Conflicts here. It will only help a rare corner case. I'll leave that to you. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225307] Merge Review: awesfx
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: awesfx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225307 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 15:22 EST --- Local build fails: + make Making all in awelib make[1]: Entering directory `/var/storage/redhat/BUILD/awesfx-0.5.0d/awelib' if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I../include-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -MT awe_parm.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/awe_parm.Tpo -c -o awe_parm.o awe_parm.c; \ then mv -f .deps/awe_parm.Tpo .deps/awe_parm.Po; else rm -f .deps/awe_parm.Tpo; exit 1; fi In file included from awe_parm.c:25: ../include/awe_parm.h:25:29: error: linux/awe_voice.h: No such file or directory In file included from awe_parm.c:25: ../include/awe_parm.h:30: error: expected ')' before '*' token ../include/awe_parm.h:31: error: expected ')' before '*' token awe_parm.c:109: error: expected ')' before '*' token awe_parm.c:142: error: expected ')' before '*' token make[1]: *** [awe_parm.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/storage/redhat/BUILD/awesfx-0.5.0d/awelib' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.94791 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225294] Merge Review: authd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: authd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225294 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 15:12 EST --- rpmlint on srpm: authd.src:7: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes pidentd The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. authd.src:18: W: prereq-use xinetd The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires is enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post), Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq. authd.src: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. These need fixing. rpmlint on rpms: authd.i386: E: non-readable /etc/ident.key 0640 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). authd.i386: E: zero-length /etc/ident.key authd.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ident.key A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here These are OK. authd.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chown Fix if possible, might want to use the full path to chown. In addition to needing a URL tag, the Source tag needs a url pointing to the upstream tarball. If Fedora or RH are upstream, get a space on hosted. License tag should be GPLv2+. Error in rawhide mock build: Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30946 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd authd-1.4.3 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + make prefix=/usr gcc -std=gnu99 -Wall -W -DNDEBUG -g -O -lcrypto -o in.authd authd.c authd.c: In function 'created_pton_hex': authd.c:198: error: 'struct in6_addr' has no member named 'in6_u' authd.c:202: error: 'struct in6_addr' has no member named 'in6_u' authd.c: In function 'initialize_crypto': authd.c:784: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of 'EVP_BytesToKey' differ in signedness make: *** [in.authd] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30946 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30946 (%build) EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output. # bash -l -c 'rpmbuild -bb --target i386 --nodeps //builddir/build/SPECS/authd.spec' Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/trace_decorator.py, line 70, in trace result = func(*args, **kw) File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/util.py, line 286, in do raise mock.exception.Error, (Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s % (command,), ret) Error: Command failed. See logs for output. # bash -l -c 'rpmbuild -bb --target i386 --nodeps //builddir/build/SPECS/authd.spec' LEAVE do -- EXCEPTION RAISED Other than that, looks good, no other blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 15:34 EST --- I would have preferred not to be the sole maintainer, but, if you want to I can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 15:45 EST --- Created an attachment (id=294042) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294042action=view) Latest ocfs2-tools spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #293957|0 |1 is obsolete|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 15:43 EST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Change the buildroot to
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root
Ahh, ok. Thanks - a new version of the package and spec have been uploaded:
Spec URL: http://oss.oracle.com/~mfasheh/fedora/ocfs2-tools.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oss.oracle.com/~mfasheh/fedora/ocfs2-tools-1.3.9-5.20080131git.fc8.src.rpm
The part of the guidelines, I wanted you to refer to regarding static libs
was,
In general, packagers are strongly encouraged not to ship static libs unless
a
compelling reason exists.
If you do have compelling reasons, it would be good to specify that in the
review.
Upstream doesn't build dynamic libraries because the ocfs2-tools api changes
quite rapidly as file system features are added / expanded. As a result, it's
impossible to provide any sort of abi stability, so static libraries are
provided instead. Generally, people writing ocfs2 programs are encouraged to
submit their software to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that it can be
included in the upstream ocfs2-tools distribution. The libraries that are
provided in ocfs2-tools-devel are intended for interim development, and for a
small number of external programs including some fs test software.
Other than those minor nit-picks, the latest spec looks ok to me. I did
a scratch build of the latest ocfs2 srpm and it builds and installs correctly.
Thanks for testing!
A sponsor has to do a official review and approve your spec before you get
commit access.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored
Ok, I will add the FE-NEEDSPONSOR field to indicate my official request for
sponsorship.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 16:03 EST --- There seems to be a problem with one of the included libraries: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# bongo-config install IP address to run on [127.0.0.1]: DNS name to use as main hostname: [localhost]: Mail Domains (enter to end adding domains): []: ERROR: Couldn't initialise auth subsystem An strace reveals the following reason for the failure: open(/usr/lib/bongo-auth/libauthsqlite3.so, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) The directory is missing the needed symlink: [EMAIL PROTECTED] bongo-auth]# ls -l libauthsqlite3.* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root23 2008-02-05 17:20 libauthsqlite3.so.0 - libauthsqlite3.so.0.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 10612 2008-02-05 17:19 libauthsqlite3.so.0.0.0 After creating the link manually Bongo works as it should. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429199] Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429199 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 16:12 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) All I see: 1. SHOULD: I'd much prefer avoiding the use of Conflicts here. It will only help a rare corner case. I'll leave that to you. But it won't hurd so I leave it in the spec. APPROVED. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429199] Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429199 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 16:15 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: polyester3 Short Description: A style for KDE3 Owners: svahl Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 430653] Review Request: baracuda - VNC system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baracuda - VNC system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430653 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 16:48 EST --- Uh, trademarks are not only about identical names, but also about confusingly similar names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225356] Review request: fonts-thai
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226353] Merge Review: quota
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: quota https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226353 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 17:01 EST --- Add the new Fedora Quota maintainer... Ondřej Vašík -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 430653] Review Request: baracuda - VNC system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baracuda - VNC system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430653 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 17:26 EST --- Unversioned obsoletes are not acceptable. The naming guidelines explain how to handle obsoletes: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-3cfc1ea19d28975faad9d56f70a6ae55661d3c3d -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 430619] Review Request: perl-Color-Library - Easy-to-use and comprehensive named-color library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Color-Library - Easy-to-use and comprehensive named-color library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430619 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 17:03 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Color-Library Short Description: Easy-to-use and comprehensive named-color library Owners: steve Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 17:32 EST --- I have taken care of all my comments (and a bit more). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?(pablo.martin- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 17:33 EST --- Sorry to answer just now but the package has been a little difficult to be perfect. I've replace the cp command by install, I don't know it do it right or not. However, I've a problem yet, the entries Add KDE menu and Restore Applications Menu in same time in the menu. (I'm not sure is it normal but, putting the KDE menu, it's restore the pirut entry which I've earsed) Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/~tsi30161/gnome-menu-extended.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/~tsi30161/gnome-menu-extended-0.7-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241319] Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241319 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 18:34 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: hotwire New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241319] Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241319 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 19:52 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429199] Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429199 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 19:54 EST --- cvs done. Any particular reason for the cvsextras commits: no? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 430619] Review Request: perl-Color-Library - Easy-to-use and comprehensive named-color library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Color-Library - Easy-to-use and comprehensive named-color library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430619 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 19:57 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428894] Review Request: rudesocket - Library (C++ API) for creating client sockets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rudesocket - Library (C++ API) for creating client sockets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428894 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 20:43 EST --- Not yet, the build failed due to missing includes for std c libraries. I got the flu before I could fix it, am working on it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 21:05 EST --- 1.2.13 is on the way (tomorrow, I believe). I have many packaging errors, but still I'll push it for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431098] Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431098 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 21:23 EST --- koji says libffi-devel is not found... http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=398016 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431633] New: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/libffi.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/libffi-2.1-0.1.20080129svn131943.fc9.src.rpm Description: Compilers for high level languages generate code that follows certain conventions. These conventions are necessary, in part, for separate compilation to work. One such convention is the calling convention. The calling convention is a set of assumptions made by the compiler about where function arguments will be found on entry to a function. A calling convention also specifies where the return value for a function is found. Some programs may not know at the time of compilation what arguments are to be passed to a function. For instance, an interpreter may be told at run-time about the number and types of arguments used to call a given function. Libffi can be used in such programs to provide a bridge from the interpreter program to compiled code. The libffi library provides a portable, high level programming interface to various calling conventions. This allows a programmer to call any function specified by a call interface description at run-time. Ffi stands for Foreign Function Interface. A foreign function interface is the popular name for the interface that allows code written in one language to call code written in another language. The libffi library really only provides the lowest, machine dependent layer of a fully featured foreign function interface. A layer must exist above libffi that handles type conversions for values passed between the two languages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||431098 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431098] Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431098 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||431633 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 21:51 EST --- Whoops. I forgot to submit that one first. :) libffi is bugzilla 431633. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 22:07 EST --- Would you elaborate why you want to ship libffi as a separate package? libffi is part of GCC, is being built when bootstrapping GCC, technically closely tied to GCC ... That said, IMO, libffi should not be shipped separately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 22:35 EST --- Or, if it is shipped for systems to use, perhaps it should be built from GCC? Note that there is precedence for apps shipping their own libffi in the absence of a system one. See g-wrap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |monk.net) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 23:16 EST --- (In reply to comment #20) From this comment it seems that finally you have to build though strap stage but you mentioned that you did only by quick stage. I actually build all the way through to strap since this is what the dist target of the ant build file does. Strap is built just to be sure that quick can bootstrap itself. In other words it guarantees that you can replace the bootstrap environment with quick and be able to build scala from scratch. I will be uploading a new srpm and spec fixing the emacs issues pointed out by Jonathan in the next couple days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428739] libgweather - A library for weather information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libgweather - A library for weather information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428739 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431534] Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-06 00:54 EST ---
SHOULD:
1)Change %{__install} to install
2)Add doc/out/html/*.html and scripts. But to avoid unnecessary installations
of Makefiles in scripts directory, you can add following line to end of %install
section
rm -f scripts/Makefile*
and change %doc to
%doc AUTHORS CHANGELOG COPYING README doc/out/html/*.html scripts
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-06 01:29 EST ---
%{_libdir}/bongo-auth/libauthsqlite3.so is in the -devel package like the
guidelines demands. It should likely try to open .so.0
Try this:
SRPM: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/bongo-0.3.1-2.fc8.src.rpm
SPEC: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/bongo.spec
- 5 sec untested patch for the above .so problem
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-06 01:57 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=398197 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. f833c873da22fe857d9a5edd3c0e9922 gyachi-1.1.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists But -plugins subpackages exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Desktop file installed correctly + GUI app. SHOULD: Remove ExcludeArch line from SPEC. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
