[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 08:45 EST --- actually since theres a release scheduled on monday i did some tests with yesterdays svn of inting and ifiles. initng svn: builds without warnings on x86_64 but has rpath problems: http://rafb.net/paste/results/MdPv0942.html initng-files: doesent boot with freshly generated runlevel configs fails to mount virtual filesystem for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191589] Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 08:47 EST --- so the next version is ready for review. here the URL: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qsa-1.2.1-4FC4.src.rpm?download Changelog: - enable qt3support - Prevent for compiling using Qt =4.2 witch will need another version of QSA. - add missing .h files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 08:52 EST --- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mysql-connector-net.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mysql-connector-net-1.0.7-5.src.rpm Change of URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178901] Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 09:29 EST --- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtksourceview-sharp.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtksourceview-sharp-2.0-9.src.rpm Change of URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 09:30 EST --- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/monodevelop.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/monodevelop-0.11-6.src.rpm Fixed #42 Change of URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 09:32 EST --- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gnome-build.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gnome-build-0.1.2-2.src.rpm Change of URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189092] Review Request: boo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 09:33 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/boo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/boo-0.7.5.2013-7.src.rpm Change of URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 09:34 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger-0.12-3.src.rpm Change of URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 09:37 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mod_mono.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mod_mono-1.1.14-3.src.rpm Change of URL A couple of tweaks. I'll address #6 today -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193957] Review Request: nant
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 09:38 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/nant.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/nant-0.85-2.src.rpm Change of URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 10:07 EST --- additionally in case selinux is turned off it still tries to switch selinux contexts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 167364] Review Request: Fuse emulator utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Fuse emulator utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167364 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 11:25 EST --- http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/emulation/downloads/fuse-utils-0.7.0-4.src.rpm 404 Not Found The requested URL /emulation/downloads/fuse-utils-0.7.0-4.src.rpm was not found on this server. I hope the spec file inside the SRPM is called fuse-emulator-utils.spec but I suspect it won't be given the SRPM name. Please fix this before posting the next URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192043] Review Request: ucblogo - An interpreter for the Logo programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ucblogo - An interpreter for the Logo programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192043 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 11:29 EST --- Built on FC4, FC5 and FC6. Added entry to owners.list. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 194011] New: Review Request: curry - Münster Curry compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194011 Summary: Review Request: curry - Münster Curry compiler Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/spec/curry.spec SRPM URL: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/curry-0.9.10-1.src.rpm Description: The Münster Curry compiler is a native code compiler for the declarative multi-paradigm language Curry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 167364] Review Request: Fuse emulator utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Fuse emulator utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167364 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 11:43 EST --- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/fuse-emulator-utils-0.7.0.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/fuse-emulator-utils-0.7.0-4.src.rpm D'oh! The spec file has been fixed as you've suggested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 182415] Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182415 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 11:55 EST --- and find nothing non-utf mans. Oops, sorry. I was confused a little because of mc uses nroff to show man pages, and nroff converts utf8 to my ancient locale... :) I've catched the package version from a VERSION Makefile's variable. OK, surely it is correct. Next days I'll finish the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187613] Review Request: sm_tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sm_tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187613 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193929] Review Request: knetstats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knetstats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193929 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 13:01 EST --- issue 1 : it automatically adds itself in Kmenu-Internet issue 2 : rpmbuilding through QA_RPATHS=$[ 0x0001|0x0010 ] rpmbuild -ba knetstats.spec Updated: Spec URL: http://beta.glwb.info/knetstats/knetstats.spec SRPM URL: http://beta.glwb.info/knetstats/knetstats-1.5-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 194012] New: Review Request: xaos - A fast, portable real-time interactive fractal zoomer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194012 Summary: Review Request: xaos - A fast, portable real-time interactive fractal zoomer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/spec/xaos.spec SRPM URL: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/xaos-3.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: XaoS is a fast, portable real-time interactive fractal zoomer. It displays the Mandelbrot set (among other escape time fractals) and allows you zoom smoothly into the fractal. Various coloring modes are provided for both the points inside and outside the selected set. XaoS supports switching between Julia and Mandelbrot fractal types and on-the-fly plane switching. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193929] Review Request: knetstats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: knetstats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193929
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 14:54 EST ---
Not a formal review, but here's a few things I've noticed.
1. You should probably patch the SConstruct file to remove rpath from the
environment. See 'env.KDEuse(environ rpath)' in the file.
2. Add -q to the %setup macro
3. Since you're using %{version} in the source tag, consider using the %{name}
macro too.
4. Drop gcc-c++ from the buildrequires, see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?highlight=%28CategoryExtras%29
5. Perhaps a matter of preference, but consider using the scons supplied with
the source, ie drop the scons BR and use ./scons in the build section.
6. Use the %{?_smp_mflags} on the scons build line, to allow parallel building
7. The install process attempts to create files outside the buildroot:
mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/knetstats': Permission
denied
This must be fixed.
8. The last changelog entry is missing its release number (im assuming it should
have been -1)
9. To fix the desktop file, one solultion might be to delete the .desktop from
the buildroot after scons install 'rm -f
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applnk/Internet/knetstats.desktop', then use
desktop-file-install to install it yourself. Remember to add desktop-file-utils
as a BR
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 15:13 EST ---
Those globs in %files are playing evil with directories ownership.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/mono/1.0
mono-core-1.1.13.7-1.fc5.1
mono-debugger-0.12-3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/mono/gac
gtk-sharp2-2.8.2-1
gtk-sharp-1.0.10-5
mono-core-1.1.13.7-1.fc5.1
gtksourceview-sharp-2.0-7
monodoc-1.1.13-6
mono-debugger-0.12-3
Both /usr/lib/mono/1.0 and /usr/lib/mono/gac should be owned by mono-core.
A quick fix up for mono-debugger.spec:
%files
%defattr(-, root, root)
%doc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog README README.FreeBSD README.build TODO NEWS
RELEASE-NOTES*
%{_bindir}/mdb
%{_libdir}/*.so*
%{_libdir}/mono/1.0/*.exe
%{_libdir}/mono/1.0/gac/Mono.Debugger/*
%{_libdir}/mono/1.0/gac/Mono.Debugger.Cecil/*
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/mono-debugger.pc
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189092] Review Request: boo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 15:21 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/boo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/boo-0.7.6.2234-1.src.rpm Changelog Bump to newer version (2237 has build issues) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187282] Review Request: sax2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sax2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187282
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis||
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 16:13 EST ---
Not building, same error. Add readline-devel to BuildRequires.
/usr/share/locale is forbidden, use %find_lang
Use python macros from fedora-rpmdevtools package to avoid hardcoding
site-packages dir.
Require the libX* package instead of the xorg implementation.
Drop the PreReq, not needed. Probably most of Requires too, most of it is
covered from library requirements brought in by BuildRequires.
Why %define __perl_requires %{nil} ? This could use a comment.
Need to use a lot more macros. Ideally, at least in my opinion, there are no
/usr references anywhere in the spec.
There are readability issues with the SuSE specific parts.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192119] Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192119 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 16:25 EST --- Now that I've tried building on devel with the new plib, I found a few missing BuildRequires: libGL-devel libXi-devel libXext-devel libXmu-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 17:16 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger-0.12-4.src.rpm Addresses problems seen in #5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|191590 | OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 19:10 EST --- MUST items: - rpmlint: Ok $ rpmlint dssi-examples-0.9.1-6.fc5.i386.rpm W: dssi-examples no-documentation Ignorable. W: dssi-examples dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/less_trivial_synth jack-dssi-host W: dssi-examples dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/trivial_sampler jack-dssi-host W: dssi-examples dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/trivial_synth jack-dssi-host Intentional. Main package supplies jack-dssi-host. - Package name: Ok - Spec name: Ok - Meets packaging guidelines: Ok - License: Ok - Spec in American English: Ok - Spec legible: Ok - Sources match upstream: Ok - Builds: Ok - BuildRequires: Ok - Locales: Ok - ldconfig: Ok - Relocation: Ok - Directory ownership: Ok - %files: Ok - %clean: Ok - Macros: Ok - Code vs. Content: Ok - Documentation: Ok - devel package: Ok - .desktop file: Ok SHOULD: - Includes license text: Ok - Mock build: Ok - Builds on all archs: Built on i386, x86_64 - Package functional: Tested on i386, x86_64 - Scriptlets: Ok - Subpackages: Ok NEEDSWORK: Source0: needs to be [...]sf.net/sourceforge/dssi/[...] or else I get a 404. (Did SF rearrange their URLs recently?) Fix the URL before import, and this is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191590] Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191590 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|189892 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193884] Review Request: tolua++ - A tool to integrate C/C++ code with Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tolua++ - A tool to integrate C/C++ code with Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193884 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193342] Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193342 Bug 193342 depends on bug 193884, which changed state. Bug 193884 Summary: Review Request: tolua++ - A tool to integrate C/C++ code with Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193884 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193210] Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193210 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 21:29 EST --- Thanks! AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189322] Review Request: rosegarden4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rosegarden4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 Bug 189322 depends on bug 189892, which changed state. Bug 189892 Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 194015] yumex 1.0.0 TB4426d5a1 ConfigParser.py:490:_read:ParsingError: File contains parsing errors:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: yumex 1.0.0 TB4426d5a1 ConfigParser.py:490:_read:ParsingError: File contains parsing errors: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194015 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Package Review |yumex CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 21:58 EST --- I'm not sure why this was filed under Package Review; unblocking FE-NEW, setting the component to yumex and CC'ing the package owner. Ronnie, I'm curious: did you submit this bug via the Fedora Extras Package Review Request form? Is there some document or URL that led you to that form as the proper method for submitting a bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 23:33 EST --- I just filed bug #194026 for the javahl problem. I'll investigate as soon as I get time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 194027] New: Review Request: metisse - Experimental X desktop with OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194027 Summary: Review Request: metisse - Experimental X desktop with OpenGL Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/metisse.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/metisse-0.4.0-1.src.rpm Description: Metisse is an experimental X desktop with some OpenGL capacity. It consists of a virtual X server called Xwnc, a special version of FVWM, and a FVWM module FvwmAmetista. NOTE: This should obsolete bug #177080 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
