[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 04:53 EST --- The bug is down to something missing in the PPC version of glibc (it's not been ported across if memory serves me right). I did file a BZ report on it but was told that the missing bit wasn't going to be implemented. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 05:23 EST --- What bugzilla number? If the something missing is something that mono-debugger can't do without, then it would be strange for the glibc bug to be closed 'wontfix'. If it's something that mono-debugger _can_ do without, then mono-debugger should be fixed. Either way, there should be a bug filed against mono-debugger which a) Clearly explains the problem b) depends on the glibc bug you mention c) blocks FE-ExcludeArch-ppc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221015] Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 05:35 EST --- Thanks :) * Tue Jan 02 2007 Johan Cwiklinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.4.2-2 - using 'name' and 'version' macros for Source0 - corrected mispelling in changelog SRPM URL : http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/moodin/ksplash-engine-moodin-0.4.2-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 05:48 EST --- Aha, it seems to be bug 205017. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 06:11 EST --- Again... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 06:26 EST --- Upstream 0.2.4 tarball is available, but it's not quite the same as the copy included in 0.2.4-1 SRPM, lib micro version has changed. Upstream URLs changed: libburn - libburnia, libburn-download - libburnia-download I think the doxygen docs belong to -devel rather than the main package. The dependency on libburn is still there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221698] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221698 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 06:38 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) How do you want to continue this review? should I only change the release version to 4 and file back ? Well, (for compat-guile-16) at least -devel package needs Requires: automake because -devel package includes automake .m4 file so please fix so. Also, please check if I have overlooked something else and add some fixes you want to do. Then I will review your spec file again. By the way, do you agree with the name compat-guile-16? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221669] Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT Alias: deluge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 06:47 EST --- deluge works great for me. AMD64 (x86_64) It's fundamental to compile python-libtorrent with -DAMD64 In python-libtorrent.cpp are this lines #ifdef AMD64 #define pythonLong int #else #define pythonLong long - see -DAMD64 #endif I used this : python-libtorrent-0.3.0-3.20061128svn.src.rpm rb_libtorrent-0.11-2.src.rpm deluge-0.4.1-1.src.rpm the python-libtorrent.spec should changed for x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 06:55 EST --- The third subpatch for src/platform/X11/Makefile.am in agg-2.4-depends.patch is not applied, certainly because it lacks a line like @@ -5,6 +5,6 @@ Another issue I found is that @x_libraries@ is empty, so there is a lone -L when linking. I think it should be fixed in the autotools build system. Maybe in configure there could be something along test -n $x_libraries X_LDFLAGS=-L$x_libraries AC_SUBST(X_LDFLAGS) and then in Makefile.am it could be libaggplatformX11_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info @AGG_LIB_VERSION@ @X_LDFLAGS@ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 07:14 EST ---
* I would personally replace
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/*.la
by
rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/*.la
The latter returns False if the target files don't exist.
The former returns True in that case and doesn't break the build.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 07:39 EST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
* I would personally replace
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/*.la
by
rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/*.la
The latter returns False if the target files don't exist.
The former returns True in that case and doesn't break the build.
Breaking the build in case those files aren't there anymore is
the point of my change. It helps to detect when something changed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 08:04 EST ---
%exclude %{_libdir}/*.la in the %files list would achieve the same.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221349] Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221349 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 08:08 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) Oh.. I just noticed that you already requested for sponsorship. Now I am sponsoring you and you should receive a mail. Thank You for sponsorship. The package was built correctly on buildsys (all arch, devel), so I can close this request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 174063] Review Request: cssed - css editor and validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - css editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174063 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution||DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 08:10 EST --- Closing that due to lack of interest. New request has been submitted in bug 221727. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 221727 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 08:10 EST --- *** Bug 174063 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 08:22 EST --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219103] Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219103 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219103] Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219103
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis||
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 08:58 EST ---
1. package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
2. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
3. dist tag is present.
4. build root is correct.
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
5. license field matches the actual license.
6. license is open source-compatible (GPL). License text included in package.
7. source files match upstream:
d2c45879e4cfb95d410bf603af891e07 dvdauthor-0.6.11.tar.gz
8. latest version is being packaged.
9. BuildRequires are proper.
10. package builds in mock (x86_64 devel).
11. rpmlint is silent.
12. final provides and requires are sane:
dvdauthor = 0.6.11-8.fc7
=
/bin/sh
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libdvdread.so.3()(64bit)
libfreetype.so.6()(64bit)
libfribidi.so.0()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpng12.so.0()(64bit)
libxml2.so.2()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
13. no shared libraries are present.
14. package is not relocatable.
15. owns the directories it creates.
16. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
17. no duplicates in %files.
18. file permissions are appropriate.
19. %clean is present.
20. %check is not present and no testsuite.
21. no scriptlets present.
22. code, not content.
23. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
24. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
25. no headers.
26. no pkgconfig files.
27. no libtool .la droppings.
28. not a GUI app.
29. not a web app.
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219103] Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219103 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 09:00 EST --- Oops forgot to set ASSIGNED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 09:03 EST ---
REVIEW:
* rpmlint gives me following result:
W: cssed-devel no-documentation
can be ignored because of lack of any devel-related documentation
* I have no objection to name of package and spec file
* package is licensed under a GPL license and the license file is included
into %doc
* package builds fine in mock fc6/x86_64
* sources match upstream (md5: ff7c818d1f819b7d76b4f714be64e08e)
* locales are handled well
* all directories are properly owned
!* %clean section presents but looks bad, you should change it to
rm -rf %{buildroot}
* %defattr macro presents in all %files sections
* macros used well
* -devel subpackage presents and looks good
!* bad icon tag in desktop-file
THINGS to do:
* change %clean section
* you have used cssed.png entry in desktop.file but that file doesn't exist.
It seems to me that the best way would be changing it to
/usr/share/cssed/pixmaps/cssed-about.png
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 09:17 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) THINGS to do: * change %clean section * you have used cssed.png entry in desktop.file but that file doesn't exist. It seems to me that the best way would be changing it to /usr/share/cssed/pixmaps/cssed-about.png Fixed. Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/cssed/cssed.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/cssed/cssed-0.4.0-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219103] Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219103 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 09:22 EST --- Devel build done, owners.list and comps-fe7 updated, FC-6 branch requested. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 09:37 EST --- I've updated the srpm and spec, how about that now... * Summary: Anti-Grain Geometry graphical rendering engine * patch fixed, and @FREETYPE_LIBS@ moved, and AC_SUBST(X_LDFLAGS) tweak added * . at end of descriptions * news added to docs * trailing / added to includedir %files * freetype-devel, pkgconfig and automake added to -devel requires * Requires.private added * rpath removed patches logged as: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1629532group_id=42020atid=431927 and http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1629915group_id=42020atid=431927 The substantive issue is gpc, and in that case we're building with --disable-gpc to disable building and including gpc in the final rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 212003] Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 10:09 EST --- We can certainly remove the jpp tags, but it's clear that I'm not making time to continue with this package, so I'd like to withdraw my review request. Perhaps somebody else would like to continue with this one. Sorry! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220635] Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220635 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 11:20 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) Are any plains when it will be added to the repo? This package is currently under review. It will be added to the repository as soon as the review is complete. If you want it to reach the repository faster, help review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 11:30 EST --- I am not able to access any of these links above. Shouldnt this review reopened or a new review submitted as per comment #18? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 11:53 EST --- It's better to check rpmlint again before sending an each new release. If you made that, you would see following result: W: cssed macro-in-%changelog clean It means you have to double % character before clean, so write %%clean instead of %clean in changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 12:10 EST --- Some question(s) and issue(s) * Is po4a really needed for rebuilding this? I can rebuild this without po4a by mockbuild on FC-devel i386. It seems that po4a is needed when you want to re-create some documents? * -- BuildRequires: gcc-c++ BuildRequires: /usr/bin/getopt (util-linux) -- These are not needed because these are included in minimal build environment. * I think adding debian/changelog is preferable because the upsteam of this package is debian people (correct?). * Does this package fail on parallel make? * rpmlint complains: --- E: fakeroot zero-length /usr/share/doc/fakeroot-1.5.10/README --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 12:43 EST --- Please post the link of the updated srpm... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 12:59 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) It's better to check rpmlint again before sending an each new release. If you made that, you would see following result: W: cssed macro-in-%changelog clean It means you have to double % character before clean, so write %%clean instead of %clean in changelog. Fixed. Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/cssed/cssed.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/cssed/cssed-0.4.0-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 13:29 EST --- Okay, now it does look fine. Package is approved. I'll sponsor you. Just request your cvsextras and fedorabugs account. After then you'll be able to import and build your package. Read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors carefully to know what you're to do. If package builds fine, don't forget to close that ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 13:32 EST ---
Well, I have to make some comments:
* Please check the requirement for -devel package.
cssed.pc includes the line:
---
Requires: gtk+-2.0 glib-2.0
---
This means that -devel package needs Requires: gtk2-devel
Also,
---
Cflags: -I${prefix}/share/cssed/include
---
points to a wrong directory. Also this file
has a strange coding at the end (try cat cssed.pc).
* Please avoid to use autotools when it is possible.
It seems that from your patch against Makefile.am and
the content of Makefile.in, you can make a patch against
Makefile.in, not against Makefile.am with ease.
* Please remove redundant BuildRequires. For example,
glib2-devel is always required by gtk2-devel, so
writting glib2-devel
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221677] Review Request: at76_usb-firmware - Firmware for Atmel AT76C503A based USB WLAN adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: at76_usb-firmware - Firmware for Atmel AT76C503A based USB WLAN adapters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221677 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: main |Review Request: at76_usb- |package name here - short |firmware - Firmware for |summary here |Atmel AT76C503A based USB ||WLAN adapters -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 13:48 EST --- Also one issue. /usr/include/cssed/SciLexer.h includes: -- // Copyright 1998-2002 by Neil Hodgson [EMAIL PROTECTED] // The License.txt file describes the conditions under which this software may be distributed. -- So please include scintilla/License.txt Note: this is MIT? If so, the license of this whole package is still GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 14:11 EST --- * Is po4a really needed for rebuilding this? Indeed, you are right, the latest release says: Drop po4a from build-deps. I'll comment BR: po4a away (but keep it in case the next release forgets again to process the language files). zero-length [...]/README [...] debian/changelog Hm, a bit sloppy in upstream. I'll add debian/changelog, but I'd like to keep the zero-sized README in case it (hopefully) gets filled with content. I.e. better to carry an empty file, than to forget to check upon the next package update. What do you say? I wouldn't really object, if you insist on removing it. | o `redundant' BRs: They do not hurt and are also tagged as `not needed', not | `forbidden'. Especially gcc-c++/libstdc++ could be removed from future | minimal roots for an easy gain of space. It's already been removed in other | buildsystems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 14:48 EST --- Also during review, each time you change the spec file, please bump the release and add a changelog entry (except maybe for very minor issues). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221769] New: Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221769 Summary: Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/libcgi.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/libcgi-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: LibCGI is a library written from scratch to easily make CGI applications in C. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal
compiler (fpc)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 16:59 EST ---
fpcmake uses the settings in Makefile.fpc to generate the makefile. If you add a
hardcoded 'lib/lazarus' in the Makefile.fpc, fpcmake places that literally in
the makefile.
I changed the patch, so that it doesn't use 'lib/lazarus', but '$(_lib)/lazarus'
and added '_LIB={%_lib}' to the make-command. This should solve the
build-problem on 64-bit systems. Can you try again? (same link?)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 16:50 EST --- I fixed all these things. Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/cssed/cssed.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/cssed/cssed-0.4.0-4.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221776] New: Review Request: digitemp - Dallas Semiconductor 1-wire device reading console application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221776 Summary: Review Request: digitemp - Dallas Semiconductor 1-wire device reading console application Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/digitemp.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/digitemp-3.5.0-1.src.rpm Description: DigiTemp is a simple to use console application for reading values from Dallas Semiconductor 1-wire devices. Its main use is for reading temperature sensors, but it also reads counters and understands the 1-wire hubs with devices on different branches of the network. DigiTemp now supports the following 1-wire temperature sensors: DS18S20 (and DS1820), DS18B20, DS1822, the DS2438 Smart Battery Monitor, DS2422 and DS2423 Counters, DS2409 MicroLAN Coupler (used in 1-wire hubs) and the AAG TAI-8540 humidity sensor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209224] Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209224 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 17:31 EST --- * Sun Jan 07 2007 Thorsten Scherf [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.9.7.1-3 - added tcp-wrapper support - fixed dirowner and permissions problem updated packages are available: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prelude-manager-0.9.7.1-3.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prelude-manager.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 18:17 EST --- greetings and happy new year, I want announce a new release of MyBashBurn 1.0.1 with major feature and enhancements, with some security bugfix important for this review, as a function against race conditions on temp files, now MyBashBurn look for root/user config in /etc/mybashburnrc, ~/.mybashburnrc in that order, fix permissions, updated man file and the option of change the 'root directory' (/usr/share/mybashburn/) have been deprecated for some time and will be removed. New files location: SPEC: http://mybashburn.sourceforge.net/mybashburn.spec SRPMS: http://mybashburn.sourceforge.net/mybashburn-1.0.1-0.src.rpm HOMEPAGE: http://mybashburn.sourceforge.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221376] Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library Alias: python-libtorrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 19:37 EST --- I've bumped it to a new release, which adds a -DAMD64 flag on 64-bit arches (as noticed by Gerd Classen on bug #221669). Updated files are on my webspace: Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/python-libtorrent.spec SRPM: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/python-libtorrent-0.3.0-4.20061128svn.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221669] Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT Alias: deluge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 19:38 EST --- Thanks for your help on getting this worked out, Gerd. I've posted an updated python-libtorrent spec/SRPM on its review request (bug #221376), and I've bumped the dependecy thereof in the spec/SRPM for Deluge as well. Update files are on my webspace: Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/deluge.spec SRPM: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/deluge-0.4.1-2.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 19:52 EST --- The http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded page is free for edit to anyone needing it. There is no need to be in a special group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217671] Review Request: libhangul - Hangul input library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libhangul - Hangul input library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217671 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 20:18 EST --- libhangul-0.0.4 was released btw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217671] Review Request: libhangul - Hangul input library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libhangul - Hangul input library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217671
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 20:23 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=145019)
-- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145019action=view)
libhangul.spec-1.patch
Fix:
- MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
(for directory ownership and usability).
- MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
and for the include dir:
- MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
All the other MUST items are satisfied, thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221698] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221698 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-08 02:30 EST --- Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/compat-guile/compat-guile-16.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/compat-guile/compat-guile-16-1.6.7-4.src.rpm Yes, I'm ok with the name. Once I've asked on the mailing list about some particular guidelines to follow for compat packages, your way is more logic to me. http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-December/msg00375.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
