[Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 03:19 EST --- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmapfont - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmapfont - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 03:25 EST ---
I have reviewed this package on FC6. Everything seems fine.
Maybe need to change to this:
Release: 6%{?dist}
I think it is good to make this rpm even work on old linux version which haven't
chkfontpath.
But the old Requires is wrong, should be:
Requires: freetype, %{_datadir}/fonts
Prereq: chkfontpath
Not chkfontconfig, as this package don't exist in FC6. Name changed?
The rpmlint output was this:
W: wqy-bitmapfont dangerous-command-in-%post cp
E: wqy-bitmapfont no-prereq-on chkfontpath
W: wqy-bitmapfont dangerous-command-in-%preun rm
E: wqy-bitmapfont no-prereq-on chkfontpath
The no-prereq-on will disappear after add Prereq: chkfontpath.
Maybe you can look at bitmap-fonts package's spec file? It is for pcf files too.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233522] Review Request: nginx - http and reverse proxy server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: nginx - http and reverse proxy server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233522
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 03:45 EST ---
Hi Jeremy,
- zlib-devel is already required by openssl-devel
- You can even drop the whole Requires line. rpm is smart enough to calculate
that by itself.
- Replace /usr/sbin/nginx in your %install section with %{_sbindir}/nginx
- You're missing a forward slash in
--lock-path=%{_localstatedir}lock/subsys/%{name}
Nothing that should block this review, but I hope it helps.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228450] Review Request: zhcon - A Fast Console CJK System Using FrameBuffer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zhcon - A Fast Console CJK System Using FrameBuffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228450 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 03:57 EST --- Hello, Zhu. This bug still block FE-NEEDSPONSOR, however according to your comment, are you already sponsored?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198816] Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198816 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 04:07 EST --- Hi Chris, Please respond, or I'll have to close this ticket in a week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209511] Review Request: gnbd - global network block device
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnbd - global network block device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209511 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 04:08 EST --- Hi Chris, Please respond, or I'll have to close this ticket in a week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the
GNU system
Alias: gmediaserver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 04:10 EST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
* %define mediadir /var/gmediaserver
please read http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html and determine the
proper location... perhaps /var/lib/gmediaserver?
Change to /srv/gmediaserver (consulted on IRC - #fedora-devel)
Seems reasonable to me.
Init file still needs some work. Here is the relevent rpmlint output:
E: gmediaserver wrong-line-in-lsb-tag # gmediaserver Start/stop gmediaserver
service
E: gmediaserver wrong-line-in-lsb-tag #
E: gmediaserver unknow-lsb-tag # chkconfig: - 85 15
E: gmediaserver unknow-lsb-tag # description: GMediaServer is a UPnP
compatible media server for the GNU system. It is part \
E: gmediaserver wrong-line-in-lsb-tag #
E: gmediaserver unknow-lsb-tag # processname: gmediaserver
E: gmediaserver unknow-lsb-tag # config: /etc/sysconfig/gmediaserver
E: gmediaserver unknow-lsb-tag # pidfile: /var/run/gmediaserver.pid
E: gmediaserver missing-mandatory-lsb-tag Provides
E: gmediaserver missing-mandatory-lsb-tag Description
E: gmediaserver missing-mandatory-lsb-tag Short-Description
And here is an example init with the LSB info:
#!/bin/bash
#
# Startup script for the ntop program
# chkconfig: - 81 19
# description: A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command
# processname: ntop
# pidfile: /var/run/ntop.pid
# config: /etc/ntop.conf
#
### BEGIN INIT INFO
# Provides: ntop
# Required-Start:$local_fs $network $syslog
# Should-Start:
# Required-Stop:
# Default-Start: 3 4 5
# Default-Stop: 0 1 2 6
# Short-Description: Start ntop daemon
# Description: Start ntop, a network traffic probe similar to the UNIX \
#top command
### END INIT INFO
E: gmediaserver executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/sysconfig/gmediaserver
E: gmediaserver script-without-shebang /etc/sysconfig/gmediaserver
this should be installed mode 644
E: gmediaserver executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/logrotate.d/gmediaserver
W: gmediaserver spurious-executable-perm /etc/logrotate.d/gmediaserver
this should be installed mode 644
install -D -m755 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/%{name}
cp %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/%{name}
chmod +x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/%{name}
the install then cp is redundant.
use -p to preserve the timestamp. If you want, you can use 'cp -p' or more
efficiently:
install -D -m 0755 -p %{SOURCE} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/%{name}
install -D $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/%{name}
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/%{name}
rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/%{name}
just use 'mv' - it will keep the timestamp, mode, ownership, etc of the original
file
you might want a comment here too, explaining that the make install put the file
in /usr/bin but for a server it should be /usr/sbin/(In reply to comment #8)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232752] Review Request: g3data - Program for extracting the data from scanned graphs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g3data - Program for extracting the data from scanned graphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232752 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 04:14 EST --- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228450] Review Request: zhcon - A Fast Console CJK System Using FrameBuffer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zhcon - A Fast Console CJK System Using FrameBuffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228450 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 04:33 EST --- I have already get sponsored. I have reviewed the wqy-bitmapfont package too. Have the review get past? If so, we can add the fedora-cvs tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228450] Review Request: zhcon - A Fast Console CJK System Using FrameBuffer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zhcon - A Fast Console CJK System Using FrameBuffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228450 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 | nThis|| Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 04:41 EST --- The okay. --- This package (zhcon) is APPROVED by me. --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228450] Review Request: zhcon - A Fast Console CJK System Using FrameBuffer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zhcon - A Fast Console CJK System Using FrameBuffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228450 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225984] Merge Review: lftp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225984 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review?, needinfo? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 04:55 EST --- mbarabas, can you please create a new spec based on the comments above? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmapfont - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmapfont - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 05:01 EST ---
Well, the newest spec file is what I can see on
http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmapfont.spec , right?
Then:
* At least this spec file cannot be accepted as this
rpm creates some non-owned files. All files created or
installed by this rpm should be owned by this rpm.
i.e. Generally using cp or ln rm on scriptlets are
generally prohibited. This means that file ownership
is somewhat wrong.
If you have some strong reason why you want to support
older versions, then IMO you should introduce %if macro, for example,
and split the case accordingly.
* /usr/X11R6/ directory is no longer used.
mkfontdir is now under %{_bindir}.
* Please use proper macros (i.e. %{_bindir} %{_sysconfdir},...)
* Please check what rpm owns %{_datadir}/fonts/wenquanyi/ .
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231707] Review Request: perl-CGI-Session - Persistent session data in CGI applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Session - Persistent session data in CGI applications Alias: perl-CGI-Session https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231707 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 05:38 EST --- Thanks for the review, package has been built for FC-5, FC-6 and rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232612] Review Request: perl-Class-Observable - Allow other classes and objects to respond to events in yours
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Observable - Allow other classes and objects to respond to events in yours https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232612 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 05:40 EST --- Thanks for the review, package has been built for FC-5, FC-6 and rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231758] Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows Alias: perl-Workflow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231758 Bug 231758 depends on bug 232612, which changed state. Bug 232612 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Observable - Allow other classes and objects to respond to events in yours https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232612 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231736] Review Request: perl-FileHandle-Fmode - FileHandle::Fmode Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-FileHandle-Fmode - FileHandle::Fmode Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231736 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 05:42 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-FileHandle-Fmode Short Description: FileHandle::Fmode Perl module Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232615] Review Request: perl-Mail-RFC822-Address - Perl extension for validating email addresses according to RFC822
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-RFC822-Address - Perl extension for validating email addresses according to RFC822 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232615 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 05:58 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Mail-RFC822-Address Short Description: Perl extension for validating addresses according to RFC822 Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 06:06 EST --- Simply because I missed it. Since I'm not the reported or the assignee, it doesn't appear in my bugzilla front page... Closing now at last :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232626] Review Request: perl-MD5 - Perl interface to the MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MD5 - Perl interface to the MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232626 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 06:06 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-MD5 Short Description: Perl interface to the MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232617] Review Request: perl-Sys-SigAction - Perl extension for Consistent Signal Handling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-SigAction - Perl extension for Consistent Signal Handling Alias: perl-Sys-SigAction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232617 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 06:07 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Sys-SigAction Short Description: Read extension for Consistent Signal Handling Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232613] Review Request: perl-Data-Password - Perl extension for assesing password quality
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Password - Perl extension for assesing password quality https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232613 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 06:11 EST --- Thanks for the review. Built for 5, 6 and rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233352] Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233352 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 06:16 EST --- Yes, the problem is there. I have tested the srpm with multiprocessor machines and I get the same failed build. This is the rpm with the parallel make flag removed http://t-rex.fis.ucm.es/~spr/funtools.spec http://t-rex.fis.ucm.es/~spr/funtools-1.3.0-0.3.b29.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232618] Review Request: perl-XML-Filter-BufferText - Filter to put all characters() in one event
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Filter-BufferText - Filter to put all characters() in one event https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232618 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 06:18 EST --- Thanks for the review. Package has been built for FC-5, FC-6 and rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232619] Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-Writer - SAX2 Writer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-Writer - SAX2 Writer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232619 Bug 232619 depends on bug 232618, which changed state. Bug 232618 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Filter-BufferText - Filter to put all characters() in one event https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232618 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232622] Review Request: perl-XML-Validator-Schema - Validate XML against a subset of W3C XML Schema
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Validator-Schema - Validate XML against a subset of W3C XML Schema https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232622 Bug 232622 depends on bug 232618, which changed state. Bug 232618 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Filter-BufferText - Filter to put all characters() in one event https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232618 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232619] Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-Writer - SAX2 Writer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-Writer - SAX2 Writer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232619 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 06:18 EST --- Thanks for the review. Package has been built for FC-5, FC-6 and rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232620] Review Request: perl-XML-Filter-XInclude - XInclude as a SAX Filter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Filter-XInclude - XInclude as a SAX Filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232620 Bug 232620 depends on bug 232619, which changed state. Bug 232619 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-Writer - SAX2 Writer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232619 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232624] Review Request: perl-ConfigReader - Read directives from a configuration file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ConfigReader - Read directives from a configuration file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232624 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 06:21 EST --- Thanks for the review. Package has been built for FC-5, FC-6 and rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232616] Review Request: perl-Proc-ProcessTable - Perl extension to access the unix process table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Proc-ProcessTable - Perl extension to access the unix process table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232616 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 06:21 EST --- Thanks for the review. Built for 5, 6 and rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232625] Review Request: perl-LockFile-Simple - Simple file locking scheme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-LockFile-Simple - Simple file locking scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232625 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 06:24 EST --- Thanks for the review. Package has been built for FC-5, FC-6 and rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225695] Merge Review: diffstat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: diffstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225695 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 06:25 EST --- I've removed that sentence. I haven't added a 'Requires' tag for diffutils because there is no dependency there -- it is entirely possible that you might want to run diffstat on a patch you've received by email without having diffutils installed, and that works just fine. Tagged and built as 1.43-5.fc7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225693] Merge Review: dialog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: dialog
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225693
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution||RAWHIDE
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 06:31 EST ---
It should be Release: 0.1.%{SubVersion}svn%{?dist}
From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines:
Release Tag for Post-Release Snapshot Packages:
*
%{X}.%{alphatag}
Where %{X} is the build number from any previous stable package build,
incremented by one (if no previous stable package build, use 1), and %{alphatag}
is the checkout string, as described above.
Example (post-release cvs):
kismet-1.0-1 (this is the formal release of kismet 1.0)
kismet-1.0-2 (this is a bugfix build to the 1.0 release)
kismet-1.0-3.20050515cvs (move to a post-release cvs checkout)
kismet-1.0-4.20050515cvs (bugfix to the post-release cvs checkout)
kismet-1.0-5.20050517cvs (new cvs checkout, note the increment of %{X})
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228450] Review Request: zhcon - A Fast Console CJK System Using FrameBuffer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zhcon - A Fast Console CJK System Using FrameBuffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228450 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 06:46 EST --- Please use the CVS request template found here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure And reset the fedora-cvs flag with an entry using that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231736] Review Request: perl-FileHandle-Fmode - FileHandle::Fmode Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-FileHandle-Fmode - FileHandle::Fmode Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231736 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232193] Review Request: perl-SVG - Generate stand-alone or inline SVG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG - Generate stand-alone or inline SVG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232193 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 06:51 EST --- Updated as per comment #2 spec: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-SVG.spec SRPM: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-SVG-2.33-2.src.rpm I also added the disttag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232615] Review Request: perl-Mail-RFC822-Address - Perl extension for validating email addresses according to RFC822
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-RFC822-Address - Perl extension for validating email addresses according to RFC822 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232615 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226670] Merge Review: zisofs-tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zisofs-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226670 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 06:53 EST --- release value is suitable but rather strange (why 3.2.2 and not 4, 5, 6.. ? ) This was from automatic rebuilds, as you can see by the changelog entries... please check zisofs-tools-1.0.7-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232626] Review Request: perl-MD5 - Perl interface to the MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MD5 - Perl interface to the MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232626 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232617] Review Request: perl-Sys-SigAction - Perl extension for Consistent Signal Handling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-SigAction - Perl extension for Consistent Signal Handling Alias: perl-Sys-SigAction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232617 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233584] New: Review Request: perl-Text-Shellwords - A thin wrapper around the shellwords.pl package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233584 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Shellwords - A thin wrapper around the shellwords.pl package Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-Text-Shellwords.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-Text-Shellwords-1.08-1.src.rpm info here Description: This is a thin wrapper around the shellwords.pl package, which comes preinstalled with Perl. This module imports a single subroutine, shellwords(). The shellwords() routine parses lines of text and returns a set of tokens using the same rules that the Unix shell does for its command-line arguments. Tokens are separated by whitespace, and can be delimited by single or double quotes. The module also respects backslash escapes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232622] Review Request: perl-XML-Validator-Schema - Validate XML against a subset of W3C XML Schema
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Validator-Schema - Validate XML against a subset of W3C XML Schema https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232622 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 07:06 EST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
make install still fails for some reason, but I solved it by manually
creating
%{_libdir}/%{name} in the build root before running make install in
the %install
section.
Can i have a look why it's failing on x86_64 arch?
The problem is simply that the Makefile in lib/ does not check for the existence
of $prefix/%{_libdir}/%{name} before attempting to copy the file. I can create
an account on my x86_64 machine if you want to check for your self, but the
problem can easily be fixed either by adding the directory to the install-dirs
rule in the top level Makefile, or by manually running mkdir -p
%{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name} before running make install.
On the other hand, it seems kind of strange to me to install the scripts in
libdir in the first place. Wouldn't the correct location be libexec?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232622] Review Request: perl-XML-Validator-Schema - Validate XML against a subset of W3C XML Schema
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Validator-Schema - Validate XML against a subset of W3C XML Schema https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232622 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 07:06 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 4f9decc25d2b484df80ee4adfa912f12 XML-Validator-Schema-1.08.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch') t/*.t t/01basic...ok t/02yaml == Testing against XML::SAX::PurePerl == == Testing against XML::LibXML::SAX == ok t/03types...ok t/04model...ok t/05xerces..skipped all skipped: Test requires $XERCES_DOMCOUNT t/06passthruskipped all skipped: Test requires XML::SAX::Writer t/07locator.ok 1/2 skipped: These tests require XML::SAX::ExpatXS All tests successful, 2 tests and 1 subtest skipped. Files=7, Tests=658, 4 wallclock secs ( 2.66 cusr + 0.24 csys = 2.90 CPU) + Provides: perl(XML::Validator::Schema) = 1.08 perl(XML::Validator::Schema::AllModelNode) perl(XML::Validator::Schema::Attribute) perl(XML::Validator::Schema::AttributeLibrary) perl(XML::Validator::Schema::ChoiceModelNode) perl(XML::Validator::Schema::ComplexTypeNode) perl(XML::Validator::Schema::ElementLibrary) perl(XML::Validator::Schema::ElementNode) perl(XML::Validator::Schema::ElementRefNode) perl(XML::Validator::Schema::Library) perl(XML::Validator::Schema::ModelNode) perl(XML::Validator::Schema::Node) perl(XML::Validator::Schema::Parser) perl(XML::Validator::Schema::RootNode) perl(XML::Validator::Schema::SequenceModelNode) perl(XML::Validator::Schema::SimpleType) perl(XML::Validator::Schema::SimpleTypeNode) perl(XML::Validator::Schema::TypeLibrary) perl(XML::Validator::Schema::Util) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233584] Review Request: perl-Text-Shellwords - A thin wrapper around the shellwords.pl package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Shellwords - A thin wrapper around the shellwords.pl package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233584 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233585] New: Review Request: perl-XML-Writer - A simple Perl module for writing XML documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233585 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Writer - A simple Perl module for writing XML documents Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-XML-Writer.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-XML-Writer-0.602-1.src.rpm here Description: XML::Writer is a simple Perl module for writing XML documents: it takes care of constructing markup and escaping data correctly, and by default, it also performs a significant amount of well-formedness checking on the output, to make certain (for example) that start and end tags match, that there is exactly one document element, and that there are not duplicate attribute names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232620] Review Request: perl-XML-Filter-XInclude - XInclude as a SAX Filter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Filter-XInclude - XInclude as a SAX Filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232620 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232620] Review Request: perl-XML-Filter-XInclude - XInclude as a SAX Filter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Filter-XInclude - XInclude as a SAX Filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232620 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 07:12 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 6fd41f32027f3dbf6993fcef0ee81578 XML-Filter-XInclude-1.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch') t/*.t t/00basic...ok t/01xincludeok All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=3, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.20 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.23 CPU) + Provides: perl(XML::Filter::XInclude) = 1.0 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233585] Review Request: perl-XML-Writer - A simple Perl module for writing XML documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Writer - A simple Perl module for writing XML
documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233585
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 07:19 EST ---
Kindly avoid hardcoding version number in Source URL tarball name. Instead use
%{version}
Anyway you can do that at time of importing package in CVS.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233585] Review Request: perl-XML-Writer - A simple Perl module for writing XML documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Writer - A simple Perl module for writing XML documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233585 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 07:20 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url c715d6fd90ac775316cc313815ba3b77 XML-Writer-0.602.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch') t/*.t t/01_main.ok t/pod-coverageskipped all skipped: Test::Pod::Coverage required for testing pod coverage t/pod.skipped all skipped: Test::Pod 1.00 required for testing POD All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. Files=3, Tests=213, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.30 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.33 CPU) + Provides: perl(XML::Writer) = 0.602 perl(XML::Writer::Namespaces) perl(XML::Writer::_String) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 07:25 EST --- Spec URL: http://manta.univ.gda.pl/~mgarski/fe/jomolhari-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://manta.univ.gda.pl/~mgarski/fe/jomolhari-fonts-0.003-2.src.rpm - Extend description section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233584] Review Request: perl-Text-Shellwords - A thin wrapper around the shellwords.pl package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Shellwords - A thin wrapper around the shellwords.pl package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233584 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 07:25 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 72284605020ed5135dbed65a8d3b70c6 Text-Shellwords-1.08.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -Iblib/lib -Iblib/arch test.pl 1..6 # Running under perl version 5.008008 for linux # Current time local: Fri Mar 23 07:11:51 2007 # Current time GMT: Fri Mar 23 11:11:51 2007 # Using Test.pm version 1.25 ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 ok 6 + Provides: perl(Text::Shellwords) = 1.08 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233588] New: Review Request: perl-Graph - A Perl module for dealing with graphs, the abstract data structure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233588 Summary: Review Request: perl-Graph - A Perl module for dealing with graphs, the abstract data structure Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-Graph.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-Graph-0.81-1.src.rpm Description: This is Graph, a Perl module for dealing with graphs, the abstract data structures. This is a full rewrite of the Graph module 0.2xx series as discussed in the book Mastering Algorithms with Perl, written by Jarkko Hietaniemi (the undersigned), John Macdonald, and Jon Orwant, and published by O'Reilly and Associates. This rewrite is not fully compatible with the 0.2xx series. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232018] Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232018 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232018] Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232018 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 07:44 EST --- Mock build log showed *** WARNING *** This release breaks compatibility with versions earlier than version 0.60 of YAML::Syck and YAML.pm when serializing blessed references. See the COMPATIBILITY file for more information. As current version of perl-YAML is 0.62, I assume this package will not break any package dependency in rawhide and in FC6 also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232423] Review Request: perl-Class-Std - Support for creating standard inside-out classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Std - Support for creating standard inside-out classes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232423 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232423] Review Request: perl-Class-Std - Support for creating standard inside-out classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Std - Support for creating standard inside-out classes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232423 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 07:50 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url dc01fecfc8d5886e41d2e8bc2f29a7a2 Class-Std-v0.0.8.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test is Successful. t/00.load..# Testing Class::Std v0.0.8 ok t/access...ok t/access_automethodok t/access_name..ok t/automethod...ok t/begin-coercion...ok t/coercionsok t/cumulative...ok t/dump.ok t/perlattrsok t/pod-coverage.ok t/pod..ok t/runtime..ok t/simple...ok t/startok All tests successful. Files=15, Tests=276, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.99 cusr + 0.19 csys = 1.18 CPU) + Provides: perl(Class::Std) perl(Class::Std::SCR) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233588] Review Request: perl-Graph - A Perl module for dealing with graphs, the abstract data structure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Graph - A Perl module for dealing with graphs, the abstract data structure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233588 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233588] Review Request: perl-Graph - A Perl module for dealing with graphs, the abstract data structure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Graph - A Perl module for dealing with graphs, the abstract data structure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233588 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 07:59 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 8400bd615c74de11644746709cbe7fe3 Graph-0.81.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test is Successful. + Provides: perl(Graph) = 0.81 perl(Graph::AdjacencyMap) perl(Graph::AdjacencyMap::Heavy) perl(Graph::AdjacencyMap::Light) perl(Graph::AdjacencyMap::Vertex) perl(Graph::AdjacencyMatrix) perl(Graph::Attribute) perl(Graph::BitMatrix) perl(Graph::Directed) perl(Graph::MSTHeapElem) = 0.01 perl(Graph::Matrix) perl(Graph::SPTHeapElem) = 0.01 perl(Graph::TransitiveClosure) perl(Graph::TransitiveClosure::Matrix) perl(Graph::Traversal) perl(Graph::Traversal::BFS) perl(Graph::Traversal::DFS) perl(Graph::Undirected) perl(Graph::UnionFind) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233585] Review Request: perl-XML-Writer - A simple Perl module for writing XML documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Writer - A simple Perl module for writing XML documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233585 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 08:11 EST --- Pushing back to review, because of this: 1.) t/pod-coverageskipped all skipped: Test::Pod::Coverage required for testing pod coverage t/pod.skipped all skipped: Test::Pod 1.00 required for testing POD = BR: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) BR: perl(Test::Pod) 2. BuildRequires: perl = 1:5.6.1 = Superfluous 3. Missing BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) Parag, Alex, these remarks also seem to apply to most other perl-packages Parag nodded off today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232193] Review Request: perl-SVG - Generate stand-alone or inline SVG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG - Generate stand-alone or inline SVG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232193 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 08:10 EST --- Review: - rpmlint is ok - name ok - spec name ok - packaging guidelines met - license ok - license matches actual license in package - spec file in American English and legible - source matches upstream - builds, installs, runs, and uninstalls cleanly - BuildRequires ok - no locale to worry about - no relocation to worry about - no duplicated files - files perms ok - clean section ok - macro useage ok - package contains code - no large doc - %doc is only doc - builds in mock This package is approved. I'll sponsor you. Cheers, C -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225695] Merge Review: diffstat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: diffstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225695 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 08:22 EST --- Everything looks good so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233596] New: Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 Summary: Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/coherence/coherence.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/coherence/coherence-0.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Coherence is a framework written in Python enabling applications to participate in digital living networks, such as the UPnP universe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233597] New: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/pigment/pigment.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/pigment/pigment-0.1.4-1.src.rpm Description: Pigment is a toolkit for writing Media Center software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233598] New: Review Request: elisa - Media Center
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa-0.1.4.2-1.src.rpm Description: Media center solution using the GStreamer multimedia framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228301] Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228301 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||233598 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228299] Review Request: python-metar - Coded METAR weather reports parser for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-metar - Coded METAR weather reports parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228299 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||233598 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228298] Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228298 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||233598 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233596] Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||233598 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||233598 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||233598 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||228298, 228299, 228301, ||228303, 233596, 233597 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 08:37 EST --- Note that this package depends on a few python packages as well as the pigment toolkit, which will need to be reviewed first (see the bug dependencies). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 08:48 EST --- Created an attachment (id=150746) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=150746action=view) install.log make install fails on x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233602] New: Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233602 Summary: Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/pykdeextentions.spec SRPM URL: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.testing/pykdeextensions-0.4.0-1.src.rpm Description: A collection of software and Python packages to support the creation and installation of KDE applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233603] New: Review Request: guidance - System administration tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233603 Summary: Review Request: guidance - System administration tools Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/guidance.spec SRPM URL: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.testing/guidance-0.7.1-1.src.rpm Description: Guidance is a collection of system administration tools for Linux/KDE systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||laurent.rineau__fedora_extra ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 08:58 EST --- As the packager of par2cmdline, I always wanted a GUI for par2cmdline in Extra. gpar2 (from parchive.sf.net) was too badly written to be accepted in Extras (see deferred bug #190991 and bug #190992). PyPar2 will hopfully be a solution. I will be quite busy in my job, until summer. I offered Maxime to co-maintain par2cmdline. Seems that he accepted (actually par2cmdline required no intervention in the past year but the FC6 mass-rebuild). I will try to find out in the Wiki what is the procedure to make somebody co-maintain a package... Congratulations, Maxime! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 09:07 EST --- right please check openobex-1.3-5.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233603] Review Request: guidance - System administration tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guidance - System administration tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233603 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||233602 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 09:10 EST --- Depends on pykdeextentions (see bug #233602), Not very polished packaging-wise yet, But wanted to get this out there for feedback. FIXME/TODO items: 1. guidance-power-manager wants a 'notify' pkg that I haven't found yet (for fedora): $/usr/share/apps/guidance/guidance-power-manager.py Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/share/apps/guidance/guidance-power-manager.py, line 47, in ? from notify import * ImportError: No module named notify 2. included rpath patch doesn't work as-is, not sure if it's worth bothering with to fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233602] Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233602 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||233603 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226453] Merge Review: system-config-boot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: system-config-boot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226453
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 08:36 EST ---
1. Minor: might include a copy of the GPL.
done
2. Since redhat/fedora is upstream for this, can you make a note in the spec
as suggested in:
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-413e1c297803cfa9de0cc4c56f3ac384bff5dc9e
done
3. I assume the reason it only builds on ix86/x86_64 is that it only
understands
lilo/grub? Might be worth filing a bug and noting it in the spec and see if
some ppc folk are interested in contributing yaboot support.
what about sparc, s390 and the others?
4. Please use one of the preferred buildroots, such as:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
done
5. Do not use %makeinstall. See:
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MakeInstall
done
6. The desktop file is missing a valid Main Category, see:
http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html
Suggest: System or Settings be added.
Without this, this tool shows up under a Other menu in Xfce.
Categories=System;Application;SystemSetup;X-Red-Hat-Base;
7. The buildrequires are not all needed, suggest changing:
BuildRequires: python = 0:2.2, perl, gettext, glibc-devel, gcc,
desktop-file-utils, yelp, perl-XML-Parser
done
8. Shouldn't the firstboot package own
%dir /usr/share/firstboot/
%dir /usr/share/firstboot/modules
and not this package?
done
9. 2 outstanding bugs. Might look if either can be resolved easily.
bug #134548 and bug #181749 are not easily fixable
10. rpmlint says:
a) E: system-config-boot no-binary
I assume this is not noarch since it can be only run on ix86/x86_64?
yep
b)
W: system-config-boot conffile-without-noreplace-flag
/etc/pam.d/system-config-boot
W: system-config-boot conffile-without-noreplace-flag
/etc/security/console.apps/system-config-boot
Suggest: should those be (noreplace)?
done
c) W: system-config-boot no-documentation
No docs available?
no .)
d)
Suggest: remove the #!/usr/bin/python from those.
done
e) W: system-config-boot unversioned-explicit-obsoletes redhat-config-boot
Suggest: add a version here? or just remove it at this point?
added version
f)
W: system-config-boot rpm-buildroot-usage %prep rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
E: system-config-boot no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
Suggest: Move the rm from prep to the top of install?
done
g)
W: system-config-boot macro-in-%changelog dist
W: system-config-boot macro-in-%changelog dist
Suggest: Change occurances of %dist in the changelog with %%dist
done
h) E: system-config-boot-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package
I guess you need to add
%define debug_package %{nil}
if this really has to be an arch package.
done
please check system-config-boot-0.2.15-1.fc7
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220635] Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220635 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 09:20 EST --- Good stuff (still), APPROVED. When/if you get round-tuit: * maybe(?)/SHOULD include a better URL, like URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraLiveCD until something better comes along. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232193] Review Request: perl-SVG - Generate stand-alone or inline SVG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG - Generate stand-alone or inline SVG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232193 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 09:20 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-SVG Short Description: An extension to generate stand-alone or inline SVG Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: Some of these may already exist because of an obsolete package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226237] Merge Review: pcmciautils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pcmciautils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226237 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 09:30 EST --- done... please check pcmciautils-014-6.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225693] Merge Review: dialog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dialog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225693 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226453] Merge Review: system-config-boot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-boot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226453 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225693] Merge Review: dialog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dialog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225693 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226670] Merge Review: zisofs-tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zisofs-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226670 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225693] Merge Review: dialog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dialog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225693 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226513] Merge Review: units
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: units https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226513 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 09:41 EST --- please check units-1.86-5.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226201] Merge Review: nmap
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226201 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 09:44 EST --- please check nmap-4.20-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226670] Merge Review: zisofs-tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zisofs-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226670 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo? |needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233140] Review Request: paragui - Graphical User Interface based on SDL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paragui - Graphical User Interface based on SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233140 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 09:59 EST --- Hint to self: fix: /usr/share/aclocal/paragui.m4:12: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_PARAGUI -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226670] Merge Review: zisofs-tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zisofs-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226670 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag|fedora-review? |needinfo?, fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 09:42 EST --- Legend: OK - passed, NA = not available/not applicable, MUSTFIX - failed MUST OK - package meets naming guidelines OK - package meets packaging guidelines OK - license (GPL ) OK, text in %doc, matches source OK - spec file legible, in am. english OK - source matches upstream, latest available version, sha1sum is 77222a47c923d937b6af06362b8c1e6bf54259fe zisofs-tools-1.0.7.tar.bz2 OK - package compiles on devel (x86_64) NA - no missing BR OK - no unnecessary BR NA - no locales OK - not relocatable OK - owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of foreign files/directories OK - no duplicate files OK - permissions ok OK - %clean ok OK - macro use consistent OK - code, not content OK - no need for -docs OK - nothing in %doc affects runtime OK - no need for .desktop file, program is a cmdline NA - no devel / pkconfig / libtool SHOULD OK - package compiles in mock OK - package builds in mock NA - no scriptlets OK - does not segfault when run APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232622] Review Request: perl-XML-Validator-Schema - Validate XML against a subset of W3C XML Schema
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Validator-Schema - Validate XML against a subset of W3C XML Schema https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232622 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 10:13 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-XML-Validator-Schema Short Description: Validate XML against a subset of W3C XML Schema Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232620] Review Request: perl-XML-Filter-XInclude - XInclude as a SAX Filter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Filter-XInclude - XInclude as a SAX Filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232620 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 10:14 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-XML-Filter-XInclude Short Description: XInclude as a SAX Filter Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232423] Review Request: perl-Class-Std - Support for creating standard inside-out classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Std - Support for creating standard inside-out classes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232423 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 10:15 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Class-Std Short Description: Support for creating standard inside-out classes Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226201] Merge Review: nmap
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: nmap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226201
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review-
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 10:59 EST ---
(4.20-4.fc7 is in CVS, actually...)
1. Not fixed, but it's not (AFAIK) a blocker.
2. Fixed, thanks. (It's a blocker now, too.)
3. Fixed (rpmlint on SRPM is now silent), thanks.
4. `make install`-y line looks better and appears to work fine.
5. nmap-4.20-nostrip.patch fixed.
A couple (minor) problems creeped in, however.
1. Versions in %changelog shouldn't have %{?dist} on the end; see the last point
in this section:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag#head-5fff04551074fb311a96352be7e7cc3006c90f25
Totally logical mistake, I fully admit. :-)
2. We now have an rpmlint warning on the binary package:
W: nmap incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.20-4 2:4.20-4.fc7
This is due to Karsten Hopp's changelog entry -- it should have contained the
Epoch used (as you and Florian have been doing).
In a totally random comment, in running `rpmdiff` on the RPMs produced by your
changes (against ones from before), it seems you may have fixed a bug that I
hadn't noticed. It looks like before your 1.35 CVS change to nmap.spec, nmap
was using its own libpcap. Your BR change from libpcap to libpcap-devel fixed
that, and added a dependency on libpcap. This, in my opinion, is a very good
thing -- thanks.
Fix the new 1 and 2, and I think nmap's good to go.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233386] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Carp - GTK+ friendly die() and warn() functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Carp - GTK+ friendly die() and warn() functions Alias: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Carp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233386 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 10:58 EST --- Nope, nothing missing -- make test fails here as mock (correctly) runs with $DISPLAY unset. New spec/srpm to follow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233386] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Carp - GTK+ friendly die() and warn() functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Carp - GTK+ friendly die() and warn() functions Alias: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Carp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233386 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 11:00 EST --- SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Carp-0.01-2.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Carp.spec Description: This module exports four functions, of which two override the standard die() and warn() functions, and two which allow for extended error reporting. When called, these functions display a user-friendly message dialog window. New spec/srpm posted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
