[Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 03:38 EST --- Parag: Nils is the upstream for the package and - if I have understood correctly - he implied that rather then incrementing the release tag, he prefers to increase the version tag each time he modifies something. Basically this comes down to the fact that he does not intend to really use the release tag, which is why he ignores it in the Changelog. Only that this decision makes rpmlint unhappy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 04:08 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to comment #11) The substantive issue is gpc, and in that case we're building with --disable-gpc to disable building and including gpc in the final rpm It isn't enough, the srpm should not contain non free or legally problematic code. This should be reported upstream anyway, upstream is violating gpc license and/or the GPL. In fact it isn't sure that there is a violation as long as no binaries are redistributed (with gpc linked in), but still there should be no non-free file shipped in fedora srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209614] Review Request: wmmemload - windowmaker dock app
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmmemload - windowmaker dock app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209614 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 04:22 EST --- What is the status of this submission? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 04:27 EST --- According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess you are supposed to set flag fedora-review to ? and wait. It's not your responsibility to look for a reviewer, just let it rot here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 04:36 EST --- (In reply to comment #12) to set flag fedora-review to ? and wait. No, my mistake. The flag should be , not ?. I apologize that I'm messing with your bug. So you are done now and should patiently wait. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DEFERRED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords||Reopened Resolution|DEFERRED| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|Reopened| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 04:49 EST --- Created an attachment (id=153401) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153401action=view) missing directories list For 1.8.6-2: 0. File entry: * Static library - Is /usr/lib/libruby-static.a needed? If so, can this be split into -static rpm? Note: If this static archive cannot be removed, splitting into different subpackage is too late as F7T4 is frozen. * Duplicate file entry - Please check the following. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ruby]$ rpm -qlp /var/lib/mock/ruby-*i386*rpm | grep -v debug | sort | uniq -d /usr/lib/ruby /usr/lib/ruby/1.8 /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/Context/irb_level-i.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/ExtendCommand/Nop/irb-i.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/ExtendCommandBundle/irb_context-i.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/ExtendCommandBundle/irb_exit-i.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/ExtendCommandBundle/irb_load-i.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/ExtendCommandBundle/irb_original_method_name-c.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/ExtendCommandBundle/irb_require-i.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/IrbLoader/irb_load-i.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/JobManager/irb-i.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/JobManager/main_irb-i.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/irb-c.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/irb_abort-c.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/irb_exit-c.yaml * Missing directory ownership - Too many, the result is attached. 1447 directories are not owned by any package. ( for f in `rpm -qlp /var/lib/mock/ruby-*i386*rpm | grep -v debug` ; do dirname $f ; done ) | sort | uniq | LANG=C xargs rpm -qf | grep package NOTE: Due to this, on my system many files related to ruby cannot be seen by non-root users. Several ruby modules package I currently submit for review request fail to be rebuilt. * From build log: - For ruby-libs: warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/1.8 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux - A. rpmlint - attached Summary : - doc-file-dependency Files included as %doc with executable permission adds additional dependency to its package. This is generally avioded and documentations should not have executable permission. - non-executable-script Generally sourced scripts should not have shebangs. It there is some exceptions for ruby package, please explain why. - spurious-executable-perm Same as doc-file-dependency - wrong-script-interpreter Setting interpreter the files under /usr/local is wrong. Z. Question * Automatically set CFLAGS - One strange thing for me is that fedora ruby rpms sets CFLAGS as fedora specific compilation flags by default. For example, currently ruby-zoom I submitted (bug 237381) is under review. Then - Just unpack ruby-zoom-0.2.2.tar.gz - do cd ruby-zoom-0.2.2 - explicitly unset CFLAGS - do ruby extconf.rb Then Makefile is created. This Makefile sets CFLAGS as fedora specific compilation flags by default. Is this a expected behavior? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 04:50 EST --- Created an attachment (id=153402) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153402action=view) rpmlint log for ruby 1.8.6-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 04:51 EST --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DEFERRED So we can assume gdb not to be present in FC7? Or is this an attempt of @RH's to demonstrate their ability to overrule the community? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 04:58 EST --- Ralf, I think this was a mistake, because the report was opened again one minute after it got closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225807] Merge Review: glib-java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: glib-java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225807 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225807] Merge Review: glib-java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: glib-java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225807 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225807] Merge Review: glib-java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: glib-java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225807 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|Reopened| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 05:04 EST --- (In reply to comment #15) Ralf, I think this was a mistake, because the report was opened again one minute after it got closed. I am more than willing to believe this, but ... given how this review and other merge reviews (did not) proceeded doesn't give me much reason for trust. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209614] Review Request: wmmemload - windowmaker dock app
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmmemload - windowmaker dock app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209614 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 05:12 EST --- Hi Patrice, wmmemload uses internal libdockapp as well as wmcpuload. After a long time I've about rewriten wmcpuload to work with libdockap 0.6 which is already in extras, this will need the same work. I'll get right on it once I submit wmcpuload again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 05:15 EST --- (In reply to comment #15) Ralf, I think this was a mistake, because the report was opened again one minute after it got closed. It was an attempt to get this Bug into the state NEW as formerly reopened Bugs went to the state NEW (and they went to REOPENED state even before). Unfortunately I found out the Bugzilla behavior changed. It was being done to reinsert this Bug back to the list referenced from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess by its link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Fedora+Extrascomponent=Package+Reviewbug_status=NEW but unfortunately one would have to CLOSE this Bug completely and open a new one to reach its NEW state again. (In reply to comment #16) I am more than willing to believe this, but ... given how this review ... (did not) proceeded The issues listed in Comment 1 were implemented in about 2 days - is it such a tragical response time? During the implementation there was found one possible security hole which was being requested to be evaluated by security response entities but unfortunately this step took too long - it was not a real security threat but noone was willing to give a certification for it. It is a security policy to never disclose any security flaws until the fix is known to protect the users of the product. So far I am glad to be the White Hat - not the Black Hat (relationship to Red Hat is just a coincidence here :-) ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 05:21 EST --- Brian, by the way would you have a time to review migemo review request I submitted (bug 236493)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: gdb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 05:39 EST ---
rpmlint v. 0.80 is not silent on gdb src.rpm.
(rpmlint on the binary rpm is OK.)
Jan, your advice is needed for the not-applied-patch issue.
The rest are just a formal issues; is it OK with you if I fix them?
W: gdb patch-not-applied Patch197: gdb-6.5-bz198365-IPv6.patch
A patch is included in your package but was not applied.
W: gdb summary-ended-with-dot A GNU source-level debugger for C, C++, Java and
other languages.
Summary ends with a dot.
W: gdb unversioned-explicit-obsoletes gdb64
The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all
older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update
problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it
was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if
possible.
E: gdb hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libc.so
A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib,
/usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}.
W: gdb macro-in-%changelog check
W: gdb macro-in-%changelog p
Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead
to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that
affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in
possibly rewriting history on subsequent package revisions and generally
odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros
in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'.
W: gdb mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 530, tab: line 517)
The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a
cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209614] Review Request: wmmemload - windowmaker dock app
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmmemload - windowmaker dock app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209614 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 05:44 EST --- Ok. As a side note I am the libdockapp maintainer in fedora (was needed for wmacpi update). Be sure to use the libdockapp api for command line args processing to have the -w option that allows to run in a window. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 05:46 EST --- OK. As maintainer is also upstream developer so no issues then. Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for for RPM. - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM. + source files match upstream. c817a01e5bf60e30458df5b4b90d27d7 hwbrowser-0.32.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text COPYING is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed correctly. + no scriptlets are used. + Provides: config(hwbrowser) = 0.32-1.fc7 + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc performance analysis tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 07:08 EST --- I believe, that period of pregnancy has ended :) rpmlint: OK MUST/SHOULD items: OK APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc performance analysis tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added URL|http://goog-|http://code.google.com/p/goo |perftools.sourceforge.net/ |gle-perftools/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 07:34 EST --- Created an attachment (id=153413) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153413action=view) proposed .spec changes to handle winbindd -- winbind change Consider this patch. Since %post section will be executed with the new code (i.e. with winbind, not winbindd), just check for and rename winbindd lock to winbind before the actual service stop. And apply the latest winbind.init cosmetic changes to smb.init and nmb.init too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 Bug 226387 depends on bug 203568, which changed state. Bug 203568 Summary: split out a -devel package for libsmbclient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203568 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 08:06 EST --- Parag, I already changed the version string in the changelog to 0.32-1, but only in the upstream CVS, not the actual built package. Once a new version (0.33) gets out, I'll surely remember why I put the -release in the changelog and will continue to do so. BTW, isn't someone supposed to close this if it is approved? Just curious... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #153353|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #153354|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 09:10 EST --- Created an attachment (id=153418) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153418action=view) mcpp.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 09:14 EST --- Created an attachment (id=153419) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153419action=view) mcpp-2.6.3-3.src.rpm I have rewritten again the spec file in order to avoid duplication in %file, and changed the installation of the documents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 09:23 EST --- Nils, once your package is approved you are supposed to ask creation of the CVS bits (see warren's mail, cvs with flags ) and after you import the package and build it in plague you are the one who should close this bz ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 09:46 EST --- Well, * release number http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FrequentlyMadeMistakes -- Increase the Release tag every time you upload a new package to avoid confusion. The reviewer and other interested parties probably still have older versions of your SRPM lying around to check what has changed between the old and new packages; those get confused when the revision didn't change. -- So please bump release number. Well, then as I said on comment 6, would you do a pre-review of other person's review request or submit a new review request of other software? (usually people choose former) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227579] Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227579 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 10:32 EST --- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 10:51 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) Parag, I already changed the version string in the changelog to 0.32-1, but only in the upstream CVS, not the actual built package. Once a new version (0.33) gets out, I'll surely remember why I put the -release in the changelog and will continue to do so. BTW, isn't someone supposed to close this if it is approved? Just curious... anyone can CLOSE this bug. The reason I have not closed it immediately is that I thought you may also want to create EPEL cvs branch request. As package is always in CVS there is no requirement for setting fedora-cvs flag for Merge-Review packages. So you can close this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #153418|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #153419|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 10:52 EST --- Created an attachment (id=153424) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153424action=view) mcpp-2.6.3-4.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #153424|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 10:53 EST --- Created an attachment (id=153425) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153425action=view) mcpp-2.6.3-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237742] Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables Alias: Text-SimpleTable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237742 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 10:56 EST --- You are building with TEST_POD disabled: ... t/02podskipped all skipped: set TEST_POD to enable this test t/03podcoverageskipped all skipped: set TEST_POD to enable this test ... Enabling them reveals these bugs: + TEST_POD=1 + ./Build test t/01useok t/02podok t/03podcoverageNOK 1 # Failed test 'Pod coverage on Text::SimpleTable' # in /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Test/Pod/Coverage.pm at line 126. # Coverage for Text::SimpleTable is 66.7%, with 1 naked subroutine: # new # Looks like you failed 1 test of 1. t/03podcoveragedubious Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) DIED. FAILED test 1 Failed 1/1 tests, 0.00% okay t/04tables.ok Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- t/03podcoverage.t1 256 11 100.00% 1 Failed 1/4 test scripts, 75.00% okay. 1/7 subtests failed, 85.71% okay. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.78813 (%check) Though Pod-tests are not really important, this doesn't necessarily provide trust into this package's quality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 10:58 EST --- Created an attachment (id=153427) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153427action=view) mcpp.spec Increased the release number. I have mis-uploaded a binary rpm, sorry. As for pre-review or other review request, please give me a few days of time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 11:02 EST --- (In reply to comment #98) Brian, by the way would you have a time to review migemo review request I submitted (bug 236493)? Yeah, I'll give it a look later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 11:04 EST --- Manuel, Parag, as this is a merge review I don't think I should be asking for any CVS creation just yet: It will be in the combined Core+Extras for Fedora 7 and is part of RHEL5 anyway... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237813] New: Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237813 Summary: Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/taxipilot.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/taxipilot-0.9.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Game where you pilot a taxi in space, the objective is to pick up passengers waiting on a number of platforms and to drop them where they want to go. That's basically it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237817] New: Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237817 Summary: Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://belial.dead.li/~jmp/thinkfinger/Fedora/thinkfinger.spec SRPM URL: http://belial.dead.li/~jmp/thinkfinger/Fedora/SRPMS/pam_thinkfinger-0.3-2.src.rpm Description: ThinkFinger is a driver for the UPEK/SGS Thomson Microelectronics fingerprint reader (USB ID 0483:2016). The device is being found either as a standalone USB device, built into USB keyboards or built into laptops. The following laptop vendors are using the device: - Dell - IBM/Lenovo - Toshiba Toshiba is shipping their laptops either with the UPEK/SGS Thomson Microelectronics fingerprint reader or with a fingerprint reader built by AuthenTec. The AuthenTec fingerprint reader is *not* supported by ThinkFinger. SONY laptops with the UPEK/SGS Thomson Microelectronics fingerprint reader are not supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 11:17 EST --- *** Bug 237564 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237817] Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237817 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||237760 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231774] Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 11:27 EST --- So we have a) D::P - Artistic or GPL b) C::S - Artistic c) License Tag - Artistic or GPL If the license tag is Artistic or GPL, doens't it imply that the entire package can be relicensed under the choice of Artistic or GPL? Nothing I see in Artistic license for C::S allows that AFAICS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237817] Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237817 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 11:38 EST --- A few random questions regarding the design of the program itself, rather than the package: - Why does pam_thinkfinger need uinput when pam_usb (http://www.pamusb.org/) doesn't? - Why does it need threading (which is likely to cause problems with PAM) (apart from a bad library design?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234791] Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email Alias: perl-Email-Send https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234791 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 11:38 EST --- *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234791] Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email Alias: perl-Email-Send https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234791 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 11:48 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Email-Send Short Description: Module for sending email Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237817] Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237817 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 11:51 EST --- Bastien, I was expecting these :-) - uinput has been added by the maintainer to send \n after the swiped image. Now this was working fine with the code from 0.2.. To me this is just a gadget and I will add --with-uinput in configure to give the choice. Ubuntu,debian and other folks already spoke to me about this. - threading... same as above! a choice from the maintainer and that I will find time sometime to get them out. Feel free to assist ;-) Jose -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237045] Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults Alias: Hash-WithDefaults https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237045 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 11:58 EST --- Me too I was thinking about EPEL when I was speaking about CVS. Anyway, I'd say that the answer to closing the bug is here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2007-February/msg00380.html Please do correct me if I am wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237705] Review Request: xclip - Command line clipboard grabber
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xclip - Command line clipboard grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237705 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 12:00 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xclip Short Description: Command line clipboard grabber Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-5 FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237045] Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with
key-casing requirements supporting defaults
Alias: Hash-WithDefaults
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237045
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 12:15 EST ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Rpmlint output: None
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPL or Artistic
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is written in American English.
[x] Spec file for the package is legible.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package: e769b5f381e2b55ec53429b847f086c1
MD5SUM upstream package: e769b5f381e2b55ec53429b847f086c1
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: FC-6 / i386
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR:
Arches excluded:
Why:
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are
listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: FC-6 / i386
[-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on:
[?] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[x] Latest version is packaged.
=== Issues ===
1.
=== Final Notes ===
1.
*** APPROVED ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237817] Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237817 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 12:16 EST --- Isn't this a duplicate of the already available/approved 'thinkfinger' package? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229291 Perhaps you could talk to the maintainer of that package and offer improvements and/or help co-maintain it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237045] Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults Alias: Hash-WithDefaults https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237045 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 12:20 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Hash-WithDefaults Short Description: Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237045] Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults Alias: Hash-WithDefaults https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237045 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237041] Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) Alias: perl-JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237041 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237817] Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237817 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 12:24 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) Isn't this a duplicate of the already available/approved 'thinkfinger' package? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229291 Perhaps you could talk to the maintainer of that package and offer improvements and/or help co-maintain it? It is indeed. As Jose is also helping upstream, it would be good if the original package could include some of Jose's patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237817] Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237817 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 12:26 EST --- Also the guy is aware of this, CCing him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237817] Merge some additional packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge some additional packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237817 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Merge some additional |pam_thinkfinger - |packages |Fingerprint PAM and usb | |libraries for Fedora| Component|Package Review |thinkfinger AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact|fedora-package- |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 12:28 EST --- Moving to thinkfinger. Julian, could you check with Jose which patches you'd want to include in the package? The README might be useful as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 12:28 EST --- Well, please change release number properly. Other things are okay. - This package (LabPlot) is APPROVED by me - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 12:32 EST --- Good: + Tar ball maches with upstream for package berusky-data Bad: - The is no version 1.1 of berusky, there is only a 1.0 version. - Tab ball differ from upstream for package berusky. - Strange directory /var/games in package berusky-data. Perhaps it shold be /usr/games? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237041] Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript
Object Notation)
Alias: perl-JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237041
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 12:34 EST ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Rpmlint output: None
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPL or Artistic
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is written in American English.
[x] Spec file for the package is legible.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package: c1e50efa98c9f7c1907b0dfd6b2656a9
MD5SUM upstream package: c1e50efa98c9f7c1907b0dfd6b2656a9
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: FC-6 / i386
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR:
Arches excluded:
Why:
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are
listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: FC-6 / i386
[-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on:
[?] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[x] Latest version is packaged.
=== Issues ===
1.
=== Final Notes ===
1.
*** APPROVED ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|normal |medium --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 12:35 EST --- Created an attachment (id=153429) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153429action=view) mock build log of cinepaint 0.22.0-1 on FC-devel i386 (autoconf added) Mock build failed FC-devel i386 because of missing BR about autoconf. Even if I added autoconf as BR, still mockbuild failed as attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225797] Merge Review: gimp-data-extras
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gimp-data-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CANTFIX Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 12:38 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237041] Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) Alias: perl-JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237041 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 12:39 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-JSON Short Description: Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237041] Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) Alias: perl-JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237041 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226455] Merge Review: system-config-date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226455 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225248] Merge Review: ant
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225248 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 12:50 EST --- God: + BR fixed. + Rpmlint was OK (with warnings) *** APPrOVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 13:15 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: evolution-brutus Short Description: Brutus based Exchange connector for Evolution Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: InitialCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 13:18 EST --- I'm doing terrible with this review :) Thanks for the prodding. I'll fix up the macros when I import to CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 13:19 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: stgit Short Description: StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231758] Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows Alias: perl-Workflow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231758 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233783] Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233783 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234784] Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers Alias: perl-Email-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234784 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 14:06 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: stgit Updated Fedora Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225114] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225114
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |medium
Priority|normal |medium
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 14:07 EST ---
Just to confirm...
No one has reviewed this for 3 months. Florin,
do you still want to import this to Fedora?
This is just I want to make it sure if you are
still watching this review request.
(In reply to comment #2)
I don't know if I have to bump the Release number after every rebuild like
this, so I'm just using the same number.
You *have to*.
Well, from just I glanced at your spec file:
* Source URL
- Please refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
for sourceforge.net source URL
* Using autotool
- Generally calling autotool is not preferred for
several reasons.
If possible, patch against configure, not configure.in,
for example
* Deprecated categories
- Categories Application X-Fedora are both deprecated
for desktop file categories and should be removed.
* Directory ownership
- _Perhaps_ %{_libdir}/ladspa is not owned by any package
(I have not tried to rebuild this package)
* %exclude
- Please don't use %exclude when it can. Just remove
the file at %install stage.
* Mimeinfo
- Please check mimeinfo section of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234791] Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email Alias: perl-Email-Send https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234791 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227032] Review Request: asm-1.5.3-2jpp - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asm-1.5.3-2jpp - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227032 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 14:37 EST --- This package was originally an indirect dependency of maven2, but is no longer needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227048] Review Request: dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.20040405.1jpp - DOM Conformance Test Suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.20040405.1jpp - DOM Conformance Test Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227048 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 14:39 EST --- This package was needed by maven2, but that is no longer the case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227099] Review Request: plexus-cdc-1.0-0.a4.2jpp - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-cdc-1.0-0.a4.2jpp - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227099 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 14:40 EST --- Re-assigning to reviewer. Package is in extras, please close. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227122] Review Request: xmlbeans-2.1.0-3jpp - XML-Java binding tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlbeans-2.1.0-3jpp - XML-Java binding tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227122 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 14:43 EST --- This package used to be an indirect dependency of maven2, but was found to be non-critical, and hence disabled for the time being. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231758] Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows Alias: perl-Workflow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231758 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 15:01 EST --- Imported, built, and all that goodness. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231755] Review Request: perl-Class-Observable - Allow other classes and objects to respond to events in yours
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Observable - Allow other classes and objects to respond to events in yours https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231755 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232612] Review Request: perl-Class-Observable - Allow other classes and objects to respond to events in yours
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Observable - Allow other classes and objects to respond to events in yours https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232612 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231753] Review Request: perl-DBD-Mock - Mock database driver for testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-Mock - Mock database driver for testing Alias: perl-DBD-Mock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231753 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231754] Review Request: perl-Class-Factory - Base class for dynamic factory classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Factory - Base class for dynamic factory classes Alias: perl-Class-Factory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231754 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234717] Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter Alias: spambayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|normal |medium --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 15:03 EST --- Trond, did you get your bugzilla accounts sorted out? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225628] Merge Review: bsh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bsh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225628 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|normal |medium --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 15:05 EST --- Any update on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 230275] Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 15:06 EST --- Ugh, fixec. src.rpm and spec in the same location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234717] Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter Alias: spambayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 15:19 EST --- fwiw, rpmlint is clean on both src.rpm and built .noarch rpm. neat. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227032] Review Request: asm-1.5.3-2jpp - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asm-1.5.3-2jpp - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227032 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords||Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 15:26 EST --- On second thought, I think I will keep this open. Although it is non-critical, it should really be added into Fedora at some point.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227048] Review Request: dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.20040405.1jpp - DOM Conformance Test Suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.20040405.1jpp - DOM Conformance Test Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227048 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords||Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 15:26 EST --- On second thought, I think I will keep this open. Although it is non-critical, it should really be added into Fedora at some point.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
