[Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated
Alias: xu4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 03:49 EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
I'm thinking that it might not be such a good idea to ship an old beta instead
of a CVS pull. In fact I'm not sure beta3 is even winnable (since you can't
talk to Hawkwind.)
Okay, this new version is based on CVS now
(In reply to comment #16 and #18)
MUST FIX
- Add Requires: desktop-file-utils
Fixed
SHOULD FIX
please also add a comment in spec why you use %{makeinstall}
Fixed
New version here:
Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/xu4.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/xu4-1.1-0.1.20070510.fc7.src.rpm
Notice that this now has version 1.1, as that is how the CVS tree identifies
itself in the games about box.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239770] New: Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239770 Summary: Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/gsm.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/gsm-1.0.12-2.src.rpm Description: libgsm, an implementation of the European GSM 06.10 provisional standard for full-rate speech transcoding, prI-ETS 300 036, which uses RPE/LTP (residual pulse excitation/long term prediction) coding at 13 kbit/s. GSM 06.10 compresses frames of 162 13-bit samples (8 kHz sampling rate, i.e. a frame rate of 50 Hz) into 260 bits; for compatibility with typical UNIX applications, our implementation turns frames of 160 16-bit linear samples into 33-byte frames (1650 Bytes/s). The quality of the algorithm is good enough for reliable speaker recognition; even music often survives transcoding in recognizable form (given the bandwidth limitations of 8 kHz sampling rate). The interfaces offered are a front end modelled after compress(1), and a library API. Compression and decompression run faster than realtime on most SPARCstations. The implementation has been verified against the ETSI standard test patterns. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|228186 |239770 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239770] Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239770 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||206871 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228186] Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228186 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|206871 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239785] New: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/rott.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/rott-1.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This is the icculus.org Linux port of Apogee's classic 3d shooter Rise of the Triad, which has been released under the GPL by Apogee. This version is enhanced with the high resolution rendering from the winrott port. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 08:00 EST --- Applied the above. I bow to your superior script-fu. :) Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail.9.spec SRPM URL:http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail-0.1-0.4.beta2.2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239800] New: php-pear maintainer updates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239800 Summary: php-pear maintainer updates Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239800] php-pear maintainer updates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: php-pear maintainer updates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 09:18 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: php-pear Updated Fedora Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 10:45 EST --- It seem that the tagpy-LISENCE file is included in srpm file but not installed from built rpm package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228186] Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228186 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||239770 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 11:05 EST --- it seem that pygoocanvas isn't included yet in branch, to check mock build. i'll re-try this night or tommorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239811] Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 10:54 EST --- nice... i'll check this out -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Alias: DBIx-SQLite-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 10:46 EST --- I botched the last one: New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple Short Description: Easy Access to SQLite databases using objects Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 10:44 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mcpp Short Description: Alternative C/C++ preprocessor Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239157] Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Alias: perl-Net-Pcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239157 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 10:34 EST --- Updated: - Add missing BR - Chance License to GPL or Artistic - Update %%files - Include t/ in %%doc Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-Pcap.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-Pcap-0.14-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239811] New: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/agistudio/agistudio.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/agistudio/agistudio-1.2.3-1.src.rpm Description: AGI (Adventure Game Interpreter) is the adventure game engine used by Sierra On-Line(tm) to create some of their early games. QT AGI Studio is a program which allows you to view, create and edit AGI games. This can use either NAGI or Sarien as a testing interpreter. I will be submitting NAGI for review also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 10:15 EST --- From rpmlint 0.80-1 changelog: - Filter messages about doc file dependencies on /bin/sh. FWIW, I don't think a dependency on /bin/sh is anything to worry about, doc or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239812] New: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/nagi/nagi.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/nagi/nagi-0.1-2002114.src.rpm Description: NAGI is an interpreter for AGI games, such as the early Space Quest, Leisure Suit Larry and King's Quest games. This can run content created with agistudio, which is also up for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239185] Review Request: nbtscan - Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nbtscan - Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239185 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 11:15 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: nbtscan Short Description: Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows Networks Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 10:53 EST --- D'oh! :-) Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/python-tag/python-tag.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/python-tag/python-tag-0.91-3.src.rpm * Fri May 11 2007 Matthias Saou http://freshrpms.net/ 0.91-3 - Actually include LICENSE file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 236177] Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Alias: perl-NetAddr-IP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236177 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 11:34 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239157] Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Alias: perl-Net-Pcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239157 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 11:20 EST --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 230549] Review Request: oxine - Lightweight, purely OSD based xine frontend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oxine - Lightweight, purely OSD based xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230549 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 11:20 EST --- Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/oxine/oxine.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/oxine/oxine-0.6.6-2.src.rpm * Fri May 11 2007 Matthias Saou http://freshrpms.net/ 0.6.6-2 - Fix black screen problem by requiring xine-lib-extras, where xineplug_decode_image.so is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238562] Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238562 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 11:22 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) The fix is easy, the real version is 1.0, the added -1 in the src tarbal (...) Right. The easiest solutions are the best ones ;) I like the package now and nothing stands in the way to approve it. The game looks quite nice, but it's a pity that there's no AI mode ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 11:59 EST --- (In reply to comment #11) From rpmlint 0.80-1 changelog: - Filter messages about doc file dependencies on /bin/sh. FWIW, I don't think a dependency on /bin/sh is anything to worry about, doc or not. hmm. I was expecting something similar. Today was so busy working day that I couldn't got time to upgrade rpmlint on FC6 machine. So new version was already available. Ok why don't you try to move then executable scripts to /etc then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238562] Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238562 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 11:39 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: machineball Short Description: A futuristic ball game with simple rules Owners:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: empty -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239157] Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Alias: perl-Net-Pcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239157 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 11:29 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Net-Pcap Short Description: Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 12:12 EST --- You can grab the buildsys rpms here: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/plague-results/fedora-6-extras/pygoocanvas/0.6.0-2.fc6/ or for F7 here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=6421 I'm leaving town May 12 and will not be able to do any updates until May 21 so take your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 13:07 EST --- So(In reply to comment #31) All that needs to be done here is to build the package with 'make tag build' in package directory and close this bug as Resolved: RAWHIDE Who has that privilage to do that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 13:21 EST --- All issues have been corrected. The new SPEC and SRPM are located here: http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi.spec http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi-3.6-2.20070511cvs.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239770] Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239770 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 13:29 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gsm Short Description: GSM speech compressor library Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239770] Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239770 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 13:32 EST --- Thank you, Michael. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 223557] Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223557 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis|| Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 13:43 EST --- No response, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 224245] Merge Review: squirrelmail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: squirrelmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224245 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 14:50 EST --- Well, I use rawhide and so I have not checked on FC-6. On rawhide, 0.22.0-2 contained several problems. --- * Compilation - Actually yes indeed...(was still working on it but was still failling on icc_examin on devel). This needs a patch (Patch0) * Directory ownership issue - Some directories were owned properly. * Undefined non-weak symbols - Some libraries in cinepaint contained undefined non-weak symbols. This cannot be accepted for a package which provides -devel subpackage because leaving these symbols leads to linkage failure * Unnecessary/missing (Build)Requires * Unnecessary %Requires(postun) etc * Use of binaries for priviledged user - Binaries for priviledged user (i.e. binaries under /sbin /usr/sbin etc..) must be specified by full path. Otherwise, calling these binaries fails on sudo user, for example. * More pkgconfig .pc file fix was needed * More proper fix for rpath was recommended - i.e. don't use chrpath when possible * Unneeded autoconf call * Timestamp keeping * desktop file fix * Requires: - What does Requires: freefont mean?? On my system no package provides freefont. * Build log should be more verbose --- I hope I fixed the issues above. http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/cinepaint.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/cinepaint-0.22.0-3.fc7.src.rpm mock build on FC-devel i386 is successful. http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/LOGS/MOCK-cinepaint.log Please check if my spec/srpm is what you expect. If you notice something, please fix/modify my spec/srpm and upload your spec/srpm --- NOTE There are still some items I have to check for this package. My package may have some problem, so please check my spec/srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 15:13 EST --- http://oops.ghostprotocols.net:81/acme/dwarves/rpm/SRPMS/ is being kept frequently updated with git snapshots. I've addressed most of the above problems. Now waiting for a new round of review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated
Alias: xu4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 16:29 EST ---
REVIEW GUIDELINES
- rpmlint output clean
- package named according to package naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- package licensed with open source compatible license
- license matches actual license
- license file included in %doc
- spec written in American english
- spec file legible
- sources match upstream
# diff -ubBr /home/fedora/rpmbuild/SPECS/u4/ /home/chris/cvs/u4/
- package successfully compiles on x86_64 FC6
- all build dependencies in BR
- no locales
- no shared libraries
- package is not relocatable
- package owns all directories it creates
- directories it does not create are brought in through Requires
- no duplicates in %files
- file permissions set properly
- contains proper %clean
- macro usage consistent
- contains code
- no large documentation
- files in %doc do not affect runtime
- no header files
- no static libraries
- no pkgconfig files
- no library with suffix
- no need for devel subpackage
- no libtool archives
- contains proper .desktop file
- does not own files or directories owned by other packages
- contains proper install
- all filenames utf-8
SHOULD FIX
- spec comments should show how to check out code from the cvs on or before the
date of cvsdate. I think cvs ... -D %{cvsdate} might work.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 16:34 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xu4 Short Description: Ultima IV recreated Owners:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: empty -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220862] Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear Alias: channel-phpunit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220862 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196749] Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts Alias: php-pecl-xdebug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196749 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 222598] Review Request: php-pecl-radius - Radius client library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-radius - Radius client library Alias: php-pecl-radius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222598 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233455] Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233455 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 236366] Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236366 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237380] Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Alias: ruby-gettext-package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238562] Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238562 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239096] Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Alias: DBIx-SQLite-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239883] New: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/powertop.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/powertop-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: powertop is a tool that monitors kernel wakeups and accounts them to userspace processes. You can use this information to find out why your CPU isn't able to go to sleep, and therefore why your battery life is so bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239157] Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Alias: perl-Net-Pcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239157 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239161] Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet Alias: perl-Net-Libdnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239161 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239185] Review Request: nbtscan - Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nbtscan - Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239185 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239770] Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239770 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239800] php-pear maintainer updates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: php-pear maintainer updates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239884] New: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/liberation-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/liberation-fonts-0.1-5.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Liberation Fonts are intended to be replacements for the three most commonly used fonts on Microsoft systems: Times New Roman, Arial, and Courier New. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 17:48 EST --- Just FYI, the font config configuration that we are planning for the liberation fonts is to add them to the lists of metrically equivalent fonts in /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-aliases-fedora.conf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 17:55 EST --- ^^ Well, In addition/resume to the full review above: + OK -- Lisence is BSD OK -- Lisence file included in package *APPROVED* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 17:55 EST --- ^^ Well, In addition/resume to the full review above: + OK -- Lisence is BSD OK -- Lisence file included in package *APPROVED* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 18:01 EST --- Checked against http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines, and OK for all MUST points. Detail from rpmlint: - rpmlint powertop-1.0-1.fc7.i386.rpm: W: powertop no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO||163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 18:27 EST --- okay, i'll check this out. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239892] New: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-checkstyle/eclipse-checkstyle.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-checkstyle/eclipse-checkstyle-4.0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Eclipse Checkstyle plug-in integrates the Checkstyle Java code auditor into the Eclipse IDE. The plug-in provides real-time feedback to the user about violations of rules that check for coding style and possible error prone code constructs. Note that you will need this script to build the tar: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-checkstyle/checkout_and_build_tarball.sh This is my first package and am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239892] Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv6Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 19:52 EST --- This package has a prereq on Math::Base85, but Math::Base85 is currently not available in the fedora collection. This is needed both for certain features of this module as well as to fully enable the test suite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239193] Review Request: perl-Module-ExtractUse - Find out what modules are used
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ExtractUse - Find out what modules are used Alias: Module-ExtractUse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239193 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 19:56 EST --- Apologies for taking so long -- it's been a busy week and I wanted to make sure I put appropriate thought into this. (In reply to comment #4) TODO is still included in -2. This is something I'd prefer to leave in, so I don't inadvertently leave it out in a future release. I don't have a particularly strong feeling about it, however, so I'll drop it. * tests can make good documentation (sometimes better than the actual docs) I don't think that's the case in this package. I actually found t/80_failing.t quite useful in understanding that the parser will not correctly pick up either 'use constant' or 'use base' constructs. This isn't in the documentation, and saved me some pain. * people might actually want to test the package post-installation I'm pretty sure that people who install software from rpms don't expect to be able to do that, at least when not installing a *-test subpackage. I'm not saying it's necessarily a doomed idea, but should be discussed in distro wide context before starting to apply in packages here and there. Well, it's processes like this that allow us to have the experience to be able to comment on such distro-wide proposals. I know I'm varying from the beaten path here, but it seems like an avenue worth exploring, and am willing to be flexible as we go along. * it doesn't hurt anything :) * It does add files to the package payload that the overwhelming vast majority does not have use for. Technically speaking, 99% of what's in %doc right now the vast majority has no use for. Heck, even the minority of fedora packagers probably don't have much use for it. * Test suites are also often quick and dirty code which is not meant to be used as an example of anything. Sometimes. But some of them are quite excellent -- see, e.g., Moose, Class::MOP, POE, WWW::Myspace, etc -- and even the quick and dirty ones serve their purpose. * Test suite code is not restricted to using the public API of the software; some features can be better tested using knowledge of module internals. We don't want anyone to use such code as an example how to use the packaged software. I'm not making any judgements as to how people should or shouldn't use software. If someone wants to go off and do things the Wrong Way, then a) it doesn't matter if the test suite is installed or not and b) they're going to do it anyways. Enabling people to test their installed s/w isn't going to impact that. * Test suites have dependencies that the users need to take care of manually, or the package will be dependency bloated. Both are bad, and easily solved by not including the test suite. Hm. To date, I've been filtering any additional dependencies the suites introduce I'm not entirely convinced that this is a bad thing, but it sounds like an argument for a -test subpackage. To summarize, I think including test suite code is acceptable if there's an upstream recommendation to use it as an example, upstream installs it too, and/or packaging test suites becomes a standard packaging practice (or there's a decision/consensus that things should move towards that). Upstream actually has recommended it in several cases I know (Moose being one), and others it just makes sense. I also believe, given the small amount of additional work needed to enable it, enabling people to test installed software with the _same_ test suite we used during build is a Good Thing. Also, as spot pointed out in an email in fedora-perl-devel recently, Blanket policies help me sleep easier at night. I'd rather package test suites up consistently rather than make a subjective judgment call as to their worth. I know this is a relatively new idea, but I think it's worth exploring. It's flexible processes (like the review process) that allow us to gain experience with various approaches along these lines, rather than waiting/expecting a directive to be handed down from upon high. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 19:59 EST --- Yeah, there's no documentation yet. Once there is I'll be happy to add it, but for now it's just run me and find what's broken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 20:04 EST --- Still need to be reviewed (just a lil' up) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 20:16 EST ---
MUST items:
- Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK
- Spec file matches base package name. - OK
- Spec has consistant macro usage. - OK
- Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK
- License - OK
- License field in spec matches - OK
- License file included in package - ***
*** should include COPYING in doc
- Spec in American English - OK
- Spec is legible. - OK
- Sources match upstream md5sum: - OK
- Package needs ExcludeArch - N/A
- BuildRequires correct - OK
- Spec handles locales/find_lang - N/A
- Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. - N/A
- Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK
- Package has a correct %clean section. - OK
- Package has correct buildroot - OK
- Package is code or permissible content. - OK
- Doc subpackage needed/used. - N/A
- Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - N/A
- Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - N/A
- Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun - N/A
- .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig - N/A
- .so files in -devel subpackage. - N/A
- -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - N/A
- .la files are removed. - N/A
- Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file - N/A
- Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK
- Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK
- Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK
- Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK
- No rpmlint output. - see above
- final provides and requires are sane: - OK
SHOULD Items:
- Should build in mock. - didn't test
- Should build on all supported archs - tested on i386
- Should function as described. - OK
- Should have sane scriptlets. - N/A
- Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. -
N/A
- Should have dist tag - OK
- Should package latest version - OK
Other things noted - could use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 20:18 EST --- Why is this a review request? linuxwacom has been in core since forever. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239895] New: Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239895 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Math-Base85.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Math-Base85-0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: RFC 1924 describes a compact, fixed-size representation of IPv6 addresses which uses a base 85 number system. This module handles some of the uglier details of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 20:31 EST --- Builds in mock for all rhel arches, btw. Though I doubt it'll do anything useful on s390x... Updated spec and srpm in same place as before. Added COPYING to %doc, patched CFLAGS to be overridable by the build system and set it to equal RPM_OPT_FLAGS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv6Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||239895 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239895] Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, Alias: perl-Math-Base85 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239895 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||perl-Math-Base85 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239895] Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, Alias: perl-Math-Base85 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239895 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||perl-Math-Base85 OtherBugsDependingO||239163 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 20:35 EST --- Seems OK to me. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 20:49 EST --- Taking for review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 22:37 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: powertop Short Description: Power consumption monitor Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 22:41 EST --- As of 0-24: % rpmlint i386/*.rpm W: dwarves no-version-in-last-changelog E: dwarves only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: dwarves devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ctracer/ctracer_relay.c W: dwarves devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ctracer/ctracer_relay.h W: dwarves devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ctracer/ctracer_jprobe.c W: dwarves-debuginfo no-version-in-last-changelog W: libdwarves1 no-version-in-last-changelog W: libdwarves1 no-documentation W: libdwarves1-devel no-version-in-last-changelog The one error is unpleasant. Any reason why that stuff's not in /usr/share? systemtap has similar code in its directories in /usr/share, so even though it technically violates one of the MUSTS in the review guidelines I think there's a good case for it. Also, if the SRPM is intended to be the preferred distribution format, then you need to note that in a comment above Source0. Otherwise passes all MUSTS as far as I can see. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237382] Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Alias: alexandria https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 Bug 237382 depends on bug 237380, which changed state. Bug 237380 Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237380] Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Alias: ruby-gettext-package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 23:32 EST --- Rebuild done on all branches, closing Thank you for review!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
