[Bug 433012] Review Request: cloudy - Spectral synthesis code to simulate conditions in interstellar matter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cloudy - Spectral synthesis code to simulate conditions in interstellar matter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 04:11 EST --- Ok, thanks New Package CVS Request === Package Name: cloudy Short Description: Spectral synthesis code to simulate conditions in interstellar matter Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 283951] Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 04:23 EST --- Don't forget to increase %Release tag (and also update changelog entry) for each spec file public update. This iteration should be 1.2.10-2. Formal review is here: OK source files match upstream: 4f8ff9892665469f915855692c9fc02801038837 incubating-log4net-1.2.10.zip OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (ASL 2.0). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. N/A compiler flags are appropriate (Mono app). OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (x86_64 Rawhide). N/A debuginfo package looks complete (no debuginfo - Mono app). OK rpmlint is silent. log4net.x86_64: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. OK for Mono app log4net.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. OK for Mono app OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK has pkgconfig files in -devel subpackage. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. This package is APPROVED with the release updated to 2 (see above). Because of the ExcludeArch you should also create a bug to track this issue and make it block FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64=238953, see e.g. #309191. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426929] Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426929 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 04:52 EST --- Please write me what provides/obsoletes do you need to add in EL-5 branch and rawhide and I'll add them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226452] Merge Review: system-config-bind
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-bind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226452 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 06:32 EST --- Hi, I'm new maintainer of system-config-bind I'm working on these issues now, it should be fixed soon... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser
Alias: opengrok-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312
Bug 433312 depends on bug 433295, which changed state.
Bug 433295 Summary: subversion-javahl jar file shouldn't reside in %{_libdir}
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433295
What|Old Value |New Value
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 07:32 EST --- I put it in %setup, and it worked beautifully. Thanks! What's that, like, 2 or 3 beers I owe you, next time you're near Chicago? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427669] Review Request: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427669 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 08:17 EST --- According to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5792 this package has landed in Rawhide. Closing ticket -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433778] New: Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433778 Summary: Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://davidf.sjsoft.com/fedora/fsvs.spec SRPM URL: http://davidf.sjsoft.com/fedora/fsvs-1.1.12-3.fc8.src.rpm Project home URL: http://fsvs.tigris.org/ Description: FSVS is the abbreviation for “Fast System VerSioning”. It is a complete backup/restore/versioning tool for all files in a directory tree or whole filesystems, with a subversionTM repository as the backend. You may think of it as some kind of tar or rsync with versioned storage. If uses a different system for storing local version information that doesn't clutter directories like /etc like .svn directories in standard subversion would A nice capability is to cope with local adjustments for different machines (using branching-like techniques), so that most of the space needed for the backup of system-files (/bin, /usr, ...) can be shared between machines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253571] Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 07:52 EST --- Here's an updated version: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-fileutils.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-fileutils-0.3.0-3.fc9.src.rpm * Thu Feb 21 2008 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.3.0-3 - Fixed grammar in the description section. - License is LGPLv2 with exceptions - Include license file with both RPMs. - Include other documentation only in the -devel RPM. BTW, my reading of the license is that it's LGPLv2 only (not or later ...). Am I mistaken? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433778] Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433778 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||177841 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 08:19 EST --- Forgot to mention that this is my first package submission and I'm seeking a sponsor :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 09:02 EST --- Imported and built for all branches, including F-7, which was rawhide when this review was submitted. :) Thanks to everyone involved in making this possible! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 430295] Review Request: sagator-libclamav - ClamAV module for python, created for SAGATOR project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sagator-libclamav - ClamAV module for python, created for SAGATOR project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430295 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 09:13 EST --- This package will be obsolete for sagator-1.1.0 and higher (currently this package does not exist), so it is not requires to review this package. This new sagator works perfectly for EPEL-5, F-7 and higher, but there is no solution for EPEL-4 (sagator-1.1.0 + clamav usage requires python-ctypes not provided for EPEL-4). I am leaving this still open now, before the EPEL-4 problem will be solved, but coexistence of sagator-1.1.0 with sagator-libclamav is not planned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253571] Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 08:55 EST --- About rpmlint warnings, see bug 433783. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253570] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253570 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 09:01 EST --- Upstream move to fast! Updated to 5.08 / OCaml 3.10.1. Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-camlp5.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-camlp5-5.08-1.fc9.src.rpm * Thu Feb 21 2008 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 5.08-1 - New upstream version 5.08. - BR ocaml = 3.10.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235249] Review Request: vdrift-data - VDrift data set
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdrift-data - VDrift data set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235249 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 09:03 EST --- Imported and built, all branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226452] Merge Review: system-config-bind
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-bind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226452 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 10:27 EST --- Everything should be fixed now: system-config-bind-4.0.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431857] Review Request: pakchois - PKCS#11 wrapper library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pakchois - PKCS#11 wrapper library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431857 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 10:50 EST --- Spec URL: http://jorton.fedorapeople.org/pakchois/pakchois.spec SRPM URL: http://jorton.fedorapeople.org/pakchois/pakchois-0.4-1.src.rpm Update again for 0.4. Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433814] New: Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433814 Summary: Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/kuftp/kuftp.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/kuftp/kuftp-0.9.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: KuFtp is a graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment. It's written in C++ using the QT/KDE libraries. It implements many features required for usable FTP interaction. Most notable features is Tab Sessions like Konqueror or Firefox, that is,you can have multiple simultaneous FTP session in separate tabs. Other features like bookmark manager,history recording,queue manager and some small nifty features are currently available in the latest version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 357661] Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar Alias: sunbird-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 11:11 EST --- Jakub: Nonexistent applications are generally poor replacement over existing ones :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 357661] Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar Alias: sunbird-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 11:03 EST --- Any sense in putting Sunbird into repo? Thunderbird 3 will bring same functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 386531] Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP Client for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP Client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=386531 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 11:00 EST --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 433814 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433814] Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433814 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 11:00 EST --- *** Bug 386531 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225292] Merge Review: audit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: audit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225292
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 11:38 EST ---
How about I do the %{python_sitelib} macro trick?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426929] Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426929 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 12:09 EST --- I think that we can assume that lineno version won't change soon, so the following should be right: Obsolete: tetex-lineno = 4.41 Provides: tetex-lineno = 4.41 And also in texlive for EL-6. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 12:10 EST --- My understanding is that the release note status is orthogonal to the resolution of the ticket. At least that's how we process the CVS queue; if the flag is '?' we look at it, regardless of whether the ticket is open or now. Honestly I'm just trying to get my bug list down, because it gets difficult to track how many reviews I have in flight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433814] Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433814 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 11:28 EST --- - Correct files section Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/kuftp/kuftp.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/kuftp/kuftp-0.9.1-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429202] Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429202 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429202] Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429202
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 12:23 EST ---
For 0.1.0-3:
* Description
- The %description of -devel package is wrong.
--
%description devel
The libqr-devel package contains the static libraries and header files
--
* .so symlink location
(In reply to comment #7)
* symlink for linkage
- %{_libdir}/lib.so should be in -devel package
(%{_libdir}/lib.so.X symlink should be in main package).
This type of errors can be detected by using rpmlint
commands (in rpmlint package).
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] liblqr-1]$ rpmlint *0.1.0-2*rpm
liblqr-1.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/liblqr-1.so
...
-
- Please check your rpms by rpmlint to detect generic packaging errors.
For newest rpm:
---
liblqr-1-devel.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin
/usr/lib/liblqr-1.so.0.0.0
liblqr-1-devel.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/lib/liblqr-1.so.0.0.0
---
What I said was:
- %_libdir/liblqr-1.so.0.0.0 and %_libdir/liblqr-1.so.0 must be
in main package
- %_libdir/liblqr-1.so must be moved to -devel package.
* BuildRequires
- Well, I rechecked BuildRequires and actually glib2-devel is
sufficient for BuildRequires (gimp-devel is not needed for
BuildRequires)
* Typo
- Please fix below (by the way with this typo rebuild actually
fails)
---
find %buildroot -name \*.la -exec %rm -f {} \;
---
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433638] Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433638 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 12:31 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Math-MatrixReal Short Description: Manipulate matrix of Reals Owners: pertusus Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429700] Review Request: bing - bandwidth ping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bing - bandwidth ping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 13:04 EST --- Imported and built, thanks all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426103] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wiimote - Xorg input driver for the Wiimote
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wiimote - Xorg input driver for the Wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426103 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 12:53 EST --- Built in rawhide, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 251536] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251536 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 13:53 EST --- Built in rawhide, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433643] Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433643 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433643] Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433643 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 14:16 EST --- I don't see the Sub::Exporter reference in the README, maybe it is only on the web? New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Math-Symbolic Short Description: Symbolic calculations Owners: pertusus Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 14:34 EST --- Sure, I'll take a look at them soon -- did you also run rpmlint against -doc package? Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226536] Merge Review: webalizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: webalizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226536 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 14:23 EST --- Hi Patrice, Do you want to take over this review? Thanks, Ruben -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 14:22 EST --- I see only two rpmlint. errors, quite easy to fix: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpmlint -i rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/postgresql-slony1-1.2.13-1.fc9.i386.rpm postgresql-slony1.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-1.2.13 0644 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpmlint -i rpmbuild/SRPMS/postgresql-slony1-1.2.13-1.fc9.src.rpm postgresql-slony1.src:229: W: macro-in-%changelog docs Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly rewriting history on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. Could you please go through the spec file and the comments in this review and see if they still apply? For instance the specific fixes for 1.2.10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433547] Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433547 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 15:26 EST --- Hi Xavier, It looks like we started from the same DAG rpm. :) Don't forget that the /etc/nagios/*.cfg files need to be mode 0600 and readable only by root because they contain encryption passwords. Since you've also worked on the same package, would you like to review and/or comaintain this with me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433863] New: Review Request: python-pysvn - Python SVN Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433863 Summary: Review Request: python-pysvn - Python SVN Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.radez.net/rpm/python-pysvn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.radez.net/rpm/python-pysvn-1.5.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Python library to subversion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #294042|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 15:20 EST --- Created an attachment (id=295556) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295556action=view) Latest ocfs2-tools spec file, with diff applied Jarod, Thank you for your review and your changes to the spec. I have looked them over and incorporated your patch into a new version of ocfs2-tools.spec, which I will attach. In the meantime, I'll look into the source changes required to honor the fedora build flags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 283951] Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 283951] Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 15:56 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) Don't forget to increase %Release tag (and also update changelog entry) for each spec file public update. This iteration should be 1.2.10-2. Gah, well spotted. This package is APPROVED with the release updated to 2 (see above). Many thanks for the review Dan, greatly appreciated. Because of the ExcludeArch you should also create a bug to track this issue and make it block FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64=238953, see e.g. #309191. Will do, as soon as it gets imported and appears in the bz list. Thanks again, Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433418] Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433418 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 15:56 EST --- OK, rawhide unbroke and I finally managed to get my local mirror updated. So it's clear, I'm reviewing the package with the libiverbs-devel dependency included. This package includes a static libarary. That's OK (it's discouraged but still left to the maintainer's discretion) but we have a few guidelines to follow. Specifically, the static library needs to be in a separate -static package. See the Packaging Static Libraries section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines for more info. * source files match upstream: 6ce541b0de7752d87782901ffe45a2035eb499a548f80a278e8ce5102d032148 librdmacm-1.0.6.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: librdmacm-1.0.6-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm librdmacm.so.1()(64bit) librdmacm.so.1(RDMACM_1.0)(64bit) librdmacm = 1.0.6-1.fc9 = /sbin/ldconfig libibverbs.so.1()(64bit) libibverbs.so.1(IBVERBS_1.0)(64bit) libibverbs.so.1(IBVERBS_1.1)(64bit) librdmacm.so.1()(64bit) librdmacm-devel-1.0.6-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm librdmacm-devel = 1.0.6-1.fc9 = /usr/include/infiniband/verbs.h librdmacm = 1.0.6-1.fc9 librdmacm.so.1()(64bit) librdmacm-utils-1.0.6-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm librdmacm-utils = 1.0.6-1.fc9 = libibverbs.so.1()(64bit) libibverbs.so.1(IBVERBS_1.0)(64bit) libibverbs.so.1(IBVERBS_1.1)(64bit) librdmacm = 1.0.6-1.fc9 librdmacm.so.1()(64bit) librdmacm.so.1(RDMACM_1.0)(64bit) * %check is not present because there's no updates. I have no idea how to actually test this, although I did run the installed binaries and verified that they either printed help messages or complained about lack of infiniband hardware. * shared libraries installed; ldconfig called properly. * unversioned so files are in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. X static libraries are present but not in a -static package. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 283951] Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 16:05 EST --- Please use a new package template from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure so we know what branches you want, what owners, etc. please reset the fedora-cvs flag when you are ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429609] Review Request: perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI - Speed up perl scripts by running them persistently
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI - Speed up perl scripts by running them persistently https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429609 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 16:09 EST --- I really thought I had sent a reply to this ticket. Anyway, if you agree to the change of the license tag, just say so and I'll be happy to approve this package. Or if you'd prefer to hear back from upstream first, just say so and we'll wait. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 432265] Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432265 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 16:17 EST --- Sure, but then they both provide the same files, so there should be an explicit 'Conflicts' here? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts Keep in mind that implicit conflicts are NEVER acceptable. If your package conflicts with another package, then you must either resolve the conflict, or mark it with Conflicts: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433638] Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433638 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 16:25 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428725] Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 16:34 EST --- Any reason why this shouldn't be closed now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 283951] Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 16:35 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: log4net Short Description: Logging for the .Net Framework Owners: snecker Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253571] Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 16:33 EST --- Well, the COPYING file says: The Library is distributed under the terms of the GNU Library General Public License version 2 (found in /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2 on debian systems). but all of the files in the libfileutils-ocaml directory say: (* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or*) (* modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public *) (* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either *) (* version 2 of the License, or any later version ; with the OCaml *) (* static compilation exception.*) and the statements on the code always win unless, of course, there is an issue with combining them which would somehow limit the license. Of course, someone should introduce a clue to upstream about this, but in the meantime it really does look like LGPLv2+ to me. Honestly the issue of a plus or not isn't something worth holding this package up over; you can fix it when you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433643] Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433643 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 16:29 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433738] Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433738 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433738] Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433738 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 17:10 EST --- Builds OK; rpmlint says: xorg-x11-drv-nouveau.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 3) which I don't really care about, fix it if you like. xorg-x11-drv-nouveau.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.1.5-2 1:0.0.10-1.fc9 You probably just want to start afresh with your changelog, but if not you should at least have an entry for the current revision. Could you provide instructions for generating the tarball in use? Just a coupe of comments for checking out a specific git tag from the repository should be fine; see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL for more info. Is this actually version 0.0.10 or is it a snapshot from the source tree made after 0.0.10 was released? If the latter, we have specific guidelines relating to the versioning of snapshots, which would indicate that this should be 0.0.10-1.20080221 or 0.0.10-1.20080221git (what follows the date is up to you; some use an abbreviated commit ID). Have to run now; more review later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 17:18 EST --- So... I've been asked to step in and be the mediator here, since I've not been involved in the debate at all. Though full disclosure: I do have past history as a contributor to Axel's ATrpms.net repo, and know a fair amount about the work he's put in to get to the point where we (fedora) could actually distribute an ivtv-firmware package. I'm still reading over everything on the matter (the bugs, some emails, fesco meeting notes, etc), and will give some feedback soonish... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 17:20 EST --- Taking over review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: ivtv - An |Review Request: ivtv - |iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16|userspace tools for |driver |iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 ||driven devices --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 17:23 EST --- Changing summary slightly. This isn't the driver, that's in the kernel... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253571] Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 17:31 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ocaml-fileutils Short Description: OCaml library for common file and filename operations Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433892] New: Review Request: xfce4-gsynaptics-mcs-plugin - GSynaptics icon for the Xfce Settings Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433892 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-gsynaptics-mcs-plugin - GSynaptics icon for the Xfce Settings Manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-gsynaptics-mcs-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-gsynaptics-mcs-plugin-1.0.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A simple MCS plugin for Xfce that starts gsynaptics when invoked and launches gsynaptics-init once loaded by the MCS manager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 19:10 EST --- Did you happen to see this bit, which Lennart had asked about in the other review ticket (without response): http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/avahi-distcc.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429609] Review Request: perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI - Speed up perl scripts by running them persistently
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI - Speed up perl scripts by running them persistently https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429609 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 18:51 EST --- I'll change the license tag, of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429609] Review Request: perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI - Speed up perl scripts by running them persistently
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI - Speed up perl scripts by running them persistently https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429609 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 19:38 EST --- OK, cool. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #295556|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 20:20 EST --- Created an attachment (id=295577) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295577action=view) Latest ocfs2-tools spec file against latest ocfs2-tools git The following two urls contain an srpm and spec file for my latest work. http://oss.oracle.com/~mfasheh/fedora/ocfs2-tools-1.3.9-6.20080221git.fc8.src.rpm http://oss.oracle.com/~mfasheh/fedora/ocfs2-tools.spec Ocfs2-tools upstream git repository has been updated with patches to honor user-set cflags. My tests show that the entire Fedora CFLAGS line is passed through to the build process. The spec file and srpm uploaded reflect these new changes. Thanks again for pointing this out - we actually considered it a bug that user-set CFLAGS weren't being honored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225292] Merge Review: audit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225292 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 21:41 EST --- That should work great... let me know if you want me to test here... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433738] Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433738 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 21:19 EST --- okay I've fixed the changelog, and versioning and tab char... so the new stuff is at the same URL. xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.10-0.20080221git5db7920.fc9.src.rpm is new src rpm name and I've updated the specfile to build that from the tar ball, and added instructions for git cloning it. The upstream project hasn't yet done a release, the version is based off the kernel API they use and report in the log files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 22:10 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) I'm just wondering how this package review is going. I for one would love to start playing around with bongo installed from a fedora repo. I'm certainly not going to switch my data to bongo until it stables up a bit, but I sure would like to start playing with the system so I can give solid feedback to the developers. Hi, Eric. Mock was complaining a lot before I realized that I had almost no disk space left on /var. I've fixed that up and now am about half-done or so with the review; I should have it finished by tomorrow assuming no further complications. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433915] New: Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433915 Summary: Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: The creation of this package was triggered by bug 433742, and subsequent mailing list discussion. I'll be asking the existing unison package maintainer to review it if possible. Spec URL: http://avon.wwwdotorg.org/downloads/unison2.13/unison2.13.spec SRPM URL: http://avon.wwwdotorg.org/downloads/unison2.13/unison2.13-2.13.16-4.fc8.src.rpm Description: Unison is a file-synchronization tool. It allows two replicas of a collection of files and directories to be stored on different hosts (or different locations on the same host), modified separately, and then brought up to date by propagating the changes in each replica to the other. This package is a compatibility release, for those users who need to interoperate with systems having a specific version of Unison installed. Users without this requirement should use the regular unison package, which will always contain the most up-to-date stable version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433915] Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433915 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 23:35 EST --- *** Bug 433742 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433924] Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433924 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433924] New: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433924 Summary: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/libyahoo2/libyahoo2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/libyahoo2/libyahoo2-0.7.5-4.src.rpm Description: libyahoo2 is a C library interface to the new Yahoo! Messenger protocol. It supports almost all current features of the protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433925] New: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433925 Summary: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/libyahoo2/libyahoo2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/libyahoo2/libyahoo2-0.7.5-4.src.rpm Description: libyahoo2 is a C library interface to the new Yahoo! Messenger protocol. It supports almost all current features of the protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433926] Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433926 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-22 00:35 EST --- This relies on libyahoo2 which has a review request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433925 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433926] New: Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433926 Summary: Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/freehoo/freehoo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/freehoo/freehoo-3.5.1-1.src.rpm Description: This is a simple Yahoo Messenger client that requires no windowing system, and it therefore can be quite useful in situations where a minimal system is being used or when a windowing system is otherwise unavailable or unfeasible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
