[Bug 436741] Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436741 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||188611 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436741] New: Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436741 Summary: Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/ltsp.spec SRPM URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/ltsp-5.1.0-0.1.20080310.fc8.src.rpm Description: Linux Terminal Server Project 5 Server and Client -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436753] Review Request: cdargs - The shell cd with bookmarks and browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdargs - The shell cd with bookmarks and browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436753 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436568] Review Request: Supybot - Cross-platform IRC bot written in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Supybot - Cross-platform IRC bot written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436568 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 05:21 EST --- I've just taken a [not very attentive] look at the config of the bot we use in our network and I think that there are 2 places where you can do modifications: a) It has the following lines in the conf: ### ### # Determines what plugins will be loaded. # # Default value: ### supybot.plugins: Web Network Lart Ctcp Limiter Insult Note Dict Factoids Internet Reply Config ChannelStats Status String Relay For mat MoobotFactoids Utilities Admin User Scheduler Services News Channel NickCapture Plugin AutoMode Anonymous ChannelLogger URL Quo teGrabs Filter Alias Games Karma Praise Time Protector ShrinkUrl Herald Google Math Misc Topic Nickometer Unix Quote Owner Seen Tod o RSS So you can ship a default /etc/sysconfig/supybot.conf / etc/default/supybot.conf / whatever name you have for the default (eventually generated by you with the wizard) which does not try to load missing plugins b) the wizard seems to enumerate the plugins, based on the directory name. So no directory - no plugin to be configured - no plugin in the conf file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436753] New: Review Request: cdargs - The shell cd with bookmarks and browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436753 Summary: Review Request: cdargs - The shell cd with bookmarks and browser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjakub/cdargs/cdargs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjakub/cdargs/cdargs-1.35-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Enables the user to quickly change working directory by navigating cd arguments and expanding the shell built-in cd with bookmarks and browser. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=507658 I'm just not sure whether the emacs subpackage is handled well (do not use emacs at all). It is a bit unclear for me from the packaging guidelines for emacs whether there must/should be two subpackages (one for GNU emacs, one for Xemacs) or if it is ok how it is done now (one subpackage for GNU emacs). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436340] Review Request: ggobi - Open source visualization for exploring high-dimensional data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ggobi - Open source visualization for exploring high-dimensional data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436340 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 05:59 EST --- Imported. Lubomir and Kevin, thank you very much! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226536] Merge Review: webalizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: webalizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226536 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 06:39 EST --- Patches to add use a sysconfig file to allow the cron script to be disabled are welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 06:47 EST --- Ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226536] Merge Review: webalizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: webalizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226536 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 06:49 EST --- I'll do that, but not now, since I am quite busy. Maybe by the end of the week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436754] New: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-FastPermute - Rapid generation of permutations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436754 Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-FastPermute - Rapid generation of permutations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjakub/perl-Algorithm-FastPermute/perl-Algorithm-FastPermute.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjakub/perl-Algorithm-FastPermute/perl-Algorithm-FastPermute-0.999-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Algorithm::FastPermute generates all the permutations of an array. You pass a block of code, which will be executed for each permutation. The array will be changed in place, and then changed back again before permute returns. During the execution of the callback, the array is read-only and you'll get an error if you try to change its length. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=507677 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436754] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-FastPermute - Rapid generation of permutations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-FastPermute - Rapid generation of permutations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436754 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227190] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227190 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 07:01 EST --- Upstream notes that Note: the 2.x version of the library will break this extension. A future version of the extension will work with the 2.x version correctly. I contacted upstream directly to see what the status is. Currently I tend to packaging 2.x in the hopes that the mediawiki openid extension will catch up soon. But let's also wait for upstream's feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426302] Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426302 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 06:28 EST --- Mamoru, thank you for comments, all fixed. Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/openuniverse/openuniverse.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/openuniverse/openuniverse-1.0-0.beta3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435598] Review Request: joni - Java regexp library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 07:08 EST --- One informal review remark concerning licensing: You've used the BSD license in the spec file, but: There is a MIT license mentioned in pom.xml: license nameMIT License/name urlhttp://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php/url distributionrepo/distribution /license And there is also the MIT license included in the source files (Modern Style with sublicense -- see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT for details). What is a bit confusing is the project's site, because there is a disclaimer: Distributed under a tri-license (CPL/GPL/LGPL). This should be probably clarified with upstream (for what parts of JRuby this applies), nevertheless according to the source files now you should use License: MIT. Otherwise it seems ok for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433187] Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing
Alias: boinc-client-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433187
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 07:17 EST ---
* Source
- BTW what are Source8-10 for?
It's explained in the comment at the beginning of the SPEC file and also in the
changelog.
Source8: trim
Trims the sources for binaries and third-party source code which is already
packaged for fedora (openssl, curl, ...).
Source9: noexec
Removes execute rights from some documentation files.
Source10: unicode
Converts some of the documentation files to utf8.
Is there any better way how to do these things?
* Dependency for -devel subpackage
- One more:
From %{_includedir}/BOINC/db_base.h:
---
23 #include mysql.h
Fixed, thanks.
New SPEC file and SRPM:
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjakub/boinc/boinc-client-5.10.40-8.20080206svn.fc8.src.rpm
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjakub/boinc/boinc-client.spec
I've posted two new review requests:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436753
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436754
And done two small review remarks:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394871
Thanks in advance for your goodwill, time and patience:)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226414] Merge Review: sg3_utils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sg3_utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226414 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 07:39 EST --- sg3_utils needs some love. Spec is not fedora compliant (static libs, .la libs). It also could use an update to 1.25 which uses automake and will make the spec file simpler. 1.25 also introduces the very useful 'sg_raw' utility. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436777] New: Review Request: python-tgcaptcha - A TurboGears CAPTCHA widget for forms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436777 Summary: Review Request: python-tgcaptcha - A TurboGears CAPTCHA widget for forms Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tgcaptcha.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tgcaptcha-0.11-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: TGCaptcha is a TurboGears widget that provides an easy way to incorporate a captcha as part a form in an attempt to reduce spam or malicious activity. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 09:09 EST --- Sorry, silly finger check on my part. Corrected links http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/s3fs.spe http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/s3fs-0.4-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 09:08 EST --- (In reply to comment #78) From a packaging standpoint, Konrad did a great review. I'd be willing to sponsor Nadia for this. Consider it APPROVED. Nadia, please apply for sponsorship and I'll take care of that. Nadia, is there still interest in having this in Fedora? If so, please apply for sponsorship in the accounts system and we'll proceed. If not, please close out the bug as WONTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 09:16 EST --- Konrad, sorry for the delay, but I had plenty of other things to do! No there is nomore interest since it won't be in the base distribution. I'll close the bug. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433070] Review Request: java-1.6.0-openjdk - The OpenJDK 1.6.0 runtime environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.6.0-openjdk - The OpenJDK 1.6.0 runtime environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433070 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436481] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 - Use the Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 - Use the Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436481 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 11:06 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 Short Description: Use the Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) Owners: rrati Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436479] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2 - Perl interface to the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2 - Perl interface to the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436479 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 11:03 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2 Short Description: Perl interface to the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) Owners: rrati Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436551] Review Request: perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determined - A virtual browser that retries errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determined - A virtual browser that retries errors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436551 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 11:08 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determined Short Description: A virtual browser that retries errors Owners: rrati Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253564] Review Request: ocaml-camomile - Unicode library for OCaml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camomile - Unicode library for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253564 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 11:46 EST --- I opened up a discussion of the legal/licensing issues here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-March/thread.html#2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435598] Review Request: joni - Java regexp library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 12:36 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) One informal review remark concerning licensing: You've used the BSD license in the spec file, but: There is a MIT license mentioned in pom.xml: license nameMIT License/name urlhttp://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php/url distributionrepo/distribution /license And there is also the MIT license included in the source files (Modern Style with sublicense -- see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT for details). What is a bit confusing is the project's site, because there is a disclaimer: Distributed under a tri-license (CPL/GPL/LGPL). This should be probably clarified with upstream (for what parts of JRuby this applies), nevertheless according to the source files now you should use License: MIT. Otherwise it seems ok for me. Yes, sorry, I noticed this and fixed it in my current spec file, but didn't feel ready to upload that unless there were no other packaging issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||435598 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435598] Review Request: joni - Java regexp library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||433497 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 12:47 EST --- No hurry with this really, until the java guidelines are done :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 430931] Review Request: kate-ctags-plugin - Plugin for Kate editor to use ctags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kate-ctags-plugin - Plugin for Kate editor to use ctags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430931 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 12:45 EST --- Sorry Sorry I have been very busy, and this was not a priority. I promise to get this done this week, I need to get mock installed (again). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436817] New: Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436817 Summary: Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/fusecompress-1.99.14-1.fc8.x86_64/fusecompress-1.99.14-1.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/fusecompress.spec mock: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/fusecompress-1.99.14-1.fc8.x86_64/ Description: FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation FuseCompress provides a mountable Linux filesystem which transparently compresses its content. Files stored in this filesystem are compressed on the fly and Fuse allows to create a transparent interface between compressed files and user applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436817] Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation Alias: fusecompress-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436817 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 12:52 EST --- Note that this is ugly and I need some serious assistannce; The package includes a mount.fusecompress wrapper which looks as follows, to enable me to be able to place the filesystem in fstab and add options there: IFS=, for i in $4 do if [ ! $i = rw ] then echo $i fi done |xargs /usr/bin/fusecompress $1 $2 Obviously rw is not the only possible option not understandable by fusecompress. I guess there should be no such script, I am just not aware how to do that, and thus I would be very thankful if someone with previous experience with fuse had a short look at this and kicked me in the right direction. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435598] Review Request: joni - Java regexp library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 12:55 EST --- New URLS: Spec: http://konrad.sobertillnoon.com/fedora/joni.spec SRPM: http://konrad.sobertillnoon.com/fedora/joni-1.0.1-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436479] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2 - Perl interface to the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2 - Perl interface to the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436479 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436481] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 - Use the Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 - Use the Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436481 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436551] Review Request: perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determined - A virtual browser that retries errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determined - A virtual browser that retries errors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436551 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 328161] Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: concord - |Review Request: concordance |Software to program the |- Software to program the |Logitech Harmony remote |Logitech Harmony remote |control |control --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 13:44 EST --- Fixing request name again; cli and project is called concordance, while the library is libconcord. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436479] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2 - Perl interface to the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2 - Perl interface to the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436479 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435121] Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435121 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 14:22 EST --- Spec URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/specs/mail/antispam/dspam.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/dspam-3.8.0-19.src.rpm From the changelog entries: - Added ldconfig postin/postun scriptlet to packages - renamed subpackage backend-sqlite3 to backend-sqlite - fixed CGI path from /srv/www/webapps to /var/www/dspam - removed %defined makeinstall -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436831] New: Review Request: gbrainy - Gbrainy is a brain teaser game and trainer to keep your brain trained
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436831 Summary: Review Request: gbrainy - Gbrainy is a brain teaser game and trainer to keep your brain trained Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://sereinity.free.fr/fedora/gbrainy.spec SRPM URL: http://sereinity.free.fr/fedora/gbrainy-0.60-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: gbrainy is a brain teaser game and trainer to have fun and to keep your brain trained. It provides the following types of games: * Logic puzzles. Games designed to challenge your reasoning and thinking skills. * Mental calculation. Games based on arithmetical operations designed to prove your mental calculation skills. * Memory trainers. Games designed to challenge your short term memory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436479] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2 - Perl interface to the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2 - Perl interface to the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436479 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: perl-Net- |Review Request: perl-Net- |Amazon-EC2 - Perl |Amazon-EC2 - Perl interface |interface to the Amazon |to the Amazon Elastic |Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)|Compute Cloud (EC2) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 14:28 EST --- Fixing summary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436481] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 - Use the Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 - Use the Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436481 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: perl-Net- |Review Request: perl-Net- |Amazon-S3 - Use the Amazon|Amazon-S3 - Use the Amazon |Simple Storage Service (S3)|Simple Storage Service (S3) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 14:27 EST --- removing from Summary for tracking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428748] Review Request: ltspfs - LTSP filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltspfs - LTSP filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428748 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 14:32 EST --- I'd be happy to review this. Look for a full review in a bit... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436481] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 - Use the Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 - Use the Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436481 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433547] Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433547 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 14:39 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) Here's another iteration based on the package that you mailed me (thanks!). I think we should keep 'NetSaint' in the description because we're not disabling any netsaint functionality. Ok I also merged the sed script that was modifying the init script into the existing init script patch. It seemed silly to use both a patch and a sed script for the same file: Agreed. http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/nsca.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/nsca-2.7.2-4.fc8.src.rpm I haven't tried the new init script myself; I'll take your word that it works as expected. I need to diff the old one and the new one to make sure it's ok. I see you actually used my spec as the new base, I hope this won't disqualify me for the formal review. I'll put it in the next comment. Also this is my first formal review, so I'll ask my sponsor to take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433547] Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433547
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 14:45 EST ---
+ source files match upstream:
33a98e7975f633a9489d7a8938ed6131
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+ license field matches the actual license.
+ license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream.
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ package builds in mock ( ).
+ package installs properly
+ debuginfo package looks complete.
+ rpmlint is not silent, but the 2 warnings are expected :
nsca.i386: E: non-readable /etc/nagios/nsca.cfg 0600
nsca-client.i386: E: non-readable /etc/nagios/send_nsca.cfg 0600
+ final provides and requires are sane:
Provides: config(nsca) = 2.7.2-4.el5
Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
Requires(post): /bin/sh /sbin/chkconfig
Requires(preun): /bin/sh /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/service
Requires(postun): /bin/sh /sbin/service
Requires: /bin/sh config(nsca) = 2.7.2-4.el5 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIB
C_2.4) libmcrypt.so.4 libnsl.so.1 nagios rtld(GNU_HASH)
Provides: config(nsca-client) = 2.7.2-4.el5
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
Requires: config(nsca-client) = 2.7.2-4.el5 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libmcrypt.so.4 libnsl.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH)
+ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
- owns the directories it creates.
nsca-client should own /etc/nagios because it doesn't require nagios.
nsca doesn't because it requires nagios.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ scriptlets follow guidelines.
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
+ no headers.
+ no pkgconfig files.
+ no libtool .la droppings.
+ not a GUI app.
just add %dir %{_sysconfdir}/nagios for the client and it should be good to go.
additional note : nsca-2.7.2-initreload.patch might need to be renamed now it
does more than just add reload to the init script.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 399951] Review Request: PyAmanith - Python bindings for Amanith
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyAmanith - Python bindings for Amanith https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399951 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 14:58 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pyamanith Short Description: Python bindings for Amanith Owners: spot Branches: F-7 F-8 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 399951] Review Request: PyAmanith - Python bindings for Amanith
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyAmanith - Python bindings for Amanith https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399951 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435347] Review Request: egd - Entropy Gathering Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egd - Entropy Gathering Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435347 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 15:09 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: egd Short Description: Entropy Gathering Daemon Owners: spot Branches: F-7 F-8 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436846] New: Review Request: qt3 - Qt 3 GUI toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436846 Summary: Review Request: qt3 - Qt 3 GUI toolkit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f9/qt3.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f9/qt-3.3.8b-7.fc8.src.rpm Description: This is qt (version 3) renamed to qt3 for Fedora 9 and later. See: http://repo.calcforge.org/f9/qt3.spec.diff for the changes made. The same spec/SRPM still builds as qt on Fedora 8 and earlier (same as kdelibs3). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435347] Review Request: egd - Entropy Gathering Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egd - Entropy Gathering Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435347 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428748] Review Request: ltspfs - LTSP filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ltspfs - LTSP filesystem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428748
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 15:13 EST ---
See below - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPL+)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
See below - Sources match upstream md5sum:
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
See below - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane.
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
Issues:
1. The URL should possibly be:
https://code.launchpad.net/ltspfs
2. This is a prerelease snapshot?
Release should be:
0.0.20080114%{?dist}
instead of
0.20080114%{?dist}
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a
3. You should include a comment on how to check out this version:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-615f6271efb394ab340a93a6cf030f2d08cf0d49
4. rpmlint says:
ltspfs.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/ltspfs-0.4.2/ChangeLog
Suggest: Drop the Changelog until it has anything in it?
ltspfsd.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/88-ltsp.rules
Should this be a conf(noreplace)? Or does it matter?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435121] Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435121 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 15:13 EST --- 403 - Forbidden for http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/dspam-3.8.0-19.src.rpm Please fix permissions. Other comments: - suggested buildroot value is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 please use any higher example - URL from spec file Not found! - same problem for Source0 ! - prepare buildroot for %install: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-6c809b2e945ca78ae25d040f250be60f73181ef0 - /usr/share/doc/dspam/ is not a path for documentation I think it is not required to install documentation files, you can include them in files section also from BUILD directory. Proper path will be automatically added for packaged files. Leave documentation for subpackages in their own documentation directories or make a separate -doc subpackage where there is a lot of docs. - Libtool archives, foo.la files, should not be included. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 - please add your name and email in one of suggested format: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b7d622f4bb245300199c6a33128acce5fb453213 Non blocker suggestion: - you can use . at end of sentences in %description (but can't in Summary) May be an reviewer, which can sponsor you can find more problems. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436551] Review Request: perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determined - A virtual browser that retries errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determined - A virtual browser that retries errors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436551 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431098] Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431098 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 15:38 EST --- Sorry it took so long to get back to this. All of the issues mentioned above should be resolved in -3: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/gambas2-2.2.1-3.fc9.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/gambas2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436741] Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436741 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 15:52 EST --- Summary should not include '5'. License should be: GPLv2 and GPLv2+ Group: specified in both top-level and packages. Necessary? rpmlint: ltsp.src:183: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/syslinux/pxelinux.0 ltsp.src:184: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/syslinux/pxelinux.0 ltsp-client.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/lts.conf ltsp-client.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rwtab.d/k12linux.rwtab ltsp-client.x86_64: E: zero-length /var/lib/random-seed ltsp-server.x86_64: E: dir-or-file-in-opt /opt/ltsp ltsp-server.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sysconfig/k12_dist ltsp-server.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/ltsp/chkconfig.d/nbdrootd ltsp-server.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/ltsp/chkconfig.d/ldminfod ltsp-server.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/ltsp/plugins/ltsp-build-client/Gentoo/020-rootpath ltsp-server.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/ltsp/plugins/ltsp-build-client/Fedora/010-chroot-creator 0644 ltsp-server.x86_64: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-postin /etc/init.d/ltsp-dhcpd ltsp-server.x86_64: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-preun /etc/init.d/ltsp-dhcpd ltsp-server.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/ltsp-dhcpd dhcpd ltsp-server.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/ltsp-dhcpd ltsp-server.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name ltsp-dhcpd ltsp-vmclient.x86_64: W: no-documentation naming: ok spec name matches: ok meets guidelines: ok license: ok license field: needs fixing as noted above license included: yes in server, but not in client or vmclient subpackages. english: ok legible: ok sources: ok builds: ok on x86_64 and i386 (the only ones I tested) exclusivearch: no blocker bug filed that I know of buildrequires: ok locales: not used, ok no shared libs, so no ldconfig. OK not relocatable: ok directory ownership OK defattr: missing for vmclient subpackage no duplicate files: ok clean: ok code not content: ok no large docs: ok no headers: ok no static libs: ok no pkgconfig files: ok no libs: ok no devel pkg: ok no libtool archives: ok no GUI apps: ok dir ownership: looks OK %install rm -rf: ok filenames UTF-8: ok license included: ok translated descriptions: no, but ok builds in mock: ok on i386 and x86_64 compiles on i386 and x86_64 should test: not done no scriptlets: ok no subpackages need to include main package: ok no pkgconfig files: ok no file deps: ok follows packaging guidelines best as I can tell. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436741] Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436741 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 16:28 EST --- ltsp.src:183: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/syslinux/pxelinux.0 ltsp.src:184: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/syslinux/pxelinux.0 Necessary because you want the 32bit version. ltsp-client.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/lts.conf Necessary because we need a blank file to be a mount point for bind mounts on the client. ltsp-client.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rwtab.d/k12linux.rwtab Necessary because we want this to be dropped into the client chroot but it should be blown away during package upgrade. ltsp-client.x86_64: E: zero-length /var/lib/random-seed Another bind mount target. ltsp-server.x86_64: E: dir-or-file-in-opt /opt/ltsp Upstream standard, we are not changing this without their agreement. ltsp-server.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sysconfig/k12_dist This is changing before F9. ltsp-server.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/ltsp/chkconfig.d/nbdrootd ltsp-server.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/ltsp/chkconfig.d/ldminfod ltsp-server.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/ltsp/plugins/ltsp-build-client/Gentoo/020-rootpath Meant to be blank. ltsp-server.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/ltsp/plugins/ltsp-build-client/Fedora/010-chroot-creator 0644 It is meant to be sourced and not executed directly. ltsp-server.x86_64: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-postin /etc/init.d/ltsp-dhcpd ltsp-server.x86_64: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-preun /etc/init.d/ltsp-dhcpd ltsp-server.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/ltsp-dhcpd dhcpd ltsp-server.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/ltsp-dhcpd ltsp-server.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name ltsp-dhcpd These might be legitimate, looking into this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428748] Review Request: ltspfs - LTSP filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltspfs - LTSP filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428748 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 16:39 EST --- http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/ltspfs.spec http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/ltspfs-0.4.2-0.20080310.fc8.src.rpm 3. You should include a comment on how to check out this version: I thought I did near the top? ltspfsd.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/88-ltsp.rules Should this be a conf(noreplace)? Or does it matter? Doesn't matter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436741] Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436741 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 16:52 EST --- exclusivearch: no blocker bug filed that I know of Eh? Is this really needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428748] Review Request: ltspfs - LTSP filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltspfs - LTSP filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428748 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 16:57 EST --- http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/ltspfs.spec http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/ltspfs-0.4.2-0.1.20080310.fc8.src.rpm Oops. The copy failed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428748] Review Request: ltspfs - LTSP filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltspfs - LTSP filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428748 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 17:00 EST --- Ah, much better... that seems to address all the issues I see... this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436741] Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436741 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 17:32 EST --- Group: specified in both top-level and packages. Necessary? rpmbuild fails without it in both. It sucks. =( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 17:38 EST --- Hello Xavier, any news on this? We should be able to approve it now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436033] Review Request: mona - a solver for the WS1S and WS2S logics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mona - a solver for the WS1S and WS2S logics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436033 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 17:50 EST --- Thanks. Also, upstream accepted the rest of my patches and pushed a new version, and I realized that some people might want the examples, so I put them into a subpackage as well. Let me address two rpmlint complaints. First, the -devel subpackage does not depend on the main package. That is because it depends on the -libs subpackage, where its true dependencies lie. I was urged to split out -libs as a subpackage for multiarch reasons, but it seems that rpmlint doesn't recognize this use. Second, rpmlint complains about an undefined non-weak symbol guide in the libmonagta library. That is upstream's doing; that symbol has to be defined by anything that links with this library. I'll look into refactoring the code so that we can avoid this, but for this release, that rpmlint warning is unavoidable. Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/mona/mona.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/mona/mona-1.4r10-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436741] Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436741 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 18:02 EST --- http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/ltsp.spec.old http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/ltsp.spec http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/ltsp.spec.patch Old spec, new spec, and diff between them. http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/ltsp-5.1.0-0.2.20080310.fc8.src.rpm I think I fixed everything that should be fixed except: ltsp-server.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name ltsp-dhcpd I am not sure what is triggering this warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426302] Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426302 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 18:08 EST --- Thanks Mamoru Package approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428748] Review Request: ltspfs - LTSP filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltspfs - LTSP filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428748 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 19:05 EST --- cvs done and built in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436846] Review Request: qt3 - Qt 3 GUI toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt3 - Qt 3 GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436846 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 19:19 EST --- Shouldn't need a review request for a straight up package rename... Simple fedora-cvs? love should suffice... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436846] Review Request: qt3 - Qt 3 GUI toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt3 - Qt 3 GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436846 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 19:27 EST --- But in case it IS needed... I just looked over the diff and it looks good (and nice attention to detail with the 'qt' to 'Qt' in one of the %descriptions). Note that this has my review+ for the diff only, as it should carry over the review for the rest of the package from the previous package (or need a merge review done if it hasn't been yet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436846] Review Request: qt3 - Qt 3 GUI toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt3 - Qt 3 GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436846 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 19:34 EST --- The merge review was approved by Rex Dieter here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226351 so I guess that should be covered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436741] Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436741 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 19:42 EST --- ok, let me do a final check here... taking for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436894] New: Review Request: universalindentgui - Gui for Reformatting Source
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436894 Summary: Review Request: universalindentgui - Gui for Reformatting Source Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/universalindentgui.spec SRPM URL:\http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/universalindentgui-0.8.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The UniversalIndentGUI is a universal graphical user interface for source code, respective text, formatter, beautifier and indenter. This is mainly achieved by a configuration file for each supported indenter. One of the main features and the reason why this tool was (better is being right now) developed is to see how the indent parameter affects the source code style directly while changing the parameters. It always bothered me to change one option of a tool like GNU Indent or GreatCode and have to run it to see what my code would look like afterward. Often the result was not what I expected from the parameters description. So these times are gone. Toggle a parameter and see what it does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436846] Review Request: qt3 - Qt 3 GUI toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt3 - Qt 3 GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436846 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 19:52 EST --- And we can't just rename the entire directories because we don't want to rename qt-qt3 and qt4-qt in Fedora 7 or 8, only in Fedora 9 and later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436846] Review Request: qt3 - Qt 3 GUI toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt3 - Qt 3 GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436846 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 19:50 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: qt3 Short Description: Qt 3 GUI toolkit Owners: than,rdieter,kkofler Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436741] Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436741 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 20:20 EST --- Aside from a small change to fix ppc builds, I don't see any further issues here. This package is APPROVED. Might be good to ping the sparc and ppc folks to get this up to speed on those arches as far as net booting clients, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 21:03 EST --- s3fs is confusing : http://code.google.com/p/s3fs/ There are other fuse-fs driver in Fedora : fuse-smb fuse-sshfs fuse-encfs fuse-s3 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 21:26 EST --- Man page mount.s3fs is packaged. But mount.s3fs is not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 22:00 EST --- Not sure that I see s3fs as confusing in any particular way, but to preserve naming, I can rename to fuse-s3fs (keeping eith the fuse-meaningful namefs convention. As for the mount.s3fs, I've recently removed it from the project as its superfulous. I'll repackage shortly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436741] Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436741 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 22:03 EST --- cvs done and building now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 22:07 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) Not sure that I see s3fs as confusing in any particular way I was locking for s3fs rpm (google code) and reached https://fedorahosted.org/s3fs/ :-) http://www.google.fr/search?hl=frq=s3fs+rpmbtnG=Recherchermeta= -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 411551] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object - relational mapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object - relational mapper Alias: perl-DBIx-Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411551 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||436905 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436905] New: Review Request: perl-JSON-Any - A meta-module to make working with JSON easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436905 Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-Any - A meta-module to make working with JSON easier Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/JSON-Any/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-JSON-Any-1.16-1.fc8.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-JSON-Any.spec Description: JSON::Any provides a coherent API to bring together the various JSON modules currently on CPAN. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436905] Review Request: perl-JSON-Any - A meta-module to make working with JSON easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-Any - A meta-module to make working with JSON easier Alias: perl-JSON-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436905 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 22:14 EST --- scratch build at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=509740 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 399951] Review Request: PyAmanith - Python bindings for Amanith
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyAmanith - Python bindings for Amanith https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399951 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 22:16 EST --- In rawhide, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 411551] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object - relational mapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object - relational mapper Alias: perl-DBIx-Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411551 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |edu)| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 22:19 EST --- Note the new dep on JSON::Any (it was bound to happen sooner or later). SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-DBIx-Class-0.08010-1.fc8.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-DBIx-Class.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436741] Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp - Linux Terminal Server Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436741 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435347] Review Request: egd - Entropy Gathering Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egd - Entropy Gathering Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435347 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 22:23 EST --- Built in rawhide (and F-7/F-8). Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427738] Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427738 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WORKSFORME -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: s3fs - Fuse |Review Request: fuse-s3fs - |filesystem for amazon.com's |Fuse filesystem for |S3 storage service |amazon.com's S3 storage ||service --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 22:44 EST --- New spec/rpm http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs.spec http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs-0.4-2.fc8.src.rpm I've renamed the package to fuse-s3fs and removed the mount.s3fs binary. as for the google code reference, yes, I found that after I created the project on fedora hosted. I'd really rather not give up the name, given that the google code project isn't packaged and its particularly descriptive. It looks like there are actually multiple google code projects for s3fs. One (s3fs-fuse) is a python implementation that hasn't been touched in over a year. The other, s3fs, is a c++ implementation that has only seen recent activity (much like my project). As there are actively multiple project competing for the name, I'd prefer not to give up my claim on it. Neither of the other projects have been packaged, or are looking to be packaged for Fedora or any other distro (at least not publically that I can find). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 23:03 EST --- Hey Josh. You are still looking for a sponsor? Take a look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored I would be happy to look at sponsoring you, but do you have any more packages you would like to submit now? Or could you go and do some 'pre-reviews' (You can't approve other reviews until you have been sponsored) to show your understanding of the guidelines? Let me know... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436777] Review Request: python-tgcaptcha - A TurboGears CAPTCHA widget for forms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tgcaptcha - A TurboGears CAPTCHA widget for forms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436777 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-11 00:59 EST --- got build error ImportError: No module named cherrypy koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=510156 also rpmlint complained = python-tgcaptcha.src: E: description-line-too-long TGCaptcha is a TurboGears widget that provides an easy way to incorporate a captcha as part a form in an attempt to reduce spam or malicious activity. python-tgcaptcha.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/tgcaptcha/static/fonts/tuffy/LICENSE.txt python-tgcaptcha.i386: E: no-binary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436894] Review Request: universalindentgui - Gui for Reformatting Source
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: universalindentgui - Gui for Reformatting Source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436894 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-11 01:23 EST --- build is unsuccessful as root.log showed me at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=510161 No Package Found for qscintilla2-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436905] Review Request: perl-JSON-Any - A meta-module to make working with JSON easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-Any - A meta-module to make working with JSON easier Alias: perl-JSON-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436905 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-11 01:28 EST --- Any reason for not installing optional modules that skipped some tests of make test - JSON::PC ...missing. == Auto-install the 1 optional module(s) from CPAN? [y/N] n [JSON::DWIW] - JSON::DWIW ...missing. == Auto-install the 1 optional module(s) from CPAN? [y/N] n [JSON::Syck] - JSON::Syck ...loaded. (0.29) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436905] Review Request: perl-JSON-Any - A meta-module to make working with JSON easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-Any - A meta-module to make working with JSON easier Alias: perl-JSON-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436905 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-11 01:32 EST --- can you also add other 2 packages for JSON::PC and JSON::DWIW? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-11 01:42 EST --- Upstream problem cannot be fixed now, it is another issue. I could do it in ths spec file. I need help actually :( Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436905] Review Request: perl-JSON-Any - A meta-module to make working with JSON easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-Any - A meta-module to make working with JSON easier Alias: perl-JSON-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436905 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-11 01:41 EST --- Yes, as noted in the spec -- JSON::Any relies on one or more of the JSON parsers currently on CPAN. We have JSON::XS and JSON in Fedora; we prefer ::XS as it's faster and ensure tests are run for that module. If other JSON parsers are added to Fedora in the future, the spec can be updated to ensure builds test against them, as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436905] Review Request: perl-JSON-Any - A meta-module to make working with JSON easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-Any - A meta-module to make working with JSON easier Alias: perl-JSON-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436905 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-11 01:52 EST --- Thanks for putting comments in advance in SPEC for additional JSON packages. Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=509740 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 37325d39aa62b291d05b9e90d2df12a0 JSON-Any-1.16.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'inc', 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch') t/00-load.t t/01-JSON.t t/02-JSON-XS.t t/03-JSON-DWIW.t t/04-ENV.t t/05-JSON-Syck.t t/10_unicode.t t/00-load.# Testing JSON::Any 1.16, Perl 5.01, /usr/bin/perl ok t/01-JSON.# Testing JSON.pm backend ok t/02-JSON-XS..# Testing JSON::XS backend ok t/03-JSON-DWIWskipped all skipped: JSON::DWIW not installed: Couldn't find a JSON Package. at (eval 3) line 1 t/04-ENV..ok t/05-JSON-Syckok t/10_unicode..# handler is JSON::XS # handler is JSON::Backend::XS::Supportable # DWIW: Couldn't find a JSON Package. at t/10_unicode.t line 18 # Syck: JSON::Syck does not support utf8 at t/10_unicode.t line 19 # PC: Couldn't find a JSON Package. at t/10_unicode.t line 18 ok All tests successful, 1 test skipped. Files=7, Tests=80, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.39 cusr + 0.04 csys = 0.43 CPU) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
