[Bug 445067] Review Request: ocaml-ounit - Unit test framework for OCaml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ounit - Unit test framework for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445067 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://www.xs4all.nl/~mmzeem ||an/ocaml/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445067] New: Review Request: ocaml-ounit - Unit test framework for OCaml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445067 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ounit - Unit test framework for OCaml Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-ounit.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-ounit-1.0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Unit test framework for OCaml rpmlint reports: ocaml-ounit.i386: E: no-binary ocaml-ounit.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Both can be ignored for OCaml packages. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=593927 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444721] Review Request: gtksourceview2-sharp - gtksourceview2 C# binding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview2-sharp - gtksourceview2 C# binding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444721 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 02:40 EST --- Paul? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445067] Review Request: ocaml-ounit - Unit test framework for OCaml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ounit - Unit test framework for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445067 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||445068 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445068] Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445068 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||445067 URL||http://ocaml.janestcapital.c ||om/?q=node/13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445068] New: Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445068 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bin-prot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bin-prot-1.0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol rpmlint says: ocaml-bin-prot.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ocaml/bin_prot/map_to_safe.ml This is OK because of the exception for *.ml files detailed here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/OCaml#head-f1fbee40338b95c780f241fa3a86f6a82e5830dd (ie. there is no corresponding map_to_safe.mli file). Note that this package is only available on little-endian architectures, and is only tested upstream on x86, hence the ExclusiveArch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445070] New: Review Request: ocaml-res - OCaml library for resizing arrays and strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445070 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-res - OCaml library for resizing arrays and strings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-res.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-res-2.2.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OCaml library for resizing arrays and strings rpmlint says: ocaml-res.i386: E: no-binary ocaml-res.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib which is OK for OCaml packages. Koji scratch build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=593964 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439141] Review Request: python-demjson - Python JSON module and lint checker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-demjson - Python JSON module and lint checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439141 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 03:30 EST --- (In reply to comment #12) is this pushed to rawhide? Not sure I understand this question. Afaict there's a python-demjson package available in f9 as well as in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434707] Review Request: ocaml-sexplib - OCaml library for converting OCaml values to S-expressions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-sexplib - OCaml library for converting OCaml values to S-expressions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434707 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 03:31 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-sexplib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-sexplib-3.7.4-1.fc9.src.rpm * Sat May 3 2008 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 3.7.4-1 - New upstream version 3.7.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445067] Review Request: ocaml-ounit - Unit test framework for OCaml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ounit - Unit test framework for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445067 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||445074 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445070] Review Request: ocaml-res - OCaml library for resizing arrays and strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-res - OCaml library for resizing arrays and strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445070 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||445074 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445074] Review Request: ocaml-core - Many and various enhancements to the OCaml standard library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-core - Many and various enhancements to the OCaml standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445074 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||434707, 445067, 445068, ||445070 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434707] Review Request: ocaml-sexplib - OCaml library for converting OCaml values to S-expressions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-sexplib - OCaml library for converting OCaml values to S-expressions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434707 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||445074 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445068] Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445068 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||445074 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445074] New: Review Request: ocaml-core - Many and various enhancements to the OCaml standard library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445074 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-core - Many and various enhancements to the OCaml standard library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-core.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-core-0.5.0-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Many and various enhancements to the OCaml standard library This is rpmlint clean. Please pay careful attention to the dependencies! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445074] Review Request: ocaml-core - Many and various enhancements to the OCaml standard library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-core - Many and various enhancements to the OCaml standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445074 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://ocaml.janestcapital.c ||om/?q=node/13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 441411] Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 04:42 EST --- Hi Mathieu, Short intro: I'm a long time Fedora contributer and a sponsor. I haven't been sponsoring anyone in a while as I've been rather busy with other stuff. But getting new people into Fedora is important so I've decided to make some time for sponsering again. Most of the things I do within Fedora are gaming related so I'm very happy to see adonthell getting packaged. As such I would like to sponsor you. The first step here would be to finish up the packaging of adonthell and wastesedge so that they are in a state where they can be approved. The next step then is for you to either package one or two more packages, for example from these lists: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games/WishList http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList Or you can do some reviews of other people packages, when you do this please add a note that it is not an official review as you aren't a contributer yet. The purpose here is for you to show a good understanding of the packaging guidelines. Once you've done a couple of good reviews and / or submitted one or two more good packages, then you can apply for cvsextras membership in the account system and I'll sponsor you. As for the review of this package, Mamoru has done a fine job so far, please fix all the items he has mentioned in his last comment and then I'll do a full review pointing out any last issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||441411 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 04:42 EST --- Hi Mathieu, Short intro: I'm a long time Fedora contributer and a sponsor. I haven't been sponsoring anyone in a while as I've been rather busy with other stuff. But getting new people into Fedora is important so I've decided to make some time for sponsering again. Most of the things I do within Fedora are gaming related so I'm very happy to see adonthell getting packaged. As such I would like to sponsor you. The first step here would be to finish up the packaging of adonthell and wastesedge so that they are in a state where they can be approved. The next step then is for you to either package one or two more packages, for example from these lists: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games/WishList http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList Or you can do some reviews of other people packages, when you do this please add a note that it is not an official review as you aren't a contributer yet. The purpose here is for you to show a good understanding of the packaging guidelines. Once you've done a couple of good reviews and / or submitted one or two more good packages, then you can apply for cvsextras membership in the account system and I'll sponsor you. I'll look into reviewing this once adonthell is in an approvable state. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445077] Review Request: lsnipes - A text-mode maze game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsnipes - A text-mode maze game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445077 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 05:15 EST --- Scratch build results: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=594007 rpmlint output: None. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 441411] Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||441415 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445077] New: Review Request: lsnipes - A text-mode maze game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445077 Summary: Review Request: lsnipes - A text-mode maze game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/lsnipes/0.9.4-2.fc9/lsnipes.spec SRPM URL: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/lsnipes/0.9.4-2.fc9/lsnipes-0.9.4-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: A text-mode maze game Linux Snipes is a reimplementation of an old text-mode DOS game. You are in a maze with a number of enemies (the snipes) and a few hives which create more of the enemies. Your job is to kill the snipes and their hives before they get the best of you. 26 option levels let you change characteristics of the game such as whether or not diagonal shots bounce off the walls. 10 levels of difficulty (only partially implemented) let you build your skills gradually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434827] Review Request: jcommon - java jfreereport base utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jcommon - java jfreereport base utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434827 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 06:14 EST --- imported, can't actually build it yet. But I assume it'll all come together after devel auto moves to F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429221] Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 05:58 EST --- Hi Ian, Short intro: I'm a long time Fedora contributer and a sponsor. I haven't been sponsoring anyone in a while as I've been rather busy with other stuff. But getting new people into Fedora is important so I've decided to make some time for sponsering again. As such I would like to sponsor you. The first step here would be to finish up the packaging of dzcomm and scantool_net so that they are in a state where they can be approved. The next step then is for you to either package one or two more packages, for example from these lists: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games/WishList Or you can do some reviews of other people packages, when you do this please add a note that it is not an official review as you aren't a contributer yet. The purpose here is for you to show a good understanding of the packaging guidelines. Once you've done a couple of good reviews and / or submitted one or two more good packages, then you can apply for cvsextras membership in the account system and I'll sponsor you. --- For starters I would like to give you a hand with fixing some of the issues with this package (dzcomm), as you're running into some issues which can be somewhat hard to fix for someone new to packaging, and on top of that this package should really be building a shared library not a static library as static libraries are evil, which will require some further patching of the Makefiles. However before I start spending time on this I would first like to get a firm commitment from your side, are you willing to make time for this to make this work, if there will be a silence of 2 weeks between comments all the time, then this is not going to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444830] Review Request: fpm2 - Password manager with GTK2 GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fpm2 - Password manager with GTK2 GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444830 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 06:03 EST --- Hi Aleš, Short intro: I'm a long time Fedora contributer and a sponsor. I haven't been sponsoring anyone in a while as I've been rather busy with other stuff. But getting new people into Fedora is important so I've decided to make some time for sponsering again. As such I would like to sponsor you. The first step here would be to finish up the packaging of fpm2 so that it is in a state where it can be approved (I haven't looked yet, it might already be). Normally the next step then is for you to either package one or two more packages, for example from these lists: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games/WishList http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList Or to do some reviews of other people packages, when you do this please add a note that it is not an official review as you aren't a contributer yet. The purpose here is for you to show a good understanding of the packaging guidelines. Once you've done a couple of good reviews and / or submitted one or two more good packages, then you can apply for cvsextras membership in the account system and I'll sponsor you. --- As I already said this is the normal (and prefered) procedure, but seeing that you're also upstream here, I wonder: are you planning on packaging other software for Fedora, or do you just want to maintain fpm2 in Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444356] Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python Interactive Interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python Interactive Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444356 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443177] Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443177 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 07:26 EST --- Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443177] Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443177 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 07:25 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: html2ps Short Description: HTML to PostScript converter Owners: pertusus Branches: F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444356] Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python Interactive Interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python Interactive Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444356 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 07:35 EST --- Going to re-do the review later (first review eaten by crashing Firefox). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442022] Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442022 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 07:45 EST --- Thanks for the review. Here is a new release based on the latest upstream which should fix the crashes you've been seeing: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/wordwarvi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/wordwarvi-0.08-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443177] Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443177 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 07:59 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) Thanks for the review! No problem! (In reply to comment #7) Branches: F-8 EL-5 Don't forget F-9 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445085] New: Review Request: jcommon-serializer - JFree Java General Serialization Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445085 Summary: Review Request: jcommon-serializer - JFree Java General Serialization Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/jfreereport/jcommon-serializer.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/jfreereport/jcommon-serializer-0.2.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: JFree Java General Serialization Framework A build requirement for jfreereport and so OOo 3.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443177] Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443177 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 08:42 EST --- OOps. Added F-9 New Package CVS Request === Package Name: html2ps Short Description: HTML to PostScript converter Owners: pertusus Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188445] Review Request: bootconf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188445 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 08:41 EST --- http://www.courier-mta.org/bootconf/download/bootconf-1.2-2.src.rpm This should address everything except the permissions on the spec file. I don't know why rpmbuild does this. The spec file is packaged inside the tarball, the srpm gets created by rpmbuild -ta, and that's what you get. The spec file has normal permissions inside the tarball. My shell umask is 002, and that's what happens when my build script runs rpmbuild -ta. I don't know what's going on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |asoni.it) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 09:47 EST --- Sorry for the big delay (still very annoying troubles at work :-( ). Here is a new SRPM and a new SPEC file: Spec URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave.spec SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave-0.7.4-1.fc8.src.rpm and these are the news: - updated to 0.7.4 - removed the qt4 explicit requirement - added a chmod command in the %prep section to fix file permissions oddity (many .cpp and .h executable files) I'm looking for a package to pre-review. In the meantime you can take a look to my other submission: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435576] Review Request: ncdu - Text-based disk usage viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncdu - Text-based disk usage viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435576 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442022] Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442022 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 11:01 EST --- Okay, the segfaults are gone now, and everything else looks good. I'm going to change the fedora-review flag to +. One concern I just noticed is that the rpm is 48M in size (vs 5M for the SRPM, because of the sound conversion from ogg to wav in building). It's not a review blocker at all, but I do think it would be better for the game to play the ogg files directly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442022] Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442022 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 11:13 EST --- (In reply to comment #18) One concern I just noticed is that the rpm is 48M in size (vs 5M for the SRPM, because of the sound conversion from ogg to wav in building). It's not a review blocker at all, but I do think it would be better for the game to play the ogg files directly. Agreed, Stephen any chance you could do this for one of the next releases? Maybe switch to SDL_mixer for the sound, that supports ogg out of the box. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442022] Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442022 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 11:17 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: wordwarvi Short Description: Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game Owners:jwrdegoede Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445094] New: Review Request: pommed - Apple laptop hotkey event handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445094 Summary: Review Request: pommed - Apple laptop hotkey event handler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/review/pommed.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/review/pommed-1.18-0.1.20080502svn.fc9.src.rpm Description: pommed handles the hotkeys found on the Apple PowerBook, MacBook, MacBook Pro, and MacBook Air laptops. pommed can adjust the LCD backlight, sound volume, keyboard backlight and eject the CD-ROM drive. pommed also monitors the ambient light sensors to automatically light up the keyboard backlight on the MacBook Pro, MacBook Air and PowerBook when applicable. pommed also supports the Apple Remote. rpmlint is not silent, however I think it is safe to ignore these warnings: pommed.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre cp -- This is done to move the now mbpeventd configuration file to the pommed one, as the pommed and mbpeventd projects have merged pommed.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/pommed $prog -- rpmlint doesn't realize $prog = pommed pommed.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/pommed -- This is the desired behaviour pommed-gpomme.x86_64: W: no-documentation -- Doesn't matter pommed-wmpomme.x86_64: W: no-documentation -- Doesn't matter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 12:44 EST ---
Hello Ralf, thank you so much for the comments.
I've removed the first four glitches, and the new SRPM Spec files are
accessible at the above links, please have a look.
In 5 MUSTFIX: When you say package %{name}, are you referring to the
tlock source or the RPM? I'm not very sure how to go about this devel
subpackage business.
Is it just that, I create a new spec file for new rpm which will install
the librpass.so readpass.h files. And in the above RPM spec file I only
install the tlock binary along with its manual?
Also could you please explain a bit more about 6 MUSTFIX? I didn't get what
special treatment is required for info manuals.
Thank you!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 13:23 EST --- 6 MUSTFIX is also fixed. Please see SPEC URL: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/tlock.spec SRPM URL: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/tlock-1.1-0.2.fc8.src.rpm Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439744] Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439744 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 13:21 EST --- Ping again, Can this please be pushed to stable updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433926] Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433926 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 14:26 EST --- Built against new freehoo 3.5.2: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/freehoo/freehoo.spec http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/freehoo/freehoo-3.5.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442022] Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442022 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 15:09 EST --- I'll look into it, but so far as I can tell, libsndfile doesn't do ogg yet. http://www.mega-nerd.com/libsndfile/#Features Though, there is this: http://www.metadecks.org/software/libsndfile/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438043] Review Request: GMT - Generic Mapping Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GMT - Generic Mapping Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438043 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 15:22 EST --- There is a new upstream release. Also I will be a week off for vacations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442022] Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442022 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 15:29 EST --- (In reply to comment #21) I'll look into it, but so far as I can tell, libsndfile doesn't do ogg yet. http://www.mega-nerd.com/libsndfile/#Features Though, there is this: http://www.metadecks.org/software/libsndfile/ Well, judging from its last release date (Aug 31 2006) libsndfile is somewhat dead. So perhaps using SDL_mixer (which will replace both portaudio and libsndfile in one go) is a better idea? You can use SDL to manage just the sound, or just the sound and joystick, gaining joystick support in one go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444165] Review Request: mkrdns - automatic reverse DNS zone generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mkrdns - automatic reverse DNS zone generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 15:44 EST --- NEEDSWORK: rpmlint mkrdns.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 11) - after Buildarch: and Requires: you inserted tabs but after all other tags you only used spaces, therefore you should change this. You should remove the Requires anyhow, because they are already added automatically by rpm for perl requirements. Naming: ok License: ok (GPLv2+), not included Building: ok, builds in koji Clean section: ok Macro Usage: ok Source Package: ok, matches upstream, latest version: 474ffb39d1eb615d0e9d8a7d52a27953 mkrdns-3_3.gz 474ffb39d1eb615d0e9d8a7d52a27953 mkrdns-3.3-1.fc8/mkrdns-3_3.gz Buildroot: ok %files: ok Besides the mixed whitespace, there is another minor issue: You write /usr/bin/pod2man instead of just pod2man, which does not make sense to me, because on my machine install is also in /usr/bin and you rely on /usr/bin being in the path there. Also the timestamp of the executable is lost, maybe you can change the spec to preserve it, but I do not know a good way to do this. In conclusion: Remove the tab after Buildarch, remove the Requires: and remove the /usr/bin from the pod2man invocation, then I will approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442022] Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442022 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 16:04 EST --- Hmm, sounds like a non-trivial change. And I kind of actually *like* that I can (in fact, must) write my own mixer code with portaudio. (for instance, I suspect you'd have a hard time writing a game like this: http://bethewumpus.sourceforge.net with SDL_mixer.) BTW, there's already joystick support (in fact, to play the game, a joystick is practically mandatory. Unless you're doing cross platform stuff, the linux joystick driver is easy enough to program against that a library is not really necessary. I don't think libsndfile is dead, ardour and audacity both use it, for instance. Hmm, come to think of it, audacity supports ogg as well, maybe that's a place I should look. What I need is a snippet of code that can read ogg files and give me an array of mono, 16-bit, 44.1khz PCM data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445105] New: Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445105 Summary: Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.ee.oulu.fi/~muep/rpms/milky/milkytracker.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ee.oulu.fi/~muep/rpms/milky/milkytracker-0.90.80-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: MilkyTracker is an application for creating music in the .MOD and .XM formats. Its goal is to be free replacement for the popular Fasttracker II software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438105] Review Request: libconcord - L ibrary to talk to Logitech® Harmony® univ ersal remote controls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech® Harmony® universal remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 17:39 EST --- I plan on adding the perl tests at an additional time. I'd like to get the package through review before Stephen goes on vacation. Spec URL:https://rpm.silfreed.net:8002/index.cgi/file/37414f878d6a/libconcord/libconcord.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/libconcord/libconcord-0.20-4.src.rpm %changelog * Sat May 03 2008 Douglas E. Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.20-4 - installing python packages to sitearch again - adding additional docs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 328161] Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 17:42 EST --- I'll try to push as much of the other items you posted from the review upstream in the near future. Spec URL: https://rpm.silfreed.net:8002/index.cgi/file/37414f878d6a/concordance/concordance.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/concordance/concordance-0.20-4.src.rpm %changelog * Sat May 03 2008 Douglas E. Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.20-4 - adding additional docs - removed harmony provides/obsoletes - removing private getopt sources - removing udev/pam_console rules - running generated xml file through xmllint at build time * Tue Apr 22 2008 Douglas E. Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.20-3 - fixed Source0 url to downloads.sourceforge.net instead of dl.sourceforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 17:48 EST --- Note, I just smoke tested this on F9 and things seem to work correctly. F9 SRPM packages for this and all dependencies are in http://www.kylev.com/pylons-rpm/ , no modifications made to spec files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445094] Review Request: pommed - Apple laptop hotkey event handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pommed - Apple laptop hotkey event handler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445094 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 18:14 EST --- Probably should, but I have no idea how to do that... I'm not sure if it has anything to do with HAL, but I know it has it's own policy and dbus configuration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 18:37 EST --- Also, see http://www.nabble.com/-scala--licensing-of-scala-collection-immutable-Tree.scala-td16932952.html for the discussion of the licensing issue. Upstream has contacted the original author and got the code relicensed under the Scala license. Does this mean I can revert the license tag immediately or do I have to wait for the next release with the LGPL notice removed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 19:26 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) Also, I'm willing to sponsor you if you'll demonstrate an ability to review packages by doing at least one pre-review as described above. I guess I can sponsor him (see bug 438750) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438105] Review Request: libconcord - L ibrary to talk to Logitech® Harmony® univ ersal remote controls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech® Harmony®
universal remote controls
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 19:37 EST ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: i386 (F8 system, F8 mock, devel mock)
[x] Rpmlint output:
Minor warnings:
libconcord-perl.i386: W: no-documentation
libconcord-python.i386: W: no-documentation
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
%(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPLv3+
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package: c2487e851864f38c4da4fe02093652a5
MD5SUM upstream package: c2487e851864f38c4da4fe02093652a5
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are
listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[!] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
TODO is packaged in both libconcord and libconcord-devel.
I would suggest simply removing it from libconcord-devel, judging by other
packages.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: i386 (F8 and devel)
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested all arches via koji scratch build for F8.
[x] Package functions as described.
[x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x] File based requires are sane.
=== SUMMARY ===
APPROVED.
Before actually building/pushing this, you should resolve the duplicate TODO
file.
Minor notes: There is a README for the Perl bindings in the source package. You
might want to package that with libconcord-perl. Latest CVS has a similar README
for the Python bindings. If you feel really energetic, you could add that file
as an extra source, and package that in libconcord-python.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442522] Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442522 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442640] Review Request: epeg - Immensely fast JPEG thumbnailer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epeg - Immensely fast JPEG thumbnailer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442640 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 20:01 EST --- * Sun May 04 2008 Pavel Stalwart Shevchuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.9.1.042-2 - Fixed timestamp of source tarball - Preserve timestamps of installed files New spec: http://rpm.scwlab.com/epeg-goes-rawhide/epeg.spec New SRPM: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e/9/epeg-0.9.1.042-2.x86_64/ epeg-0.9.1.042-2.fc9.src.rpm Built RPMs: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e/9/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442022] Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442022 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 20:04 EST --- Oh, and Hans, about packaging dependencies, now libsndfile isn't needed, but libvorbisfile is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442437] Review Request: edje - A graphical layout and animation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: edje - A graphical layout and animation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442437 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 20:34 EST --- * Sun May 04 2008 Pavel Stalwart Shevchuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.5.0.042-2 - Added missing dependencies for edje-devel - Fixed timestamp of source tarball - Preserve timestamps of installed files - Added html docs New spec: http://rpm.scwlab.com/edje-goes-rawhide/edje.spec New SRPM: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e/9/edje-0.5.0.042-2.x86_64/ edje-0.5.0.042-2.fc9.src.rpm Built RPMs: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e/9/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445105] Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445105 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442808] Review Request: epsilon - Small, display independent, and quick thumbnailing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epsilon - Small, display independent, and quick thumbnailing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442808 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 22:00 EST --- * Sun May 04 2008 Pavel Stalwart Shevchuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.3.0.012-2 - Added missing dependencies for epsilon-devel - Fixed timestamp of source tarball - Preserve timestamps of installed files New spec: http://rpm.scwlab.com/epsilon-goes-rawhide/epsilon.spec New SRPM: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e/9/epsilon-0.3.0.012-2.x86_64/ epsilon-0.3.0.012-2.fc9.src.rpm Built RPMs: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e/9/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444165] Review Request: mkrdns - automatic reverse DNS zone generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mkrdns - automatic reverse DNS zone generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444165
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 22:04 EST ---
WRT the timestamp: try
zcat %{SOURCE0} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/mkrdns
chmod 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/mkrdns
touch -r ${SOURCE0} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/mkrdns
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 22:57 EST --- Hi Mamoru, if you'd like to sponsor Claudio then that's fine with me. And Claudio -- can you please respond to comment #7? If you fix the license and improve the VTK_DATA_ROOT situation then I'll approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443449] Review Request: udpcast - UDP broadcast file distribution and installation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: udpcast - UDP broadcast file distribution and installation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443449 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 23:23 EST --- The --prefix, --mandir, and --libdir options are set by the %configure macro, so you should delete those. See the definition in /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros. Otherwise, this package looks ready to go. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442404] Review Request: efreet - An implementation of several specifications from freedesktop.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efreet - An implementation of several specifications from freedesktop.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442404 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 23:28 EST --- * Sun May 04 2008 Pavel Stalwart Shevchuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.0.3.042-2 - Fixed missing dependencies for efreet-devel - Fixed timestamp of source tarball - Preserve timestamps of installed files New spec: http://rpm.scwlab.com/efreet-goes-rawhide/efreet.spec New SRPM: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e/9/efreet-0.0.3.042-2.fc9.x86_64/ efreet-0.0.3.042-2.fc9.src.rpm Built RPMs: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e/9/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442022] Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442022 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 23:31 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443177] Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443177 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 23:34 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442462] Review Request: e_dbus - Wrappers around dbus for EFL based applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e_dbus - Wrappers around dbus for EFL based applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442462 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 23:58 EST --- * Sun May 04 2008 Pavel Stalwart Shevchuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.1.0.042-2 - Fixed typo in E_Nm.h, fix committed upstream - Added missing dependencies to e_dbus-devel - Fixed timestamp of source tarball - Preserve timestamps of installed files New spec: http://rpm.scwlab.com/e_dbus-goes-rawhide/e_dbus.spec New SRPM: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e/9/e_dbus-0.1.0.042-2.fc9.x86_64/ e_dbus-0.1.0.042-2.fc9.src.rpm Built RPMs: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e/9/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444792] Review Request: Augeas - library for changing configuration files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Augeas - library for changing configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444792 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-04 01:23 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: augeas Short Description: a configuration API Owners: lutter Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444792] Review Request: Augeas - library for changing configuration files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Augeas - library for changing configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444792 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-04 01:21 EST --- Thanks for spotting this - I'll check it and address it before I import the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445126] New: Review Request: report-mirror - Fedora MirrorManager client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445126 Summary: Review Request: report-mirror - Fedora MirrorManager client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/report-mirror.spec SRPM URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/report-mirror-0.1-2.git20080504.fc8.src.rpm Description: This is the client for MirrorManager, the Fedora mirror management system. The configuration file should be edited prior to using this package. For more information, For further information, please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Mirroring [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-8-i386/result/report-mirror-0.1-2.git20080504.fc8.noarch.rpm [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ I need a sponsor :). I'm also copying Matt Domsch on this request, since he is the upstream author. A little about me: I'm currently heading up the bug triage team within Fedora, and noticed that this wasn't packaged, but probably should be. Let me know if further information is required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445126] Review Request: report-mirror - Fedora MirrorManager client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: report-mirror - Fedora MirrorManager client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445126 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-04 01:35 EST --- One thing that I'm not sure about in this package is the version number. Matt, can you help me out here? Is there some canonical released version of MM that I can base the version number off of? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445126] Review Request: report-mirror - Fedora MirrorManager client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: report-mirror - Fedora MirrorManager client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445126 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444356] Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python Interactive Interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python
Interactive Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444356
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-04 01:41 EST ---
Review Guidelines MUST items:
- [OK] rpmlint output: none
- [OK] package name
- [OK] %{name}.spec
- [OK] Packaging Guidelines
- [OK] Licensing Guidelines (MIT)
- [OK] License Field in spec
- [OK] License text in %doc
- [OK] Spec file in en_US
- [OK] legible spec file
- [OK] source matches upstream
- [OK] compiles successfully as noarch
- [OK] BuildRequires
- N/A %find_lang
- N/A shared libs
- N/A not relocatable
- [OK] directory ownership
- [OK] no duplicate files in %files
- [OK] proper permissions on files, %defattr present
- [OK] %clean section cleans %{buildroot}
- [OK] consistently uses macros
- [OK] package contains code
- N/A large docs
- [OK] %doc files do not affect runtime behaviour
- N/A header files in -devel
- N/A static libs in -static
- N/A foo.pc files
- N/A libfoo.so.1.1
- N/A no devel package
- N/A no .la archives
- N/A not a GUI app
- [OK] Does not own files/dirs owned by other packages
- [OK] %install cleans out %{buildroot} first
- [OK] all filenames are valid ASCII and thus UTF-8
Review Guidelines SHOULD items:
- N/A license text
- N/A no translated descriptions available
- [OK] builds in mock: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=594044
- N/A noarch package
- [OK] appears to work
- N/A no scriptlets
- N/A no sub-packages
- N/A no foo.pc
- N/A no file dependencies
Remarks on Python Packaging Guidelines:
- [OK] good python_sitelib macro definition
- [OK] use %{python_sitelib}
- N/A Not an egg, only builds .egg-info
- [OK] Includes all byte compiled files
Remarks on Packaging Guidelines:
- package uses second allowed choice for BuildRoot:
- CFLAGS=%{optflags}... what for in a noarch package?
- desktop file:
- as non-GUI app bpython does not need one
- it is non-functional
- ergo: why not leave it out?
If you do decide to add a desktop file starting bpython in a terminal:
Please use %{__install}'s -p parameter.
I'd change those three, but they are OK as-is.
ACCEPTED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444257] Review Request: nted - Musical score editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nted - Musical score editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444257 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
