[Bug 447751] Review Request: diary - A application to allow you to keep a diary of your life
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diary - A application to allow you to keep a diary of your life https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447751 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 02:23 EST --- I can't really change the name to include GNOME, since it's not part of the GNOME desktop (even though it uses the same technologies). How about Almanac Diary, with almanac as the executable name? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444134] Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444134 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 02:45 EST --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG is no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 Bug 432259 depends on bug 433253, which changed state. Bug 433253 Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 What|Old Value |New Value Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452872] Review Request: bmake - The NetBSD make(1) tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bmake - The NetBSD make(1) tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452872 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 02:46 EST --- Yes, sorry Mamoru. I already did the steps until the Get Sponsored section, but was waiting to tell you because I'm rather busy this week with work stuff. Anyway. The account I set up in FAS is named jmmv. Now, from what I understood, I cannot continue doing the steps from the Add Package to CVS and Set Owner section onwards. Either I need to gain some privileges (be sponsored?) or someone else has to do the cvs work for me; is that right? Thank you for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 02:48 EST --- Would you submit a updates request for F-9 on https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ so that speech-dispatcher can be rebuilt on F-9? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445105] Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445105 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 02:50 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453847] Review Request: gpt - The Grid Packaging Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gpt - The Grid Packaging Toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 04:02 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Thank you for taking the time to review this.
It seems strange to me to need gpt for globus in fedora, on pure
rpm system it should not be useful. That being said, it doesn't mean
that gpt cannot be in fedora.
You are right, gpt is quite useless for most things. Except for building globus.
The globus build (makefiles and configure files) makes heavy use of gpt macros
and gpt package dependency description files. Building globus without gpt would
be possible, but would require a large amount of work to rewrite the build
instructions.
I think that the name is too short, it would be better to have something
longer.
I have made a new package where I use the full name, grid-packaging-tools:
http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/grid-packaging-tools-3.2-9.fc9.src.rpm
http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/grid-packaging-tools.spec
It is still OK to use /usr/share/gpt as the install location, right? Or must I
change that to /usr/share/grid-packaging-tools?
You have a fair amount of patches. Is upstream aware of these?
The patch with the fixes from globus I consider to be upstream. The patches that
adapt to the HFS file system layout used in Fedora are not really bug fixes but
packaging adaptations, so not really appropriate to submit to upstream. The
remaining patches are mainly one and two liners, that probably should be
committed upstream. NCSA:s bugzilla is quite closed - you need to have an
account to submit, and you need to apply for an account via e-mail - no online
registration. I will submit the relevant patches upstream when I get a reply on
my bugzilla account request (provided it is accepted).
Why do you change _ in - in script file names?
The upstream code is inconsistent in its naming. It has 20 script names that
have - and 8 that uses _, for no apparent good reason. Making the naming of the
scripts consistent is more userfriendly.
Reading the /usr/share/gpt/lib/perl/Grid/GPT/LocalEnv.pm
file it seems that gtar/gzip is used, so a Requires should be needed,
in stead of the perl(Archive::Tar) Requires. Also rpm and rpmbuild
seems to be used so maybe some Requires are missing.
I have added Requires for tar and gzip. (I did not do that originally since
those were listed as exceptions that were not needed to be listed as build
requirements. But thinking about it that is not quite the same thing.) The
perl(Archive::Tar) requirement is automatically picked up by rpm, and not
mentioned in the spec file. And I think it should be there.
I did not add any requires for rpm and rpmbuild since their use inside gpt is a
rather exotic use of gpt. Using gpt to produce rpms that way will create bad
rpms, with no proper sources.
Why aren't the dtds in some dtd directory?
In the new package I have moved them to /usr/share/gpt/dtd which seems
consistent with how other Fedora packages install dtd files.
There are some automake duplicated files, this deserves a comment.
The files in /usr/share/gpt/amdir are not simple copies of the automake
versions. They are extended gpt versions with additional build instructions in
them.
Also gpt-bootstrap.sh seems to require all the autotools and it is not
very clear where it is documented.
Yes bootstrapping requires the autotools, but that is normally the case, so I
can't see that it requires any special documentation. Please clarify what you
meant by this comment, since I don't get what you are suggesting.
the globus_core-src.tar.gz file seems also dubious to me.
Removed in the new package.
Do you really need to rerun the autotools? It doesn't seems clear
to me based on the patches.
Patches change configure.in and Makefile.am, so yes.
Instead of populating %{docdir} yourseld, I wuold suggest using an
in-source directory and %doc. This allows to better keep timestamps
without much work. Like:
rm -rf __dist_docs
mkdir __dist_docs
mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/dtd __dist_docs/
mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/gpt_rpm.spec __dist_docs/
iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 LICENSE LICENSE.utf8
touch -c -r LICENSE LICENSE.utf8
mv LICENSE.utf8 LICENSE
Done. (It was even simpler since I moved the dtds to its own directory).
and in %files:
%doc __dist_docs/* CHANGES INSTALL README
For patch, 2 suggestions, use
%patch0 -p1 -b .globus
to be able to use gendiff more easily, and name patch like
Patch0: %{name}-3.2-globus.patch
to know in which version the patch was introduced.
I have added -b options to the patch macros.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 04:22 EST --- (In reply to comment #24) Personally I would rather keep the upstream name un-fonts-core. We do that with other fonts packages too. My preference would be un-core-fonts/un-extra-fonts to minimize confusion with subpackages. Multiple slightly different conventions are user-unfriendly. But I'll let you have the last call on this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #310415|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 04:19 EST --- Created an attachment (id=311133) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=311133action=view) Purge the error and warning messages given by rpmlint 1. Modify the Licence info 2. Remove the lines may cause requiring self problem 3. Remove the hard-coded problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 04:24 EST --- Why not, care to take the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 04:30 EST --- (In reply to comment #18) I am not sure it is a good idea to rename the package from the upstream name. We have the case here of an upstream naming that's very close to our own conventions, so it's not so clear cut. But in other cases we don't hesitate to rename, so I don't see why not there. IMHO (and Debian has gone this way too lately) we'll need someday to review all our font package names to be more strict and consistent. Consistency pays big time with users and upstream namings are sadly not consistent at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447751] Review Request: diary - A application to allow you to keep a diary of your life
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diary - A application to allow you to keep a diary of your life https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447751 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 04:33 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) I can't really change the name to include GNOME, ... I wasn't talking about you but about upstream. ...since it's not part of the GNOME desktop (even though it uses the same technologies). To me GConf2 _is_ Gnome technology. There are a lot of gnome-* applications that are not part of the official GNOME desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454229] Review Request: gnome-keyring-sharp - Mono implementation of GNOME Keyring
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-keyring-sharp - Mono implementation of GNOME Keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454229 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454250] New: Review Request: tangoGPS - tangoGPS is a lightweight and fast mapping application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454250 Summary: Review Request: tangoGPS - tangoGPS is a lightweight and fast mapping application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/tangogps.spec SRPM URL: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/tangogps-0.9.2-1.fc9.src.rpm tangoGPS is a lightweight and fast mapping application. It runs on handheld devices like the Openmoko Neo1973 as well as on the eeePC and the Linux desktop. By default is uses map data from the OpenStreetMap.org project; additionally a variety of other repositories can easily be added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 05:32 EST --- Thanks, updated. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ebnetd/ebnetd.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ebnetd/ebnetd-1.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453119] Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453119 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 05:39 EST --- Thanks a lot Jason ! So what's the next step now ? require fedora-cvs flag ? Daniel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453119] Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453119 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 05:44 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libvirt-java Short Description: Java bindings for the libvirt virtualization API Owners: veillard Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451280] Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451280 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 08:21 EST --- Thank you for the Review! I will look at this minor points. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451280] Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451280 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451280] Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451280 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 08:22 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xqf Short Description: a server browser for many popular games Owners: cheekyboinc Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 10:12 EST --- Additional Remark: I choosed 0.5.1 stable instead of svn due to fact svn is highly unstable, it even doesnt compile. Olso, 0.5.1 has some issue with shape.input driver on 64bit, it abuses of integers, however spending several hours and formatting to int32_t type does still not solve the issue, i am still investigating the issue, and commit upstream if i catch it. It's safer for now to use gdal as input source insted of direct shape.input driver. //cristian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 10:44 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) Last remark : this font set is very rich, with ~ 1 MiB for the resulting rpm, it would be nice to split it in 2 ~ 500 KiB subpackages (discuss with upstream what would be a user-friendly split) See from upstream: http://www.khmeros.info/drupal/?q=en/node/2740#comment-6623 The problem here is that when I choose some way of splitting package to two sub-packages and upstream will choose it's own separation (and different from ours) then we might face problems when trying to publish new upstreamised sub-packages. I'd prefer issuing this package as-is and split it in future based on upstream decision. What you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 10:47 EST --- * (updated) http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/khmeros-fonts/khmeros-fonts.spec * (new) http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/khmeros-fonts/khmeros-fonts-5.0-2.fc9.src.rpm [EMAIL PROTECTED] SOURCES]# rpmlint ../SPECS/khmeros-fonts.spec /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/khmeros-fonts-5.0-2.fc9.src.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/khmeros-fonts-5.0-2.fc9.noarch.rpm khmeros-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. * Expected, upstream does not provide any. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443469] Review Request: pytrainer - A tool to log all your sport excursions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pytrainer - A tool to log all your sport excursions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443469 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 11:10 EST --- Upstream has said they'll include the license file soon; I'll get the stuff imported and built and wait to push it to updates until that gets in there officially. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427411] Review Request: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427411 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 11:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) Ready for approval, contigent on three things being fixed (listed below): - remove tabs - check with legal on licensing (looks more liberal than LGPL so I'm personally OK with it) - include debian/copyright LLGPL is on the approved license list now. I'll make the two other changes and add this. Thanks! AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427411] Review Request: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427411 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 11:50 EST --- Here are the updated files: Spec URL: http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/common-lisp-controller.spec SRPM URL: http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/common-lisp-controller-6.15-2.fc9.src.rpm Note that I also upgraded from 6.12 to 6.15. Approved? Thanks, AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454302] New: Review Request: npush - A logic game similar to Sokoban
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454302 Summary: Review Request: npush - A logic game similar to Sokoban Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/npush.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/npush-0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: nPush is a logic game similar to Sokoban and Boulder Dash. You need to collect all the gold on the level and reach the exit. To make it hard there are some rocks that stand in your way, and you also have some dynamite to blast them away. Main difference from Sokoban, KSokoban and similar games is that you can have multiple player-controlled characters you can move on the screen. nPush is a terminal based application and uses nCurses library for user interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 394871] Review Request: automaton - a Java finite state automata/regular expression library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: automaton - a Java finite state automata/regular expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394871 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 12:16 EST --- Thanks everybody. Automaton is now in rawhide and will hit F-9 soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 12:24 EST ---
make %{?_smp_mflags}
* Omit '%{?_smp_mflags}' in python package, this won't speed up anything. Usable
only when compiling C/C++(/Fortran) code.
%configure --disable-mime-update --disable-update-desktop --prefix=/usr
--sysconfdir=/etc --libdir=/usr/share
* This hardwired paths are not proper. Use ones from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros in case you really need them.
Don't forget that rpmbuild probably populates the configure variables in a good
manner.
Familiarize yourself more with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python
and python_sitelib.
* Please post results of rpmlint.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 12:32 EST --- Taking this bug for review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 13:02 EST ---
As a general comment, I think Alan has worked hard on this package,
addressing every one of the (many) comments that we have made
along the way.
Package review follows below.
+ rpmlint output
coq.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/coqtop.byte
coq.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/parser.opt
coq.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/coqtop.opt
coq.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/coq-tex
coq.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/parser
coq.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gallina
coq.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/coqdoc
coq.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/coqwc
coq.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/coq-interface.opt
coq.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/coqdep
coq.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/coq_makefile
coq.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/coq-interface
coq-coqide.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/coq/ide/.coqide-gtk2rc
coq-coqide.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/coqide.opt
coq-coqide.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/coqide.byte
The 'executable-stack' warnings are an instance of bug 450551.
The 'unstripped-binary-or-object' warnings are because these bytecode
files shouldn't be stripped.
The 'hidden-file-or-dir' looks like it can be ignored in this case.
+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
Because Alan isn't shipping any library, we just checked against
the rather more relaxed OCaml binary guidelines, and these are OK.
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
License appears to be LGPLv2 (not '+').
+ license matches the actual package license
+ %doc includes license file
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
84311faf7865b2eab964990cdb365dca 3003593
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
i386
- ExcludeArch bugs filed
Alan, please file ExcludeArch bugs for the platforms where it
doesn't compile (ie. ppc)
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ does not use Prefix: /usr
+ package owns all directories it creates
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ %defattr line
- %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Alan, you don't need 'make clean' in %clean.
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
+ large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a header files should be in -devel
n/a static libraries should be in -static
n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
n/a packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc.
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8
Optional:
n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
+ reviewer should build the package in mock
- the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
- review should test the package functions as described
+ scriptlets should be sane
n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel
n/a shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or
/usr/sbin
Please fix the two problems noted above, before I can approve the package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452388] Review Request: python-migrate - Schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-migrate - Schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452388 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 13:12 EST --- I queried upstream about the name. They aren't too worried about potential conflicts (their reasoning is Debian has imported it with /usr/bin/migrate). I asked and they did say that sqlalchemy-migrate seemed like a good name if we wanted to do that locally. So I'm in favour of renaming migrate = sqlalchemy-migrate. I looked at py.test as well but it wasn't trivial to package. I could probably get it working with some more work but I'm still swamped with post-vacation work so I concur with holding off on that until py.test is included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452749] Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI
music files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452749
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 13:40 EST ---
Full review (relevant issues only)
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-development-i386/result
ocp.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 61, tab: line 61)
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Looks fine, that warning can be ignored.
Packaging Guidelines:
I'd rather you installed the icons as
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/{16x16,48x48}/apps/ocp.xpm
and used
Icon=ocp
in the desktop file instead of the full path. Or is the path /usr/share/pixmaps
hardcoded somewhere? This will of course require adding the proper gtk icon
cache update calls to %post(un).
Licencing is a bit problematic. Most files have just copyright assignment and no
licence header at all. Some have no licencing information whatsoever. Just
putting a COPYING file with GPL text in it in the tarball doesn't cut it. Please
work with upstream to fix that.
Source matches upstream:
b936f236b41e7f1184e401f5e099debe ocp-0.1.15.tar.bz2
Builds fine on i386/devel and x86_64/F-8.
Everything else seems fine.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447751] Review Request: diary - A application to allow you to keep a diary of your life
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diary - A application to allow you to keep a diary of your life https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447751 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 13:52 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) (In reply to comment #9) I can't really change the name to include GNOME, ... I wasn't talking about you but about upstream. I *am* upstream! ...since it's not part of the GNOME desktop (even though it uses the same technologies). To me GConf2 _is_ Gnome technology. There are a lot of gnome-* applications that are not part of the official GNOME desktop. Regardless, I think it would be a bit foolish to choose a name which could be confused with the gnome-diary project; even though it never released anything, I don't want to have the possibility of any confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 14:01 EST --- Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/xmp.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/xmp-2.5.1-2.fc8.src.rpm (In reply to comment #2) On naming, it looks like most audacious plugin packages are named audacious-plugins-*. The only exception is audacious-plugin-fc. The plugins packages appear to be all built from a single audacious-plugins src.rpm, so it makes sense to use plugins for that. The fc plugin is a single plugin built from its own audacious-plugin-fc.src.rpm package. [...] Thoughts? audacious-plugin-xmp is consistent with the fc plugin, so I'm okay with that naming. I think *-plugin-* is a better name, too. (In reply to comment #3) Looks good with the exception of the OCL-licensed gdm.txt which needs to be addressed. Fixed in 2.5.1-2 by repackaging the tarball without the problematic file. I'll ask upstream about removing that file later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446134] Review Request: jsr-305 - reference implementation of JSR-305
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jsr-305 - reference implementation of JSR-305 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446134 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 14:29 EST --- I'd like to proceed with this package once the maven directory issue is finalized. That way it can be in place when the next findbugs release occurs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454329] Review Request: PolicyKit-olpc - OLPC-specific PolicyKit overrides
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PolicyKit-olpc - OLPC-specific PolicyKit overrides https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454329 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 14:32 EST --- Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/PolicyKit-olpc/PolicyKit-olpc.spec (Sorry!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454329] New: Review Request: PolicyKit-olpc - OLPC-specific PolicyKit overrides
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454329 Summary: Review Request: PolicyKit-olpc - OLPC-specific PolicyKit overrides Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/PolicyKit-olpc/ SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/PolicyKit-olpc/PolicyKit-olpc-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Software for the XO laptop requires some modification to the default policies installed by certain applications. This package provides OLPC-specific policy overrides. See http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7350 This is my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor. Maybe Dennis Gilmore ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454330] New: Review Request: gresolver - Graphical DNS query tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454330 Summary: Review Request: gresolver - Graphical DNS query tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] SPEC URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gresolver/gresolver.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gresolver/gresolver-0.0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: GResolver is a graphical DNS query tool. It allows system administrators to quickly and easily make the most common DNS queries without constructing lengthy 'dig' commands. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 14:46 EST --- Lawyer says that, to the extent that ExtJS is licensed under GPLv3, there is a license incompatibility here because of GPLv3/MPL incompatibility, and thus the risk of violation of ExtJS's copyright. If LGPLv3 is the license, on the other hand, there is no compatibility problem. At one point, ExtJS was released under LGPLv3, but they've since changed to release under GPLv3. Unfortunately, the testopia code doesn't give any indication of when they pulled in their local copy of ExtJS, and all of the code refers back to the website for licensing, which says GPLv3, so we can only safely assume GPLv3. The options here are: 1. Find a checkout of ExtJS that we know was released under the LGPLv3 and replace what is in testopia with that. 2. Prove that the ExtJS bits in testopia were released under the LGPLv3 license. 3. Move testopia to use OpenExt (http://sourceforge.net/projects/openext/) 4. Don't put testopia in Fedora. This package is legal blocked until one of those outcomes is reached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 14:49 EST ---
Some minor tweaks to the specfile after some remarks in the yacpi review
request:
* Changed BuildRoot
* replace some occurences of libacpi with %{name}
New SRPM: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/libacpi-0.2-10.fc9.src.rpm
SPEC: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/libacpi.spec
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445152] Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445152 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 14:47 EST --- Hello Rakesh, thanks for your remarks. I have updated the specfile: SPEC: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/yacpi.spec New SRPM: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/yacpi-3.0.1-9.fc9.src.rpm 0. no package libacpi-devel: libacpi is a separate review request - #445153 - 445153 blocks this bug so it looks correct in my eyes? 1. fixed 2. changed, I agree - two lines less is better 3. fixed 4. changed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448215] Review Request: mozvoikko - Finnish Voikko spell-checker extension for Mozilla programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozvoikko - Finnish Voikko spell-checker extension for Mozilla programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448215 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 14:53 EST --- I finally got around to updating to F-9 and thus reviewing this. If I understand correctly, using xulrunner-unstable makes this prone to breakage on updates - is there some versioned dependency towards some package that could be used so that it would be easier to notice such cases? The dependency on libvoikko works, but as the sources hardcode libvoikko.so.1 and libmalaga.so.7, it could be good to have the dependency to those sonames. I've done that in the pcsc-perl package, check it out for an example if you agree implementing that would be feasible. Would Applications/Internet be a better Group: value? Aren't all Mozilla apps this package works with Internet related ones? When other Mozilla apps that can use this are shipped in Fedora, the dependency on firefox should probably be dropped, right? None of the above are blockers but just comments and food for thought, approved as is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451280] Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451280 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 14:57 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453119] Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453119 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 15:00 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 15:10 EST --- The preceding two issues have been addressed: - A new version of the spec file, which works with dist-f10, can be found through http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=700547 which includes the change to remove make clean from the %clean section as desired. I assume also that the version desired for commit to the repositories is the one that works with dist-f10, and thus must have ppc64 as an excluded architecture. - I am under the impression that the bug is supposed to be filed after the package is committed, as otherwise there's no way (that I can see) to indicate the package that has a bug - there's no coq package bugzilla page. However, I will file the bug with blocker FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 when an appropriate page exists and this will have the following description: Exception raised during Koji ppc64 build of coq package. Problem is not fixed by restricting to byte-code compilation instead of native-code compilation. (Failed) Build logs with dist-f10 available at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=700733 Build succeeds (with native-code compilation) for dist-f9, available at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=699677 so error must be Fedora 10 specific. (Is it ok to reference the koji builds like that? Will they disappear after a while - should duplicate/put the results somewhere else?) Are those acceptable resolutions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 15:15 EST --- Looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 15:38 EST --- I'll try to look at your new spec tomorrow or thr day after. I agree that if upstream promised changes for the next version, it's no use anticipating them and packaging as-is (with commitment to adapt once upstream does its new release) is the way to go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 15:37 EST ---
Thanks for taking a look. I've removed the smp flags - they were generated by
Emacs.
If I don't alter the paths to configure, the *.py* files go to an arch-specific
directory e.g. /usr/lib64 on my laptop. Would this be more acceptable?:
%configure --disable-mime-update --disable-update-desktop --libdir=%{_datadir}
The original tarball didn't place anything in the system Python directories and
I thought it better not to alter it too much. However, happy to change that if
it's what the Fedora policy specifies.
rpmlint output:
rpmlint germanium.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint germanium-0.2.0-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 16:14 EST --- There is a discussion of licensing issues upstream at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430138 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 169249] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating Postscript fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating Postscript fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=169249 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC|fedora-package- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-extras- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 16:17 EST --- Hi, What's the status of this package, it's necessary if you want to use OTF with pdfTeX. Btw the current version is 2.69. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438433] Review Request: python-toscawidgets - Web widget toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-toscawidgets - Web widget toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438433 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 20:11 EST --- Toshio, has this been built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451407] Review Request: python-webtest - Helper to test WSGI applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-webtest - Helper to test WSGI applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451407 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 20:20 EST --- Remove it from the queue until python-Web0b is submitted; just clear the whiteboard when it's ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 20:21 EST --- Remove it from the queue until python-Web0b is submitted; just clear the whiteboard when it's ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454302] Review Request: npush - A logic game similar to Sokoban
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: npush - A logic game similar to Sokoban
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454302
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 20:38 EST ---
MD5Sum:
6670aac74dd7db005462c11c5688db52 npush-0.6.tgz
Good:
* Source URL is canonical
* Upstream source tarball verified
* Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines
* Valid license tag
* Group Tag is from the official list
* Buildroot has all required elements
* All paths begin with macros
* All necessary BuildRequires listed.
* Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined
* Files have appropriate permissions and owners
* rpmlint produces no errors or warnings.
+1 APPROVE
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453465] Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453465 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 20:50 EST --- -the macros in the first 5 lines are gone. -the url link now points to http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/lingobot.git -the %source you suggested won't work properly because of the '?format=raw' tagged onto the end. The spec file searches for a file called 'transbot-0.1-1.src.rpm?format=raw'. Therefore, I've simply hosted the project on another site that does have a direct link to the source tarball. It should work fine. -The changelog now has an entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453264] Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453264 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453264] Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453264 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 21:17 EST --- MD5Sum: 8e06fb1d7fdc06b02f5e79093908157e jscoverage-0.3.2rc1.tar.bz2 Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Valid license tag * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Package installs and uninstalls clean Bad (non-blockers): * As tibbs noted in comment #4, there is a test suite in the tarball that might might be worth running. * The devel subpackage bits can probably be dropped, since your not packaging anything for it. * rpmlint produces the following errors that should be fixed before importing into CVS: jscoverage.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/jscoverage-0.3.2/doc/example-jsunit/jsunit/licenses/gpl-2.txt jscoverage.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/jscoverage-0.3.2/doc/example-jsunit/jsunit/app/xbDebug.js jscoverage.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/jscoverage-0.3.2/doc/example-jsunit/jsunit/app/css/readme etc. +1 APPROVE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438433] Review Request: python-toscawidgets - Web widget toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-toscawidgets - Web widget toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438433 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 22:06 EST --- Oops. Yes it has. The build is in testing. closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217484] Review Request: rlwrap - Wrapper for GNU readline
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rlwrap - Wrapper for GNU readline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217484 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192574] Review Request: perl-Data-Structure-Util
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Structure-Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192574 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189157] Review Request: aspell-he
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-he https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189157 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 206037] Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables Alias: pear-Console-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206037 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204164] Review Request: perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse - Library for enabling X-WSSE authentication in LWP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse - Library for enabling X-WSSE authentication in LWP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204164 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189219] Review Request: poker-eval - Poker hand evaluator library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-eval - Poker hand evaluator library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189219 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198878] Review Request: python-mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198878 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204605] Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204605 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192124] Review Request: exiv2: Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library and tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: exiv2: Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192124 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220926] Review Request: ingo - The Horde email filter manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ingo - The Horde email filter manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220926 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190315] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME - Easy MIME message parsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME - Easy MIME message parsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190315 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198881 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192918] Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192918 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 175551] Review Request: asa - Convert Fortran carriage control characters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asa - Convert Fortran carriage control characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175551 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197298] Review Request: perl-Locale-SubCountry
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-SubCountry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197298 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188208] Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188208 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 165648] Review Request: perl-Array-Compare - Perl extension for comparing arrays
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Array-Compare - Perl extension for comparing arrays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165648 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 180255] Review Request: nazghul - Old school RPG engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nazghul - Old school RPG engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=180255 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200666] Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200666 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 174181] Review Request: python-simpy Python simulation framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-simpy Python simulation framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=174181 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC|fedora-package- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-extras- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191592] Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191592 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 214113] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192060] Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192060 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178604] Review Request: ruby-mysql
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-mysql https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178604 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC|fedora-package- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-extras- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 183089] Review Request: ularn - a text-based roguelike game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ularn - a text-based roguelike game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183089 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 186132] Review Request: openoffice.org-dict-cs_CZ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-dict-cs_CZ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186132 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202670] Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202670 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176526] Review Request: python-TestGears: Unit testing for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-TestGears: Unit testing for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176526 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC|fedora-package- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-extras- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205269] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines Alias: perl-Sub-Exporter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205269 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 208436] Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208436 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205143] Review Request: perl-UNIVERSAL-require - Require() modules from a variable
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-UNIVERSAL-require - Require() modules from a variable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205143 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202837] Review Request: fRaBs - Free data files for abuse the game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fRaBs - Free data files for abuse the game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202837 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
