[Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-core-fonts - Core Arabic fonts from Arabeyes.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED], ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||at.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459073] Review Request: iok - Indic onscreen virtual keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459073 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 03:00:09 EDT --- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131
--- Comment #9 from Marcela Maslanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 03:25:19
EDT ---
Shouldn't you use also this part?
desktop-file-install --vendor=fedora\
--add-category=Network\
--delete-original\
--dir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/applications\
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/applications/kde/%{name}.desktop
You can follow this guide lines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop
I'm not sure if I have correct the category.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459073] Review Request: iok - Indic onscreen virtual keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459073 --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 03:30:15 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: iok New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459073] Review Request: iok - Indic onscreen virtual keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459073 --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 03:44:05 EDT --- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459073] Review Request: iok - Indic onscreen virtual keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459073 --- Comment #15 from Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 03:46:44 EDT --- Jens, Thanks for review and cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457277] Review Request: pentaho-reporting-flow-engine - Reporting Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457277 --- Comment #3 from Caolan McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 03:54:30 EDT --- silly me, fixed as: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/jfreereport/pentaho-reporting-flow-engine.spec http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/jfreereport/pentaho-reporting-flow-engine-0.9.3-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461237] New: Review Request: libmusicbrainz3 - Library for accessing MusicBrainz servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libmusicbrainz3 - Library for accessing MusicBrainz servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461237 Summary: Review Request: libmusicbrainz3 - Library for accessing MusicBrainz servers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/libmusicbrainz3/libmusicbrainz3.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/libmusicbrainz3/libmusicbrainz3-3.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The MusicBrainz client library allows applications to make metadata lookup to a MusicBrainz server, generate signatures from WAV data and create CD Index Disk ids from audio CD roms. This library uses the new XML service from Musicbrainz, whereas libmusicbrainz itself uses the deprecated RDF service. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461237] Review Request: libmusicbrainz3 - Library for accessing MusicBrainz servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461237 --- Comment #1 from Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 05:03:59 EDT --- *Sigh*. It's already in the repo... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461237] Review Request: libmusicbrainz3 - Library for accessing MusicBrainz servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461237 Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 05:22:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=315852) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=315852) ghc-X11.spec Here is a slightly revised spec file without the macros embedded using the latest macros I attached to bug 460304 - tested and builds on rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461106] Review Request: libnotifymm - C++ interface for libnotify
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461106 --- Comment #2 from Denis Leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 05:42:02 EDT --- [EMAIL PROTECTED], rawhide package includes an API-breaking patch. Here's the fix, but this will only build on rawhide. For F-9, comment out the first patch from the spec file. Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/libnotifymm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/libnotifymm-0.6.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461250] New: Review-Request: justmoon - Just Moon is lunar observing software for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review-Request: justmoon - Just Moon is lunar observing software for Linux Alias: justmoon-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461250 Summary: Review-Request: justmoon - Just Moon is lunar observing software for Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPMS: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/justmoon-0.3.3-1.el5.src.rpm SPECS: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/justmoon.spec Description: This package contains a lunar observing software with GTK+-based user interface that fits the GNOME Desktop environment, and QT-based user interface that fits the KDE Desktop environment. They are is supplemented with package that contains data files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457535] Review Request: myanmar3-unicode-fonts - Myanmar3 unicode font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457535 --- Comment #11 from Minto Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 07:46:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: myanmar3-unicode-fonts Short Description: Myanmar3 unicode font Owners: mintojoseph Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461260] New: Review Request: hunspell-is - Icelandic hunspell dictionary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-is - Icelandic hunspell dictionary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461260 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-is - Icelandic hunspell dictionary Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-is.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-is-0.20060928-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Icelandic dictionaries for hunspell, as used by OpenOffice.org, firefox, etc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456298] Review Request: netbeans-resolver - Resolver subproject of xml-commons patched for NetBeans
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456298 Victor G. Vasilyev [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |un.com) | --- Comment #8 from Victor G. Vasilyev [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 08:05:28 EDT --- The fifth release is prepared for review. Spec URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2050/netbeans-resolver.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2167/netbeans-resolver-6.1-5.fc10.src.rpm Changes (In reply to comment #7): 2 issues to be resolved. 1.13 Summary and description Change the description so it does not extend pass 80 chars/line - The description is formatted MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. No. The license field says ASL 2.0, where as the actual license is ASL 1.1. - The license version is fixed The rpmlint shows no errors and no warnings against both SRPM and RPM. Successful koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=808496 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #35 from Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 08:11:14 EDT --- the name needs to be fixed, in some parts of the code have Slony-I name Slony-I slony1 postgresql-slony1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453701] Review Request: minisat2 - A minimalistic, open-source SAT solver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453701 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 08:18:57 EDT --- minisat2-2.0-7.20070721.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458405] Review Request: pisg - Perl IRC Statistics Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458405 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 08:18:50 EDT --- pisg-0.72-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457026] Review Request: rubygem-arrayfields - Arrayfields RubyGem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457026 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 08:19:10 EDT --- rubygem-arrayfields-4.5.0-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457263] Review Request: liblayout - positioning library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457263 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 08:20:38 EDT --- Great, APPROVED. Sorry I didn't realize the dependency chain prevented Mattias from doing a complete review initially. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460101] Review Request: perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes - Concise attribute rewriting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460101 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 08:21:51 EDT --- perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes-0.03-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 08:20:48 EDT --- ferm-2.0.2-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455032] Review Request: iwl5000-firmware - Firmwa re for Intel® PRO /Wireless 5000 A/G/N network adaptors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455032 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 08:22:07 EDT --- iwl5000-firmware-5.4.A.11-2 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457277] Review Request: pentaho-reporting-flow-engine - Reporting Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457277 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460101] Review Request: perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes - Concise attribute rewriting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460101 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455032] Review Request: iwl5000-firmware - Firmwa re for Intel® PRO /Wireless 5000 A/G/N network adaptors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455032 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454469] Review Request: php-pear-Var-Dump - rovides methods for dumping structured information about a variable
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454469 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 08:21:16 EDT --- php-pear-Var-Dump-1.0.3-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pear-Var-Dump'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-7275 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461250] Review-Request: justmoon - Just Moon is lunar observing software for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461250 Marek Mahut [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 --- Comment #14 from Darryl L. Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 08:29:13 EDT --- Not sure what's up with the weird timestamp. I built the gem locally and then unpacked it and am getting none of what you're seeing. Is it possible the RPM process is repackaging the gem, like it does with JARs? I took your advice, ran koji local and all built properly. Spec: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-cobbler.spec SRPM: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-cobbler-0.0.2-4.fc9.src.rpm GEM: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/cobbler-0.0.2.gem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461250] Review-Request: justmoon - Just Moon is lunar observing software for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461250 Marek Mahut [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #1 from Marek Mahut [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 08:30:02 EDT --- [X] RPMlink mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs - cosmetic issue rpm-buildroot-usage - please move desktop-file-install to %install [OK] source files match upstream url 3007c84e3b5232c0dba9f5c0b5c3a669 justmoon-0.3.3.tar.gz [OK] package meets naming and packaging guideline [OK] specfile is sane [OK] spec file is legible [OK] dist tag is present [OK] build root is correct [OK] license is Fedora compatible [OK] %clean is present [X] builds in rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=808442 [...] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 08:20:19 EDT --- E-0.999.006-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot - An Avi parser and content descriptor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 --- Comment #89 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 08:17:52 EDT --- themonospot-0.7.1.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453701] Review Request: minisat2 - A minimalistic, open-source SAT solver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453701 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460615] Review Request: bti - Bash Twitter Idiocy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460615 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 08:18:45 EDT --- bti-005-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bti'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-7252 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456298] Review Request: netbeans-resolver - Resolver subproject of xml-commons patched for NetBeans
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456298 --- Comment #9 from Lillian Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 08:53:48 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160
--- Comment #5 from David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 08:59:11 EDT ---
Did you post updated spec and srpm somewhere ? Please provide those links each
time your spec is upgraded {make it easy for your reviewers to confirm
suggested changes have occurred}.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461250] Review-Request: justmoon - Just Moon is lunar observing software for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461250 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 08:59:15 EDT --- Your internets is broken -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461250] Review-Request: justmoon - Just Moon is lunar observing software for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461250 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 09:00:56 EDT --- SRPMS: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/justmoon-0.3.3-2.el5.src.rpm SPECS: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/justmoon.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459871] Review Request: samefile - An utility to find identical files on the file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 09:08:16 EDT --- samefile-2.12-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/samefile-2.12-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459871] Review Request: samefile - An utility to find identical files on the file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 09:08:20 EDT --- samefile-2.12-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/samefile-2.12-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461250] Review-Request: justmoon - Just Moon is lunar observing software for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461250 --- Comment #4 from Marek Mahut [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 09:12:46 EDT --- Please also correct the desktop file in %files, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461250] Review-Request: justmoon - Just Moon is lunar observing software for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461250 --- Comment #5 from Marek Mahut [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 09:26:21 EDT --- Great, looks correct! - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=808659 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461250] Review-Request: justmoon - Just Moon is lunar observing software for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461250 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 09:29:36 EDT --- Just in case anyone is interested what marek was reviewing (locally at FUDCon, since bugzilla was returning 500 errors). SRPMS: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/justmoon-0.3.3-3.el5.src.rpm SPECS: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/justmoon.spec New Package CVS Request === Package Name: justmoon Short Description: Lunar observing software Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 Karol Trzcionka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #5 from Karol Trzcionka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 09:45:47 EDT --- Please add script to generate tarball according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code but at now it is not a blocker. others: + rpmlint returns only: audacious-plugin-xmp.x86_64: W: no-documentation xmms-xmp.x86_64: W: no-documentation it might be ignored + naming is OK + specfile named correct + package meets Guidelines + License is correct (files which cannot be shipped by Fedora are removed) + License tag is ok + COPYING file correctly provided + I think it is American English + specfile is clear for me + tarball is changed, so I don't compare md5sum + building checked before on koji + N/A + compiled on koji fine, so I think BRs are correct + N/A + N/A + OK, using macros instead of hardcoded paths + correct own all files + there are no duplicates in %files + %defattr used + correct %clean section + macros are used correctly + nonfree file is removed + N/A + %doc doesn't affect the runtime of app + N/A + N/A + N/A + N/A + N/A + there are not any .la files + N/A + correct owns all files + correct %install section + RPMs have valid UTF-8 files SHOULD Items: + N/A (license is included) + N/A (no translations) + chacked on koji by Charles + like above ? I cannot check working + N/A ? probably it is not needed to requires it with full version + N/A (no .pc files) + dependencies are correct I can approve but change comment about removing a file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456298] Review Request: netbeans-resolver - Resolver subproject of xml-commons patched for NetBeans
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456298 --- Comment #10 from Victor G. Vasilyev [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 09:32:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: netbeans-resolver Short Description: Resolver subproject of xml-commons patched for NetBeans Owners: victorv Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455989] Review Request: xfce-mcs-plugins-extra - Extra plugins for the Xfce mcs manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455989 --- Comment #8 from Rahul Sundaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 09:37:02 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461250] Review-Request: justmoon - Just Moon is lunar observing software for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461250 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 09:36:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458449] Review Request: perl-Log-TraceMessages - Perl extension for trace messages used in debugging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458449
--- Comment #3 from David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 09:49:07 EDT ---
Hi,
(In reply to comment #2)
Initial cc: perl-sig is at cvs creation step. (once package is approved).
I didn't get what you meant by Data::Dumper
TraceMessages.pm has:
=cut
sub d($) {
return '' if not $On;
require Data::Dumper;
my $s = $_[0];
I'm not sure where/if that is automatically available.
Extracted perl dependencies seems clean to me.
Provides: perl(Log::TraceMessages) = 1.4
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) =
3.0.3-1
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Exporter) perl(FileHandle)
perl(strict) perl(vars)
Vérification des fichiers non empaquetés: /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
/var/tmp/perl-Log-TraceMessages-1.4-1.fc8.kwizart-root-builder
If you consider they are fine, that's OK, since I have no experience in this
area !
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457263] Review Request: liblayout - positioning library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457263 --- Comment #9 from Caolan McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 10:19:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: liblayout Short Description: Java Positioning Library Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457277] Review Request: pentaho-reporting-flow-engine - Reporting Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457277
--- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 10:26:13 EDT
---
OK, builds and installs fine now. rpmlint says:
pentaho-reporting-flow-engine.src:87: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package
%attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}
which comes from rpmlint not parsing the conditional arch-ness of this package.
pentaho-reporting-flow-engine-javadoc.x86_64: W: non-standard-group
Development/Documentation
which is OK because we don't care what goes in group. And:
pentaho-reporting-flow-engine-debuginfo.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long
This package provides debug information for package
pentaho-reporting-flow-engine.
which could use a line wrap.
I'll go ahead and apprrove this and you can tweak that description when you
check in.
* source files match upstream:
9ddd78ea9239cefbad21e81621bdc4f2c1f1a9a42a247d38100d49882d90d475
pentaho-reporting-flow-engine-0.9.3.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK (javadoc description needs a line wrap).
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
X rpmlint has one valid, but minor complaint.
* final provides and requires are sane:
pentaho-reporting-flow-engine-0.9.3-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm
pentaho-reporting-flow-engine.jar.so()(64bit)
pentaho-reporting-flow-engine = 0.9.3-2.fc10
pentaho-reporting-flow-engine(x86-64) = 0.9.3-2.fc10
=
/bin/sh
flute
java
java-gcj-compat = 1.0.31
jcommon
jcommon-serializer
jpackage-utils
libfonts = 0.3.4
libformula = 0.1.18
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit)
liblayout = 0.2.9
librepository = 0.1.6
libz.so.1()(64bit)
pentaho-libxml
sac
pentaho-reporting-flow-engine-javadoc-0.9.3-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm
pentaho-reporting-flow-engine-javadoc = 0.9.3-2.fc10
pentaho-reporting-flow-engine-javadoc(x86-64) = 0.9.3-2.fc10
=
jpackage-utils
pentaho-reporting-flow-engine = 0.9.3-2.fc10
* %check is not present; no test suite.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* scriptlets are OK (rebuild-gcj-db).
* no pre-built jars
* single jar, named after the package
* jarfiles are under _javadir.
* javadocs are under _javadocdir.
* ant called properly.
* gcj called properly.
APPROVED, just line-wrap the javadoc description at your leisure.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461277] New: Package Review Request: radial
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review Request: radial https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461277 Summary: Package Review Request: radial Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=315908) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=315908) Source RPM of radial package. Description of problem: Need review of new package radial for astronomy spin. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): radial-1.0-1 Additional info: Already reviewed at HackFest at FudCon Brno. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459148] Review Request: txt2rss - Convert from txt to rss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459148 --- Comment #7 from Rahul Sundaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 10:44:37 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459148] Review Request: txt2rss - Convert from txt to rss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459148 --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 10:48:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: txt2rss Short Description: Convert from txt to rss Owners: rakesh Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: rakesh Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461277] Package Review Request: radial
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461277 Marek Mahut [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Alias||radial-review --- Comment #1 from Marek Mahut [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 10:50:59 EDT --- This package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457277] Review Request: pentaho-reporting-flow-engine - Reporting Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457277 --- Comment #5 from Caolan McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 10:51:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pentaho-reporting-flow-engine Short Description: A flow reporting engine Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: Thanks tibbs, this is the last package in a chain which has taken nearly 6 months from the first review to the last, and I appreciate being able to see the back of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #10 from Pavel Alexeev [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 11:03:17 EDT --- Marcela Maslanova, thank you. Before I include desktop file as regular file. I think this is more correct way. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/sim/sim-0.9.5-3.SVN20080904rev2258.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461277] Package Review Request: radial
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461277 Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 11:02:40 EDT --- Changed NEW to ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457277] Review Request: pentaho-reporting-flow-engine - Reporting Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457277 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 11:08:33 EDT --- Sorry it took so long. Once the java guidelines were done, I had intended to run through all of them but I stopped at the point where others had assigned themselves to the tickets. I hope that whatever you needed these packages for doesn't miss the freeze. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #64 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 11:12:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #63) Scala isn't Java, and even thought scaladoc has some similarities with javadoc they aren't the same, so naming the subpackage -javadoc wouldn't be appropriate. Okay, then I wait for the rest issues to be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459880] Review Request: anyremote2html - WEB interface for anyRemote
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459880 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 11:23:15 EDT --- Well, (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #6) - which I could download from the URL does not coincide with the one in your srpm. Updated to coincide with each other. Please don't do this way. As the upstream you should not modify the tarball once formally released without changing the version, unless people who want to download and compile your source by themselves will get confused. Please restore 0.5.2 tarball you released first and if you want to modify the tarball itself please change the version of the tarball. Note: Some upstream maintainers change the tarballs in the srpms during review requests with_out_ releasing the tarballs formally and when the reviews are passed they release the final tarballs as formal ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 --- Comment #17 from Rick L Vinyard Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 11:27:53 EDT --- I've been working with upstream to get the autotools files into the project. There should be a new release coming up that incorporates them. As far as the DXT code goes I don't think it will be a problem. The DXT code is in the squish library, not the mini library. When building, mini provides an option to build against the squish library, but we're disabling that option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 Rick L Vinyard Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |edu)| --- Comment #15 from Rick L Vinyard Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 11:30:39 EDT --- Still planning to work on it soon. I need to contact upstream and see if they'll incorporate the build tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455989] Review Request: xfce-mcs-plugins-extra - Extra plugins for the Xfce mcs manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455989 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 11:32:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xfce-mcs-plugins-extra Short Description: Extra plugins for the Xfce mcs manager Owners: cwickert, kevin Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #12 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 11:40:59 EDT --- Sorry, it should better be http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PreReleasePackages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #11 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 11:40:08 EDT --- The %release seems, at first glance to be incorrect, please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460912] Review Request: DeviceKit-power - Power Management Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460912 Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:06:39 EDT --- Taking this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460912] Review Request: DeviceKit-power - Power Management Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460912 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:10:15 EDT --- Builds fine in mock. rpmlint says: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/DeviceKit-power-*.rpm DeviceKit-power.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/95-devkit-power-csr.rules DeviceKit-power.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.DeviceKit.Power.conf DeviceKit-power.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/95-devkit-power-wup.rules DeviceKit-power.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/95-devkit-power-hid.rules 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. All ignorable warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #36 from Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:17:48 EDT --- It is more or less fixed in current code, I believe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458548] Review Request: uriparser - URI parsing library - RFC 3986
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458548
Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:16:15 EDT
---
For 0.7.1-4:
* Group
- Usually Group tag for the main package of this type
is System Environment/Libraries (and -devel subpackage
has Development/Libraries)
! %setup
- -n %{name}-%{version} is redundant as the default of
%setup directory is this.
* autotools call
419 + cd doc
..
443 config.status: creating Makefile
444 + make -j8
445 cd . /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/uriparser-0.7.1/missing --run
aclocal-1.10
446 /builddir/build/BUILD/uriparser-0.7.1/missing: line 54: aclocal-1.10:
command not found
447 WARNING: `aclocal-1.10' is missing on your system. You should only
need it if
448 you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. You might want
449 to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from
450 any GNU archive site.
451 cd . /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/uriparser-0.7.1/missing --run
autoconf
..
- Automated autotool calls after configure is not desired. Usually
timestamps on some files (aclocal.m4 and so on) are wrong.
You can avoid this by touching some files.
* Timestamp
- Please consider to use
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL=install -p
to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible.
This method usually works for recent autotool based Makefiles.
* Documents install
# doc folder make install does nothing
install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/html/
install -p -m 0644 doc/html/*
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/html/
- Well, this does not do anything (and can be removed completely) ...
Actually in -devel package the directory
%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/html/ does not exist.
This is because of %doc invocation. As build.log shows
what %doc actually does (when the list in %doc does not
begin with /) is:
663 Processing files: uriparser-0.7.1-4.fc10
664 Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.hz0MmE
665 + umask 022
666 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD
667 + cd uriparser-0.7.1
668 +
DOCDIR=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/uriparser-0.7.1-4.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/uriparser-0.7.1
669 + export DOCDIR
670 + rm -rf
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/uriparser-0.7.1-4.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/uriparser-0.7.1
671 + /bin/mkdir -p
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/uriparser-0.7.1-4.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/uriparser-0.7.1
672 + cp -pr THANKS AUTHORS COPYING
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/uriparser-0.7.1-4.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/uripars
er-0.7.1
673 + exit 0
See the line 670. %doc once removes all files under
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/.
* Documents
- Please consider to add the following file to %doc.
ChangeLog
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #13 from Pavel Alexeev [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:26:40 EDT --- I'm understand what Release should start from 0. and followed by spec releases, but not completely understand about svn/cvs information in release: It is meant what version should be: sim-0.9.5-0.3.20080904svn ? Or I can add revision number like this: sim-0.9.5-0.3.20080904svn2258rev ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #14 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:35:57 EDT --- both are correct. There is a limit in the number of character, if I remember well, however, to be verified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459148] Review Request: txt2rss - Convert from txt to rss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459148 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:38:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456298] Review Request: netbeans-resolver - Resolver subproject of xml-commons patched for NetBeans
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456298 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:40:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455989] Review Request: xfce-mcs-plugins-extra - Extra plugins for the Xfce mcs manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455989 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:37:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:42:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:48:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457535] Review Request: myanmar3-unicode-fonts - Myanmar3 unicode font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457535 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:46:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460244] Review Request: alt-ergo - Alt-Ergo automatic theorem prover
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460244 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:50:28 EDT --- You should be able to build/test this against rawhide however, right? I fired off a scratch build against rawhide and it failed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=808966 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458446] Review Request: perl-HTML-FromText - Convert plain text to HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458446 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:51:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461105] Review Request: labrea - A sticky honeypot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461105 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:52:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457263] Review Request: liblayout - positioning library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457263 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:53:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460732] Review Request: ocaml-reins - Library of OCaml persistent data structures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460732 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 13:00:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459138] Review Request: ctemplate - A simple but powerful template language for C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459138 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:57:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457277] Review Request: pentaho-reporting-flow-engine - Reporting Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457277 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:56:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461054] Review Request: qrq - Morse telegraphy trainer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461054 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 13:01:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447457] Review Request: gupnp-av - UPnP-AV is a collection of helpers for building AV upnp apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447457 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 13:02:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460244] Review Request: alt-ergo - Alt-Ergo automatic theorem prover
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460244 --- Comment #8 from Alan Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 13:09:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) You should be able to build/test this against rawhide however, right? I fired off a scratch build against rawhide and it failed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=808966 You are correct on both counts (should've realize re: rawhide for testing, but it's not a full substitute I suppose...) - was missing prelink from BuildRequires: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=809019 New SRPM and spec file at http://www.duke.edu/~amd34/alt-ergo/ (or take from Koji) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 13:26:36 EDT --- rpm doesn't do any kind of repacking of game. I asked folks on IRC to download the GEM URL above and they also saw the bizarre timestamping issue. The package, however, is OK now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460912] Review Request: DeviceKit-power - Power Management Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460912 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 13:28:33 EDT --- package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: says MIT, but COPYING is GPL. What gives ? license: file: I notice the first line: Copyright (C) 2008 David Zeuthen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe you want to add yourself there ? spec language: ok spec legibility: ok upstream sources: ok buildable: ok excludearch: n/a build deps: ok locale handling: n/a shared libs: ok relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok file permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissable large docs: n/a header files: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a versioned shared libs: n/a devel-base dep: ok libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a directory ownership: must not own /usr/share/PolicyKit/policy (owned by PolicyKit) /usr/share/dbus-1/interfaces (owned by dbus) %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok In summary: - fix the license situation - fix directory ownership then its good to go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-core-fonts - Core Arabic fonts from Arabeyes.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 13:40:16 EDT --- Hi Subhodip, I'll try to do a full review this week-end. In the meanwhile: 1. Please split your package in two, since you have two different fonts from two different sources. This will provide more user flexibility 2. Please follow the workflow described on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle and in particular create a wiki page per font packages that can be referenced in release notes and other documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456341] Review Request: netbeans-platform8 - NetBeans 6.1 Platform 8
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456341 Lillian Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |ect.org)| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456298] Review Request: netbeans-resolver - Resolver subproject of xml-commons patched for NetBeans
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456298 Victor G. Vasilyev [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Victor G. Vasilyev [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 13:42:34 EDT --- Successful koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=809078 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456337] Review Request: NetBeans 6.1 - Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456337 Bug 456337 depends on bug 456298, which changed state. Bug 456298 Summary: Review Request: netbeans-resolver - Resolver subproject of xml-commons patched for NetBeans https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456298 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 --- Comment #16 from Darryl L. Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 13:48:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rubygem-cobbler Short Description: Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. Owners: mcpierce Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: mcpierce -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 13:51:47 EDT --- Well, * Same with bug 459916, the license of src/freedink_xpm.c is unclear. * This package installs LiberationSans-Regular.ttf. However this font is already provided by other Fedora package and shipping duplicate fonts like this way is not allowed. Please modify the source so that this package uses system widely provided fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456341] Review Request: netbeans-platform8 - NetBeans 6.1 Platform 8
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456341
Lillian Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]
||un.com)
--- Comment #11 from Lillian Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 13:58:00 EDT
---
Rpmlint:
$ rpmlint /notnfs/langel/rpm/RPMS/noarch/netbeans-platform8-*
netbeans-platform8.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln
netbeans-platform8.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm
netbeans-platform8-harness.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln
netbeans-platform8-harness.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm
Can the file linking be moved to %build or %install? It is also possibly these
create files that end up being unowned by the package.
The rm calls are ok.
These are ok:
netbeans-platform8.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest
/usr/share/netbeans/platform8/modules/org-netbeans-modules-javahelp.jar
netbeans-platform8.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest
/usr/share/netbeans/platform8/modules/org-netbeans-modules-autoupdate-services.jar
netbeans-platform8.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest
/usr/share/netbeans/platform8/modules/org-netbeans-libs-jsr223.jar
netbeans-platform8.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest
/usr/share/netbeans/platform8/modules/org-netbeans-libs-jna.jar
netbeans-platform8.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest
/usr/share/netbeans/platform8/modules/org-jdesktop-layout.jar
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
1 Packaging Guidelines
* 1.1 Naming
ok
* 1.2 Legal
ok
* 1.4 Writing a package from scratch
ok
* 1.5 Modifying an existing package
ok
* 1.6 Filesystem Layout
o 1.6.1 Libexecdir
* 1.7 Use rpmlint
o 1.7.1 Rpmlint Errors
* 1.8 Changelogs
* 1.9 Tags
ok
* 1.10 BuildRoot tag
ok
* 1.11 Requires
ok
* 1.13 Summary and description
ok
* 1.14 Encoding
ok
* 1.15 Documentation
ok
* 1.16 Compiler flags
ok
* 1.17 Debuginfo packages
n/a
* 1.18 Exclusion of Static Libraries
n/a
* 1.19 Duplication of system libraries
n/a
* 1.20 Beware of Rpath
n/a
* 1.21 Configuration files
ok
* 1.22 Initscripts
ok
* 1.23 Desktop files
ok
* 1.24 Macros
ok
* 1.25 Handling Locale Files
n/a
* 1.26 Timestamps
n/a
* 1.27 Parallel make
n/a
* 1.28 Scriptlets requirements
n/a
* 1.29 Running scriptlets only in certain situations
n/a
* 1.30 Scriplets are only allowed to write in certain directories
n/a
* 1.31 Conditional dependencies
n/a
* 1.32 Build packages with separate user accounts
n/a
* 1.33 Relocatable packages
n/a
* 1.34 Code Vs Content
ok
* 1.35 File and Directory Ownership
Fix permission. Listed below.
* 1.36 Users and Groups
ok
* 1.37 Web Applications
ok
* 1.38 Conflicts
n/a
* 1.39 No External Kernel Modules
n/a
* 1.40 No Files or Directories under /srv
n/a
* 1.41 Application Specific Guidelines
n/a
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
MUST Items:
MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
See comments above
- MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
ok
- MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines
.
ok
- MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
ok
- MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
ok
- MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
ok
- MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
ok
- MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
ok
- MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is
unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora
is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest
(http://www.ioccc.org/).
ok
- MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
ok
- MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one supported architecture.
ok
- MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
ok
- MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as
[Bug 461303] New: Review Request: perl-Data-Section - Read multiple hunks of data out of your DATA section
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Section - Read multiple hunks of data out of your DATA section https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461303 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Section - Read multiple hunks of data out of your DATA section Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://berrange.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Data-Section/perl-Data-Section.spec SRPM URL: http://berrange.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Data-Section/perl-Data-Section-0.005-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Data::Section provides an easy way to access multiple named chunks of line- oriented data in your module's DATA section. It was written to allow modules to store their own templates, but probably has other uses. This new package is a requirement to upgrade perl-Module-CPANTS-Analyse to latest upstream release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461305] New: Review Request: pam_kcoda - coda auth/cred/session PAM module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pam_kcoda - coda auth/cred/session PAM module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461305 Summary: Review Request: pam_kcoda - coda auth/cred/session PAM module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nhorman.fedorapeople.org/pam_kcoda.spec SRPM URL: http://nhorman.fedorapeople.org/pam_kcoda-0.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This is a PAM module that allows a user to obtain coda tokens when authenticated against a krb5 realm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
